Impact of cavity shave margins in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing conserving breast surgery.

Aim: The main challenge during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is to obtain clear margins, especially in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) due to the absence of well-defined nodules. Many surgical approaches have been used in an attempt to reduce the positive margin rate. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the cavity shave margin technique with standard surgery and the intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study analyzing margin status, need for re-excision, and surgical time in a cohort of 227 patients who underwent surgery from September 2016 to September 2022. Results: In patients subjected to cavity shaving, we reported a significant reduction in positive margins of 17.1% versus 28.7% (p-value = 0.042). Also, a difference in terms of surgical re-excision was reported as p-value = 0.039 (12.4% versus 23.8%, respectively, for the cavity shave and control group). In the multivariate analysis, intraoperative evaluation of the margins was a risk factor for margins re-excision (Wald = 4.315, p = 0.038, OR: 2.331 [95% CI: 1.049-5.180]). Surgical time was lower in patients subjected to cavity shaves (p = 0.024), and the relative mean time was 68.4 min ± 37.1 min in the cavity shave group versus 93.9 min ± 40.6 min in the control group. Conclusion: The cavity shave margin technique in conserving breast surgery results in a reduction in positive margin rate, surgical re-excision, and operative time.

Breast Cancer in Patients with Previous Endometriosis Showed Low Aggressive Subtype.

Background and Objectives: The association between endometriosis and breast cancer still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the different subtypes of breast cancer, immunohistochemical markers, hormone receptors, and ki67 proliferation indexes in patients with and without endometriosis and/or adenomyosis. Materials and Methods: All patients with endometriosis and breast cancer were enrolled. Women with endometriosis and breast cancer (Group BC+EN+) were compared to patients with breast cancer without endometriosis (group BC+EN-) and those with endometriosis without breast cancer (group BC-EN+). General population characteristics and histological and immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancer were compared between groups. Results: Our study included 41 cases affected by both endometriosis and/or adenomyosis and breast cancer (Group BC+EN+) that were matched (1:2) with 82 patients affected only by breast cancer (group BC+EN-) and 82 patients affected only by endometriosis and/or adenomyosis (group BC-EN+). Group BC+EN+ presented a higher percentage of ER receptor expression (83% vs. 70%, p = 0.02), as well as lower values of Ki 67% (15% vs. 24%, p < 0.0001) and HER2+ (9.8% vs. 28%, p = 0.022). These findings were more evident when comparing patients with premenopausal status, while in postmenopausal patients, this difference was no longer significant. Regarding endometriosis, no statistical differences were observed in type or specific localization of the disease among the groups with and without breast cancer. Conclusions: Patients with endometriosis presented lower aggressive breast cancer rates with higher values of ER% and lower values of Ki 67 and HER2neu+. The type and severity of endometriotic diseases seemed not to influence breast cancer occurrence.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Using Intradermal Microbubble Sulfur Hexafluoride in Non-invasive Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer: Are we Missing a Chance?

BACKGROUND/AIM: In the context of surgical de-escalation in early breast cancer (EBC), this study aimed to evaluate the contrast enhancement ultrasound (CEUS) sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure as a non-invasive axillary staging procedure in EBC in comparison with standard SLN biopsy (SLNB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A subanalysis of the AX-CES study, a prospective single-arm, monocentric phase 3 study was performed (EudraCT: 2020-000393-20). The study included patients with EBC undergoing upfront surgery and SLN resection, with no prior history of locoregional treatment, and weighing between 40-85 kg. All patients underwent the CEUS SLN procedure as a non-invasive axillary staging procedure, with CEUS SLN accumulation marked using blue dye. After the CEUS SLN procedure, all patients underwent the standard mapping procedure. Data on success rate, systemic reactions, mean procedure time, mean surgical procedure, mean procedure without axillary staging, CEUS SLN appearance (normal/pathological), SLN number, and concordance with standard mapping procedure were collected. RESULTS: After the CEUS SLN procedure, 29 LNs among 16 patients were identified and marked. In all cases, CEUS SLN revealed at least one LN enhancement. Six (37.50%) LNs were defined as pathological after the CEUS SLN procedure. Definitive staining of CEUS SLN pathology revealed metastatic involvement in four (66.67%) of the cases. Two SLNs were identified during the CEUS SLN procedure; however, owing to the low disease burden, no change in the surgical plan was reported. CONCLUSION: The CEUS SLN procedure shows promise as a technique for non-invasive assessment of the axilla, potentially enabling safe axillary de-escalation in EBC by estimating the axillary disease burden.

