Obstetric Characteristics and Outcomes of Gestational Carrier Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Advancements in assisted reproductive technology (ART) have led to an increase in gestational carrier (GC) pregnancies. However, the perinatal outcomes of GC pregnancies remain understudied, necessitating a deeper understanding of their associated risks. Objective: To assess maternal characteristics and obstetric outcomes associated with GC pregnancies. Data Sources: A comprehensive systematic search of publications published before October 31, 2023, using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Study Selection: Two authors selected studies examining obstetric characteristics and outcomes in GC pregnancies with 24 or more weeks' gestation. Studies with insufficient outcome information, unavailable data on gestational surrogacies, and non-English language studies were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, 2 investigators extracted and synthesized both quantitative and qualitative data. Both fixed-effect and random-effect analysis were used to pool data. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were obstetric characteristics and outcomes, including hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and low birth weight. Secondary outcomes included severe maternal morbidity and mortality associated with GC pregnancies. Results: Six studies from 2011 to 2023 involving 28 300 GC pregnancies and 1 270 662 non-GC pregnancies were included. GCs accounted for 2.5% of in vitro fertilization cycles (59 502 of 2 374 154 cycles) and 3.8% of ART pregnancies (26 759 of 701 047 ART pregnancies). GC pregnancies were more likely to be conceived by frozen embryo transfer compared with non-GC ART pregnancies (odds ratio [OR], 2.84; 95% CI, 1.56-5.15), and rates of single embryo transfer were similar between the 2 groups (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.94-1.48). GCs were rarely nulliparous (6 of 361 patients [1.7%]) and were more likely to have multifetal pregnancies compared with non-GC ART patients (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.35). Comparator studies revealed lower odds of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65) and comparable rates of hypertensive disorders (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.45-1.64), preterm birth (aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-1.00), and low birth weight (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50-1.26) in GC pregnancies vs non-GC ART pregnancies. Comparatively, GC pregnancies had higher odds of hypertensive disorders (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.13-1.84) vs general (non-GC ART and non-ART) pregnancies with comparable cesarean delivery risk (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.90-1.25). Preterm birth and low birth weight data lacked a comparative group using multivariate analysis. Severe maternal morbidity and maternal mortality were rare among GCs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, although GC pregnancies had slightly improved outcomes compared with non-GC ART pregnancies, they posed higher risks than general pregnancies. Contributing factors may include ART procedures and increased rates of multiple gestations which influence adverse perinatal outcomes in GC pregnancies.

Obstetric outcomes of women with congenital uterine anomalies in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Due to the rarity, congenital uterine anomaly type-specific evaluation of pregnant women has been relatively understudied. OBJECTIVE: To describe national-level obstetric outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Pregnant women with diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies who had hospital delivery between 2016 and 2019 were examined. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Disease, 10th revision coding was used to delineate type of congenital uterine anomaly, diagnoses, and procedures performed during the index admission. Primary outcomes included pregnancy outcome, which was classified as full-term live birth, preterm live birth, abortion/stillbirth, or ectopic pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included obstetric comorbidities and severe maternal mortality, which were compared between different subtypes of congenital uterine anomalies with multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 50,180 pregnant women with congenital uterine anomalies were identified. Bicornuate was the most common subtype (73.5%), followed by arcuate (13.5%) and unicornuate (10.0%). 70.6% of women with congenital uterine anomalies had a full-term live birth, 26.8% had a preterm live birth, 2.1% had an abortion or stillbirth, and 0.4% had an ectopic pregnancy. 61.8% of preterm births occurred between 33 and 36 weeks, 16.9% between 30 and 32 weeks, and 21.3% at <30 weeks. There were 1,440 (2.9%) periviable births. The preterm (34.5%) and periviable (6.9%) birth rates were highest in the uterine didelphys group. Overall, two-thirds (65.7%) of patients with congenital uterine anomalies were delivered via cesarean section. When compared to arcuate uterus, risk of severe maternal morbidity in septate uterus (4.8% vs 2.6%, adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-4.52) was increased, including hemorrhage (14.5% vs 7.7%, aOR 2.16, 95% CI 1.51-3.07). This was followed by uterine didelphys (4.2% vs 2.6%, aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.24-2.47), unicornuate uterus (3.8% vs 2.6%, aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.29-2.01), and bicornuate uterus (3.0% vs 2.6%, aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.47). CONCLUSION: While the majority of patients with congenital uterine anomalies result in full-term viable deliveries, each subtype of congenital uterine anomalies confers different obstetric risks. Uterine didelphys was associated with the highest risk of preterm birth, while septate uterus was associated with the highest risk of severe maternal morbidity. While this hospital delivery dataset likely overrepresents bicornuate uteri, this populational data may help inform patients with congenital anomalies considering pregnancy.

Pregnancy with endometriosis: Assessment of national-level trends, characteristics, and maternal morbidity at delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine pregnancy characteristics and maternal morbidity at delivery among pregnant patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. Study population was 17,796,365 hospital deliveries from 2016 to 2020, excluded adenomyosis and uterine myoma. The exposure was endometriosis diagnosis. Main outcome measures were clinical and pregnancy characteristics and severe maternal morbidity at delivery related to endometriosis, assessed with multivariable regression model. RESULTS: Endometriosis was diagnosed in 17,590 patients. The prevalence of endometriosis increased by 24 % from one in 1,191 patients in 2016 to one in 853 patients in 2020 (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.30). Clinical and pregnancy characteristics that had greater than two-fold association to endometriosis included polycystic ovary syndrome, placenta previa, cesarean delivery, maternal age of ≥30 years, prior pregnancy loss, and anxiety disorder. Pregnant patients with endometriosis were more likely to have the diagnosis of measured severe maternal morbidity during the index hospitalization for delivery (47.8 vs 17.3 per 1,000 deliveries, aOR 1.91, 95%CI 1.78-2.06); these associations were more prominent following vaginal (aOR 2.82, 95%CI 2.41-3.30) compared to cesarean (aOR 1.85, 95%CI 1.71-2.00) deliveries. Among the individual morbidity indicators, endometriosis was most strongly associated with thromboembolism (aOR 5.05, 95%CI 3.70-6.91), followed by sepsis (aOR 2.39, 95%CI 1.85-3.09) and hysterectomy (aOR 2.18, 95%CI 1.85-2.56). When stratified for endometriosis anatomical site, odds of thromboembolism was increased in endometriosis at distant site (aOR 9.10, 95%CI 3.76-22.02) and adnexa (aOR 7.37, 95%CI 4.43-12.28); odds of sepsis was most increased in endometriosis at multi-classifier locations (aOR 7.33, 95%CI 2.93-18.31) followed by pelvic peritoneum (aOR 5.54, 95%CI 2.95-10.40); and odds of hysterectomy exceeded three-fold in endometriosis at adnexa (aOR 3.00, 95%CI 2.30-3.90), distant site (aOR 5.36, 95%CI 3.48-8.24), and multi-classifier location (aOR 4.46, 95%CI 2.11-9.41). CONCLUSION: The results of this nationwide analysis suggest that pregnancy with endometriosis is uncommon but gradually increasing over time in the United States. The data also suggest that endometriosis during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery, especially for thromboembolism, sepsis, and hysterectomy. These morbidity risks differed by the anatomical location of endometriosis.

Cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum: Surgeon specialty-specific assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess (i) clinical and pregnancy characteristics, (ii) patterns of surgical procedures, and (iii) surgical morbidity associated with cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum based on the specialty of the attending surgeon. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried retrospectively to study patients with placenta accreta spectrum who underwent cesarean delivery and concurrent hysterectomy from 2016 to 2020. Surgical morbidity was assessed with propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting based on surgeon specialty for hysterectomy: general obstetrician-gynecologists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and gynecologic oncologists. RESULTS: A total of 2240 cesarean hysterectomies were studies. The most common surgeon type was general obstetrician-gynecologist (n = 1534, 68.5%), followed by gynecologic oncologist (n = 532, 23.8%) and maternal-fetal medicine specialist (n = 174, 7.8%). Patients in the gynecologic oncologist group had the highest rate of placenta increta or percreta, followed by the maternal-fetal medicine specialist and general obstetrician-gynecologist groups (43.4%, 39.6%, and 30.6%, P < .001). In a propensity score-weighted model, measured surgical morbidity was similar across the three subspecialty groups, including hemorrhage / blood transfusion (59.4-63.7%), bladder injury (18.3-24.0%), ureteral injury (2.2-4.3%), shock (8.6-10.5%), and coagulopathy (3.3-7.4%) (all, P > .05). Among the cesarean hysterectomy performed by gynecologic oncologist, hemorrhage / transfusion rates remained substantial despite additional surgical procedures: tranexamic acid / ureteral stent (60.4%), tranexamic acid / endo-arterial procedure (76.2%), ureteral stent / endo-arterial procedure (51.6%), and all three procedures (55.4%). Tranexamic acid administration with ureteral stent placement was associated with decreased bladder injury (12.8% vs 23.8-32.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patient characteristics and surgical procedures related to cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum differ based on surgeon specialty. Gynecologic oncologists appear to manage more severe forms of placenta accreta spectrum. Regardless of surgeon's specialty, surgical morbidity of cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum is significant.

Assessment of obstetric characteristics and outcomes associated with pregnancy with Turner syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess national-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes of pregnancies with Turner syndrome in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. SUBJECTS: A total of 17,865,495 hospital deliveries from 2016-2020. EXPOSURE: A diagnosis of Turner syndrome, identified according to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Disease 10th revision code of Q96. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Obstetrics outcomes related to Turner syndrome, assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort and multivariable binary logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The prevalence of pregnant patients with Turner syndrome was 7.0 per 100,000 deliveries (one in 14,235). The number of hospital deliveries with patients who have a diagnosis of Turner syndrome increased from 5.0 to 11.7 per 100,000 deliveries during the study period (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] for 2020 vs. 2016; 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-2.60). Pregnant patients with Turner syndrome were more likely to have a diagnosis of pregestational hypertension (4.8% vs. 2.8%; aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.26-2.15), uterine anomaly (1.6% vs. 0.4%; aOR, 3.01; 95% CI 1.93-4.69), and prior pregnancy losses (1.6% vs. 0.3%; aOR 4.70; 95% CI 3.01-7.32) compared with those without Turner syndrome. For the index obstetric characteristics, Turner syndrome was associated with an increased risk of intrauterine fetal demise (10.9% vs. 0.7%; aOR 8.40; 95% CI 5.30-13.30), intrauterine growth restriction (8.5% vs. 3.5%; aOR 2.11; 95% CI 1.48-2.99), and placenta accreta spectrum (aOR 3.63; 95% CI 1.20-10.97). For delivery outcome, pregnant patients with Turner syndrome were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (41.6% vs. 32.3%; aOR 1.53; 95% CI 1.26-1.87). Moreover, the odds of periviable delivery (22-25 weeks: 6.1% vs. 0.4%; aOR 5.88; 95% CI 3.47-9.98) and previable delivery (<22 weeks: 3.3% vs. 0.3%; aOR 2.87; 95% CI 1.45-5.69) were increased compared with those without Turner syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The results of contemporaneous, nationwide assessment in the United States suggest that although pregnancy with Turner syndrome is uncommon this may represent a high-risk group, particularly for intrauterine fetal demise and periviable delivery. Establishing a society-based approach for preconception counseling and antenatal follow-up would be clinically compelling.

Pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology in morbidly obese patients: assessment of feto-maternal outcomes.

PURPOSE: To examine feto-maternal characteristics and outcomes of morbidly obese pregnant patients who conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. Study population was 48,365 patients with ART pregnancy from January 2012 to September 2015, including non-obesity (n = 45,125, 93.3%), class I-II obesity (n = 2445, 5.1%), and class III obesity (n = 795, 1.6%). Severe maternal morbidity at delivery per the Centers for Disease and Control Prevention definition was assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: Patients in the class III obesity group were more likely to have a hypertensive disorder (adjusted-odds ratio (aOR) 3.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.61-3.52), diabetes mellitus (aOR 3.08, 95%CI 2.64-3.60), large for gestational age neonate (aOR 3.57, 95%CI 2.77-4.60), and intrauterine fetal demise (aOR 2.03, 95%CI 1.05-3.94) compared to those in the non-obesity group. Increased risks of hypertensive disease (aOR 1.35, 95%CI 1.14-1.60) and diabetes mellitus (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.17-1.66) in the class III obesity group remained robust even compared to the class I-II obesity group. After controlling for priori selected clinical, pregnancy, and delivery factors, patients with class III obesity were 70% more likely to have severe maternal morbidity at delivery compared to non-obese patients (8.2% vs 4.4%, aOR 1.70, 95%CI 1.30-2.22) whereas those with class I-II obesity were not (4.1% vs 4.4%, aOR 0.87, 95%CI 0.70-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this national-level analysis in the United States suggested that morbidly obese pregnant patients conceived with ART have increased risks of adverse fetal and maternal outcomes.

Pregnant patients undergoing cholecystectomy: nationwide assessment of clinical characteristics and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Gallstone disease in pregnancy is one of the most common indications for nonobstetrical surgery during pregnancy. National-level data on contemporary surgical practice and outcomes are limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing cholecystectomy during pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study examined the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's 2 nationwide databases in the United States: the National Inpatient Sample and the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. The study population included 18,630 patients who had cholecystectomy during pregnancy from January 2016 to December 2020. The exposure was gestational age, grouped sequentially into the following 5 groups: first trimester (<14 weeks), early second trimester (14-20 weeks), late second trimester (21-27 weeks), early third trimester (28-36 weeks), and late third trimester (≥37 weeks). The main outcomes were clinical demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical information, and pregnancy characteristics and outcomes, assessed by gestational age. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy was most common in the early second trimester (32.1%), followed by the first trimester (25.2%), late second trimester (23.1%), early third trimester (12.4%), and late third trimester (7.2%). Patients in the first-trimester group were more likely to be aged ≥35 years, to smoke, and to have acute cholecystitis, severe hyperemesis gravidarum including metabolic disturbance, pregestational diabetes, multifetal gestation, and sepsis/shock (P<.001). Patients in the early-third-trimester group were more likely to be obese and have gestational diabetes, Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥1, premature rupture of membranes, and intrauterine growth restriction, whereas those in the late-third-trimester group were more likely to have gallstone pancreatitis, biliary colic, chorioamnionitis, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and severe maternal morbidity including sepsis (P<.001). At the cohort level, a laparoscopic approach was used in most cholecystectomy procedures (97.5%), and bile duct injury was uncommon (<0.1%). Delivery during the admission occurred in 0.3%, 0%, 0.6%, 17.8%, and 60.6% in the 5 gestational age groups, respectively (P<.001). Among the cases that had delivery in the early- and late-third-trimester groups, the delivery event preceded cholecystectomy in 61.4% and 86.2%, respectively, whereas both delivery and cholecystectomy occurred on the same day in 34.3% and 13.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This nationwide analysis suggests that clinical and pregnancy characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing cholecystectomy differ by pregnancy stage with a bimodal distribution. Although patients in the first and third trimesters have distinct medical conditions, more clinically significant pregnancy and maternal outcomes were found in both groups compared with patients in the second trimester.

