Pharmacokinetic interaction of quetiapine and lamotrigine - victim and perpetrator?

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the ambiguous findings of earlier research regarding the reduction of quetiapine plasma levels when combined with lamotrigine, most likely via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase induction by lamotrigine. METHODS: One thousand one hundred and fifty samples, divided into four groups of patients receiving either quetiapine immediate- (IR) or extended-release (XR) without or in combination with lamotrigine were compared regarding absolute and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations. Furthermore, samples of intra-individual controls were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients receiving quetiapine IR in combination with lamotrigine showed 31% lower plasma (p = 0.002) and 23% lower dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (p = 0.004) compared to those receiving IR monotherapy. The proportion of patients with quetiapine plasma concentrations below the lower limit of the therapeutic reference range was 50% and 30% in the combination group and in patients receiving monotherapy, respectively (p = 0.03). However, no significant differences regarding plasma concentration (p = 0.13) and dose-adjusted plasma concentration (p = 0.42) were observed in patients with combination vs. monotherapy with the XR formulation of quetiapine. In the intra-individual controls, no trends could be identified, possibly due to insufficient number of samples (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of quetiapine IR with lamotrigine is associated with significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, potentially impacting quetiapine effectiveness. For quetiapine ER, a significant interaction is less likely.

Discovering interactions in polypharmacy: Impact of metamizole on the metabolism of quetiapine.

AIMS: Metamizole is quite an old drug with analgesic, antipyretic and spasmolytic properties. Recent findings have shown that it may induce several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, especially CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. The clinical relevance of these properties is uncertain. We aimed to unravel potential pharmacokinetic interactions between metamizole and the CYP3A4 substrate quetiapine. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of quetiapine from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database were analysed. Two groups of 33 patients, either receiving quetiapine as a monotherapy (without CYP modulating comedications) or with concomitantly applied metamizole, were compared addressing a potential impact of metamizole on the metabolism of quetiapine being reflected in differences of plasma concentrations of quetiapine and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Patients comedicated with metamizole showed >50% lower plasma concentrations of quetiapine (median 45.2 ng/mL, Q1 = 15.5; Q3 = 90.5 vs. 92.0 ng/mL, Q1 = 52.3; Q3 = 203.8, P = .003). The dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were 69% lower in the comedication group (P = .001). Subgroup analyses did not suggest a dose dependency of the metamizole effect or an influence of quetiapine formulation (immediate vs. extended release). Finally, the comedication group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of patients whose quetiapine concentrations were below the therapeutic reference range (78.8% in the metamizole group vs. 54.4% in the control group, P = .037) indicating therapeutically insufficient drug concentrations. CONCLUSION: The combination of metamizole and quetiapine leads to significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, probably via an induction of CYP3A4. Clinicians must consider the risk of adverse drug reactions, especially treatment failure under quetiapine when adding metamizole.

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND: For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialised tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalise drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging. METHODS: In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 45 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)). RESULTS: Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings. CONCLUSION: All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimise treatment effects, minimise side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalised drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

The impact of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of antiseizure medications: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 674 pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Increasing evidence suggests that the physiological changes of pregnancy may impact pharmacokinetics of antiseizure medications (ASM), and this may affect treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to quantify the pregnancy impact on the ASM pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/EMBASE in November 2022 and updated in August 2023 for studies comparing levels of ASM in the same individuals during pregnancy and in the preconception/postpartum period. Alteration ratios between the 3rd trimester and baseline were estimated. We also performed a random-effects meta-analysis calculating between-timepoint differences in mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D ratios). Study quality was assessed using the ClinPK guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 65 studies investigating 15 ASMs in 674 pregnancies were included. The largest differences were reported for lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam (alteration ratio 0.42, range 0.07-2.45, 0.42, range 0.08-0.82 and 0.52, range 0.04-2.77 respectively): accordingly, C/D levels were lower in the 3rd trimester for lamotrigine, levetiracetam and the main oxcarbazepine metabolite monohydroxycarbazepine (MD = -12.33 × 10-3, 95%CI = -16.08 to -8.58 × 10-3 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), p < 0.001, MD = -7.16 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), 95%CI = -9.96 to -4.36, p < 0.001, and MD = -4.87 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), 95%CI = -9.39 to -0.35, p = 0.035, respectively), but not for oxcarbazepine (MD = 1.16 × 10-3 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), 95%CI = -2.55 to 0.24 × 10-3, p = 0.10). The quality of studies was acceptable with an average rating score of 11.5. CONCLUSIONS: Data for lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine (and monohydroxycarbazepine) and levetiracetam demonstrate major changes in pharmacokinetics during pregnancy, suggesting the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring to assist clinicians in optimizing treatment outcomes.