Surgical De-Escalation for Re-Excision in Patients with a Margin Less Than 2 mm and a Diagnosis of DCIS.

The current surgical guidelines recommend an optimal margin width of 2 mm for the management of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, there are still many controversies regarding re-excision when the optimal margin criteria are not met in the first resection. The purpose of this study is to understand the importance of surgical margin width, re-excision, and treatments to avoid additional surgery on locoregional recurrence (LRR). The study is retrospective and analyzed surgical margins, adjuvant treatments, re-excision, and LRR in patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A total of 197 patients were enrolled. Re-operation for a close margin rate was 13.5%, and the 3-year recurrence was 7.6%. No difference in the LRR was reported among the patients subjected to BCS regardless of the margin width (p = 0.295). The recurrence rate according to margin status was not significant (p = 0.484). Approximately 36.9% (n: 79) patients had resection margins < 2 mm. A sub-analysis of patients with margins < 2 mm showed no difference in the recurrence between the patients treated with a second surgery and those treated with radiation (p = 0.091). The recurrence rate according to margin status in patients with margins < 2 mm was not significant (p = 0.161). The margin was not a predictive factor of LRR p = 0.999. Surgical re-excision should be avoided in patients with a focally positive margin and no evidence of the disease at post-surgical imaging.

Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Conservative Surgery a Strategy to Reduce Positive Margins and Surgical Time.

Background: Resection of additional tissue circumferentially around the cavity left by lumpectomy (cavity shave) was suggested to reduce rates of positive margins and re-excision. Methods: A single center retrospective study which analyzed margins status, re-excision, and surgical time in patients who underwent breast conserving surgery and cavity shave or intraoperative evaluation of resection margins. Results: Between 2021 and 2023, 594 patients were enrolled in the study. In patients subjected to cavity shave, a significant reduction in positive, focally positive, or closer margins was reported 8.9% vs. 18.5% (p = 0.003). No difference was reported in terms of surgical re-excision (p < 0.846) (5% vs. 5.5%). Surgical time was lower in patients subjected to cavity shave (<0.001). The multivariate analysis intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph node OR 1.816 and cavity shave OR 2.909 were predictive factors for a shorter surgical time. Excluding patients subjected to intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph node and patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, patients that underwent the cavity shave presented a reduced surgical time (67.9 + 3.8 min vs. 81.6 + 2.8 min) (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Cavity shaving after lumpectomy reduced the rate of positive margins and it was associated with a significant reduction in surgical time compared to intraoperative evaluation of resection margins.

Socioeconomic Impact of OncotypeDX on Breast Cancer Treatment: Preliminary Results.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent oncological diagnosis worldwide. Molecular subtyping has provided valuable insights for treatment decisions, but challenges remain in adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative luminal BC (LBC). Multigene markers like Oncotype DX have emerged to provide more precise prognostic information. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of gene expression panels on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), quality of life (QoL), and healthcare-related greenhouse emissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A monocentric retrospective analysis was conducted using a prospective database of patients undergoing Oncotype DX. QoL assessments were performed using the Short Breast Health Perception Questionnaire (BHPQ) and Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ-32). Reductions in hospital visits and travel distance were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent Oncotype DX testing. Of these, 17.85% received adjuvant chemotherapy based on the recurrence score (RS). The implementation of Oncotype DX resulted in a significant reduction in hospital visits, travel distance, and healthcare-related greenhouse gas emissions. QoL assessments using BHPQ and LSQ-32 showed lower levels of FCR and improved QoL in various domains for patients who received hormone therapy (HT) alone. CONCLUSION: The implementation of Oncotype DX in clinical practice has the potential to reduce overtreatment, decrease healthcare-related greenhouse gas emissions, and improve QoL. Lower levels of FCR and improved QoL were observed in patients who received HT-only based on the RS score.

