Guidelines for reducing the environmental impact of general anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for reducing the environmental impact of general anaesthesia. DESIGN: A committee of ten experts from SFAR and SF2H and SFPC learned societies was set up. A policy of declaration of competing interests was applied and observed throughout the guideline-writing process. Likewise, it did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product (drug or medical device). The committee followed the GRADE® method (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. METHODS: We aimed to formulate recommendations according to the GRADE® methodology for three different fields: anaesthesia vapours and gases; intravenous drugs; medical devices and the working environment. Each question was formulated according to the PICO format (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome). The literature review and recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS: The experts' work on the synthesis and application of the GRADE® method led to the formulation of 17 recommendations. Since the GRADE® method could not be entirely applied to all of the questions, some of the recommendations were formulated as expert opinions. CONCLUSION: Based on strong agreement between experts, we produced 17 recommendations designed to guide reducing the environmental impact of general anaesthesia.

Pain evaluation after day-surgery using a mobile phone application.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies assess postoperative outcomes after discharge in the ambulatory setting. The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative pain and adverse effects at 24 h and at 7 days after day surgery using an e-health follow-up smartphone-based application named SATELIA®. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational and monocentric cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital of Bordeaux. All eligible patients for SATELIA® follow-up between May 2018 and June 2019 were screened for the analysis. Data were extracted from two databases. Those with a missing primary outcome were excluded from the analysis. The main outcome was the worst pain score on POD 1, self-reported via SATELIA®. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of adverse effects on POD1, as well as the worst pain score and adverse effects on POD7. Quantitative data were reported by the median (IQR) and categorical data were presented as absolute numbers (%). RESULTS: A total of 2283 patients were screened for analysis, from which 592 were excluded due to missing data for the main outcome; 1691 patients were thus finally included. The median worst pain score at POD 1 was 3.0 (1.0-5.0); 35.5% (n = 601/1691) and 29.1% (n = 492/1691) of the patients reported moderate-to-severe pain at POD1 and POD7, respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study shows that 35.5% of patients experience moderate-to-severe pain after day surgery. Even if SATELIA® should be further developed and evaluated, it also demonstrates the interest of using phone based software to follow patients after discharge and ensure a better personalised management.

[The challenges of sustainable development in healthcare facilities]. / Les enjeux du développement durable en établissement de santé.

Healthcare and medical-social facilities have a major responsibility within society, that of the quality of care, but also that of developing a system of sustainable and socially-responsible health. This system must meet the three pillars which constitute such an approach: economic, social and environmental sustainability. Innovation remains central to the sustainable evolution of practices and the first results are now visible.