Contraception and sterilization selection at delivery among pregnant patients with malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: Since malignancy during pregnancy is uncommon, information regarding contraception selection or sterilization at delivery is limited. The objective of this study was to examine the type of long-acting reversible contraception or surgical sterilization procedure chosen by pregnant patients with malignancy at delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample in the USA. The study population was vaginal and cesarean deliveries in a hospital setting from January 2017 to December 2020. Pregnant patients with breast cancer (n = 1605), leukemia (n = 1190), lymphoma (n = 1120), thyroid cancer (n = 715), cervical cancer (n = 425) and melanoma (n = 400) were compared with 14 265 319 pregnant patients without malignancy. The main outcome measures were utilization of long-acting reversible contraception (subdermal implant or intrauterine device) and performance of permanent surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy) during the index hospital admission for delivery, assessed with a multinomial regression model controlling for clinical, pregnancy and delivery characteristics. RESULTS: When compared with pregnant patients without malignancy, pregnant patients with breast cancer were more likely to proceed with bilateral salpingectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.30) or intrauterine device (aOR 1.91); none received the subdermal implant. Pregnant patients with leukemia were more likely to choose a subdermal implant (aOR 2.22), whereas those with lymphoma were more likely to proceed with bilateral salpingectomy (aOR 1.93) and bilateral tubal ligation (aOR 1.76). Pregnant patients with thyroid cancer were more likely to proceed with bilateral tubal ligation (aOR 2.21) and none received the subdermal implant. No patients in the cervical cancer group selected long-acting reversible contraception, and they were more likely to proceed with bilateral salpingectomy (aOR 2.08). None in the melanoma group chose long-acting reversible contraception. Among pregnant patients aged <30, the odds of proceeding with bilateral salpingectomy were increased in patients with breast cancer (aOR 3.01), cervical cancer (aOR 2.26) or lymphoma (aOR 2.08). The odds of proceeding with bilateral tubal ligation in pregnant patients aged <30 with melanoma (aOR 5.36) was also increased. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this nationwide assessment in the United States suggest that among pregnant patients with malignancy, the preferred contraceptive option or method of sterilization at time of hospital delivery differs by malignancy type.

The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery.

BACKGROUND: The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 7,385,341 vaginal deliveries from January 2017 to December 2019. The exposure assignment was obesity status. The main outcomes were third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis examining the exposure-outcome association included (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting with log-Poisson regression generalized linear model to account for prepregnant and pregnant confounders for the exposure and (2) multinomial regression model to account for delivery factors in the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort. The secondary outcomes included (1) the temporal trends of fourth-degree laceration and its associated factors at cohort level and (2) risk factor patterns for fourth-degree laceration by constructing a classification tree model. RESULTS: In the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort, patients with obesity were less likely to have fourth-degree lacerations and third-degree lacerations than patients without obesity (fourth-degree laceration: 2.3 vs 3.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.69; third-degree laceration: 15.6 vs 20.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.82). In contrast, in patients with obesity vs those without obesity, forceps delivery (54.7 vs 3.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 17.73; 95% confidence interval, 16.17-19.44), vacuum-assisted delivery (19.8 vs 2.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.85-5.53), episiotomy (19.2 vs 2.8 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.71-4.20), and shoulder dystocia (17.8 vs 3.4 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 2.29-2.94) were associated with more than a 2-fold increased risk of fourth-degree perineal laceration. Among the group with obesity, patients who had forceps delivery and shoulder dystocia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (105.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). Among the group without obesity, patients who had forceps delivery, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (294.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). The incidence of fourth-degree perineal laceration decreased by 11.9% over time (P trend=.004); moreover, forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, and episiotomy decreased by 3.8%, 7.6%, and 29.5%, respectively (all, P trend<.05). CONCLUSION: This national-level analysis suggests that patients with obesity are less likely to have obstetric anal sphincter injuries at the time of vaginal delivery. Furthermore, this analysis confirms other known risk factors for fourth-degree laceration, such as forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, episiotomy, and shoulder dystocia. However, we noted a decreasing trend in fourth-degree lacerations, which may be due to evolving obstetrical practices.

