ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms: 2023 Update.

Asymptomatic adnexal masses are commonly encountered in daily radiology practice. Although the vast majority of these masses are benign, a small subset have a risk of malignancy, which require gynecologic oncology referral for best treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, using a combination of both transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex Doppler technique can accurately characterize the majority of these lesions. MRI with and without contrast is a useful complementary modality that can help characterize indeterminate lesions and assess the risk of malignancy is those that are suspicious. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Percutaneous Core Biopsy Devices: A Detailed Review and Comparison of Different Needle Designs.

ABSTRACT: Percutaneous core-needle biopsy (PCNB) plays a growing and essential role in many medical specialties. Proper and effective use of various PCNB devices requires basic understanding of how they function. Current literature lacks a detailed overview and illustration of needle function and design differences, a potentially valuable reference for users ranging from early trainees to experts who are less familiar with certain devices. This pictorial aims to provide such an overview, using diagrams and magnified photographs to illustrate the intricate components of these devices. Following a brief historical review of biopsy needle technology for context, we emphasize distinctions in design between 2 major classes of PCNB devices (side- and end-cutting devices), focusing on practical implications for how each device is most effectively used. We believe a nuanced understanding of biopsy device function sheds light on certain lingering ambiguities in biopsy practice, such as the optimal needle gauge in organ biopsy, the benefits and risks associated with coaxial technique, the impact of needle selection and technique on bleeding, and the risk of unsuccessful sampling. In a subsequent pictorial, we will draw on the concepts presented here to illustrate examples of biopsy needle failure and how unrecognized needle failure can be an important and often preventable cause of increased biopsy risk and lower tissue yield.

O-RADS US v2022: An Update from the American College of Radiology's Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US Committee.

First published in 2019, the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US provides a standardized lexicon for ovarian and adnexal lesions, enables stratification of these lesions with use of a numeric score based on morphologic features to indicate the risk of malignancy, and offers management guidance. This risk stratification system has subsequently been validated in retrospective studies and has yielded good interreader concordance, even with users of different levels of expertise. As use of the system increased, it was recognized that an update was needed to address certain clinical challenges, clarify recommendations, and incorporate emerging data from validation studies. Additional morphologic features that favor benignity, such as the bilocular feature for cysts without solid components and shadowing for solid lesions with smooth contours, were added to O-RADS US for optimal risk-appropriate scoring. As O-RADS US 4 has been shown to be an appropriate cutoff for malignancy, it is now recommended that lower-risk O-RADS US 3 lesions be followed with US if not excised. For solid lesions and cystic lesions with solid components, further characterization with MRI is now emphasized as a supplemental evaluation method, as MRI may provide higher specificity. This statement summarizes the updates to the governing concepts, lexicon terminology and assessment categories, and management recommendations found in the 2022 version of O-RADS US.

Thyroid Nodule Margin Assessment Using ACR TI-RADS: Adding Points for Macrolobulation Impairs Performance.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the performance of ACR TI-RADS when points for lobulated margins are applied only when the margins meet a quantified measure of margin microlobulation and not applied when nodules only demonstrate macrolobulation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound and pathology records (May 01, 2018 to July 31, 2020) to find all thyroid nodules at one institution characterized as having lobulated margins using the ACR TI-RADS lexicon and subsequently undergoing fine needle aspiration (FNA). Nodule margins were evaluated to note the presence or absence of microlobulation, quantitatively defined as a protrusion with a base <2.5 mm in length. The impact to detection of malignant nodules and avoidance of benign FNA when margin points for lobulation were added only when microlobulated was analyzed. RESULTS: 58 of 516 thyroid nodules undergoing US-guided FNA were classified as lobulated, comprising the study population. 21 (36.2%) had microlobulated margins, with 12 of the 21 (57.1%) being malignant. Comparatively, of the 37 nodules showing only macrolobulated margins without microlobulation, only 2 (5.4%) were malignant (P < .0001). For 53 nodules ≥10 mm, 15 (28.3%) benign nodules would not have met size criteria for FNA had points for margins not been applied when only showing macrolobulation, whereas all 10 malignant nodules would still have been sampled. CONCLUSION: Adding two points to the ACR TI-RADS score for lobulated thyroid nodules should only apply when microlobulations are present.

Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremity: Doppler US Evaluation Protocols, Patterns, and Pitfalls.

Venous insufficiency is a cause of substantial morbidity and medical expenditures. Diagnostic US evaluation of venous insufficiency requires a thorough understanding of the venous anatomy, including the deep, superficial, and perforator veins. The highly variable venous anatomy requires that operators use sound judgment to expand on protocol images and thus avoid missing important sources of reflux. The US examination requires specific patient positioning and use of provocative maneuvers. A basic understanding of the pathophysiology of venous insufficiency and the various treatment methods helps to identify key observations so that ineffective treatment methods are not pursued. The examination reports should have greater detail than those for the more common lower extremity deep venous thrombosis evaluation, requiring numeric and narrative descriptions of deep and superficial venous patency, reflux, diameter, and pathways. Potential pitfalls include not recognizing or detecting deep venous reflux, misidentifying common femoral vein reflux as deep venous reflux when the reflux is isolated or related to saphenofemoral insufficiency, not recognizing anterior accessory great saphenous vein (AAGSV) involvement in saphenofemoral insufficiency, not recognizing or reporting great saphenous vein or AAGSV superficialization, not suspecting central venous obstruction, and not realizing when provocative maneuvers were ineffective. With knowledge of the lower extremity venous anatomy, venous insufficiency pathophysiology, basic treatment strategies, protocol best practices, patterns of observation, and diagnostic pitfalls, those who interpret venous insufficiency US studies can perform examinations and deliver reports that help patients receive appropriate treatment. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Non-Vascular Considerations When Interpreting Extremity Arterial and Venous Examinations.

Peripheral arterial and venous examinations are performed regularly in vascular labs and interpreted by physicians of different specialities. Many vascular examinations have nonvascular pathology that is either inadvertently imaged by the sonographer or imaged with intent as it relates to patient's symptoms. It is prudent for every reader of vascular studies to be acquainted with the sonographic appearance of these non-vascular lesions to enable appropriate and optimal interpretation that has a direct bearing on patient's clinical care. Our review includes a discussion of the nonvascular pathologies like lymph nodes, soft tissue edema, soft tissue fluid collections, musculotendinous injuries, soft tissue masses, and joint and bursal pathologies that may be encountered during interpretation of vascular exams. The pictorial essay includes a discussion of their sonographic appearances and pitfalls in interpretation. Multiple illustrative examples and sonographic images of the non-vascular pathologies found during interpretation of vascular studies have been utilized to highlight their appearances.

Medical Education Research Design.

As with clinical care, radiology education benefits when stakeholders collaborate to gather and analyze data to answer questions and solve issues. Just as importantly, radiology educators benefit academically and professionally when they demonstrate a portfolio of published scholarship to promotion committees and department leaders. The principles and techniques used in the design of medical education research are not well understood by many radiology educators because educational scholarship methodologies have received little attention in our literature. Lack of familiarity and inexperience with research methodologies, particularly qualitative research, are barriers that education researchers can address with knowledge acquisition and practice. This overview surveys the landscape and offers suggested medical education research resources to help researchers explore topics to increase understanding of quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, survey, and educational design methodologies.

Performance of an algorithm for diagnosing acute cholecystitis using clinical and sonographic parameters.

PURPOSE: Identify an algorithm using clinical and ultrasound (US) parameters with high diagnostic performance for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Consecutive emergency department (ED) patients from 4/1/2019 to 12/31/2019 were retrospectively reviewed to record non-US parameters and make US observations. Outcomes were categorized as either: (1) acute cholecystitis; or (2) negative acute cholecystitis. Pivot tables identified parameter combinations either not found with acute cholecystitis or with predictive value for acute cholecystitis to establish the algorithm. US Division radiologists finalized an US report prior to ED disposition without use of the algorithm. Radiologist impression and algorithm prediction for acute cholecystitis were categorized as either (1) acute cholecystitis; (2) negative acute cholecystitis; or (3) inconclusive. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-six studies on 357 patients (mean age, 51 yrs ± 20 yrs; 215 women) met the inclusion criteria. 10.9% (40/366) of US studies had acute cholecystitis, 12.6% (46/366) had pathologically identified chronic cholecystitis without acute cholecystitis, and 76.5% (280/366) were negative acute cholecystitis. Algorithm compared to radiologist diagnostic performance was as follows: (1) sensitivity: 90.0% vs. 55.0%, p < 0.001; (2) augmented sensitivity (defined as when inconclusive categorization is considered consistent with acute cholecystitis): 100% vs. 85.0%, p < 0.001; (3) specificity: 93.6% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.50; (4) diagnostic rate (opposite of inconclusive rate): 96.4% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.04; (5) adverse outcome rate: 0.0% vs. 1.6%, p undefined. CONCLUSION: For acute cholecystitis, an algorithm using non-binary ultrasound and clinical assessments had higher sensitivity, higher diagnostic rate, and fewer adverse outcomes, than subspecialty radiologist impressions.