Assessing Pharmacokinetic Correlates of Escitalopram-Related Adverse Drug Reactions.

BACKGROUND: To assess the pharmacokinetic correlates of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) under antidepressant treatment with escitalopram (ESC) using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. METHODS: A large naturalistic sample of inpatients and outpatients prescribed ESC was analyzed. ADRs were classified using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect rating scale. We compared ESC-treated patients with (n = 35) and without ADRs (n = 273) using ESC plasma concentrations as the primary outcome. We also compared ADR rates in the 2 groups based on 2 cut-off ESC levels reflecting the recommended upper thresholds of the therapeutic reference range of 80 ng/mL, suggested by the consensus therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines, and 40 ng/mL, based on recent meta-analysis data. The effects of age, sex, smoking, daily ESC dose, plasma concentrations, and concentrations corrected for daily dose were included in a binary logistic regression model to predict ADRs. RESULTS: No differences in clinical, demographic, or pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between patients with and without ADRs ( P > 0.05). Patients with ESC-related ADRs were more frequently diagnosed with psychotic disorders than those without (25% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.004). None of the variables was associated with ADR risk. Overall, ADR rates were not significantly different in patients above versus below thresholds of ESC concentrations (ESC concentrations >40 [n = 59] vs. ≤40 ng/mL [n = 249] and >80 [n = 8] vs. ≤80 ng/mL [n = 300]; P = 0.56 and P = 1.0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No distinct pharmacokinetic patterns underlying ESC-associated ADRs were observed. Further studies with more specific assessments of ADRs in larger cohorts are required to better identify potential underlying patterns.

Pharmacokinetic correlates of clinical response in a naturalistic sample of escitalopram-treated patients.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed pharmacokinetic correlates of treatment response to escitalopram using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. METHODS: A large naturalistic sample of patients receiving escitalopram was analyzed. Responders were defined as 'very much improved' or 'much improved' based on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement score, CGI-I. We compared responders (n = 83) vs. non-responders (n = 388) with the primary outcome being the escitalopram plasma concentration and concentration corrected by the daily dose (C/D ratio). Effects of age, sex, body-mass-index (BMI), and C/D ratio were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression model predicting response. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between responders vs. non-responders. There were also no differences between escitalopram daily doses or plasma concentrations, while C/D ratios were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders (1.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 (ng/mL)/(mg/day), p = 0.007); C/D ratios (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.80, p < 0.003) were associated with response to escitalopram, after controlling for age, sex, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low clearance of escitalopram as reflected upon high C/D ratios may be less likely respond to escitalopram. Identifying these patients during dose titration may support clinical decision-making, including switching to a different antidepressant instead of increasing daily dose.

[Psychopharmacotherapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding-Part II: focus on breastfeeding : Support options by using therapeutic drug monitoring]. / Psychopharmakotherapie in der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit ­ Teil II: Schwerpunkt Stillzeit : Möglichkeiten der Unterstützung durch therapeutisches Drug-Monitoring.

The drug treatment of mental disorders during lactation requires special knowledge about the possible effects on the breastfed infant. The first part of this 2­part article is devoted to the use of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy. This second part addresses the use of psychotropic drugs during breastfeeding.The uncertainty about whether maternal breastfeeding can be recommended during drug treatment is high and the clinical management of psychopharmacotherapy during breastfeeding is a major challenge. Due to sparse scientific evidence, the administration of psychotropic drugs must be evaluated individually; however, the risk of mental decompensation of the mother is a weighty factor that can have a very negative impact on the mother-child pair, in the worst case up to suicide or infanticide. Drug treatment during breastfeeding is always off-label and should therefore only be given after a careful risk assessment and comprehensive clarification. Every treatment decision is a case by case decision based on an assessment of the overall constellation. This includes the psychiatric history, the current complaints and a risk assessment for the infant, ideally with the involvement of a social support network in the environment. A multiprofessional support by psychiatrists, pediatricians, gynecologists and midwives should accompany drug treatment during breastfeeding under close monitoring.This second part of the 2­part article provides an overview of the most frequently used drug classes during the breastfeeding period. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a valuable tool for risk and exposure assessment during the breastfeeding period.

[Psychopharmacotherapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding-Part I: focus on pregnancy : Support options by using therapeutic drug monitoring]. / Psychopharmakotherapie in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit ­ Teil I: Schwerpunkt Schwangerschaft : Möglichkeiten der Unterstützung durch therapeutisches Drug-Monitoring.

The medicinal treatment of mental disorders during pregnancy and lactation requires special knowledge about possible effects of the psychopharmacotherapy on the intrauterine exposure of the embryo/fetus. Therefore, the first part of this 2­part article focuses on the use of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy. In the second part, the use of psychotropic drugs during breastfeeding is addressed. Possible substance-specific risks as a consequence of the administration have to be assessed compared to the natural risk of pregnancy complications, birth complications and neonatal complications associated with the appropriate (untreated) mental disease. Pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy require a special focus on the safety of drug treatment and treatment efficacy. Currently, neither the European Medicines Agency (EMA) nor the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved any psychotropic drug for use during pregnancy or breastfeeding. A more detailed consideration of the risk profiles of all psychotropic drugs, prescribed off-label during this time, is important. Antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers are the main drugs used, despite their lack of approval. This first part of our 2­part article provides an overview of the most frequently used substance groups during pregnancy and their special characteristics. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is presented as a clinical tool that can provide a supportive contribution to treatment safety and effectiveness during pregnancy and later also during breastfeeding, not only because of the changing pharmacokinetics. In this context, the measurement of concentrations of the active substance allows a better quantification of the intrauterine and postpartum exposure risk. Despite all clinical support possibilities, each therapeutic decision for the administration of a psychotropic drug remains an individual case decision. For those involved in the treatment, this means a careful balancing of the possible consequences of non-treatment and the possible sequelae of the use of psychopharmacotherapy.

Changes in Psychotropic Drug Blood Levels After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Two-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence from case reports suggests that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination may interact with the treatment outcomes of psychiatric medications. Apart from clozapine, reports on the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on other psychotropic agents are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the plasma levels of different psychotropic drugs using therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: Plasma levels of psychotropic agents, including agomelatine, amisulpride, amitriptyline, escitalopram, fluoxetine, lamotrigine, mirtazapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertraline, trazodone, and venlafaxine, from inpatients with a broad spectrum of psychiatric diseases receiving COVID-19 vaccinations were collected at 2 medical centers between 08/2021 and 02/2022 under steady-state conditions before and after vaccination. Postvaccination changes were estimated as a percentage of baseline. RESULTS: Data from 16 patients who received COVID-19 vaccination were included. The largest changes in plasma levels were reported for quetiapine (+101.2%) and trazodone (-38.5%) in 1 and 3 patients, respectively, 1 day postvaccination compared with baseline levels. One week postvaccination, the plasma levels of fluoxetine (active moiety) and escitalopram increased by 31% and 24.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of major changes in the plasma levels of escitalopram, fluoxetine, trazodone, and quetiapine after COVID-19 vaccination. When planning COVID-19 vaccination for patients treated with these medications, clinicians should monitor rapid changes in bioavailability and consider short-term dose adjustments to ensure safety.

Discovering interactions in augmentation strategies: Impact of duloxetine on the metabolism of aripiprazole.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to unravel potential pharmacokinetic interactions between aripiprazole and duloxetine. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of aripiprazole in two groups of 78 patients each, receiving aripiprazole as a monotherapy or combined with duloxetine, were compared. A potential impact of duloxetine on the metabolism of aripiprazole was expected in higher plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and higher dose-adjusted plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Patients co-medicated with duloxetine showed significantly higher plasma concentrations of aripiprazole by 54.2% (p = 0.019). Dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were 45.6% higher (p = 0.001); 12.8% of these patients exhibited aripiprazole plasma concentrations above the upper limit of the therapeutic reference range, in the control group this was only the case for 10.3% of the patients. A positive relationship was found between the daily dose of duloxetine and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations of aripiprazole (p = 0.034). As dehydroaripiprazole concentrations were not available, conclusions for the active moiety (aripiprazole plus dehydroaripiprazole) could not be drawn. CONCLUSIONS: Combining duloxetine and aripiprazole leads to significantly higher drug concentrations of aripiprazole, most likely via an inhibition of cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent of CYP3A4 by duloxetine. Clinicians have to consider increasing aripiprazole concentrations when adding duloxetine to a treatment regimen with aripiprazole.

Lower sertraline plasma concentration in patients co-medicated with clozapine-Implications for pharmacological augmentation strategies in schizophrenia.

Augmentation of antipsychotic treatment with antidepressants represents a common and beneficial treatment strategy in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Combining clozapine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline represents a clinically important strategy in patients with therapy-resistant schizophrenia, but there is limited knowledge about mutual pharmacokinetic interactions. In the present study, we assessed the impact of clozapine on sertraline plasma concentrations. Based on a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database, sertraline plasma concentrations were compared between two groups: patients receiving a combined treatment with sertraline and clozapine (N = 15) and a matched control group receiving sertraline but no clozapine (N = 17). Group differences with respect to raw and dose-adjusted concentrations were assessed using nonparametric tests. Comedication with clozapine was associated with 67% lower median sertraline plasma concentrations (16 vs. 48 ng/mL; p = .022) and 28% lower median dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D; 0.21 vs. 0.29 (ng/mL)/(mg/day); p = .049) as compared to the control group. Scatter plots revealed a complex relationship between the dosage of clozapine and dose-adjusted sertraline concentrations composed of an initial decrease at clozapine doses below 300 mg, an increase between 300 and 600 mg and a final decrease at 800 mg which was best modeled by a third order polynomial term. Cotreatment with clozapine may lead to reduced sertraline plasma concentrations which may be explained by clozapine-induced gastrointestinal hypo-mobility already present at low doses and cytochrome P450 3A4 inducing properties at high clozapine doses. For this drug combination, clinicians should consider TDM to confirm therapeutically effective plasma concentrations of sertraline.

Functional connectivity signatures of NMDAR dysfunction in schizophrenia-integrating findings from imaging genetics and pharmaco-fMRI.

Both, pharmacological and genome-wide association studies suggest N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction and excitatory/inhibitory (E/I)-imbalance as a major pathophysiological mechanism of schizophrenia. The identification of shared fMRI brain signatures of genetically and pharmacologically induced NMDAR dysfunction may help to define biomarkers for patient stratification. NMDAR-related genetic and pharmacological effects on functional connectivity were investigated by integrating three different datasets: (A) resting state fMRI data from 146 patients with schizophrenia genotyped for the disease-associated genetic variant rs7191183 of GRIN2A (encoding the NMDAR 2 A subunit) as well as 142 healthy controls. (B) Pharmacological effects of the NMDAR antagonist ketamine and the GABA-A receptor agonist midazolam were obtained from a double-blind, crossover pharmaco-fMRI study in 28 healthy participants. (C) Regional gene expression profiles were estimated using a postmortem whole-brain microarray dataset from six healthy donors. A strong resemblance was observed between the effect of the genetic variant in schizophrenia and the ketamine versus midazolam contrast of connectivity suggestive for an associated E/I-imbalance. This similarity became more pronounced for regions with high density of NMDARs, glutamatergic neurons, and parvalbumin-positive interneurons. From a functional perspective, increased connectivity emerged between striato-pallido-thalamic regions and cortical regions of the auditory-sensory-motor network, while decreased connectivity was observed between auditory (superior temporal gyrus) and visual processing regions (lateral occipital cortex, fusiform gyrus, cuneus). Importantly, these imaging phenotypes were associated with the genetic variant, the differential effect of ketamine versus midazolam and schizophrenia (as compared to healthy controls). Moreover, the genetic variant was associated with language-related negative symptomatology which correlated with disturbed connectivity between the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and the superior lateral occipital cortex. Shared genetic and pharmacological functional connectivity profiles were suggestive of E/I-imbalance and associated with schizophrenia. The identified brain signatures may help to stratify patients with a common molecular disease pathway providing a basis for personalized psychiatry.

Transfer of anticonvulsants and lithium into amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood & breast milk: A systematic review & combined analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the ability of anticonvulsants and lithium to enter fetal and newborn circulation has become increasingly available; here we estimated penetration ratios in a series of matrices from combined samples of pregnant/breastfeeding women treated with anticonvulsants or lithium. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed/EMBASE for studies with concentrations of anticonvulsants/lithium from maternal blood, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood and/or breast milk. Penetration ratios were calculated by dividing the concentrations in amniotic fluid, umbilical cord plasma or breast milk by the maternal concentrations. When data from multiple studies were available, we calculated combined penetration ratios, weighting studies' mean by study size. RESULTS: Ninety-one eligible studies for brivaracetam, carbamazepine, clonazepam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lithium, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, primidone, topiramate, valproate, vigabatrin and zonisamide were identified. For amniotic fluid, the highest penetration ratios were estimated for levetiracetam (mean 3.56, range 1.27-5.85, n = 2) and lowest for valproate (mean 0.11, range 0.02-1.02, n = 57). For umbilical cord plasma, oxcarbazepine had the highest ratio (mean 1.59, range 0.11-4.33, n = 12) with clonazepam having the lowest (mean 0.55, range 0.52-0.59, n = 2). For breast milk, the highest ratios were observed for oxcarbazepine (mean 3.75, range 0.5-7.0, n = 2), whereas the lowest were observed for valproate (mean 0.04, range 0.01-0.22, n = 121). DISCUSSION: We observed substantial variability between anticonvulsants and lithium regarding their ability to enter fetal/newborn circulation. Assessing concentrations of anticonvulsants and lithium in maternal samples can provide a surrogate of fetal/infant exposure, although patterns of concentration-dependent effects for maternal/neonatal safety are lacking.

Clozapine once- versus multiple-daily dosing: a two-center cross-sectional study, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Evidence regarding effectiveness and safety of clozapine once- vs. multiple-daily dosing is limited. We compared demographic and clinical parameters between patients with once- vs. multiple-daily dosing in the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Germany (AGATE dataset), and the Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, using non-parametric tests. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were available in the AGATE dataset. We performed a systematic review in PubMed/Embase until February 2022, meta-analyzing studies comparing clozapine once- vs. multiple-daily-dosing. We estimated a pooled odds ratio for adverse drug-induced reactions (ADRs) and meta-analyzed differences regarding clinical symptom severity, age, percentage males, smokers, clozapine dose, and co-medications between patients receiving once- vs. multiple-daily dosing. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale. Of 1494 and 174 patients included in AGATE and Lausanne datasets, clozapine was prescribed multiple-daily in 74.8% and 67.8%, respectively. In the AGATE cohort, no differences were reported for the clinical symptoms severity or ADR rate (p > 0.05). Meta-analyzing eight cohorts with a total of 2810 clozapine-treated individuals, we found more severe clinical symptoms (p = 0.036), increased ADR risk (p = 0.01), higher clozapine doses (p < 0.001), more frequent co-medication with other antipsychotics (p < 0.001), benzodiazepines (p < 0.001), anticholinergics (p = 0.039), and laxatives (p < 0.001) in patients on multiple- vs. once-daily dosing. Of six studies, five were rated as good, and one as poor quality. Patients responding less well to clozapine may be prescribed higher doses multiple-daily, also treated with polypharmacy, potentially underlying worse safety outcomes. Patient preferences and adherence should be considered during regimen selection.

