Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Disease (COVAD) study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence of breakthrough COVID-19 infections (BIs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with patients with other rheumatic autoimmune diseases (rAIDs), patients with non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: The study was based on data from 7035 fully vaccinated respondents to the online COVAD questionnaire with SLE (N = 852), rAIDs (N = 3098), or nrAIDs (N = 414), and HCs (N = 2671). BI was defined as COVID-19 infection occurring in individuals vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses (or 1 dose of J&J) ≥ 14 days after vaccination and not after 6 months since the last vaccine dose. Data were analysed using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 91/852 (10.7%) SLE patients reported at least one BI. The frequency of BIs in SLE patients was comparable to that among HCs (277/2671; p = 0.847) and patients with nrAID (39/414; p = 0.552) but higher than that among patients with other rAIDs (235/3098; p = 0.005). No demographic factors or treatments were associated with BIs in SLE patients (p ≥ 0.05 for all). Joint pain was more frequent in SLE patients than in HCs (odds ratio [OR]: 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-6.04; p < 0.001) or nrAID patients (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.04-5.75; p = 0.041). Patient with SLE did not report a higher frequency of hospitalisation or need for advanced treatment for COVID-19 infection compared with disease controls and HCs, respectively. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination conferred similar protection against COVID-19 infection in terms of frequency and severity in patients with SLE to that reported by healthy individuals.

Liquid biopsy in brain tumors: moving on, slowly.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Due to limited access to the tumor, there is an obvious clinical potential for liquid biopsy in patients with primary brain tumors. Here, we review current approaches, present limitations to be dealt with, and new promising data that may impact the field. RECENT FINDINGS: The value of circulating tumor cell-free DNA (ctDNA) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the noninvasive diagnosis of primary brain tumors has been confirmed in several reports. The detection of ctDNA in the peripheral blood is desirable for patient follow-up but requires ultrasensitive methods to identify low mutant allelic frequencies. Digital PCR approaches and targeted gene panels have been used to identify recurrent hotspot mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) from CSF or plasma. Tumor classification from circulating methylomes in plasma has been actively pursued, although the need of advanced bioinformatics currently hampers clinical application. The use of focused ultrasounds to open the blood-brain barrier may represent a way to enrich of ctDNA the peripheral blood and enhance plasma-based liquid biopsy. SUMMARY: Monitoring CNVs and hotspot mutations by liquid biopsy is a promising tool to detect minimal residual disease and strengthen response assessment in patients with primary brain tumors. Novel methods to increase the relative and/or absolute amount of ctDNA can improve the clinical potential of plasma-based liquid biopsies.

Patients with neuropsychiatric involvement systemic lupus erythematosus experience poorer health-related quality of life and more fatigue than systemic lupus erythematosus patients with no neuropsychiatric involvement, irrespective of neuropsychiatric activity.

OBJECTIVES: Substantial proportions of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) report poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our objective was to investigate the impact of neuropsychiatric involvement (NP) in SLE on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We analysed data from four phase III trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC, EMBRACE; N = 2968). The neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) group comprised individuals with NP-British Isles Lupus Assessment group (BILAG) A/B/C/D or score in any descriptor of the NP-SLEDAI-2K at baseline (N = 350), while the non-NPSLE group consisted of patients with NP-BILAG E (N = 2618). HRQoL was assessed with the SF-36, EQ-5D-3L, and FACIT-F. Full health state (FHS) was defined as "no problems" in all EQ-5D dimensions. RESULTS: NPSLE patients reported lower scores in the SF-36 physical and mental component summary compared with the non-NPSLE population (mean±s.d.: 35.7±9.1 versus 39.6±9.6; p<0.001 and 37.3±12.1 versus 41.4±11.0; p<0.001, respectively). NPSLE patients also exhibited impaired HRQoL in all EQ-5D dimensions compared with non-NPSLE patients (p<0.05 for all). A substantially lower proportion among NPSLE patients experienced FHS in comparison with the non-NPSLE group (3.3% versus 14.5%; p<0.001). NPSLE was associated with severe fatigue (23.8±12.2 versus 31.5±11.6; p<0.001). Notably, our findings revealed no discernible distinctions between active and inactive NPSLE patients with regard to SF-36, EQ-5D, FHS, and FACIT-F scores. CONCLUSION: Neuropsychiatric involvement in patients with SLE has a detrimental effect on HRQoL experience and is associated with severe fatigue, regardless of the degree of neuropsychiatric disease activity. Early intervention is warranted in NPSLE patients to enhance long-term HRQoL experience.

Determinants of neuropsychiatric flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from five phase III trials of belimumab.

OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of neuropsychiatric (NP) flares in patients with SLE treated for active SLE yet no ongoing severe NPSLE with non-biologic standard therapy plus belimumab or placebo. METHODS: We analysed data from five phase III trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-NEA, BLISS-SC, EMBRACE; n = 3638) after exclusion of patients with baseline NP BILAG A. Factors associated with NPSLE flare, defined as a new NP BILAG A or B, were investigated using Cox regression. In a subgroup analysis, we studied patients with baseline NP BILAG E for determinants of de novo NPSLE flare. Organ damage was assessed using the SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI). RESULTS: We documented 105 (2.9%) NPSLE flares. In multivariable analysis, male sex (HR = 2.37; 95% CI: 1.31, 4.28; P = 0.004), baseline NP BILAG B-D (HR = 5.91; 95% CI: 3.86, 9.06; P < 0.001), and increasing SDI scores (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.50; P < 0.001) were strongly associated with NPSLE flare. Belimumab use yielded no association at any dose or administration form. In analysis of SDI domains, NP damage was the strongest determinant of NPSLE flare (HR = 3.25; 95% CI: 2.72, 3.88; P < 0.001), holding true for cognitive impairment (HR = 14.29; 95% CI: 9.22, 22.14; P < 0.001), transverse myelitis (HR = 21.89; 95% CI: 5.40, 88.72; P < 0.001), and neuropathy (HR = 8.87; 95% CI: 5.59, 14.09; P < 0.001). Male sex was the strongest determinant of de novo NPSLE flare (HR = 3.26; 95% CI: 1.51, 7.04; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Male sex, NPSLE history, and NP damage were strong determinants of impending NPSLE flare. No clear protection or predisposition was conferred from add-on belimumab.

Effect of Belimumab on Preventing de novo Renal Lupus Flares.

Introduction: Belimumab was recently approved for treating lupus nephritis (LN), yet de novo LN cases during belimumab treatment given for nonrenal causes have been reported. Identification of reliable signals of impending flare is imperative. Methods: We evaluated belimumab efficacy in preventing de novo renal flares and factors associated with renal flare occurrence in nephritis-naïve patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who are receiving add-on belimumab or placebo in 5 phase 3 clinical trials using Cox regression analysis. Results: Of 1844 eligible patients, 136 (7.4%) developed a de novo renal flare during a 52-week long follow-up. Asian origin (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [HRadj]: 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.94; P = 0.001), positive baseline anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels (HRadj: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.07-1.63; P = 0.008), and increasing mean prednisone dose during follow-up (HRadj: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.04; P < 0.001) were associated with de novo renal flares. Low-dose intravenous (IV) belimumab (1 mg/kg monthly) yielded a nearly 3-fold lower hazard of de novo renal flare (HRadj: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20-0.73; P = 0.004). Subcutaneous (SC) belimumab (200 mg weekly) also yielded a lower hazard (HRadj.: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54-0.88; P = 0.003). The labeled IV dose (10 mg/kg monthly) conferred no clear protection (HRadj.: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.50-1.09; P = 0.127). Conclusion: We corroborated the substantial vulnerability of the Asian SLE population to renal affliction. Add-on low-dose IV belimumab (1 mg/kg) and SC belimumab appeared protective against renal flares in nephritis-naïve patients with SLE. The approved IV dose (10 mg/kg) yielded no clear protection.

Current Insights on Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, promising emerging biomarkers pave the way toward an improved management of patients with LN. We have reviewed the literature over the past decade, and we herein summarise the most relevant biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis in LN. An initial systematic search of Medline was conducted to identify pertinent articles. A total of 104 studies were selected to be included in this review. Several diagnostic biomarkers, including MCP-1, TWEAK, NGAL, and uric acid, exhibited good ability to differentiate LN patients from non-renal SLE patients. Several cytokines and chemokines, including IL-10, IL-17, MCP-1, and IP-10, hold promise for assessing LN disease activity, as do cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). Angiogenesis-related and haemostasis-related proteins have also displayed potential for monitoring disease activity. Biomarkers of responses to therapy include Axl, CD163, and BAFF, whereas VCAM-1, ALCAM, and ANCAs have been reported as prognostic markers, along with traditional markers. In addition, novel renal tissue biomarkers may prove to be a useful complement to histological evaluations. The overall heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria and outcome measures across different studies, along with a lack of validation in multi-centre cohorts, call for future collaborative efforts. Nevertheless, we foresee that several biomarkers hold promise toward optimisation of the management of LN, with the use of integrated omics and panels of less invasive biomarkers paving the way towards personalised medicine.