A History of Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Surgeons have been involved, since the beginning, in the development and evolution of endoscopy. They have been instrumental in developing new methods and have been actively involved in most of the therapeutic applications. The continued evolution of endoscopic technique is inevitable and will involve the integration of new technology with innovative thinking.

Enhanced recovery outcomes following per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP): a comparison of safety and cost with same-day discharge versus inpatient recovery.

BACKGROUND: While per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) has shown promise as a novel endoscopic procedure to treat medically refractory gastroparesis, standardized care pathways are not well-defined. We aimed to compare the safety and cost of same-day discharge (SDD) after POP with inpatient stay overnight or longer. METHODS: All patients with SDD after POP between January 2016 and May 2018 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Propensity scores considering gender, age, gastroparesis etiology, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class were used to match a comparison group which stayed overnight or longer. Statistical tests included two-sample t tests for continuous variables, Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and paired sample t tests for within-group comparisons with repeated measures. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients who underwent POP with SDD during the study period were propensity-matched with 54 patients with inpatient recovery. The SDD cohort was 85.2% female with a mean age of 44.8 years and median ASA class 3. The etiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic in 53.7% (n = 29), diabetic in 29.6% (n = 16), and post-surgical in 11.1% (n = 6). Operative time was shorter in the SDD cohort (25.4 vs. 31.3 min, p = 0.02). The mean post-procedure recovery time was 4 h in patients with SDD and 29.3 h in the inpatient cohort (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards less readmissions with SDD (7.4% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.08). There was no increased risk of complications with SDD (1.9% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.57). Compared to inpatient recovery, the average total cost for the procedure, recovery, and all subsequent care within 30 days was 26.0% less with SDD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following POP, patients can be safely discharged the same day with low risk of both complications and readmission. Total costs in the complete perioperative period are significantly less with SDD compared to inpatient recovery.

Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Post-surgical gastroparesis (psGP) is putatively related to vagal denervation from either therapeutic transection or inadvertent injury. Here, we present a series of patients undergoing endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) as a treatment for medically refractory psGP. METHODS: Patients identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing POP procedures at our institution from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. Surgical history, symptom scores, and gastric emptying studies before and 3 months after POP were additionally recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 177 POP procedures were performed, of which 38 (21.5%) were for psGP. The study cohort was 84.2% female with a mean body mass index of 27.6 kg/m2 and mean age of 55.2 years. Common comorbidities included hypertension (34.2%), depression (31.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (28.9%). Hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repair (39.5%) or fundoplication (36.8%) preceded psGP diagnosis most often. The mean operative time was 30 ± 20 min. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean postoperative length of stay was 1.2 days. There were two readmissions within 30 days, one for melena and one for dehydration. The mean improvement in total Gastroparesis Symptom Index Score was 1.29 (p = 0.0002). The mean 4-h gastric retention improved from a pre-POP mean of 46.4 to 17.9% post-POP. Normal gastric emptying was noted in 50% of subjects with available follow-up imaging. CONCLUSION: POP is a safe and effective endoscopic therapy for patients with psGP. POP should be considered a reasonable first-line option for patients with medically refractory psGP and may allow stomach preservation.

Laparoscopic pyloroplasty versus endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy for the treatment of gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is a debilitating functional disorder of the stomach characterized by delayed gastric emptying absent an obstructive etiology. Surgical or endoscopic disruption of the pylorus has been utilized to treat this disease, but there is little evidence comparing laparoscopic pyloroplasty (LP) with endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP). Herein we describe our experience at our institution using a propensity-matched cohort study to compare outcomes between these procedures. METHODS: All patients who underwent LP for the treatment of gastroparesis from October 2014 through September 2017 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity scoring was used to match these patients 1:1 to patients undergoing POP during this time period based on gender, age, and etiology of gastroparesis. Symptom scores using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES), and perioperative outcomes were compared between matched cohorts. Thirty patients underwent LP for gastroparesis during the study period which were matched 1:1 with patients undergoing POP. The etiology of gastroparesis was 63.3% idiopathic (n = 19), 20.0% post-surgical (n = 6), and 16.7% diabetic (n = 5) in both cohorts. RESULTS: Patients who underwent LP had a longer average length of stay (4.6 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.003), operative time (99.3 vs. 33.9 min, p < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (12.9 vs. 0.4 mL, p < 0.001). There were more complications in the LP cohort (16.7 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.086), which included surgical site infection (6.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.153), pneumonia (6.7 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.153), and unplanned ICU admission (10.0 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.078). LP and POP both resulted in similar, significant improvements in both in GCSI scores and objective gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) is safe and effective for the treatment of medical refractory gastroparesis. POP has less perioperative morbidity compared to LP with comparative functional outcomes.

Per-oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Short Term Results From the First 100 Patients at a High Volume Center.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with gastroparesis, temporary pyloric disruption has been shown to improve symptoms and gastric emptying. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) is an innovative endoscopic procedure to divide the pylorus from within a submucosal tunnel, as a corollary to surgical pyloromyotomy. Here we evaluate subjective and objective outcomes 12-weeks after POP at a high volume center. METHODS: The first 100 consecutive patients undergoing POP were included, with procedure dates between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), and 4-hour solid-phase scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES) prior to procedure and at 90 days post-POP RESULTS:: The study cohort was 85% female with a mean age of 45.0 ±â€Š14.6 years. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (56%), diabetic (21%), postsurgical (19%), and other in 4%. There were 67% of the patients who had previous endoscopic or surgical interventions for gastroparesis. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (97%) and were completed in an average of 33 minutes. Ten patients incurred complications (10%), which included 1 diagnostic laparoscopy and 2 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall GCSI improved from a preoperative mean of 3.82 ±â€Š0.86 to 2.54 ±â€Š1.2 (P < 0.001). The improvement in each GCSI subscore was also highly statistically significant. Among the patients with postoperative GES available, 78% had objectively better 4-hour emptying with a mean improvement in retention by 23.6% (P < 0.001). This included 57% of patients with normal gastric emptying post-POP. CONCLUSION: For patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, POP results in both subjective and objective improvement in the majority of patients. Prior intervention does not obviate POP as a therapeutic option. POP should be included along the treatment algorithm for patients with gastroparesis as an organ-sparing procedure.

Comparison of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension: long-term durability and nutritional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Enteral access through the jejunum is indicated when patients cannot tolerate oral intake or gastric feeding. While multiple approaches for feeding jejunal access exist, few studies have compared the efficacy of these techniques. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term durability, re-intervention rates, and nutritional outcomes following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes with jejunal extension tubes (PEG-JET) versus laparoscopic jejunostomy tubes (j-tubes). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent PEG-JET or laparoscopic jejunostomy tube placement from January 2005 through December 2015 at our institution. Thirty-day and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent PEG-JET and 307 patients underwent laparoscopic j-tube placement during the defined study period. In terms of 30-day outcomes, patients who underwent PEG-JET placement were significantly more likely to experience a tube dislodgement event (p = 0.005) and undergo a re-intervention (p < 0.001). Patients who had a laparoscopic j-tube placed were significantly more likely to meet their enteral feeding goals (p = 0.002) and less likely to require nutritional supplementation with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (p < 0.001). With regard to long-term outcomes, patients who underwent PEG-JET placement were significantly more likely to experience tube occlusion (p < 0.001) and require an endoscopic or surgical tube re-intervention (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent laparoscopic j-tube placement were significantly more likely to experience a tube site leak (p = 0.015) but were less likely to require nutritional supplementation with TPN (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic jejunostomy tubes provide more durable long-term enteral access compared to PEG-JET. Consideration should be given to laparoscopic jejunostomy tube placement in eligible patients who cannot tolerate oral intake or gastric enteral feeding.

How I Do It: Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP).

INTRODUCTION: Several surgical treatments exist for treatment of gastroparesis, including gastric electrical stimulation, pyloroplasty, and gastrectomy. Division of the pylorus by means of endoscopy, Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP), is a newer, endoluminal therapy that may offer a less invasive, interventional treatment option. METHODS: We describe and present a video of our step by step technique for POP using a lesser curvature approach. The following are technical steps to complete the POP procedure from the lesser curve approach. CONCLUSION: In our experience, these methods provide promising initial results with low operative risks, although long-term outcomes remain to be determined.

Per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: initial results from a single institution.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroparesis is a debilitating disease characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. A new intramural technique, per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP), has been proposed as an alternative to surgical pyloroplasty for the management of medical refractory gastroparesis. Herein, we detail the short-term results of POP at our institution. METHODS: POP was first performed at our institution in January 2016. All patients undergoing POP for management of gastroparesis from January 2016 through January 2017 were prospectively followed. All patients underwent a 4-h, non-extrapolated gastric emptying scintigraphy study and were asked to rate their symptoms using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) at their pre-procedure visit and at 3 months post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients underwent POP during the defined study period. Twenty-seven (57.4%) patients had idiopathic gastroparesis, 12 (25.6%) had diabetic gastroparesis, and eight (17.0%) had post-surgical gastroparesis. Forty-one (87.2%) patients had at least one previous intervention (i.e., enteral feeding tube, gastric pacer, botox injection) for their gastroparesis symptoms. All patients had evidence of gastroparesis on pre-procedure gastric emptying studies. The average length of hospital stay was 1 day. One patient died within 30-days of their index procedure which was unrelated to the procedure itself. The average pre-procedure percentage of retained food at 4 h was 37% compared to an average post-procedure percentage of 20% (p < 0.03). The average pre-procedure GCSI score was 4.6 compared to an average post-procedure GCSI of 3.3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: POP is a safe and feasible endoscopic intervention for medical refractory gastroparesis. Additional follow-up is required to determine the long-term success of this approach in alleviating gastroparesis symptoms.

