Telemedical Intervention and Its Effect on Quality of Life in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: The Results from the Telemedicine and e-Health Solution Pilot Program.

(1) Background: Heart failure (HF) is not only a common cardiovascular disease with a poor prognosis. Its prevalence in developed countries equals 1-2% of the general population of adults, while in Poland HF, patients constitute 3.2% of the total population. Modern heart failure treatment should be focused not only on reducing the risk of death and the number of readmissions due to HF exacerbation but quality of life as well. Telemedicine has been suggested as a viable tool for enhancing HRQL. Therefore, we present the results of telemedical intervention in a group of HF patients and its effect on quality of life in chronic heart failure patients from a pilot study dedicated to reducing social inequalities in health through the use of telemedicine and e-health solutions. (2) Method: The project was a multicenter, open, non-controlled trial conducted by the University of Rzeszów, Poland. The data points were collected in the June 2023-December 2023 period from fourteen primary care units from five voivodeships, mostly considered social exclusion areas. A total of 52.7% of the patients recruited were Podkarpackie Voivodeship inhabitants. The result and discussion are presented based on the Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire (CHFQ) and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQVAS). (3) Results: During the program, a total of over 100,000 telemedicine examinations were conducted in the form of body weight measurement, heart rate, blood pressure tests, and 7-day Holter or 14-day event Holter assessment. Over the course of this study, coordinating the pilot program medical staff has ordered 570 changes in the patient's pharmacotherapy, confirming the positive impact on quality of life in the study group. (4) Conclusions: A comprehensive telemedical intervention can contribute to an improvement in the quality of life of patients with HF beyond what was achieved with the basic standard of care in the group of HF patients from the social exclusion region. It is now unclear if the result of the basic telemedical intervention would be constant after discontinuation of the mentioned pilot program.

High in-hospital mortality and prevalence of cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and concomitant COVID-19.

Introduction: Published data suggest worse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with concomitant coronavirus disease (COVID-19) due to delays in standard management caused by burdened healthcare. Aim: To report the demographics, angiographic findings, and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and to compare these with the non-COVID-19 cohort hospitalized during the same period with the same access to medical care. Material and methods: From October 23rd, 2020 to April 23rd, 2021 (exactly 6 months) data were collected into a prospective ACS Registry. STEMI patients underwent invasive coronary angiography and were tested for COVID-19. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and prevalence of cardiogenic shock. Results: 125 patients, of whom 25 were COVID-19 positive, were admitted to the cardiology ward, and completed their hospital stay (i.e. discharge or death). There were no differences with regard to the time from symptom onset to reperfusion (median (Q1-Q3); 165 (130-202) vs. 170 (123-210), p = 0.86) and door-to-balloon time between the compared groups (25 (21-35) vs. 29 (21-59), p = 0.26). There was a higher GRACE risk score and mortality in the COVID-19 positive patients (180 (154-226) vs. 155 (132-181) and 48% vs. 10%, respectively, both p < 0.0001). Cardiogenic shock occurred more often in this group (32% vs. 13%; p = 0.035). COVID-19 positive patients had elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (p < 0.0001) and D-dimer (p = 0.003) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.037). Postprocedural TIMI 3 flow grade was observed less frequently in this group (p = 0.044). Conclusions: High in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI and COVID-19 did not result from delays in standard management, and could be related to increased thrombogenicity.

Employment of the Evolution RL sheath as a first-choice device shortens transvenous lead extraction time without affecting procedural safety and efficacy compared to its auxiliary use: Insights from the prospective multicenter EVO registry.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is recommended in cases of local and systemic infections related to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Additionally, TLE is indicated in the event of lead damage or CIED malfunction. The extraction procedure is associated with a risk of life-threatening complications. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the EVO registry was to assess the safety and efficacy of birotational Evolution tool usage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This registry study was prospectively conducted in 8 high-volume implantation centers in Poland. The study included 133 patients aged 63.5 ±15.1 years, and 76.69% were male. Indications for the procedure were: local or systemic infection (33.1%) and lead dysfunction (66.9%). The number of leads extracted varied from 1 (39.84%) to 3 (9.77%). RESULTS: Clinical procedural success was achieved in 99.1% of cases. A total of 226 leads were extracted, and 206 used the Evolution system. Two procedural strategies were identified while using the Evolution system: (1) usage of locking stylet, propylene sheaths and the Evolution system (118 leads, 52%) - group A; (2) usage of locking stylet and Evolution (88 leads, 39%) - group B. There were no differences in the number of complications between these 2 groups. The extraction time was significantly shorter (p = 0.02) in group B than in group A. Major complications occurred in 5.2% of cases with 2 intraprocedural deaths. Minor complications occurred in 1.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The registry confirmed the efficacy and relative safety of the birotational Evolution sheath. Using the rotational sheath as a first attempt significantly reduces extraction time without compromising its safety.

