Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 139: 112615, 2024 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39032475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Liver cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most common type of primary liver cancer. APG-1252 is a small molecule inhibitor targeting Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl. However, its anti-tumor effects in HCC, alone or in combination with Cabozantinib, have not been extensively studied. EXPERIMENTAL: Approach: TCGA database analysis was used to analysis the gene expression levels of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl in HCC tissues. Western blot was employed to detect the protein expression levels. And the inhibitory effects of APG-1252 and Cabozantinib on the proliferation of HCC cell lines was detected by CCK-8. The effect on the migration and invasion of HCC cells was verified by transwell assay. Huh7 xenograft model in nude mice was used to investigate the combination antitumor effect in vivo. KEY RESULTS: Our study demonstrated that APG-1252 monotherapy inhibited the proliferation and migration ability of HCC cells, and induced HCC cells apoptosis. The combination of APG-1252 and Cabozantinib showed significant synergistic antitumor effects. Furthermore, the in vivo experiment demonstrated that the combination therapy exerted a synergistic effect in delaying tumor growth, notably downregulating MEK/ERK phosphorylation levels. In terms of mechanism, Cabozantinib treatment caused an increase in the phosphorylation levels of CREB and Bcl-xl proteins, while the combination with APG-1252 mitigated this effect, thereby enhanced the antitumor effect of Cabozantinib. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that APG-1252 in combination with Cabozantinib offers a more effective treatment strategy for HCC patients, warranting further clinical investigation.


Subject(s)
Anilides , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Cell Proliferation , Liver Neoplasms , Mice, Nude , Pyridines , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , bcl-X Protein , Animals , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/metabolism , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Anilides/pharmacology , Anilides/therapeutic use , Pyridines/pharmacology , Pyridines/therapeutic use , bcl-X Protein/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Mice , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein/metabolism , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Male
2.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(8): 144, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of first-line programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma are controversial. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had undergone first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy between October 2017 and May 2022. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). SPSS software V27.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of 345 enrolled patients, 290 had measurable lesions. The overall ORR was 59.3%. PD-L1 status was available in 171 patients, and 67.8% of them were considered as low PD-L1 expression level (combined positive score (CPS) < 5). Patients with PD-L1 CPS < 5 showed a lower response rate (51.1% vs 70.8%, P = 0.024) and a worse PFS (P = 0.009) compared to those with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. In the PD-L1 low-expression cohort, patients with non-diffuse type, GEJ cancer, synchronous metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, non-peritoneal metastasis, and HER2 positive were significantly associated with higher response rates to PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05). The presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.028) and diffuse type (P = 0.046) were identified as independent predictors of poor PFS in multivariate analysis of the PD-L1 CPS < 5 subgroup. When evaluated for correlation with overall survival (OS) in the PD-L1 low-expression subgroup, peritoneal metastasis was found to be the only independent prognostic factor of an increased risk of death (hazard ratio: 2.31, 95% CI 1.09-4.90; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 is significantly associated with improved response and extended PFS in G/GEJ cancer patients treated with a combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy. Specific subgroups within the low PD-L1-expressing population, such as those with non-diffuse-type tumors and without peritoneal metastases, may also benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , B7-H1 Antigen , Biomarkers, Tumor , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Middle Aged , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Prognosis
3.
PLoS Med ; 21(5): e1004389, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether intensification of the chemotherapy backbone in tandem with an anti-EGFR can confer superior clinical outcomes in a cohort of RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). To that end, we sought to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI (triplet arm) versus cetuximab plus FOLFOX (doublet arm) as a conversion regimen (i.e., unresectable to resectable) in CRC patients with unresectable CRLM. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2018 to December 2022 in 7 medical centers across China, enrolling 146 RAS/BRAF wild-type CRC patients with initially unresectable CRLM. A stratified blocked randomization method was utilized to assign patients (1:1) to either the cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI (n = 72) or cetuximab plus FOLFOX (n = 74) treatment arms. Stratification factors were tumor location (left versus right) and resectability (technically unresectable versus ≥5 metastases). The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes included the median depth of tumor response (DpR), early tumor shrinkage (ETS), R0 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (not mature at the time of analysis), and safety profile. Radiological tumor evaluations were conducted by radiologists blinded to the group allocation. Primary efficacy analyses were conducted based on the intention-to-treat population, while safety analyses were performed on patients who received at least 1 line of chemotherapy. A total of 14 patients (9.6%) were lost to follow-up (9 in the doublet arm and 5 in the triplet arm). The ORR was comparable following adjustment for stratification factors, with 84.7% versus 79.7% in the triplet and doublet arms, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence intervals [CI] [0.30, 1.67], Chi-square p = 0.42). Moreover, the ETS rate showed no significant difference between the triplet and doublet arms (80.6% (58/72) versus 77.0% (57/74), OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.37, 1.83], Chi-square p = 0.63). Although median DpR was higher in the triplet therapy group (59.6%, interquartile range [IQR], [50.0, 69.7] versus 55.0%, IQR [42.8, 63.8], Mann-Whitney p = 0.039), the R0/R1 resection rate with or without radiofrequency ablation/stereotactic body radiation therapy was comparable with 54.2% (39/72) of patients in the triplet arm versus 52.7% (39/74) in the doublet arm. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months (IQR [12.8, 40.5]), the median PFS was 11.8 months in the triplet arm versus 13.4 months in the doublet arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI [0.50, 1.11], Log-rank p = 0.14). Grade ≥ 3 events were reported in 47.2% (35/74) of patients in the doublet arm and 55.9% (38/68) of patients in the triplet arm. The triplet arm was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (44.1% versus 27.0%, p = 0.03) and diarrhea (5.9% versus 0%, p = 0.03). The primary limitations of the study encompass the inherent bias in subjective surgical decisions regarding resection feasibility, as well as the lack of a centralized assessment for ORR and resection. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cetuximab with FOLFOXIRI did not significantly improve ORR compared to cetuximab plus FOLFOX. Despite achieving an enhanced DpR, this improvement did not translate into improved R0 resection rates or PFS. Moreover, the triplet arm was associated with an increase in treatment-related toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03493048.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Camptothecin , Cetuximab , Colorectal Neoplasms , Fluorouracil , Leucovorin , Liver Neoplasms , Organoplatinum Compounds , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Humans , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Cetuximab/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Aged , Adult , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Camptothecin/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , ras Proteins/genetics
4.
BMJ ; 385: e078876, 2024 05 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806195