Awake Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Awake surgery has become a valid alternative to general anesthesia in many surgery fields. This technique played a very important role during the COVID-19 period. The growing use of this technique has many advantages. We performed a systematic review to study the potentialities of awake breast surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library database and retrieved a total of 109 records. Forty-nine of them were excluded as unsuitable. Finally, we selected a total of 12 records concerning different types of studies for topic appropriateness. Three reviewers reviewed independently each record. RESULTS: Five articles analyzing the sustainability of awake surgery during the COVID-19 period were selected. In addition, one article analyzing the impact on the immune system and six articles and eight case reports analyzing anesthetic techniques were also selected. The studies analyzing awake breast surgery during the COVID-19 period showed advantages in terms of sustainability and length of hospitalization. The study analyzing the immune response after awake breast surgery showed lesser lymphocyte response than the general anesthesia group. The studies analyzing anesthetic techniques in awake breast surgery showed that the nerve blocks allow good level of safety and postoperative pain control. CONCLUSION: The awake breast surgery and fast track implementation shortened hospital stays and reduced costs, without influencing the surgical results. Furthermore, awake breast surgery reduced surgical stress compared to general anesthesia. Among the various anesthetic techniques, nerve blocks are the most advantageous in terms of safety and efficacy compared to epidural anesthesia.

From Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to Environment Related Outcome Measure (EROM): Towards "Green Breast Surgery".

Climate change is a global issue that has had significant impacts on public health and healthcare policy worldwide. The direct impact of climate change on healthcare has been associated with extreme weather events, resulting in a higher demand for disaster management resources and reduced healthcare access. Moreover, the increase of zoonotic spillover effects has increased the risk of transmission of different diseases, including COVID-19. The healthcare industry alone is responsible for 4.4% of greenhouse gas global emissions. The surgical theatre is a resource-intense healthcare activity and a major carbon emitter, thus surgical processes require rethinking. This article proposes the introduction of environmental-related outcome measures in clinical trials, which will associate highest clinical standards to a reduced impact of care on climate change. Breast cancer care may represent a model disease for the implementation of evidence-based protocols, such as Green Breast Surgery, aiming to optimize the carbon footprint of care without affecting oncological and non-oncological outcomes. Physicians and healthcare workers worldwide should be aware of the importance of addressing environmental issues in healthcare policy, implementing programs to reduce their carbon footprint, and contributing to a more sustainable future.

Anxiety and Fear of Breast Cancer Patients During and After the COVID-19 Era.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic had a huge impact on medical resource allocation. While it is clear that the surgery refusal rate of patients with breast cancer (BC) was higher during the pandemic, long-term effect of COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admission in the post-pandemic period has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to estimate how patients' behavior changed following the pandemic and whether the cross-infection risk is still influencing patients' decision-making process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between the 16th of January and 18th of March 2020, between 19th of March 2020 and the 20th of March 2020, and between 19th of March 2023 and the 20th of March 2023, 266 patients were enrolled and divided into PRE-COVID-19, COVID-19, and POST-COVID-19 groups, respectively. A total of 137 patients with a suspected breast lesion (SBL) were divided into 3 groups: PRE-COVID-19-SBL, COVID-19-SBL, and POST-COVID-19-SBL groups. In addition, 129 BC patients were divided into PRE-COVID-19-BC, COVID-19-BC and POST-COVID-19-BC groups. Patient characteristics including age, marital status, SBL/BC diameter, personal and family history of BC, clinical stage and molecular subtype were recorded. Procedure refusal (PR) and Surgical refusal (SR) were also recorded with their reason. RESULTS: BC and SBL analysis showed no difference in pre-treatment characteristics (p>0.05). While higher rate of PR and SR rates were reported in COVID-19-SBL and COVID-19-BC groups when compared with PRE-COVID-19 (p=0.003, p=0.013, respectively) and POST-COVID-19 (p=0.005, p=0.004, respectively) groups, no statistical difference was found between PRE-COVID-19 and POST-COVID-19 subanalysis. CONCLUSION: Thanks to preventive measures, COVID-19 does not currently seem to affect the decision-making process of patients with BC.

