Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hum Genet ; 143(8): 955-964, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39012485

ABSTRACT

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the inheritance of both homologues of a chromosome from only one parent. The detection of UPDs in sequencing data is not well established and a common gap in genetic diagnostics. We applied our in-house UPD detection pipeline to evaluate a cohort of 9212 samples, including multigene panels as well as exome sequencing data in a single, duo or trio constellation. We used the results to inform the design of our publicly available web app altAFplotter. UPDs categorized as heterodisomy, whole chromosome or segmental isodisomy were identified and validated with microsatellites, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as well as Sanger sequencing. We detected 14 previously undiagnosed UPDs including nine isodisomies, four segmental isodisomies as well as one heterodisomy on chromosome 22. We characterized eight findings as potentially causative through homozygous pathogenic variants or imprinting disorders. Overall, our study demonstrates the utility of our UPD detection pipeline with our web app, altAFplotter, to reliably identify UPDs. This not only increases the diagnostic yield of cases with growth and metabolic disturbances, as well as developmental delay, but also enhances the understanding of UPDs that may be relevant for recurrence risks and genetic counseling.


Subject(s)
Uniparental Disomy , Humans , Uniparental Disomy/genetics , Uniparental Disomy/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Female , Male , Exome Sequencing/methods , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics
2.
N Engl J Med ; 390(21): 1985-1997, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838312

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genetic variants that cause rare disorders may remain elusive even after expansive testing, such as exome sequencing. The diagnostic yield of genome sequencing, particularly after a negative evaluation, remains poorly defined. METHODS: We sequenced and analyzed the genomes of families with diverse phenotypes who were suspected to have a rare monogenic disease and for whom genetic testing had not revealed a diagnosis, as well as the genomes of a replication cohort at an independent clinical center. RESULTS: We sequenced the genomes of 822 families (744 in the initial cohort and 78 in the replication cohort) and made a molecular diagnosis in 218 of 744 families (29.3%). Of the 218 families, 61 (28.0%) - 8.2% of families in the initial cohort - had variants that required genome sequencing for identification, including coding variants, intronic variants, small structural variants, copy-neutral inversions, complex rearrangements, and tandem repeat expansions. Most families in which a molecular diagnosis was made after previous nondiagnostic exome sequencing (63.5%) had variants that could be detected by reanalysis of the exome-sequence data (53.4%) or by additional analytic methods, such as copy-number variant calling, to exome-sequence data (10.8%). We obtained similar results in the replication cohort: in 33% of the families in which a molecular diagnosis was made, or 8% of the cohort, genome sequencing was required, which showed the applicability of these findings to both research and clinical environments. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield of genome sequencing in a large, diverse research cohort and in a small clinical cohort of persons who had previously undergone genetic testing was approximately 8% and included several types of pathogenic variation that had not previously been detected by means of exome sequencing or other techniques. (Funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute and others.).


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Rare Diseases , Whole Genome Sequencing , Female , Humans , Male , Cohort Studies , Exome , Exome Sequencing , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/ethnology , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Genetic Testing , Genome, Human , Phenotype , Rare Diseases/diagnosis , Rare Diseases/ethnology , Rare Diseases/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult
3.
Front Genet ; 14: 1297754, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38188501

ABSTRACT

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the inheritance of both alleles of a chromosome from only one parent. So far, the detection of UPDs in sequencing data is not well established and a known gap in next-generation sequencing (NGS) diagnostics. By developing a new tool for UPD detection, we re-evaluated an eight-year-old individual presenting with scoliosis, muscle weakness and global developmental delay. Previous panel analysis identified a homozygous likely pathogenic loss-of-function variant in the PIEZO2-gene associated with arthrogryposis (OMIM # 617146). Interestingly, during a re-evaluation process, we identified a region of homozygosity (ROH) covering over 95% of chromosome 18. Segregation and microsatellite analysis within the family revealed that only the father is a heterozygous carrier of the variant in PIEZO2 and confirmed paternal uniparental isodisomy (iUPD) on chromosome 18 in the individual. Further methylation analysis indicated demethylation of the promotor region of PARD6G-AS1, which is described to be maternally imprinted and could possibly influence the individuals' phenotype. Our report describes the first complete iUPD on chromosome 18 and highlights that UPDs can be a cause for homozygous pathogenic variants, which reduces the risk of reoccurrence in case of a new pregnancy in comparison to an autosomal recessive inheritance trait significantly.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL