Invasive Lobular Carcinoma-Correlation Between Imaging and Final Pathology: Is MRI Better?

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is associated with high re-excision rates following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The correlation between lesion size on different imaging modalities and final tumor size has not been well characterized. METHODS: A prospective database of patients with stage I-III breast cancer undergoing BCS between 2006 and 2016 was reviewed. Pearson correlation analysis was used to correlate tumor size on breast imaging to final pathology. RESULTS: Of these, 111 patients with ILC were identified. Mean lesion size was 1.93 cm for MMG, 1.61 cm for US, and 2.51 cm for MRI. Mean tumor size on surgical excision was 2.64 cm. The correlation coefficient between pathology and the different imaging modalities were as follows: MMG .17, US 0.37, and MRI .58. Actual tumor size was underestimated by 1 cm in 27.1% of MMGs, 50% of USs, and in 13.3% of MRIs. 38 patients (34.2%) underwent re-excision. No differences in re-excision rates were noted in patients with and without MRI, 30.3% vs 40.0%, respectively (P = .31). CONCLUSION: While MRI provides a better estimate of tumor size than MMG and US, the size of the tumor on imaging only weakly correlated with pathology. The use of MRI does not decrease re-excision rates.

Effects of paravertebral blocks versus liposomal bupivacaine on hospital utilization after mastectomy with reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate pain control frequently extends length of stay (LOS) and costs for patients undergoing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction (IBR). We sought to examine the effects of Paravertebral blocks (PVB) and liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and compare LOS, pain scores and costs of hospitalization. METHODS: Prospective database review of patients undergoing mastectomy with IBR was performed. RESULTS: 541 patients were identified. 51/491 (9.4%) received PVB and 50 (9.2%) received LB. LOS in the PVB group was significantly less than that of the no block (NB) group (1 [1-2] days PVB vs 3 [2-4] days NB (p < 0.0001), but was not different from the LB group (1 [1-2] days LB, p = 0.23). PVB patients had lower PACU pain scores compared to NB patients (3.2 ± 2.9 PVB vs 5.7 ± 2.6 NB, p < 0.0001), but similar PACU pain scores to LB patients (4.1 ± 2.3). Patients who received PVB had higher total costs compared to NB patients ($27148±$7053 PVB vs $23113 ± 6860 NB, p = 0.003) but similar to LB patients ($26183 ± $3761). CONCLUSION: PVB and LB are associated with shorter LOS and lower pain scores compared to NB.

Multisite Quality Improvement Study of a Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this multisite quality improvement study was to evaluate patients' experiences with the patient-centered pathology (PCP) consultation program and to determine whether PCP enhanced their care experience. METHODS: Patients were invited to attend PCP consultations to review their pathology report and slides and have their questions answered by the pathologist privately, with the option to attend the appointment with family members or friends for support. A patient experience questionnaire (PEQ) was administered to patients, who participated voluntarily in the PCP, and survey data were collected and stored in REDCap. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute). RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (95.5% female) aged 18 to 84 years across 4 institutions completed the PEQ. Overall, 58% and 15.8% of patients had breast and brain tumors, respectively, and 59.7% of tumors were newly diagnosed. Most patients thought it was important for them to learn as much as they could about their health condition. However, the majority of patients reported some degree of difficulty learning about their health condition based on written information, despite 97% having completed high school and/or further education. The majority of patients rated their pathologist as "excellent" across communication metrics. Ultimately, 100% of respondents were satisfied, found their visits to be useful, and would recommend the PCP to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients found that personalized clinical encounters with pathologists improved their understanding of their health condition and their satisfaction with their care experience. Patients thought pathologists communicated respectfully, effectively, and empathetically.