EvolvRehab-MoveWell telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: study protocol for a feasibility with embedded initial proof-of-concept study.

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is a leading cause of disability throughout the world. Unilateral upper limb impairment is common in people who have had a stroke. As a result of impaired upper limb function, people who have had a stroke often employ abnormal 'compensatory' movements. In the short term, these compensatory movements allow the individual to complete tasks, though long-term movement in this manner can lead to limitations. Telerehabilitation offers the provision of rehabilitation services to patients at a remote location using information and communication technologies. 'EvolvRehab' is one such telerehabilitation system, which uses activities to assess and correct compensatory upper body movements, although the feasibility of its use is yet to be determined in National Health Service services. Using EvolvRehab, we aim to assess the feasibility of 6 weeks telerehabilitation in people after a stroke. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multisite feasibility study with embedded design phase. Normally distributed data will be analysed using paired samples t-tests; non-normally distributed data will be analysed using related samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Thematic content analysis of interview transcripts will be used to investigate the usability and perceived usefulness of the EvolvRehab kit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from Solihull Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 23/WM/0054). Dissemination will be carried out according to the dissemination plan co-written with stroke survivors, including academic publications and presentations; written reports; articles in publications of stakeholder organisations; presentations to and publications for potential customers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05875792.

Efficacy of a personalised activity plan for BREAKing UP sitting time in patients with intermittent claudication (the BREAK UP study).

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the concept of an 8-week personalised activity plan, using short periods of physical activity to break up sitting time in people with Intermittent Claudication (IC), to improve walking ability, and reduce time spent sitting. METHODS: The study was designed as a single centre, single arm, before and after study and is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04572737). The co-primary outcomes are time spent sitting and walking ability measured via the walking impairment questionnaire. Normally distributed data was analysed using paired samples T-tests; non-normally distributed data was analysed using related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in both co-primary outcomes: walking ability and time spent sitting, as well as the following secondary outcomes: total bouts and time spent in prolonged sitting, time spent standing and stepping, anxiety, depression, and activity levels reported on the vascular quality of life questionnaire. CONCLUSION: An 8-week personalised activity plan to break up sitting time shows promise as a treatment for people with IC, improving walking ability and reducing time spent sitting. This study supports the use of large randomised controlled trials to further develop this treatment in people with IC.

Device-measured physical activity behaviours, and physical function, in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease: A cross-sectional study.

AIM: To quantify differences in device-measured physical activity (PA) behaviours, and physical function (PF), in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with and without peripheral artery disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants from the Chronotype of Patients with T2DM and Effect on Glycaemic Control cross-sectional study wore accelerometers on their non-dominant wrist for up to 8-days to quantify: volume and intensity distribution of PA, time spent inactive, time in light PA, moderate-to-vigorous PA in at least 1-minute bouts (MVPA1min), and the average intensity achieved during the most active continuous 2, 5, 10, 30, and 60-minute periods of the 24-h day. PF was assessed using the short physical performance battery (SPPB), the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), sit-to-stand repetitions in 60 s (STS-60); hand-grip strength was also assessed. Differences between subjects with and without PAD were estimated using regressions adjusted for possible confounders. RESULTS: 736 participants with T2DM (without diabetic foot ulcers) were included in the analysis, 689 had no PAD. People with T2DM and PAD undertake less PA (MVPA1min: -9.2 min [95 % CI: -15.3 to -3.0; p = 0.004]) (light intensity PA: -18.7 min [-36.4 to -1.0; p = 0.039]), spend more time inactive (49.2 min [12.1 to 86.2; p = 0.009]), and have reduced PF (SPPB score: -1.6 [-2.5 to -0.8; p = 0.001]) (DASI score: -14.8 [-19.8 to -9.8; p = 0.001]) (STS-60 repetitions: -7.1 [-10.5 to -3.8; p = 0.001]) compared to people without; some differences in PA were attenuated by confounders. Reduced intensity of activity for the most active continuous 2-30 min in the 24-h day, and reduced PF, persisted after accounting for confounders. There were no significant differences in hand-grip strength. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this cross-sectional study suggest that, the presence of PAD in T2DM may have been associated with lower PA levels and PF.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on a Dedicated Vascular Emergency Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Vascular Emergency Clinics (VEC) improve patient outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). They provide a "1 stop" open access policy, whereby "suspicion of CLTI" by a healthcare professional or patient leads to a direct review. We assessed the resilience of the outpatient VEC model to the first year of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients assessed in our VEC for lower limb pathologies between March 2020 and April 2021 was performed. This was cross-referenced to national and loco-regional Governmental COVID-19 data. Individuals with CLTI were further analysed to determine Peripheral Arterial Disease-Quality Improvement Framework compliance. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety one patients attended for 1,084 assessments (Male n = 484, 61%; Age 72.5 ± standard deviation 12.2 years; White British n = 645, 81.7%). In total, 322 patients were diagnosed with CLTI (40.7%). A total of 188 individuals (58.6%) underwent a first revascularization strategy (Endovascular n = 128, 39.8%; Hybrid n = 41, 12.7%; Open surgery n = 19, 5.9%; Conservative n = 134, 41.6%). Major lower limb amputation rate was 10.9% (n = 35) and mortality rate was 25.8% (n = 83) at 12 months of follow-up. Median referral to assessment time was 3 days (interquartile range: 1-5). For the nonadmitted patient with CLTI, the median assessment to intervention was 8 days (interquartile range: 6-15) and median referral to intervention time of 11 days (11-18). CONCLUSIONS: The VEC model has demonstrated strong resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic with rapid treatment timelines maintained for patients with CLTI.

Effect of high-pain versus low-pain structured exercise on walking ability in people with intermittent claudication: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine the comparative benefits of structured high-pain exercise, structured low-pain exercise, and usual-care control, to identify which has the largest effect on walking ability in people with intermittent claudication (IC). METHODS: A network meta-analysis was undertaken to assess two outcomes: pain-free walking ability (PFWA) and maximal walking ability (MWA). Nine electronic databases were searched. Trials were included if they were: RCTS; involved adults with IC; had at least two of the following arms-structured low-pain exercise, structured high--pain exercise or usual-care control; and a maximal or pain-free treadmill walking outcome. RESULTS: Some 14 trials were included; results were pooled using the standardized mean difference (MD). Structured low-pain exercise had a significant large positive effect on MWA (MD 2.23, 95 percent c.i. 1.11 to 3.35) and PFWA (MD 2.26, 1.26 to 3.26) compared with usual-care control. Structured high-pain exercise had a significant large positive effect on MWA (MD 0.95, 0.20 to 1.70) and a moderate positive effect on PFWA (0.77, 0.01 to 1.53) compared with usual-care control. In an analysis of structured low- versus high pain exercise, there was a large positive effect in favour of low-pain exercise on MWA (MD 1.28, -0.07 to 2.62) and PFWA (1.50, 0.24 to 2.75); however, this was significant only for PFWA. CONCLUSION: There is strong evidence in support of use of structured high-pain exercise, and some evidence in support of structured low-pain exercise, to improve walking ability in people with IC compared with usual-care control (unstructured exercise advice).