Massive Biliary Dilation after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is it Ampullary Achalasia?

BACKGROUND: This series of patients with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and cholecystectomy presented with symptoms consistent with obstructive biliary disease and massive biliary dilation of ≥15 mm, suggesting a structural cause. Findings from laparoscopic-assisted transgastric (TG) ERCP were a normal-appearing ampulla without structural lesions or stones, suggesting a functional cause instead. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent TGERCP from January 2008 to October 2016 and had a surgical history of RYGB and cholecystectomy were identified from an institutional database. Inclusion criteria was biliary dilation ≥15 mm, age 18 years or older, and no explanatory obstructive pathology. RESULTS: Nine female patients met the inclusion criteria. At time of TGERCP, their mean age was 53.9 years, mean BMI was 32.5 kg/m2, mean bile duct diameter was 18.1 mm, and all patients experienced abdominal pain. Six patients (66.7%) presented with abnormal liver enzymes, 5 (55.6%) with nausea and/or vomiting, and 4 (44.4%) with earlier episode(s) of acute pancreatitis. Each patient had a normal-appearing papilla of Vater without stones or strictures at the time of TGERCP, with 8 (88.9%) patients experiencing cessation of abdominal pain after biliary sphincterotomy. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of patients with a history of RYGB and cholecystectomy presented with massively dilated biliary trees lacking an obstructive disease process and experienced immediate symptom improvement after sphincterotomy. Their surgical history predisposed them to vagal nerve injury, leading to denervation of the sphincter of Oddi, and resulting in tonic contraction of the ampulla, that is, ampullary achalasia.

Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy (DPEJ) Tube Placement: A Single Institution Experience and Outcomes to 30 Days and Beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with prior foregut surgery requiring long-term enteral access typically undergo operative jejunostomy tube placement; however, direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) is a viable alternative. METHODS: All de novo DPEJ procedures performed by surgical and advanced endoscopists from May 2003 to June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed following approval by the Institutional Review Board. There were 59 cases identified. RESULTS: Our cohort had a mean age of 50.3 ± 16.9 years and 35 (59.3%) were female. All but two patients previously had foregut surgery including 19 patients (34.5%) with prior bariatric surgery. The composite of malnutrition and dehydration was the indication for DPEJ in 29 patients (49.1%) and was the initial enteral access placed in 47 patients (79.7%). Moderate sedation was used in 32 cases (54.2%), and 29 procedures (49.2%) were performed in the operating room. Within 30 days, there were six complications in five patients, giving a peri-procedural complication rate of 12.5%. Beyond 30 days, the most common complications were peri-tube leakage and dislodgement (each 16.9%). The median time to complication was 197 days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with surgically altered foregut anatomy, DPEJ offers a less invasive alternative to operative jejunostomy tube placement. DPEJ can be placed in the endoscopy suite or operating room with an acceptable risk of perioperative complications.

Long-term outcomes of combined endoscopic/laparoscopic intragastric enucleation of presumed gastric stromal tumors.