Assessment of placenta accreta spectrum at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Previous cesarean delivery is a risk factor for developing placenta accreta spectrum in a subsequent pregnancy and patients with antenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum frequently undergo planned cesarean hysterectomy. There is a paucity of data regarding unsuspected placenta accreta spectrum among patients undergoing trial of labor after cesarean delivery for attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the incidence, characteristics, and delivery outcomes of patients with placenta accreta spectrum diagnosed at the time of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 184,415 patients with a history of low transverse cesarean delivery who had vaginal delivery in the current index hospital admission between 2017 and 2020. Those with placenta previa, previous vertical cesarean delivery, other uterine scars, and uterine rupture were excluded. This study identified placenta accreta spectrum cases using the World Health Organization International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, codes of O43.2. Coprimary outcomes were (1) the incidence rate of placenta accreta spectrum at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery; (2) clinical and pregnancy characteristics related to placenta accreta spectrum, assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model; and (3) delivery outcomes associated with placenta accreta spectrum by fitting propensity score adjustment. The secondary outcome was to conduct a systematic literature review using 3 public search engines (PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus). Data on incidence rate and maternal morbidity related to placenta accreta spectrum at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence rate of placenta accreta spectrum at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was 8.1 per 10,000 deliveries. Most placenta accreta spectrum cases were placenta accreta (83.3%). In a multivariable analysis, older maternal age, tobacco use, preeclampsia, multifetal pregnancy, fetal anomaly, preterm premature rupture of membrane, chorioamnionitis, low-lying placenta, and preterm delivery were associated with an increased risk of placenta accreta spectrum (all, P<.05). Of these factors, low-lying placenta had the largest odds for placenta accreta spectrum (526.3 vs 7.3 per 10,000 deliveries; adjusted odds ratio, 35.02; 95% confidence interval, 18.19-67.42). Patients in the placenta accreta spectrum group were more likely to have postpartum hemorrhage (80.0% vs 5.5%), blood product transfusion (23.3% vs 1.0%), shock or coagulopathy (20.0% vs 0.2%), and hysterectomy (43.3% vs <0.1%) than those without placenta accreta spectrum (all, P<.001). In a systematic literature review, a total of 212 studies were screened, and none of these studies examined the incidence and morbidity of placenta accreta spectrum at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: This nationwide assessment suggests that although placenta accreta spectrum with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery is uncommon (1 of 1229 cases), the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery is associated with significant maternal morbidity. In addition, the data suggest that low-lying placenta in the setting of previous low transverse cesarean delivery warrants careful evaluation for possible placenta accreta spectrum before a trial of labor.

Trends, Characteristics, and Maternal Morbidity Associated With Unhoused Status in Pregnancy.

Importance: Unhoused status is a substantial problem in the US. Pregnancy characteristics and maternal outcomes of individuals experiencing homelessness are currently under active investigation to optimize health outcomes for this population. Objective: To assess the trends, characteristics, and maternal outcomes associated with unhoused status in pregnancy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. The study population included hospitalizations for vaginal and cesarean deliveries from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. Unhoused status of these patients was identified from use of International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code Z59.0. Statistical analysis was conducted from December 2022 to June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were (1) temporal trends; (2) patient and pregnancy characteristics associated with unhoused status, which were assessed with a multivariable logistic regression model; (3) delivery outcomes, including severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality at delivery, which used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition for SMM indicators and were assessed with a propensity score-adjusted model; and (4) choice of long-acting reversible contraception method and surgical sterilization at delivery. Results: A total of 18 076 440 hospital deliveries were included, of which 18 970 involved pregnant patients who were experiencing homelessness at the time of delivery, for a prevalence rate of 104.9 per 100 000 hospital deliveries. These patients had a median (IQR) age of 29 (25-33) years. The prevalence of unhoused patients increased by 72.1% over a 5-year period from 76.1 in 2016 to 131.0 in 2020 per 100 000 deliveries (P for trend < .001). This association remained independent in multivariable analysis. In addition, (1) substance use disorder (tobacco, illicit drugs, and alcohol use disorder), (2) mental health conditions (schizophrenia, bipolar, depressive, and anxiety disorders, including suicidal ideation and past suicide attempt), (3) infectious diseases (hepatitis, gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, and COVID-19), (4) patient characteristics (Black and Native American race and ethnicity, younger and older age, low or unknown household income, obesity, pregestational hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and asthma), and (5) pregnancy characteristics (prior uterine scar, excess weight gain during pregnancy, and preeclampsia) were associated with unhoused status in pregnancy. Unhoused status was associated with extreme preterm delivery (<28-week gestation: 34.3 vs 10.8 per 1000 deliveries; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.76 [95% CI, 2.55-2.99]); SMM at in-hospital delivery (any morbidity: 53.8 vs 17.7 per 1000 deliveries; AOR, 2.30 [95% CI, 2.15-2.45]); and in-hospital mortality (0.8 vs <0.1 per 1000 deliveries; AOR, 10.17 [95% CI, 6.10-16.94]), including case fatality risk after SMM (1.5% vs 0.3%; AOR, 4.46 [95% CI, 2.67-7.45]). Individual morbidity indicators associated with unhoused status included cardiac arrest (AOR, 12.43; 95% CI, 8.66-17.85), cardiac rhythm conversion (AOR, 6.62; 95% CI, 3.98-11.01), ventilation (AOR, 6.24; 95% CI, 5.03-7.74), and sepsis (AOR, 5.37; 95% CI, 4.53-6.36). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this national cross-sectional study suggest that unhoused status in pregnancy gradually increased in the US during the 5-year study period and that pregnant patients with unhoused status were a high-risk pregnancy group.

