Performance evaluation of the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay in comparison with the Cobas HPV test for high-risk HPV genotyping.

Molecular testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) genotypes is important in screening for cervical cancer. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a newly developed Allplex HPV HR Detection assay in comparison with the Cobas HPV Test. A total of 1,275 cervical specimens obtained from a healthcare center between August 2021 and May 2022 were analyzed. The overall agreement for hrHPV detection was 98.4%, with higher agreement observed for HPV-16 (99.7%) and HPV-18 (99.8%) compared to other hrHPV genotypes (97.2%). Sequencing revealed that the majority of discrepancies was genotyped accurately by the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay with the exception of one false positive for HPV-16 and two false positives for other hrHPV genotypes. The Allplex HPV HR Detection assay showed almost perfect agreement with the Cobas HPV test, emphasizing its utility in hrHPV screening and monitoring.

Baseline glycated albumin level and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Healthy individuals: a retrospective longitudinal observation in Korea.

Glycated albumin (GA) reflects glycemic status for the past three weeks. GA level demonstrates a strong correlation with HbA1c level and is used as an adjunctive biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this study, we validated the predictive performance of baseline GA for development of T2DM in healthy individuals in Korea. From August 2013 to September 2014, the medical records of 3,771 healthy Koreans were retrospectively reviewed. Each participant was categorized into tertiles based on initial GA level. During the follow-up period through May 2020, study participants were evaluated for T2DM using HbA1c, fasting glucose level, and a self-reported diagnosis history. Baseline GA level by tertile (T1 to T3) was 10.4 ± 0.8% (mean ± SD), 12.1 ± 0.3%, and 13.7 ± 0.9%, respectively. The median follow-up was 5.97 years, during which 4.9% (186 of 3,771) of the participants developed T2DM. After adjusting for confounding factors, the hazard ratio for the development of T2DM in the highest GA level group (T3) compared to the reference group (T1) was 2.46 (95% CI, 1.7 to 3.58, p < 0.001 for trend) with a Harrell's C index of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83). Also, within highest group of baseline HbA1c and FG levels, higher GA levels were associated with an increased HRs for T2DM. In conclusion, Our study confirms that the risk of T2DM increases with baseline GA level. Additional follow-up of the cohort is warranted to investigate the correlations between GA and other clinical indicators including diabetic complications.

Evaluation of clinical usefulness of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE: High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is a leading cause of cervical cancer, of which human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 and HPV-18 account for about 70% of cases. Since HPV infection is common, it is important to focus on the HPV genotypes that pose the highest risk for effective cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening. METHODS: A total of 86,022 women aged 25 years or older was analyzed in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HPV genotyping and cytology were analyzed. In addition, we subdivided participants into two groups according to cytology results, negative for intraepithelial lesion of malignancy (NILM) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and analyzed absolute risk (AR) and relative risk (RR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or worse according to HPV genotype. RESULTS: The AR of CIN 3 or worse was 77.0 times higher in HR-HPV-positive compared to HR-HPV-negative. Compared to 12 other HR-HPV-positive, the AR of CIN 3 or worse was 4.2 times higher in HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 positive. This finding was more evident in women with NILM than in women with ASC-US. The RR of CIN 3 or worse was 7.0 in women with NILM and 4.5 in women with ASC-US. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the cytology results, the risk of CIN 3 or worse was higher in HPV-16/HPV-18 than in other HR-HPV. HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping is recommended to screen women with a high risk of cervical cancer.

Evaluation of molecular methods for plasma detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are detected in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and associated with responses to therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We compared the analytical performances of two real-time PCRs and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect EGFR mutations using plasma. METHODS: Plasma EGFR tests were performed using 86 plasma samples from 75 prospectively enrolled NSCLC patients with early and advanced stages. Analytical performances of plasma-using two real-time PCR, Cobas EGFR mutation v2 and PANAMutyper, EGFR kit, and ddPCR were evaluated based on the tissue EGFR test results. The frequencies of EGFR mutations and acquired T790M mutation after TKI therapy were also assessed. RESULTS: The incidence of all EGFR mutations was 52.3% (23/44) in tissue and was up to 43.2% (19/44) in plasma. The Cobas detection rates of three EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions, L858R, and T790M) in plasma were similar to those in tissue. The Cobas showed a higher detection rate (76.7%) than that by the PANAMutyper (60.5%). Sensitivity for T790M mutation was lower than the sensitivity for the exon 19 deletions or L858R in both tests. Mutant allele frequency measured by ddPCR was significantly correlated with the semi-quantitative values of the Cobas. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma EGFR tests showed similar detection rates for common EGFR mutations compared to the tissue EGFR tests. Cobas showed higher sensitivity in detection of EGFR mutations in body fluids than the PANAMutyper. Real-time PCR using plasma or body fluids could be a suitable first test for the detection of EGFR mutations.