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in Poland: Results of the Polish S-ICD Registry.

BACKGROUND: The use of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) has been growing in Poland since 2014. The Polish Registry of S-ICD Implantations was run by the Heart Rhythm Section of the Polish Cardiac Society between May 2020 and September 2022 to monitor the implementation of that therapy in Poland. AIMS: To investigate and present the state-of-the-art of S-ICD implantation in Poland. METHODS: Implanting centers reported clinical data of patients undergoing S-ICD implantations and replacements, including age, sex, height, weight, underlying disease, history of pacemaker and defibrillator implantations, indications for S-ICD, electrocardiographical parameters, procedural techniques, and complications. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty patients undergoing S-ICD implantation (411) or replacement (29) were reported by 16 centers. Most patients were in New York Heart Association class II (218 patients, 53%) or I (150 patients, 36.5%). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 10%-80%, median (IQR) was 33% (25%-55%). Primary prevention indications were present in 273 patients (66.4%). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was reported in 194 patients (47.2%). The main reason for the choice of S-ICD were: young age (309, 75.2%), risk of infectious complications (46, 11.2%), prior infective endocarditis (36, 8.8%), hemodialysis (23, 5.6%), and immunosuppressive therapy (7, 1.7%). Electrocardiographic screening was performed in 90% of patients. The rate of adverse events was low (1.7%). No surgical complications were observed.

The GRACE risk score in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and concomitant COVID-19.

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome represents a major cause of mortality throughout the world. To date, there are only a few reports of ST-segment elevation type 1 myocardial infarction in patients with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and angiographic characteristics alongside the prediction of in-hospital mortality using the GRACE risk score in this group. Material and methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients admitted to a multi-specialist hospital with confirmed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Demographic, clinical and angiographic characteristics were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Results: Twenty-five patients, of whom 23 (92%) were men, with confirmed STEMI and COVID-19, with a median age of 70 years and high comorbidity burden, were included in this study. They were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and 12 (48%) of them died. Non-survivors had elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (p = 0.026) and D-dimer (p = 0.042) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (30 ±9 vs. 41 ±7; p = 0.003). Postprocedural TIMI 3 flow grade was less frequently observed in this group (p = 0.039). There was a higher GRACE score in the non-survivor group (mean ± SD; 210 ±35 vs. 169 ±42, p = 0.014). In ROC analysis, GRACE score predicted in-hospital death with an AUC of 0.788 (95% CI: 0.6-0.98, p = 0.014). A score of 176 was identified as the optimal cut-off with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 69%. Conclusions: The GRACE risk score is a good predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients presenting with STEMI with concomitant COVID-19.

The cost of CIED infectious complications treatment in Poland from the perspective of Polish hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are a recognized form of therapy in cardiology. Apart from the benefits, the use of CIEDs is also associated with the risk of complications, and the most important ones influencing treatment results and prognosis are infectious complications. AIM: This study aimed to calculate the cost of treatment of CIED-related infections, including transvenous lead extraction and device reimplantation, from the perspective of a Polish hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of hospitalization costs of patients referred to transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for CIED infection was performed. The study covers cases from three Polish reference centers specializing in the comprehensive treatment of cardiac electrotherapy complications. RESULTS: It was shown that the average cost of treating a CIED infection is 34 000 PLN (8010 EUR) and is the highest in the cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function (CRT-D) group, where it amounts to almost 50 000 PLN (11 440 EUR). Thus, treatment of CIED infections is associated with an average loss of 3000 PLN for the healthcare provider and the length of hospitalization has a major influence on final outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The hospital cost of treatment of CIED-related infections was high and related mainly to the type of device and length of hospitalization. Despite the low utilization of costly extraction tools, the hospitalization was still likely to be unprofitable.

Implantable cardiac defibrillator events in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is associated with a risk of sudden cardiac death. Optimal risk stratification is still under debate. The main purpose of this long-term, single-centre observation was to analyse predictors of appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) interventions in the population of patients with ARVC with a high risk of life-threatening arrhythmias. METHODS: The study comprised 65 adult patients (median age 40 years, 48 men) with a definite diagnosis of ARVC who received ICD over a time span of 20 years in primary (40%) or secondary (60%) prevention of sudden cardiac death. The study endpoints were first appropriate and inappropriate ICD interventions (shock or antitachycardia pacing) after device implantation. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 7.75 years after ICD implantation, nine patients died and six individuals underwent heart transplantation. Appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 43 patients (66.2%) and inappropriate ICD interventions in 18 patients (27.7%). Multivariable analysis using cause-specific hazard model identified three predictors of appropriate ICD interventions: right ventricle dysfunction (cause-specific HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.21, p<0.001), age <40 years at ICD implantation (cause-specific HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.94, p=0.022) and a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (cause-specific HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.16 to 5.63, p=0.020). Predictors of inappropriate ICD therapy were not found. Complications related to ICD implantation occurred in 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricle dysfunction, age <40 years and a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia were predictors of appropriate ICD interventions in patients with ARVC. The results may be used to improve risk stratification before ICD implantation.

Utilization of Subcutaneous Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Poland and Europe-Comparison of the Results of Multi-Center Registries.

The implantation of a subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) may be used instead of a traditional transvenous system to prevent sudden cardiac death. Our aim was to compare the characteristics of S-ICD patients from the multi-center registry of S-ICD implantations in Poland with the published results of the European Snapshot Survey on S-ICD Implantation (ESSS-SICDI). We compared data of 137 Polish S-ICD patients with 68 patients from the ESSS-SICDI registry. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of sex, prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy, concomitant diseases, and the rate of primary prevention indication. Polish patients had more advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III: 11.7% vs. 2.9%, NYHA II: 48.9% vs. 29.4%, NYHA I: 39.4% vs. 67.7%, p < 0.05 each). Young age (75.9% vs. 50%, p < 0.05) and no vascular access (7.3% vs. 0%, p < 0.05) were more often indications for S-ICD. The percentage of patients after transvenous system removal due to infections was significantly higher in the Polish group (11% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.05). In the European population, S-ICD was more frequently chosen because of patients' active lifestyle and patients' preference (both 10.3% vs. 0%, p < 0.05). Our analysis shows that in Poland, compared to other European countries, subcutaneous cardioverters-defibrillators are being implanted in patients at a more advanced stage of chronic heart failure. The most frequent reason for choosing a subcutaneous system instead of a transvenous ICD is the young age of a patient.

A new approach to ticagrelor-based de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. A rationale for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated, multicenter clinical study.

The risk of ischemic events gradually decreases after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), reaching a stable level after 1 month, while the risk of bleeding remains steady during the whole period of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). Several de-escalation strategies of antiplatelet treatment aiming to enhance safety of DAPT without depriving it of its efficacy have been evaluated so far. We hypothesized that reduction of the ticagrelor maintenance dose 1 month after ACS and its continuation until 12 months after ACS may improve adherence to antiplatelet treatment due to better tolerability compared with the standard dose of ticagrelor. Moreover, improved safety of treatment and preserved anti-ischemic benefit may also be expected with additional acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) withdrawal. To evaluate these hypotheses, we designed the Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Two Ticagrelor-based De-escalation Antiplatelet Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndrome - a randomized clinical trial (ELECTRA-SIRIO 2), to assess the influence of ticagrelor dose reduction with or without continuation of ASA versus DAPT with standard dose ticagrelor in reducing clinically relevant bleeding and maintaining anti-ischemic efficacy in ACS patients. The study was designed as a phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, investigator-initiated clinical study with a 12-month follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04718025; EudraCT number: 2020-005130-15).