Placenta previa percreta with surrounding organ involvement: a proposal for management.

Placenta accreta spectrum encompasses cases where the placenta is morbidly adherent to the myometrium. Placenta percreta, the most severe form of placenta accreta spectrum (grade 3E), occurs when the placenta invades through the myometrium and possibly into surrounding structures next to the uterine corpus. Maternal morbidity of placenta percreta is high, including severe maternal morbidity in 82.1% and mortality in 1.4% in the recent nationwide U.S. statistics. Although cesarean hysterectomy is commonly performed for patients with placenta accreta spectrum, conservative management is becoming more popular because of reduced morbidity in select cases. Treatment of grade 3E disease involving the urinary bladder, uterine cervix, or parametria is surgically complicated due to the location of the invasive placenta deep in the maternal pelvis. Cesarean hysterectomy in this setting has the potential for catastrophic hemorrhage and significant damage to surrounding organs. We propose a step-by-step schema to evaluate cases of grade 3E disease and determine whether immediate hysterectomy or conservative management, including planned delayed hysterectomy, is the most appropriate treatment option. The approach includes evaluation in the antenatal period with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to determine suspicion for placenta previa percreta with surrounding organ involvement, planned cesarean delivery with a multidisciplinary team including experienced pelvic surgeons such as a gynecologic oncologist, intra-operative assessment including gross surgical field exposure and examination, cystoscopy, and consideration of careful intra-operative transvaginal ultrasound to determine the extent of placental invasion into surrounding organs. This evaluation helps decide the safety of primary cesarean hysterectomy. If safely resectable, additional considerations include intra-operative use of uterine artery embolization combined with tranexamic acid injection in cases at high risk for pelvic hemorrhage and ureteral stent placement. Availability of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is ideal. If safe resection is concerned, conservative management including planned delayed hysterectomy at around 4 weeks from cesarean delivery in stable patients is recommended.