Evaluation of Cobas 8000 Analyzer Series Module e801 Analytical Performance.

BACKGROUND: Immunoassays are important tests that provide essential information for patient care. The e801, a module of the recently released Cobas 8000 series (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), is an automated immunoassay system based on streptavidin-biotin interactions. In this study, we evaluated the analytical performance of the e801. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, linearity, assay comparison, and reference range validation of 16 analytes (AFP, CA19-9, CA125, CEA, CYFRA, ferritin, NSE, PSA, Vitamin D, E2, fT4, TSH, FSH, insulin, NT-proBNP, and T) according to the guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. RESULTS: In precision evaluations, the coefficients of variation were less than each allowable total error for all analytes. Linearity was observed for all analytes over the entire tested analytical range (r2≥0.99). Performance comparisons revealed that the two systems are comparable, with correlation coefficients (r)>0.975 for all analytes. The reference range validation was also within the allowable criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the Cobas 8000 e801 analyzer demonstrated acceptable performance with respect to precision, linearity, reference range validation, and correlation. Therefore, the e801 analyzer is expected to be useful for routine immunoassays in clinical laboratories, although education and awareness about biotin interference is necessary for successful implementation in clinical practice.

Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: With the development of the automated treponemal test, new syphilis serodiagnosis algorithms, reverse algorithm, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) algorithm have been recommended recently. We investigated the efficacy of an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) as an initial screening test in the reverse and ECDC algorithms. METHODS: Samples from 4,771 subjects were included in this study. We performed rapid plasma reagin (RPR), ECLIA, and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) according to these three algorithms. The fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) test was additionally applied for discordant cases between the RPR and ECLIA results. The FTA-ABS results and the consensus of three algorithms were considered a gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 208 subjects were diagnosed with syphilis. The traditional algorithm had a sensitivity of 25.96%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 96.77%. Both the reverse and ECDC algorithms showed the same diagnostic performance, sensitivity of 95.19%, specificity of 99.96%, and accuracy of 99.75%. The agreements between the traditional algorithm and the other algorithms were 96.9% with a kappa value of 0.415. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the reverse and ECDC algorithms using the ECLIA as a first-line screening test was superior to that of the traditional algorithm.

Urine Cotinine level with smoking history predicts a risk of coronary artery calcification.

We investigated whether urine cotinine level, alone or combined with smoking status and cumulative smoking amount, could predict coronary calcium (CAC) score increase over time. The study population included 10,980 subjects. We analysed an association between CAC score increase over time and single or combined smoking-related factors. Urine cotinine level of ≥100 ng/mL, current or ex-smokers, and cumulative smoking amount of ≥1 pack-years (PY) showed significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for CAC score increase over time. A combination of current smokers with >10 PY and urine cotinine level of ≥100 ng/mL showed the highest OR. Irrespective of smoking status and cumulative smoking amount, all combinations with urine cotinine of ≥100 ng/mL showed higher ORs than other combinations with urine cotinine level of <100 ng/mL. Urine cotinine levels can be useful to predict coronary artery calcification and encourage smokers to quit smoking.

Comparison of AdvanSure HPV GenoBlot and Hybrid Capture 2 assays for detection of HPV infection.

