ABSTRACT
Background: On March 9, 2020, the Italian Prime Minister announced the lockdown, which was officially closed on May 4. This extraordinary measure was necessary to contain the COVID-19 pandemic spread in Italy. During this phase, a significant decrease in patients' access to Emergency Department (ED) was observed. Delayed access to treatment determined a delay in the diagnosis of acute surgical conditions, as already documented in other clinical areas, with consequences on surgical outcome and survival. Aim of this study is to provide a detailed description of abdominal urgent-emergent conditions surgically treated and surgical outcomes during the lockdown in a tertiary referral Italian hospital, compared with historical data. Methods: A retrospective review of urgent-emergent patients surgically treated in our department was conducted in order to compare patients' characteristics and surgical outcomes during the period March 9th-May 4th, 2020 with the same period of the previous year. Results: 152 patients were included in our study, 79 patients in 2020 group and 77 patients in 2019. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding ASA score, age, gender, and disease prevalence. Significant differences were found in symptom duration before ER access and abdominal pain as the main symptom in non-traumatic conditions. We also performed a sub-analysis on peritonitis which showed significant differences in: hospital length of stay, presence of colostomy vs. ileostomy, and fatal events in 2020. No differences were found in the use of laparoscopy. Conclusions: While the overall number of ER accesses has decreased in 2020 group, the number of patients surgically treated in emergency-urgency conditions has not decreased. However, those patients waited significantly more before the hospital access. This diagnostic delay was associated with a more severe clinical condition and a consequent significantly worse prognosis.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Cardiac complications are a leading cause of mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) and pre-operative risk stratification is challenging. We evaluated whether coronary artery calcium (CAC) score calculated on a standard (non-thin layer, non-ECG gated) chest computed tomography (CT) predicted cardiac outcome after LT. METHODS: We included a consecutive series of LT recipients who underwent pre-operative cardiac evaluation including stress-testing or cardiac catheterization in high-risk patients. Patients with a history of coronary artery disease or coronary revascularization were excluded. The CAC score was calculated from the chest CT routinely performed before LT. CAC values were not available at the time of pre-transplant cardiac evaluation and did not affect LT eligibility. The primary end-point included peri-operative arrhythmic cardiac arrest and sustained ventricular arrhythmias; heart failure, myocardial infarction and cardiac death within 1-year after LT. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 301 patients (median age 56 years, 76% males). At chest CT, 49% had CAC = 0; 27% had CAC = 1-99, 15% had CAC = 100-399 and 9% CAC > 400. The primary end-point incidence increased from 7% in patients with CAC = 0 to 27% in patients with CAC > 400 (p = 0.007). At multivariable analysis including traditional risk factors, CAC remained an independent predictor of cardiac events (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CAC score calculated on a standard chest CT stratified the risk of cardiac events in patients who underwent LT after negative pre-transplant cardiac evaluation. These findings suggest that evaluation of CAC from a standard chest CT performed for other reasons can be used as an early cardiac risk stratification tool before LT.