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab added to chemotherapy as first line (primary) treatment for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma compared with placebo plus chemotherapy. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, phase 3 study. SETTING: 146 medical centres across Asia, Europe, and North America, between 13 December 2018 and 28 February 2023. PARTICIPANTS: 1657 patients aged ≥18 years with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status, who had not received systemic anticancer therapy for advanced disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive either tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every three weeks in combination with chemotherapy (investigator's choice of oxaliplatin and capecitabine, or cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) and stratified by region, PD-L1 expression, presence or absence of peritoneal metastases, and investigator's choice of chemotherapy. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was overall survival, both in patients with a PD-L1 tumour area positivity (TAP) score of ≥5% and in all randomised patients. Safety was assessed in all those who received at least one dose of study treatment. RESULTS: Of 1657 patients screened between 13 December 2018 and 9 February 2021, 660 were ineligible due to not meeting the eligibility criteria, withdrawal of consent, adverse events, or other reasons. Overall, 997 were randomly assigned to receive tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (n=501) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=496). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy showed statistically significant improvements in overall survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with a PD-L1 TAP score of ≥5% (median 17.2 months v 12.6 months; hazard ratio 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.94); P=0.006 (interim analysis)) and in all randomised patients (median 15.0 months v 12.9 months; hazard ratio 0.80 (0.70 to 0.92); P=0.001 (final analysis)). Grade 3 or worse treatment related adverse events were observed in 54% (268/498) of patients in the tislelizumab plus chemotherapy arm versus 50% (246/494) in the placebo plus chemotherapy arm. CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab added to chemotherapy as primary treatment for advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma provided superior overall survival with a manageable safety profile versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with a PD-L1 TAP score of ≥5%, and in all randomised patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03777657.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Male , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Female , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Aged , Adult , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Capecitabine/administration & dosage , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use
5.
Cancer Cell Int ; 24(1): 181, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved for the treatment of various tumors, but the response rate is not satisfactory in certain malignancies. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) ubiquitin-E3 ligase activity is involved in the regulation of immune responses. APG-1387 is a novel second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac) mimetic IAP inhibitor. The aim of this study was to explore the synergistic effect of APG-1387 when combined with anti-PD-1 antibody in a preclinical setting. METHODS: We utilized syngeneic mouse models of ovarian cancer (ID8), colon cancer (MC38), malignant melanoma (B16), and liver cancer (Hepa1-6) to assess the combination effect of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody, including immune-related factors, tumor growth, and survival. MSD V-PLEX validated assays were used to measure in vitro and in vivo cytokine release. RESULTS: In ID8 ovarian cancer and MC38 colon cancer models, APG-1387 and anti-PD1 antibody had synergistic antitumor effects. In the MC38 model, the combination of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody significantly inhibited tumor growth (P < 0.0001) and increased the survival rate of tumor-bearing animals (P < 0.001). Moreover, we found that APG-1387 upregulated tumor-infiltrating CD3 + NK1.1 + cells by nearly 2-fold, by promoting tumor cell secretion of IL-12. Blocking IL-12 secretion abrogated the synergistic effects of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody in both MC38 and ID8 models. CONCLUSIONS: APG-1387 has the potential to turn "cold tumors" into hot ones by recruiting more CD3 + NK1.1 + cells into certain tumors. Based on these and other data, the safety and therapeutic effect of this combination will be investigated in a phase 1/2 trial in patients with advanced solid tumors or hematologic malignancies (NCT03386526).