Pregnancy with retained intrauterine device: national-level assessment of characteristics and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although intrauterine devices provide effective contraceptive protection, unintentional pregnancy can occur. Previous studies have shown that a retained intrauterine device during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes but there is a paucity of nationwide data and analysis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies with a retained intrauterine device. STUDY DESIGN: This serial cross-sectional study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population comprised 18,067,310 hospital deliveries for national estimates from January 2016 to December 2020. The exposure was retained intrauterine device status, identified by the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code O26.3. The co-primary outcome measures were incidence rate, clinical and pregnancy characteristics, and delivery outcome of patients with a retained intrauterine device. To assess the pregnancy characteristics and delivery outcomes, an inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort was created to mitigate the prepregnant confounders for a retain intrauterine device. RESULTS: A retained intrauterine device was reported in 1 in 8307 hospital deliveries (12.0 per 100,000). In a multivariable analysis, Hispanic individuals, grand multiparity, obesity, alcohol use, and a previous uterine scar were patient characteristics associated with a retained intrauterine device (all P<.05). Current pregnancy characteristics associated with a retained intrauterine device included preterm premature rupture of membrane (9.2% vs 2.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-4.12), fetal malpresentation (10.9% vs 7.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.88), fetal anomaly (2.2% vs 1.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.85), intrauterine fetal demise (2.6% vs 0.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-3.57), placenta malformation (1.8% vs 0.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-3.76), placenta abruption (4.7% vs 1.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 2.25-4.66), and placenta accreta spectrum (0.7% vs 0.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-11.65). Delivery characteristics associated with a retained intrauterine device included previable loss at <22 weeks' gestation (3.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 5.49; 95% confidence interval, 3.30-9.15) and periviable delivery at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation (3.1% vs 0.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-4.86). Patients in the retained intrauterine device group were more likely to have a diagnosis of retained placenta at delivery (2.5% vs 0.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.45; 95% confidence interval, 2.70-7.36) and to undergo manual placental removal (3.2% vs 0.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.81; 95% confidence interval, 3.11-7.44). CONCLUSION: This nationwide analysis confirmed that pregnancy with a retained intrauterine device is uncommon, but these pregnancies may be associated with high-risk pregnancy characteristics and outcomes.

Incidence, characteristics, and maternal outcomes of pregnancy with uterine prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Gravid uterine prolapse refers to abnormal descent of the uterus during pregnancy. It is a rare pregnancy complication and its clinical characteristics and obstetrical outcomes are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the national-level incidence, characteristics, and maternal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by gravid uterine prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 14,647,670 deliveries from January 2016 to December 2019. The exposure assignment was the diagnosis of uterine prolapse. The coprimary outcome measures were incidence rate, clinical and pregnancy characteristics, and delivery outcomes of patients with gravid uterine prolapse. The inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort was created to mitigate the difference in prepregnancy confounding factors, followed by adjusting for pregnancy and delivery factors. RESULTS: The incidence of gravid uterine prolapse was 1 in 4209 deliveries (23.8 per 100,000). In a multivariable analysis, older age (≥40 years; adjusted odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.70-3.81); age from 35 to 39 years (adjusted odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 2.37-2.99); Black (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.63), Asian (adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.64), and Native American (adjusted odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-2.88) race/ethnicity; tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.37); grand multiparity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.55); and history of pregnancy losses (adjusted odds ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.26) were the patient characteristics associated with increased risk of gravid uterine prolapse. Current pregnancy characteristics associated with gravid uterine prolapse included cervical insufficiency (adjusted odds ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.94-5.45), preterm labor (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.97), preterm premature rupture of membranes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.94), and chorioamnionitis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.28). Delivery characteristics associated with gravid uterine prolapse included early-preterm delivery at <34 weeks' gestation (69.1 vs 32.0 per 1000; adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-2.59) and precipitate labor (35.2 vs 20.1; adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.44). Moreover, risks of postpartum hemorrhage (112.1 vs 44.4 per 1000; adjusted odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-3.32), uterine atony (32.0 vs 15.7; adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-3.03), uterine inversion (9.6 vs 0.3; adjusted odds ratio, 31.97; 95% confidence interval, 16.60-61.58), shock (3.2 vs 0.7; adjusted odds ratio, 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-12.40), blood product transfusion (22.4 vs 11.1; adjusted odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.18), and hysterectomy (7.5 vs 2.3; adjusted odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-6.51) were increased in the gravid uterine prolapse group compared with the nonprolapse group. Conversely, patients with gravid uterine prolapse were less likely to deliver via cesarean delivery compared with those without gravid uterine prolapse (200.6 vs 322.8 per 1000; adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.61). CONCLUSION: This nationwide analysis suggests that pregnancy with gravid uterine prolapse is uncommon but associated with several high-risk pregnancy characteristics and adverse delivery outcomes.