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare the performance of the AdvanSure assay to the Hybrid Capture (HC) 2 for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV). METHODS: A total of 855 cervical swab specimens were obtained. We submitted all specimens for HR HPV detection with HC2 and the AdvanSure assay. We subsequently analyzed discordant results and specimens that were positive on both assays using restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) genotyping analysis. RESULTS: HC2 yielded positive results in 12.0% of specimens, while the AdvanSure assay detected one of 13 HR HPV types in 11.5% of specimens. The overall agreement rate between the assays was 98.5% with a kappa coefficient of 0.928. Discordant results between these two assays were observed in 12 cases, seven were positive only on HC2 and five were positive only on AdvanSure. RFMP analysis of the 12 discordant cases revealed three false-positive results using HC2, and one false-positive and five false-negative results using AdvanSure. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high agreement rate with HC2 and the ability to differentiate 35 HPV genotypes including HPV 16/18, the AdvanSure assay could be used as a laboratory testing method for HPV infection screening.

Harmonization of laboratory results by data adjustment in multicenter clinical trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In multicenter clinical trials, laboratory tests are performed in the laboratory of each center, mostly using different measuring methodologies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate coefficients of variation (CVs) of laboratory results produced by various measuring methods and to determine whether mathematical data adjustment could achieve harmonization between the methods. METHODS: We chose 10 clinical laboratories, including Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs), the central laboratory, for the measurement of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum triglycerides, creatinine, and glucose. The serum panels made with patient samples referred to GC Labs were sent to the other laboratories. Twenty serum samples for each analyte were prepared, sent frozen, and analyzed by each participating laboratory. RESULTS: All methods used by participating laboratories for the six analytes had traceability by reference materials and methods. When the results from the nine laboratories were compared with those from GC Labs, the mean CVs for total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and glucose analyzed using the same method were 1.7%, 3.7%, 4.3%, and 1.7%, respectively; and those for triglycerides and creatinine analyzed using two different methods were 4.5% and 4.48%, respectively. After adjusting data using Deming regression, the mean CV were 0.7%, 1.4%, 1.8%, 1.4%, 1.6%, and 0.8% for total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, creatinine, and glucose, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found that more comparable results can be produced by laboratory data harmonization using commutable samples. Therefore, harmonization efforts should be undertaken in multicenter trials for accurate data analysis (CRIS number; KCT0001235).

Evaluation of the URiSCAN 2 ACR Strip to estimate the urine albumin/creatinine ratios.

BACKGROUND: The urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) test is used to screen patients with chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases that put them at an increased risk of developing kidney disease. Here, we evaluated the performance of the URiSCAN 2 ACR Strip (URiSCAN; YD diagnostics, Yongin, Korea), a semiquantitative point-of-care testing (POCT) assay, and we compared to an existing POCT assay and a quantitative assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,020 random urine specimens were analyzed using the semiquantitative URiSCAN 2 ACR Strip and semiquantitative CLINITEK Microalbumin 2 Strip (CLINITEK; Siemens, New York, USA). We evaluated the precision of the URiSCAN 2 ACR Strip and compared the results of the ACR obtained from URiSCAN to those of CLINITEK with the quantitative results of a quantitative assay as a reference. RESULTS: The precision evaluation of the URiSCAN revealed a range between the cutoff (C50 )-20% and C50 +20% bounds, the C5 -C95 interval, with 85.8% confidence. URiSCAN and CLINITEK showed sensitivity and specificity of 87.7% and 72.2%, and 90.2% and 83.0%, respectively. The concordance rates of URiSCAN with CLINITEK and the quantitative assay were 75.6% and 79.1%, respectively. The concordance rate in the abnormal range (≥30 mg/g) between URiSCAN and the quantitative assay were higher than that between CLINITEK and the quantitative assay (78.8% vs 75.4%). CONCLUSIONS: URiSCAN showed good precision and comparable sensitivity with lower specificity than those of CLINITEK.

Comparison of GeneFinder human papillomavirus (HPV) Liquid Beads Microarray PCR Kit and Hybrid Capture 2 Assay for Detection of HPV Infection.