Vacuum-assisted Evacuation (VAEv) of Symptomatic and/or Voluminous Breast Haematomas Following Surgeries and Percutaneous Procedures.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Among postoperative complications in breast surgery, postoperative hematoma is the most common occurrence. While mostly self-limited, in some cases surgical revision is mandatory. Among percutaneous procedures, preliminary studies demonstrated the efficacy of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) in evacuating postprocedural breast hematomas. However, no data are available regarding VAB evacuating postoperative breast hematomas. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the VAB system in evacuating postoperative and postprocedural hematoma, symptom resolution, and avoidance of surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to January 2020, patients with ≥25 mm symptomatic breast hematomas developed after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and percutaneous procedures were retrospectively enrolled from a perspective-maintained database. Hematoma maximum diameter, estimated hematoma volume, total procedure time, and visual analog scale (VAS) score before ultrasound (US) vacuum-assisted evacuation (VAEv) were recorded. At one-week VAS score, residual hematoma volume, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Among 932 BCSs and 618 VAB procedures, a total of 15 late postoperative hematomas were recorded (9 after BCS and 6 after VAB). Preoperative median diameter was 43.00 (35.50-52.50) mm and median volume 12.60 (7.35-18.30) mm3 Regarding VAEv, median time recorded was 25.92 (21.89-36.81) min. At one week, the median hematoma reduction was 83.00% (78.00%-87.5%) with a statistically significant VAS reduction (5.00 vs. 2.00; p>0.001). No surgical treatment was needed and only one case of seroma occurred. CONCLUSION: VAEv represents a promising safe, time and resource-sparing treatment modality for the evacuation of breast hematomas, potentially decreasing the rate of reoperation after surgery.

Surgical Treatments for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) in Elderly Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite an aging population, there is no consensus regarding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treatment for elderly women. Breast surgery can be well tolerated even in elderly patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical management of DCIS in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with DCIS from 2016 to 2022 at our Breast Unit and divided our population according to age. RESULTS: Out of 231 patients with DCIS, 45 (19.5%) were elderly. The Charlson comorbidity index and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was significantly higher in the elderly (p<0.001 for both). Among the elderly, 10 (22.2%) patients received upstaging diagnoses, versus 18 (9.7%) in the control (p=0.048). Twelve (26.7%) of the elderly patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, versus 93 (50%) in the control group (p=0.005). No difference was reported between groups in terms of breast conserving surgeries performed. A higher incidence of surgeries performed using local anesthesia was reported in the elderly group (p=0.041). Thirty-day surgical complications, according to Clavien-Dindo, did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION: Despite higher comorbidity and ASA score, breast surgery is safe and feasible in elderly patients. Due to the higher risk of upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma, surgery should be performed but sentinel lymph node biopsy should be omitted, owing to the low risk of lymph node metastasis and lower use of adjuvant treatments.

Implementation of Blockchain Technology Could Increase Equity and Transparency in Organ Transplantation: A Narrative Review of an Emergent Tool.

In the last few years, innovative technology and health care digitalization played a major role in all medical fields and a great effort worldwide to manage this large amount of data, in terms of security and digital privacy has been made by different national health systems. Blockchain technology, a peer-to-peer distributed database without centralized authority, initially applied to Bitcoin protocol, soon gained popularity, thanks to its distributed immutable nature in several non-medical fields. Therefore, the aim of the present review (PROSPERO N° CRD42022316661) is to establish a putative future role of blockchain and distribution ledger technology (DLT) in the organ transplantation field and its role to overcome inequalities. Preoperative assessment of the deceased donor, supranational crossover programs with the international waitlist databases, and reduction of black-market donations and counterfeit drugs are some of the possible applications of DLT, thanks to its distributed, efficient, secure, trackable, and immutable nature to reduce inequalities and discrimination.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Using Intradermal Microbubble Sulfur Hexafluoride for Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes During Breast Cancer Surgery: A Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedures have gained popularity in early breast cancer thanks to the reduction of surgical side-effects. The standard SLN mapping procedure uses 99mTc-nanocolloid human serum albumin with/without blue dye; limitations include logistical challenges and adverse reactions. Recently, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using sulfur hexafluoride has emerged as a promising technique for SLN mapping. Our study aimed to compare the CEUS technique with the standard isotope method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AX-CES, a prospective, monocentric, single-arm phase-3 study was designed (EudraCT: 2020-000393-20). Inclusion criteria were histologically diagnosed early breast cancer eligible for upfront surgery and SLN resection, bodyweight 40-85 kg, and no prior history of ipsilateral surgery or radiotherapy. All patients underwent CEUS prior to surgery and blue dye injection was performed in areas with contrast accumulation. After the experimental procedure, all patients underwent the standard mapping procedure and SLN frozen section assessment was performed. Data on the success rate, systemic reactions, mean procedure time, CEUS appearance, SLN number, and concordance with standard mapping procedure were collected. RESULTS: Among 16 cases, a median of two SLNs were identified during CEUS. In all cases, at least one SLN was identified by CEUS (100%). In six cases, SLNs were classified during CEUS as abnormal, which was confirmed by definitive staining in four cases. After the standard mapping technique, in 15 out of the 16 cases (87.50%), at least one SLN from the standard mapping procedure was marked with blue dye in the CEUS procedure. In our series, sensitivity and specificity of SLN detection by CEUS were 75% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CEUS is a safe and manageable intraoperative procedure. When compared with standard techniques, US appearance during CEUS may provide additional information when associated with histological assessment.

Awake Breast Conservative Surgery: A Strategy to Shorten Surgical Waiting Lists During and Post COVID-19 Emergency.

BACKGROUND/AIM: SARS-CoV-2 with a dramatical worldwide spread, impacted greatly daily life and healthcare. In order to avoid delay in cancer treatment, many strategies and measures were implemented. The Awake breast surgery was a strategy implemented in our Unit during the pandemic, aimed to reduce operatory room occupancy and increase the number of procedures performed during the daily surgical session. The aim of the study was to evaluate how the use of this strategy has changed before and after the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, and its relative benefits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study analysing all patients subjected to breast conservative surgery for oncological disease from July 2018 to December 2021. RESULTS: Out of 498 patients enrolled in the study, 253 (50.8%) cases were treated before the pandemic and were designated as "pre-COVID-19" group. The remaining 245 (49.1%) cases were considered the "COVID-19" group. Cases of awake surgery in COVID-19 group were 141 (54.7%) vs. 84 (33.2%), p<0.001. Length of hospitalization and surgical time were comparable between the groups: relative p=0.188 and 0.264, respectively. Differently, operation room occupation was significantly shorter in the COVID-19 group, p<0.001; and number of outpatient surgical procedures was higher, p=0.0304. Multivariate analysis identified the period of surgery (OR=1.47) as a statistically significant factor, p=0.011, predictive of prolonged operatory room occupancy. CONCLUSION: Awake surgery was one of the strategies which made more operating rooms available and allowed avoiding further delays.

The Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Is a Safe Journey for Kidney Transplant Recipients during the "Extended Criteria Donor" Era.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are still underused in kidney transplantation (KT) due to recipients' "frailty" and risk of postoperative complications. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ERAS in KT during the "extended-criteria donor" era, and to identify the predictive factors of prolonged hospitalization. In 2010−2019, all patients receiving KT were included in ERAS program targeting a discharge home within 5 days of surgery. Recipient, transplant, and outcomes data were analyzed. Of 454 KT [male: 280, 63.9%; age: 57 (19−77) years], 212 (46.7%) recipients were discharged within the ERAS target (≤5 days), while 242 (53.3%) were discharged later. Patients within the ERAS target (≤5 days) had comparable recipient and transplant characteristics to those with longer hospital stays, and they had similar post-operative complications, readmission rates, and 5 year graft/patient survival. In the multivariate analysis, DGF (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.08−4.34, p < 0.030) and in-hospital dialysis (HR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.73−7.85, p < 0.001) were the only predictive factors for late discharge. The ERAS approach is feasible and safe in all KT candidates, and its failure is primarily related to the postoperative graft function, rather than the recipient's clinical status. ERAS pathways, integrated with strict collaboration with local nephrologists, allow early discharge after KT, with clinical benefits.

Neoadjuvant Treatment as a Risk Factor for Variation of Upper Limb Lymph Node Drainage During Axillary Reverse Mapping in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Axillary Reverse Mapping technique in breast cancer, was adopted in order to minimize the risk of upper limb lymphedema. Currently, there is only limited evidence available regarding its oncological safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of upper limb nodes in surgical specimens following axillary lymphadenectomy, and its relative predictive relevance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing axillary lymphadenectomy were enrolled in the current prospective observational study. Indocyanine green was injected into the ipsilateral arm, followed by the standard axillary surgical procedure. Subsequently, the surgical specimens were examined in order to identify any resected upper limb nodes. RESULTS: Out of 22 patients, 5 (22.7%) exhibited fluorescent nodes in the surgical specimen. At univariate analysis, these patients presented statistically significant differences in terms of neoadjuvant treatment, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki67 index and position of fluorescent lymph nodes (p=0.021, p=0.033, p=0.002, p=0.049 and p=0.001, respectively). At multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and Ki67 index were associated with the risk of resecting fluorescent nodes during a standard lymphadenectomy (p=0.005 and p=0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: Axillary Reverse Mapping should be individually tailored for patients with advanced axillary breast cancer and those undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. Suspected metastases or upper limb nodes identified in unusual positions must always be resected.

