Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
J Comp Eff Res ; 12(3): e220049, 2023 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749006

Aim: It is not well known how comorbidities may change the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This study was aimed to analyze the impact of cardiovascular disease on this population. Materials & methods: EMIR was a multicenter, prospective study, including 1433 AF patients taking rivaroxaban for ≥6 months. Data were analyzed according to the presence of vascular disease. Results: Coronary artery disease was detected in 16.4%, peripheral artery disease/aortic plaque in 6.7%, vascular disease in 28.3%. Patients with coronary artery disease had higher rates (per 100 patient-years) of major adverse cardiovascular events (2.98 vs 0.71; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (1.79 vs 0.41; p = 0.004). Those with vascular disease had higher rates of thromboembolic events (1.47 vs 0.44; p = 0.007), major adverse cardiovascular events (2.03 vs 0.70; p = 0.004), and cardiovascular death (1.24 vs 0.39; p = 0.025). Patients with peripheral artery disease/aortic plaque had similar rates. Conclusion: AF patients with vascular disease have a higher risk of non-embolic outcomes.


Atrial Fibrillation , Cardiovascular Diseases , Coronary Artery Disease , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Stroke , Humans , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Stroke/chemically induced , Prospective Studies , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Peripheral Arterial Disease/chemically induced , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Anticoagulants/adverse effects
2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 11(16): 1173-1184, 2022 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36148923

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: The clinical profile and outcomes of the EMIR study were indirectly compared with those of ROCKET-AF, eight other Spanish observational studies and XANTUS. Results: In EMIR, mean age was 74.2 years and CHA2DS2-VASc was 3.5. In the rivaroxaban arm of the ROCKET-AF trial, mean age was 73 years and CHADS2 was 3.5, whereas in the Spanish studies mean age ranged from 74.9 years to 78.4 years and CHA2DS2-VASc from 3.5 to 4.3. In EMIR, rates of stroke/systemic embolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death and major bleeding were 0.57, 1.07, 0.63 and 1.04 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In ROCKET-AF, these numbers were 1.7, 3.91, 1.53 and 3.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In the Spanish studies, rates of stroke and major bleeding were 0-1.8 and 0.22-4.2 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In XANTUS, rates of stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding were 0.7, 1.8 and 2.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusion: Despite the fact that rivaroxaban is prescribed for elderly patients with a high thromboembolic risk, rates of outcomes remain low.


Atrial Fibrillation , Rivaroxaban , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Registries , Risk Factors , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
...