BACKGROUND: Along with advances in methodological technologies, various assays for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) have been introduced. The GeneFinder HPV liquid beads microarray PCR kit is one of the recently developed. Our aim was to compare the performance of GeneFinder to Hybrid Capture 2 for detection of HR HPV. METHODS: A total of 900 cervical swab specimens were obtained. All specimens were submitted for HR HPV detection with Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) and GeneFinder and then additionally analyzed the discordant or both positive results using restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) genotyping analysis. RESULTS: Hybrid Capture 2 detected 12.8% cases and GeneFinder detected 15.8% cases with 13 HR HPV types. Also, GeneFinder detected 27.4% cases for 32 detectable HPV types. The overall agreement rate was 93.2% with 0.724 kappa coefficient. Discordant results between these two assays were observed in 56 cases. HC2 showed sensitivity of 83.5% and specificity of 95.9%, while GeneFinder showed sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 91.9%. For HPV 16 or HPV 18 detection, GeneFinder showed 95.0% or 66.7% of sensitivity and 99.2% or 100%, respectively. Overall coinfection rate was 15.4% (38/247) in GeneFinder analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high agreement rate with HC2, high sensitivity and the ability to differentiate 32 HPV genotypes including HPV 16/18, GeneFinder could be used as a laboratory testing method for the screening of HPV infections. The use of GeneFinder may also contribute to future research associated with the significance of various HPV types and multiple coinfections.

Comparison of Abbott RealTime High-Risk HPV and Hybrid Capture 2 Assays for Detection of HPV Infection.

BACKGROUND: Various assays for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) have been introduced recently, including the Abbott RealTime High-Risk HPV assay. We sought to compare the performance of Abbott PCR to Hybrid Capture 2 for the detection of HR HPV. METHODS: A total of 941 cervical swab specimens were obtained. We submitted all specimens for HR HPV detection with HC2 and Abbott PCR, and then additionally analyzed discordant and concordant positive results using restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) genotyping analysis. RESULTS: HC2 detected one of 13 HR HPV types in 12.3% (116/941) of cases, while Abbott PCR detected one of 14 detectable HR HPV types in 12.9% (121/941) of cases. The overall agreement rate was 97.3% with a kappa coefficient of 0.879. Discordant results between these two assays were observed in 25 cases. HC2 showed a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 95.9%, while Abbott PCR showed a sensitivity of 98.0% and specificity of 96.8% when using RFMP results as the gold standard. For HPV 16/18 detection, Abbott PCR showed 95.8%/88.9% sensitivity and 99.2%/99.8% specificity, respectively. The overall coinfection rate between HPV 16, 18 and non-16/18 was 9.9% (12/121) in Abbott PCR analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Considering its high agreement rate with HC2, higher sensitivity/specificity compared to HC2, and ability to differentiate HPV 16/18 from other HPV types, Abbott PCR could be a reliable laboratory testing method for the screening of HPV infections.

Evaluation of Serum Cotinine Cut-Off to Distinguish Smokers From Nonsmokers in the Korean Population.

BACKGROUND: Cotinine has been widely used as an objective marker to identify current smokers. We conducted this study to address the absence of Korean studies investigating the efficacy of immunoassays and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the detection of serum cotinine and to determine the optimal serum cotinine cut-off level for differentiating current smokers from nonsmokers. METHODS: Serum specimens were obtained from 120 subjects. They were randomly chosen to represent a broad distribution of urine cotinine levels based on a retrospective review of questionnaires and results of urine cotinine levels. We determined serum cotinine levels using the IMMULITE 2000 XPi Immunoassay System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., USA) and LC-MS/MS (API-4000, Applied Biosystems, USA). Correlation was analyzed between IMMULITE serum cotinine, urine cotinine, and LC-MS/MS serum cotinine levels. ROC curve was analyzed to identify the optimal IMMULITE serum cotinine cut-off level for differentiating current smokers from nonsmokers. RESULTS: IMMULITE serum cotinine levels correlated with both urine cotinine and LC-MS/MS serum cotinine levels, with correlation coefficients of 0.958 and 0.986, respectively. The optimal serum cotinine cut-off level for distinguishing current smokers from nonsmokers was 13.2 ng/mL (95.7% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity) using IMMULITE. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate the use of LC-MS/MS for the measurement of serum cotinine and to determine the optimal serum cotinine cut-off level for the IMMULITE immunoassay. Our results could provide guidelines for differentiating current smokers from nonsmokers in the Korean population.

