Non-pharmaceutical interventions to combat COVID-19 in the Americas described through daily sub-national data.

This dataset covers national and subnational non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the Americas. Prior to the development of a vaccine, NPI were governments' primary tools to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Variation in subnational responses to COVID-19 is high and is salient for health outcomes. This dataset captures governments' dynamic, varied NPI to combat COVID-19 for 80% of Latin America's population from each country's first case through December 2021. These daily data encompass all national and subnational units in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru. The dataset includes individual and aggregate indices of nine NPI: school closures, work suspensions, public event cancellations, public transport suspensions, information campaigns, local travel restrictions, international travel controls, stay-at-home orders, and restrictions on the size of gatherings. We also collected data on mask mandates as a separate indicator. Local country-teams drew from multiple data sources, resulting in high-quality, reliable data. The dataset thus allows for consistent, meaningful comparisons of NPI within and across countries during the pandemic.

Strengthening Health Systems To Face Pandemics: Subnational Policy Responses To COVID-19 In Latin America.

Nonpharmaceutical interventions such as stay-at-home orders continue to be the main policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic in countries with limited or slow vaccine rollout. Often, nonpharmaceutical interventions are managed or implemented at the subnational level, yet little information exists on within-country variation in nonpharmaceutical intervention policies. We focused on Latin America, a COVID-19 epicenter, and collected and analyzed daily subnational data on public health measures in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru to compare within- and across-country nonpharmaceutical interventions. We showed high heterogeneity in the adoption of these interventions at the subnational level in Brazil and Mexico; consistent national guidelines with subnational heterogeneity in Argentina and Colombia; and homogeneous policies guided by centralized national policies in Bolivia, Chile, and Peru. Our results point to the role of subnational policies and governments in responding to health crises. We found that subnational responses cannot replace coordinated national policy. Our findings imply that governments should focus on evidence-based national policies while coordinating with subnational governments to tailor local responses to changing local conditions.

Measuring quality in arthritis care: the Arthritis Foundation's quality indicator set for analgesics.

OBJECTIVE: To develop systematically validated quality indicators (QIs) addressing analgesic safety. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of existing quality measures, clinical guidelines, and evidence supporting potential QIs concerning nonselective (traditional) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and newer cyclooxygenase 2-selective NSAIDs was undertaken. An expert panel then validated or refuted potential indicators utilizing a proven methodology. RESULTS: Eleven potential QIs were proposed. After panel review, 8 were judged to be valid; an additional 10 were proposed by the panel, of which 7 were rated as valid. Quality indicators focused upon informing patients about risk, NSAID choice and gastrointestinal prophylaxis, and side effect monitoring. CONCLUSION: The 15 validated indicators were combined, where appropriate, to yield 10 validated processes of care indicators for the safe use of NSAIDs. These indicators developed by literature review and finalized by our expert panel process can serve as a basis to compare the quality of analgesic use provided by health care providers and delivery systems.

Quality of care indicators for gout management.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the significant health impact of gout, there is no consensus on management standards. To guide physician practice, we sought to develop quality of care indicators for gout management. METHODS: A systematic literature review of gout therapy was performed using the Medline database. Two abstractors independently reviewed each of the articles for relevance and satisfaction of minimal inclusion criteria. Based on the review of the literature, 11 preliminary quality indicators were developed and then reviewed and refined by an initial feasibility panel of community and academic rheumatologists. A twelfth indicator was added at the request of the first panel. Using a modification of the RAND/University of California at Los Angeles appropriateness method (bridging teleconference and white-board Internet technology were added), a second expert panel rated each of the proposed indicators for validity using a 9-point scale, in which ratings of 1-3, 4-6, and 7-9 were considered "invalid," "indeterminate," and "highly valid," respectively. Indicators were considered valid if the median panel rating was > or =7 and there was no evidence of panel disagreement (defined to occur when 2 of 6 panelists provided a validity rating of 1-3 and 2 panelists provided a validity rating of 7-9). RESULTS: Ten of the 12 draft indicators were rated to be valid by our second expert panel. Validated indicators pertained to 1) the use of urate-lowering medications in chronic gout, 2) the use of antiinflammatory drugs, and 3) counseling on lifestyle modifications. CONCLUSION: Using a combination of evidence and expert opinion, 10 indicators for quality of gout care were developed. These indicators represent an important initial step in quality improvement initiatives for gout care.

Racial disparities in osteoporosis prevention in a managed care population.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis in black women may result in increased disability, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality compared with white women. However, it is unknown whether osteoporosis treatment or bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is different in these women, particularly in those at highest risk. METHODS: To examine differences and determinants of osteoporosis preventive interventions among white and black women in a large regional health maintenance organization, women 50 years of age and older were surveyed (n = 8,909) to determine their receipt of BMD testing and medical therapies for osteoporosis prevention. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, black women had two- to threefold lower odds of BMD test or osteoporosis prescription treatment. Even among women with a previous fracture, blacks still had a significantly lower likelihood of both BMD testing and prescription therapy. CONCLUSION: Compared with whites, black women reported significantly less BMD testing and prescription and nonprescription osteoporosis therapy. This disparity was not fully explained by other demographic or risk factor differences.

The effects of physician specialty and patient comorbidities on the use and discontinuation of coxibs.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of physician specialty and comorbidities on cyclooxygenase 2-selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; coxibs) utilization. METHODS: Medical records of 452 patients from a regional managed care organization with >/=3 consecutive NSAID prescriptions from June 1998 to April 2001 were abstracted. Multivariable adjusted associations between coxib initiation and discontinuation and patient and provider characteristics were examined. RESULTS: A total of 1,142 NSAID prescriptions were written over 9,398 total patient-months of followup. Compared with patients seeing family or general practitioners, patients seeing rheumatologists (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.1-5.7) and internists (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.6) were significantly more likely to receive a coxib, as well as patients with a history of osteoarthritis (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.7-3.8), gastrointestinal disease (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.5), and congestive heart failure (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.0-16.4). Although specialists were more likely than generalists to prescribe coxibs, only family or general practitioners were significantly more likely to selectively use coxibs among their patients with a history of gastrointestinal disease. Fifty-four percent of NSAID prescriptions were discontinued, and coxibs were significantly less likely to be discontinued than were traditional NSAIDs (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest significantly greater, but perhaps less selective use of coxibs among specialists, even after accounting for important covariates. The initiation and discontinuation of coxibs was influenced by physician specialty and by patient risk factors.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug toxicity monitoring and safety practices.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) related gastrointestinal (GI) and renal adverse events are commonly reported. Although published guidelines recommend periodic laboratory monitoring, NSAID safety practices of physicians have not been investigated at a population level. We examined the associations of physician specialty and patient characteristics with NSAID safety practices. METHODS: Using administrative data and medical record review from a regional managed care organization, we studied a retrospective cohort of 373 frequent NSAID users (> or = 3 consecutive NSAID prescriptions and > or = 1 month of continuous NSAID use and followup). NSAID safety measures included: complete blood count (CBC) testing, creatinine testing, use of GI cytoprotective agents, and lack of simultaneous prescriptions for different NSAID (NSAID overlap). RESULTS: The mean duration of cumulative NSAID use was 14.4 +/- 7.7 months/patient, patient age was 62.0 +/- 11.4 years, and 63% were women. About two-thirds of patients received CBC (238, 63.8%) and creatinine monitoring (263, 70.5%), one-third (120, 32.2%) were prescribed cytoprotective agents, and one-fourth (97, 26%) had at least one NSAID overlap. After multivariable adjustments, concomitant use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.8), longer NSAID exposure (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), and a greater number of physician visits/year (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2) were significantly associated with receipt of a CBC. A history of hypertension (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), longer NSAID exposure (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4), and more physician visits/year (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2) were significantly associated with serum creatinine testing. Rheumatologists, and to a lesser extent internists, trended toward more NSAID toxicity monitoring than family/general practitioners. However, family/general practitioners and internists were more likely to monitor creatinine than rheumatologists among patients with renal risk factors. CONCLUSION: While rheumatologists and internists trended toward more CBC and creatinine testing, visit frequency, duration of NSAID use, and comorbidities were the factors most consistently associated with safety monitoring.

Evaluación de las acciones estatales de salud en los barrios populares de noroccidente de Quito / Evaluation of the state actions of health in the popular neighborhoods of noroccidente of Quito

El objeto de investigación del presente trabajo es la propuesta gubernamental de atención en salud contenida en el Programa de Salud Familiar y Comunitaria y las particularidades y efectos de su aplicación es un sector urbano marginal de la ciudad de Quito.Este proyecto de investigación fue formulado y ejecutado en un proceso participativo entre la Federación de Barrios Populares de Noroccidente de Quito una organización popular activa de la sociedad y el Curso de Postgrado en Investigación y Administración de Salud de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de la Universidad Central del Ecuador (CEIAS), como respuesta al interés común de definir y comprender la situación de salud de esos barrios y valorar la coherencia de la respuesta estatal a dicha siutación