Acute Appendicitis During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Increasing Incidence of Complicate Appendicitis, Severity and Length of Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND/AIM: COVID-19 is rapidly spreading, and due to the high morbidity and mortality caused by the pandemic many Governments have introduced social restrictions. Those measures combined with infection-related patient anxiety, led to hiding other diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on numbers and severity of acute appendicitis cases referred during the pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2019 and March 2021, all patients who underwent appendectomy in Tor Vergata Hospital, Rome were included. Patients were divided in two groups (COVID-19/pre-COVID-19). Clinical features, intraoperative findings, hospital stay, and histologic examination data were included in the retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Out of 334 admitted patients, 36 (10.7%) had a diagnosis of acute appendicitis (COVID-19 group) vs. 59(11.2%) in the pre-COVID-19 group. The COVID-19 group presented significantly longer hospitalization, incidence of appendicular abscess, perforation, and severity of inflammation at univariate analysis p=0.002, p=0.021, p=0.001, p=0.006, p=0.001, respectively. At multivariate analysis, appendicular abscess (p=0.015) and higher serum levels of C reactive protein (p<0.008) were associated with prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the correlation between COVID-19 pandemic and the severity of acute appendicitis presentations.

Proposal and validation of a liver graft discard score for liver transplantation from deceased donors: a multicenter Italian study.

Several studies have explored the risk of graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT) in recent years. Conversely, risk factors for graft discard before or at procurement have poorly been investigated. The study aimed at identifying a score to predict the risk of liver-related graft discard before transplantation. Secondary aims were to test the score for prediction of biopsy-related negative features and post-LT early graft loss. A total of 4207 donors evaluated during the period January 2004-Decemeber 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The group was split into a training set (n = 3,156; 75.0%) and a validation set (n = 1,051; 25.0%). The Donor Rejected Organ Pre-transplantation (DROP) Score was proposed: - 2.68 + (2.14 if Regional Share) + (0.03*age) + (0.04*weight)-(0.03*height) + (0.29 if diabetes) + (1.65 if anti-HCV-positive) + (0.27 if HBV core) - (0.69 if hypotension) + (0.09*creatinine) + (0.38*log10AST) + (0.34*log10ALT) + (0.06*total bilirubin). At validation, the DROP Score showed the best AUCs for the prediction of liver-related graft discard (0.82; p < 0.001) and macrovesicular steatosis ≥ 30% (0.71; p < 0.001). Patients exceeding the DROP 90th centile had the worse post-LT results (3-month graft loss: 82.8%; log-rank P = 0.024).The DROP score represents a valuable tool to predict the risk of liver function-related graft discard, steatosis, and early post-LT graft survival rates. Studies focused on the validation of this score in other geographical settings are required.

Graft weight integration in the early allograft dysfunction formula improves the prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation.

The role of the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) in adult liver transplantation (LT) has been poorly investigated so far. The aim is to evaluate the contribution of the GRWR to the well-recognized early allograft dysfunction (EAD) model (i.e., Olthoff model) for the prediction of 90-day graft loss after LT in adults. Three hundred thirty-one consecutive adult patients undergoing LT between 2009 and 2018 at Tor Vergata and Sapienza University in Rome, Italy, served as the Training-Set. The Validation-Set included 123 LTs performed at the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The mEAD model for 90-day graft loss included the following variables: GRWR [Formula: see text] 1.57 = 2.5, GRWR [Formula: see text] 2.13 = 2.5, total bilirubin ≥ 10.0 mg/dL = 2.0, INR ≥ 1.60 = 2.3, and aminotransferase > 2000 IU/L = 2.2. The mEAD model showed an AUC = 0.74 (95%CI = 0.66-0.82; p < 0.001) and AUC = 0.68 (95%CI = 0.58-0.88; p = 0.01) in the Training-Set and Validation-Set, respectively, outperforming conventional EAD in both cohorts (Training-Set: AUC = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.57-0.72; p = 0.001; Validation-Set: AUC = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.35-0.69, p = 0.87). Incorporation of graft weight in a composite multivariate model allowed for better prediction of patients who presented an aminotransferase peak > 2000 IU/L after LT (OR = 2.39, 95%CI = 1.47-3.93, p = 0.0005). The GRWR is important in determining early graft loss after adult LT, and the mEAD model is a useful predictive tool in this perspective, which may assist in improving the graft allocation process.