Diagnostic performance and establishment of reference limits of HE4 in Korean healthy women.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish distribution and reference limits of HE4 and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in healthy Korean women and investigated the factors influencing HE4 levels. We also investigated the diagnostic performances of HE4 and ROMA score, compared with CA125. METHODS: We collected specimens from 1809 healthy Korean women, 140 specimens from patients with ovarian cancers (OCs) and 123 specimens from patients with benign ovarian tumor. Serum HE4 and CA125 concentrations were measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done for ROMA, HE4, CA125 and combining of HE4 and CA125. RESULTS: HE4 level was influenced by age, not by menopausal status. The 97.5th percentile upper reference limit of HE4 of subjects <50years and ≥50year-old was 63.87pmol/L and 88.28pmol/L, respectively. The 97.5th percentile upper reference limits of ROMA score were 13.66 in premenopausal and 19.30 in postmenopausal women. The serum HE4 level was even lower in the patients with benign tumor compared to those in healthy controls. HE4 had significantly higher concentrations in OCs than benign ovarian tumor (P<0.001). ROMA and HE4 combined with CA125 or not performed better diagnostically than CA125 alone for distinguishing OCs, with AUCs of 0.844 for ROMA, 0.827 for combining of HE4 and CA125, 0.825 for HE4, and 0.795 for CA125. CONCLUSIONS: The reference limit of HE4 was different from those reported by other studies, suggesting racial or regional difference. HE4 and ROMA were better than CA125 for differentiation normal and benign ovarian tumor from OCs. (Word count: 253).

Comparison of the efficacy of disinfectants in automated endoscope reprocessors for colonoscopes: tertiary amine compound (Sencron2®) versus ortho-phthalaldehyde (Cidex®OPA).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To prevent the transmission of pathogens by endoscopes, following established reprocessing guidelines is critical. An ideal reprocessing step is simple, fast, and inexpensive. Here, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of two disinfectants, a tertiary amine compound (TAC) and ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA). METHODS: A total of 100 colonoscopes were randomly reprocessed using two same automated endoscope reprocessors, according to disinfectant. The exposure time was 10 minutes for 0.55% OPA (Cidex® OPA, Johnson & Johnson) and 5 minutes for 4% TAC (Sencron2®, Bab Gencel Pharma & Chemical Ind. Co.). Three culture samples were obtained from each colonoscope after reprocessing. RESULTS: A total of nine samples were positive among the 300 culture samples. The positive culture rate was not statistically different between the two groups (4% for OPA and 2% for TAC, P=0.501). There were no incidents related to safety during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: TAC was non-inferior in terms of reprocessing efficacy to OPA and was safe to use. Therefore, TAC seems to be a good alternative disinfectant with a relatively short exposure time and is also less expensive than OPA.

Analysis of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status According to Age, Gender, and Seasonal Variation.

BACKGROUND: The effects of age, gender, and seasonal variation on human levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) are not well understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate 25(OH)D status according to these factors in a Korean population. METHODS: A total of 303,943 serum 25(OH)D levels were measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay between October 2011 and May 2014. Potential participants were ineligible for the study if they had significant renal, hepatic, or thyroid dysfunction, as well as any major ongoing disease that could influence serum 25(OH)D levels. RESULTS: A total of 95,137 subjects (49,662 men and 45,475 women) were included in this study. The mean 25(OH)D levels were higher in men (42.4 nmol/l) than in women (32.9 nmol/l, P < 0.001). Among the men and women, 73.0% and 88.9%, respectively, had 25(OH)D levels <50 nmol/l, whereas only 3.8% of men and 1.4% of women had levels >75 nmol/l. The highest mean 25(OH)D value was noted in individuals aged ≥70 for both genders. The proportion of those with 25(OH)D levels <50 nmol/l appeared to be higher among younger subjects (P < 0.001). Lastly, there were significant differences between 25(OH)D levels in individuals during summer to fall and winter to spring in both genders, indicating seasonal periodicity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum 25(OH)D status varied according to gender, age, and season. Therefore, analyses of vitamin D status require individualized gender, age, and seasonally adjusted thresholds. Clinicians should consider these factors when determining optimal serum 25(OH)D levels in clinical practice.