6.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(7): 132, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have become the first-line treatment of metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEACs). This study aims to figure out the optimal combined positive score (CPS) cutoff value. METHODS: We searched for randomized phase III trials to investigate the efficacy of ICIs plus chemotherapy for metastatic GEACs compared with chemotherapy alone. Pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) based on PD-L1 expression were performed. RESULTS: A total of six trials (KEYNOTE-062, KEYNOTE-590, KEYNOTE-859, ATTRACTION-04, CheckMate 649, and ORIENT-16) were included, comprising 5,242 patients. ICIs plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.86 in global patients; HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.98 in Asian patients) and PFS (HR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.82 in global patients; HR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.56-0.73 in Asian patients) compared with chemotherapy alone. The differences in OS (ratio of HR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.40; predictive value: - 5.1%) and PFS (ratio of HR: 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.36; predictive value: - 13.5%) were not statistically significant between the global and Asian patients. Subgroup analyses indicated that the optimal CPS threshold was at ≥ 5 for OS and ≥ 10 for PFS with the highest predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit derived from ICIs plus chemotherapy is similar between Asian and global GEAC patients. However, those with a PD-L1 CPS < 5 or CPS < 10 may not have significant benefits from ICIs therapy. Therefore, it is advisable to routinely assess PD-L1 expression in GEAC patients considered for ICIs treatment.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , B7-H1 Antigen , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
7.
Nat Med ; 30(4): 1035-1043, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438735

ABSTRACT

Epigenetic modifications of chromatin, including histone acetylation, and tumor angiogenesis play pivotal roles in creating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In the randomized phase 2 CAPability-01 trial, we investigated the potential efficacy of combining the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody sintilimab with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) chidamide with or without the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in patients with unresectable chemotherapy-refractory locally advanced or metastatic microsatellite stable/proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) colorectal cancer. Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either the doublet arm (sintilimab and chidamide, n = 23) or the triplet arm (sintilimab, chidamide and bevacizumab, n = 25). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 weeks (18wPFS rate) was met with a rate of 43.8% (21 of 48) for the entire study population. Secondary endpoint results include a median PFS of 3.7 months, an overall response rate of 29.2% (14 of 48), a disease control rate of 56.3% (27 of 48) and a median duration of response of 12.0 months. The secondary endpoint of median overall survival time was not mature. The triplet arm exhibited significantly improved outcomes compared to the doublet arm, with a greater 18wPFS rate (64.0% versus 21.7%, P = 0.003), higher overall response rate (44.0% versus 13.0%, P = 0.027) and longer median PFS rate (7.3 months versus 1.5 months, P = 0.006). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events observed in both the triplet and doublet arms included proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia and diarrhea. There were two treatment-related fatalities (hepatic failure and pneumonitis). Analysis of bulk RNA sequencing data from the patients suggested that the triplet combination enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration, resulting in a more immunologically active tumor microenvironment. Our study suggests that the combination of a PD-1 antibody, an HDACi, and a VEGF antibody could be a promising treatment regimen for patients with MSS/pMMR advanced colorectal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04724239 .


Subject(s)
Aminopyridines , Benzamides , Colorectal Neoplasms , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
8.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(3): 765-773, mar. 2024.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-230806

ABSTRACT

Background Brain metastasis (BM) in gastric cancer (GC) is underestimated, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is a durable poor prognostic factor. We explored the relationship between the two and made a survival analysis. Methods HER2 expression and BM status were collected from GC patients who were diagnosed between December 2009 and May 2021. We collected GC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 from the SEER database. The primary endpoint was survival from the diagnosis of BM. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine potential risk factors of BM at diagnosis in SEER database. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Result There were 513 HER2-positive GC patients, including 16 (3.1%) with BM. Among 38 brain metastasis GC patients we collected, 16 (42.1%) patients were HER2 positive. We collected 34,199 GC patients from the SEER database and there were 260 (0.76%) patients with BM at diagnosis. GC patients that are male, white, of younger age, with primary lesions located in the proximal stomach or with distant lymph nodes, liver, bone, or lung metastasis are more likely to develop BM. The median overall survival time from diagnosis of BM was 12.73 months, and the survival time from brain metastasis of HER2-positive patients was numerically shorter, though the difference was not significant (5.30 months vs.16.13 months, P = 0.28.) Conclusion The incidence of BM in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer is 4.08 times higher than that in general patients. The median overall survival time from BM is shorter for HER2-positive patients (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Survival Analysis , Risk Factors , Prognosis
9.
Cancer Commun (Lond) ; 44(1): 127-172, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160327

ABSTRACT

The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Medical Oncology , Immunotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , China
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL