[Association between controlled circulatory death donor waitlisting and waiting time before kidney transplantation in a French center]. / Association entre l'inscription sur liste d'attente de donneur à cœur arrêté contrôlé Maastricht III et le temps d'attente avant la transplantation rénale dans un centre français.

INTRODUCTION: Transplantation from controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCD) is a new practice in France. An additional specific consent is required for registration on the cDCD waiting list. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of cDCD acceptance on the waiting time for the registered patients on the transplant list. METHODS: Patients registered on the kidney transplant waiting list for a Death Brain Donor (DBD) kidney transplant between 2018 and 2019 in our center were included. Patients who were candidates for a second kidney transplant or who had already received an organ transplant were not included. The cDCD waiting list registration was authorized by a signed consent of the patient on the day of DBD registration. The primary endpoint was time to renal transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 315 patients eligible for a cDCD graft at transplant list registration, 152 were registered on the cDCD waiting list. Time to transplantation for these patients was multiplied by 1.42 (95%CI 1.07-1.87) compared with patients not registered for a cDCD graft. The time to transplantation was 2.59 months (95%CI 0.49-4.69) shorter for a 2-year follow-up for cDCD-listed patients. This represents one additional transplant at 6 months for every seven registered patients. CONCLUSION: cDCD waiting list registration reduced the time to kidney transplantation in France.

Donor-to-recipient transmission and reactivation in a kidney transplant recipient of an inherited chromosomally integrated HHV-6A: Evidence and outcomes.

Human herpesvirus (HHV)-6A can be inherited and chromosomally integrated (iciHHV-6A), and donor-to-recipient transmission has been reported in solid organ transplant. However, when HHV-6A reactivation happens after transplant, the source of HHV-6A is often not evident and its pathogenicity remains unclear. Here, we present an exhaustive case of donor-to-recipient transmission and reactivation of iciHHV-6A through kidney transplant. The absence of HHV-6A genome from the nails of the recipient excluded a recipient-related iciHHV-6A. Viral loads > 7 log10 copies/106 cells in donor blood samples and similarities of U38, U39, U69, and U100 viral genes between donor, recipient, and previously published iciHHV-6A strains are proof of donor-related transmission. Detection of noncoding HHV-6 snc-RNA14 using fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis and immunofluorescence staining of HHV-6A gp82/gp105 late proteins on kidney biopsies showed evidence of reactivation in the transplanted kidney. Because HHV-6A reactivation can be life threatening in immunocompromised patients, we provide several tools to help during the complete screening and diagnosis.