The impact of blood pressure on the risk of major bleeding complication after renal transplant biopsy.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of elevated blood pressure on the rate of major hemorrhagic complication after renal transplant biopsy. METHODS: Pre-procedural systolic (SBP), diastolic (SBP), and mean arterial (MAP) blood pressure for consecutive patients undergoing US-guided renal transplant biopsies from 08/01/2015 to 7/31/2017 were retrospectively recorded. Patients who had a major bleeding complication were identified. The risk of complication as a function of SBP, DBP, and MAP was statistically analyzed, with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 1689 biopsies, there were 10 bleeding complications (10/1689, 0.59%). There was no statistically significant difference between biopsies with complication compared to those without complication based on SBP (p = 0.351), DBP (p = 0.088), or MAP (p = 0.132). Using risk dichotomization criteria, the odds ratio for hemorrhagic complication when the patient had SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and DBP ≥ 95 mmHg was 75.63 (95% CI 6.87-516.8, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The rate of hemorrhagic complication from renal transplant biopsy is low, and there is no statistically significant threshold for increased biopsy risk based on SBP, DBP, or MAP alone. The risk of complication was significantly higher only when both the SBP is ≥ 180 mmHg and DBP is ≥ 95 mmHg.

Growth Rate of Ovarian Serous Cystadenomas and Cystadenofibromas.

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed growth rates of benign ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas to understand what percentage would show a volume doubling time (DT) of less than 3 years, between 3 and 5 years, or greater than 5 years. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed pathology records (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019) to find all surgically excised ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas. Imaging records were then reviewed to identify those that had been confidently identified with ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography at least twice before surgical removal, with at least a 60-day interval between studies. Three orthogonal measurements were recorded on the first and last imaging studies on which the mass was detected, with volume calculations by the prolate formula (product of 3 measurements multiplied by 0.52). The volume DT was calculated and grouped into 1 of 5 categories: (1) DT of less than 1 year; (2) DT of 1 to 3 years; (3) DT of 3 to 5 years; (4) DT of 5 to 10 years; and (5) no growth (any mass with a DT >10 years or showing a decrease in volume). RESULTS: A total of 102 of 536 cystadenomas and 44 of 227 cystadenofibromas met inclusion criteria. Of the 146 tumors, 40 (27.4%) had a DT of less than 1 year; 38 (26.0%) had a DT of 1 to 3 years; 22 (15.1%) had a DT of 3 to 5 years; 10 (6.8%) had a DT of 5 to 10 years; and 36 (24.7%) showed no growth. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 53.4% of ovarian serous cystadenomas/cystadenofibromas have a DT of less than 3 years; 15.1% have a DT between 3 and 5 years; and 31.5% have a DT of greater than 5 years or show no growth.

Detection of Bleeding Complications After Renal Transplant Biopsy.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to analyze the timing of major bleeding complications after renal transplant biopsy in the context of a standardized 1-hour postprocedure observation protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records for consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsies between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, and were observed according to a newly implemented 1-hour postprocedure observation protocol. The development of a major bleeding complication (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events class 3 or higher) was recorded along with all available details regarding the time course of patient symptoms and presentation. Complications were grouped into one of four categories according to onset time after biopsy: 2 hours or less (timing category 1), more than 2 hours but 4 hours or less (timing category 2), more than 4 hours but 8 hours or less (timing category 3), and more than 8 hours (timing category 4). RESULTS. In 1824 patients (769 women, 1055 men) who underwent 4519 consecutive ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsies during the study period, 11 class 3 complications were found (11/4519 [0.2%]). Four of the 11 patients (36.4%) had symptoms during the 1-hour observation period. Of these four patients, three (3/11 [27.3%]) had substantial symptoms related to major bleeding and were classified as timing category 1, and one (1/11 [9.1%]) had initially minor symptoms that increased in severity more than 2 hours but within 4 hours and was classified as timing category 2. Seven of the 11 patients (63.6%) did not have any symptoms at 1 hour of observation and were discharged; three (27.3%) were classified as timing category 3, and four (36.4%) were classified as category 4. CONCLUSION. Major bleeding complications following ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy are rare (0.2% of patients in this study). In our study, more than half were not clinically apparent within 4 hours of biopsy. A 1-hour postprocedure recovery period can be safely used after renal transplant biopsy.

The Flipped Ovary Sign in Ovarian Torsion.

The diagnosis of ovarian torsion is challenging and relies mostly on morphologic findings. Occasionally, women or children with acute pelvic pain who have undergone an initial ultrasound (US) evaluation with results interpreted as negative for ovarian torsion will return with recurrent or increasing pain, prompting an US reevaluation. The flipped ovary sign refers to a demonstrable change in the orientation of the ovary on follow-up US examinations, recognized by changing positions of ovarian landmarks established by follicles, cysts, or masses. This sign is valuable for identifying ovarian torsion in these patients, even in the absence of classic morphologic or Doppler features of ovarian torsion.