Therapeutic Reference Range for Aripiprazole in Schizophrenia Revised: a Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

RATIONALE: While one of the basic axioms of pharmacology postulates that there is a relationship between the concentration and effects of a drug, the value of measuring blood levels is questioned by many clinicians. This is due to the often-missing validation of therapeutic reference ranges. OBJECTIVES: Here, we present a prototypical meta-analysis of the relationships between blood levels of aripiprazole, its target engagement in the human brain, and clinical effects and side effects in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders. METHODS: The relevant literature was systematically searched and reviewed for aripiprazole oral and injectable formulations. Population-based concentration ranges were computed (N = 3,373) and pharmacokinetic influences investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-three study cohorts met the eligibility criteria. Twenty-nine studies report blood level after oral, 15 after injectable formulations, and nine were positron emission tomography studies. Conflicting evidence for a relationship between concentration, efficacy, and side effects exists (assigned level of evidence low, C; and absent, D). Population-based reference ranges are well in-line with findings from neuroimaging data and individual efficacy studies. We suggest a therapeutic reference range of 120-270 ng/ml and 180-380 ng/ml, respectively, for aripiprazole and its active moiety for the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. CONCLUSIONS: High interindividual variability and the influence of CYP2D6 genotypes gives a special indication for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of oral and long-acting aripiprazole. A starting dose of 10 mg will in most patients result in effective concentrations in blood and brain. 5 mg will be sufficient for known poor metabolizers.

Drug-drug interactions between psychotropic medications and oral contraceptives.

INTRODUCTION: This is a comprehensive overview of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving oral contraceptives (OCs) and psychotropic medications. AREAS COVERED: Medline and Embase from inception to April 2021 were searched for DDIs between OCs and psychotropic medications. They included case reports/series and cross-sectional, cross-over, placebo-controlled studies of patient cohorts and healthy females. We classified DDIs as: combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) acting as victim drugs (i.e. affected by psychotropic co-medications), CHCs as perpetrators, (i.e. affecting the activity of psychotropic co-medications), progestin-derivatives as victim drugs and progestin-derivatives affecting psychotropic co-medications. Alteration ratios reflecting changes in pharmacokinetic parameters before and after the DDI were estimated to approximate the extent of the DDI. EXPERT OPINION: Women taking antiepileptic agents with strong to moderate enzyme-inducing properties (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin) or those with moderate to mild enzyme-inducing properties (cenobamate, clobazam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, oxcarbazepine, rufinamide, topiramate) should avoid OCs. Daily doses of cytochrome P450 1A2 substrates including clozapine may need to be reduced by 50% in women taking concomitant CHCs. Compared to CHCs, the propensity of progestin-only pills for DDIs has been investigated less. We provide a summary table for clinicians containing recommendations based on literature and package inserts; whenever evidence was available, we provided dose-correction factors.

The negative impact of vitamin D on antipsychotic drug exposure may counteract its potential benefits in schizophrenia.

