Measurement properties of the backward walk test in people with balance and mobility deficits: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Backward walking is an indispensable component of activities of daily living. The backward walk test has been used to assess balance, mobility, and fall risk in different populations. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize measurement properties of the backward walk test in people with balance and mobility deficits. METHODS: Three bibliographic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched on June 18th, 2023. Cross-sectional or cohort studies assessing the measurement properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness) of the backward walk test were included. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist was used for methodological quality assessment. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were completed by two reviewers independently and in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 786 records were identified from three databases. Fourteen studies published from 2019 to 2023 with a total of 853 participants were included. Two studies were rated inadequate in quality assessment, all other studies demonstrated adequate to very good quality. The participants population included patients with cerebral palsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, fibromyalgia, hip and knee arthroplasty, dementia, and community-dwelling older adults. Good interrater and intrarater reliability, and moderate to good concurrent validity of the backward walk test were demonstrated. SIGNIFICANCE: The review demonstrates that the backward walk test appears to be a valid and reliable tool in different patient populations. The 3-meter backward walk time and 3-meter backward walk speed can be used as outcome measures in clinical practice to assess balance and mobility and track progress throughout the course of physical rehabilitation. Future studies with a prospective cohort design are required to provide information regarding the predictive validity of the backward walk test for fall risk assessment.

Performance-based outcome measures of upper extremity in virtual reality and telerehabilitation: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize evidence regarding measurement properties of upper extremity performance-based outcome measures performed in virtual reality or in telerehabilitation to inform clinical applications and research endeavors. METHODS: Five bibliographic databases, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus, were searched on July 12, 2023. Studies assessing the measurement properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness) of upper extremity performance-based outcome measures in virtual reality and telerehabilitation were eligible for inclusion. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist was used for methodological quality assessment. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were completed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 240 records were identified from the five databases. Nine cross-sectional studies published from 2016 to 2023 were included. Participants included 210 patients with neurological conditions and 184 healthy subjects. In virtual reality studies, four implemented the Box and Block Test, one the Arm Research Action Test, and one the Peg Insertion Test. In telerehabilitation studies, three implemented the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity. For quality assessment, one study was rated inadequate, one was rated doubtful, and all others demonstrated adequate to good quality. Most studies demonstrated good test-retest reliability and concurrent validity to the original in-person assessments. CONCLUSION: Implementing upper extremity performance-based outcome measures in virtual reality and telerehabilitation is feasible and promising. Further studies are warranted to develop and refine remote assessment paradigms and validate them on a larger scale to inform clinical application and promote digital health in rehabilitation.

Effects of virtual reality-based telerehabilitation for stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation provides an essential opportunity to deliver continuous rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home, especially amid a global pandemic. Virtual reality is a simulation technology that has shown promising outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Combining telerehabilitation and virtual reality is an emerging and innovative approach that enriches the rehabilitation experience and potentially enhances functional recovery outcomes. This review synthesized current evidence of using virtual reality-based telerehabilitation for patients after stroke and compared it with conventional in-person rehabilitation. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were searched across six databases published after 2000. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. The Physiotherapy Evidence Databases scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted to compare functional outcomes after Virtual reality-based telerehabilitation with conventional in-person rehabilitation. RESULTS: Nine studies including 260 participants were selected from 933 relevant records. Seven studies met the criteria for good quality based on the Physiotherapy Evidence Databases scale, two studies were fair quality. Compared with conventional in-person rehabilitation, the meta-analysis indicated that virtual reality-based telerehabilitation had comparable outcomes of upper extremity function and balance function. Both groups demonstrated similar effects on outcomes in mobility, cognition, activities of daily life, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality-based telerehabilitation is an effective alternative approach for patients with stroke, given the barriers and restrictions of traditional in-person rehabilitation.