PURPOSE: Definitive surgical treatment of gastric myogenic neoplasms such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) typically involves full-thickness resection of the lesion with normal gastric wall as the margin. This is not readily possible with proximal gastric lesions near the gastroesophageal junction, nor necessary for small incidental lesions. We have employed a combined endoscopic/laparoscopic intraluminal enucleation technique for selected patients and report long-term surveillance following this novel technique. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who have undergone intraluminal laparoscopic resection from 1994 to 2008. RESULTS: Fifteen patients who underwent intraluminal enucleation were followed up for a median of 61 months. There were eight men and seven women with a mean age of 62.1 ± 3.38 years. Eight patients (53 %) underwent endoscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding, six for dyspepsia (40 %), six for anemia (40 %), and four for abdominal pain (27 %). Eight lesions (53 %) were located in the fundus/cardia: six (40 %) in the body and two (13 %) in the antrum. The mean tumor size was 3.5 ± 0.45 (1.5-7.0) cm. GIST lesions with benign histologic features predominated. All operations were successfully completed, including full-thickness resections with no conversion to open procedure, major morbidity, or mortality. Complete endoscopic and endosonographic surveillance was accomplished in 14 patients with no local or distant recurrence and no symptomatic follow-up in any patient. CONCLUSION: Enucleation of intact gastrointestinal stromal tumors can be accomplished with low risk of recurrence when done with a combined endoscopic/laparoscopic intraluminal technique. It should be the preferred approach considered for small, proximal, intraluminal tumors.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) leads to similar results in patients with and without prior endoscopic or surgical therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Traditional treatment for the esophageal motility disorder, achalasia, ranges from endoscopic botulinum toxin (Botox) injections or balloon dilatation, to laparoscopic or open surgical myotomy. Recent advances in endoscopic therapy have led to peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as a viable alternative to traditional techniques for myotomy. Uncertainty exists as to whether the procedure is feasible for patients who have already received prior endoscopic or surgical procedures for therapy, as these groups experience higher failure rates as well as intraoperative mucosal perforations and technical difficulty during Heller myotomy. We describe our first 40 patients who have undergone POEM and compare outcomes between patients who have or have not received previous treatment for achalasia. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We evaluated our prospectively collected database of POEM procedures performed by two surgeons (JLP and JMM) at a single institution. Perioperative data was collected for operative and hospital outcomes. Patients completed pre- and postoperative GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires (GERD-HRQL) and SF-12 surveys for symptom scoring. RESULTS: Forty patients received a POEM procedure between 2011 and 2013. Of these, 40% (n = 16) had had at least one prior endoscopic or surgical procedure. Nine had prior Botox injections, 7 had balloon dilations, 3 had both Botox and dilations, and 3 received prior laparoscopic Heller myotomy (two with Dor fundoplication). Mean operative time was 102 min for patients with prior procedures (Prior Tx) and 118 min for patients without any prior procedure (No Tx) (p = 0.07). Intraoperative complication rates for the Prior Tx group were 12.5 versus 16.7% for the No Tx group. Mean follow-up was 10 months. Both groups independently demonstrated clinical improvement in both the GERD-HRQL and SF-12 scores following POEM. There were no statistical differences between the two groups for GERD-HRQL reflux and dysphagia subset scores, or SF-12 mental component summary. CONCLUSION: We found favorable outcomes following POEM in patients who have had prior endoscopic or surgical treatments for achalasia, as well as for patients without prior intervention. There were no significant differences between these two groups with regards to operative times, GERD-HRQL scores, and mental component SF-12 scores. One complication requiring intervention occurred in a patient that had received multiple prior Botox injections and balloon dilatations. POEM appears to be a viable alternative for treatment of achalasia compared to traditional techniques, however, long-term data are needed to establish the durability of this technique and to determine whether symptoms will recur necessitating re-intervention.

Retrograde myotomy: a variation in per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) technique.

BACKGROUND: Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has evolved as a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of esophageal motility disorders such as achalasia. The originally described dissection technique involves cutting the inner circular esophageal muscle fibers in an antegrade fashion. We have modified this technique by commencing the muscular division at the most distal aspect of the submucosal tunnel and continuing the dissection in a retrograde fashion. We present our initial series of patients performed using this modified technique. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected database. Peri- and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. POEM procedures were performed in a near-identical manner as previously published. RESULTS: Retrograde myotomy was performed on five patients with a diagnosis of achalasia. Four had a history of prior treatment including balloon dilation, with one of these having a prior surgical myotomy. Retrograde POEM procedures were performed with trace blood loss and without any complications. Mean operative time was 85 min. All patients had normal esophagram studies, and diets were advanced as per protocol. CONCLUSION: POEM was developed as a minimally invasive method for the treatment of achalasia. Our retrograde dissection modification allows the most critical portion of the case, namely division of the lower esophageal and upper gastric circular muscle fibers, to be performed earlier in the case. This ensures adequate dissection of the primary site of esophageal dysfunction should problems arise during the procedure. The modification is straightforward, without the need for additional training or equipment, and appears to provide a more rapid myotomy with less charring in this small cohort of patients.

Advances in the treatment of achalasia.

OPINION STATEMENT: Achalasia, although rare, remains one of the most commonly diagnosed disorders of esophageal motility. It results from an idiopathic loss of ganglion cells responsible for esophageal motility and relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). As a result, patients present with worsening dysphagia to both liquids and solids and often suffer from significant regurgitation of retained food in the esophagus. When the diagnosis of achalasia is suspected, patients should undergo evaluation with esophageal motility testing, endoscopic examination, and contrast esophagram. Once the diagnosis of achalasia has been established, options for treatment rely on controlling patient symptoms. Medical options are available, but their effectiveness is inconsistent. Endoscopic options include injection of botulinum toxin, which can achieve good short-term results, and pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD), considered the most effective non-surgical option. Surgical options, including laparoscopic, open, or endoscopic myotomy, and provide long-lasting results. This chapter will review achalasia and the treatment options available.