AIMS: Patients with schizophrenia frequently show insufficient vitamin D levels, which are associated with somatic comorbidity and may contribute to psychopathology. For many reasons, vitamin D supplementation may be indicated for this patient cohort. However, there is growing evidence for a vitamin D-mediated increase of drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Hence, this study aimed to assess vitamin D's impact on both antipsychotic drug concentrations and psychopathology in a non-interventional manner. METHODS: Totals of 107 serum concentrations of different antipsychotic drugs (amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone), 80 serum concentrations of vitamin D and psychopathological assessments were obtained from 80 patients with schizophrenia. The impact of Vitamin D on antipsychotic drug concentrations and symptomatology was assessed using a generalized linear model, path and correlation analyses. RESULTS: We observed a negative relationship between vitamin D and dose-adjusted antipsychotic drug concentrations, which was particularly pronounced for drugs which are predominantly metabolized via CYP3A4 (i.e., aripiprazole and quetiapine). A path analysis suggested a relieving effect of vitamin D on symptomatology which was, however, counteracted by its negative impact on antipsychotic drug levels. Finally, patients with vitamin D levels above the median exhibited a significantly higher proportion of therapeutically insufficient dose-normalized drug concentrations of aripiprazole and quetiapine. CONCLUSION: Despite vitamin D's potential benefits on physical and mental health, clinicians should be aware of its negative impact on blood concentrations of antipsychotics metabolized by CYP3A4 in patients with schizophrenia. Therefore, when considering its supplementation, therapeutic drug monitoring should be applied to guide dose adjustment.

Effects of body weight, smoking status, and sex on plasma concentrations of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate.

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge about the impact of body composition features on pharmacokinetics of newer long-acting injectable antipsychotics is limited. METHODS: We analyzed steady-state plasma concentrations of paliperidone in different body mass index (BMI), age, sex, and smoking status patient subgroups treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M). Paliperidone plasma concentrations and dose-adjusted-plasma concentrations (C/D) from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database of PP1M-treated patients were compared among normal BMI, overweight, and obese patients as well as between females vs. males, elderly vs. non-elderly, and smokers vs. non-smokers using non-parametric tests. RESULTS: In a total of 183 PP1M-treated patients, we found highly variable paliperidone plasma concentrations between individuals but no significant effect of PP1M dose or dosing intervals (p> 0.05). C/D ratios were similar in 54 obese, 82 overweight, and 47 normal BMI patients (p> 0.05). Females had 13.7% higher C/D ratios compared to males, yet this difference was not significant (p> 0.05). No differences were found between elderly vs. non-elderly patients or for smokers vs. non-smokers (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that age, sex, smoking, or body weight may not substantially affect pharmacokinetic indices of PP1M. The high interindividual variation of plasma concentrations implies that TDM may be helpful to enhance PP1M efficacy and tolerability.

Effects of the antidepressant mirtazapine on the swimming behaviour and gene expression rate of Danio rerio embryos - Is the sedating effect seen in humans also evident for fish?

In the last decade, mirtazapine has become an important antidepressant in clinical use and has also been found at many different environmental sampling sites. Several homologies between the zebrafish Danio rerio and humans, combined with a number of advantages for behavioural and gene expression research using zebrafish embryos, make their use for the analysis of mirtazapine appropriate. The sedative effect of mirtazapine in humans was also found for a specific concentration range in zebrafish embryos (1333.4 µg/L - 2666.9 µg/L). Specifically, 116 hpf old zebrafish embryos showed a reduced swimming distance when exposed to 1334.4 µg/L mirtazapine. Furthermore, changes at the gene regulatory level could be measured (1333.4 µg/L), in particular in the superordinate regulatory systems. For selected transporters of all regulatory systems, an up regulation of the genes by a factor of more than five times could be measured at the highest mirtazapine exposure concentration that was tested. Finally, studies on the protein levels demonstrated an increase in acetylcholinesterase activity for several exposure concentrations (83.3 µg/L and 666.7 µg/L). The physiological changes in zebrafish embryos caused by mirtazapine demonstrate the relevance of these types of studies in aquatic non-target organisms. Such neuroactive substances could pose a potential risk for aquatic organisms below the previously considered concentration threshold for morphological effects.