Escalating Oral Treprostinil Dose With Intravenous Treprostinil Bridging Therapy.

Oral treprostinil, approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, remains an attractive option in combination with other medications to delay disease progression and improve exercise capacity. However, patients are often challenged with the ability to overcome adverse effects as outpatients and reach effective doses in a timely manner. We describe a case of a 47-year-old female on oral treprostinil who presented to the clinic with worsening symptoms of disease, necessitating higher dosing. This patient was previously uptitrated outpatient with oral treprostinil, which had allowed her to remain stable for years. Once uptitrated with additional intravenous therapy, the oral treprostinil dose was gradually further increased to the new goal dosage, resulting in improvements in symptoms and right ventricular function. This case highlights the versatility of dose optimization of oral treprostinil with rapid bridging through intravenous therapy.

Implementing the EXPEDITE parenteral induction protocol: Rapid parenteral treprostinil titration and transition to oral treprostinil.

Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that targets multiple cellular receptors to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In certain scenarios, patients may require aggressive treprostinil titration. Several studies have demonstrated that higher doses of treprostinil lead to greater clinical benefit. Data supports successful transitions from parenteral to oral treprostinil; however, administration routes, transition duration, and transition setting vary in the real-world. The EXPEDITE clinical trial (NCT03497689) prospectively studied whether rapid parenteral treprostinil induction can be used to achieve high doses of oral treprostinil (total daily dose: ≥12 mg) in prostacyclin naïve PAH patients. Parenteral prostacyclin induction may be more appropriate for patients who need to reach therapeutic dosing more urgently than longer titration durations reported with conventional de novo oral treprostinil initiation. This summary provides strategies utilized in EXPEDITE. Parenteral treprostinil was initiated at 2 ng/kg/min intravenously or subcutaneously; clinicians determined the frequency and dose increment of up-titration. Two distinct transition schedules from parenteral to oral treprostinil were employed: rapid cross-titration in an inpatient setting (median: 2 days) or gradual cross-titration in an outpatient setting (median: 5 days). Patient status was closely monitored after transition; oral treprostinil dose was titrated to clinical effect and tolerability. Factors considered when individualizing dosing strategies included parenteral and oral treprostinil target doses, nursing support, patient education, medication counseling and adverse events management. EXPEDITE demonstrated the time to a therapeutic dose of oral treprostinil is significantly shorter when utilizing a short-term parenteral induction strategy and may be suitable for patients requiring aggressive titration of oral treprostinil.

Management of nontuberculous mycobacteria in lung transplant cases: an international Delphi study.

Rationale: Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) diseases are difficult-to-treat infections, especially in lung transplant (LTx) candidates. Currently, there is a paucity of recommendations on the management of NTM infections in LTx, focusing on Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), M. abscessus and M. kansasii. Methods: Pulmonologists, infectious disease specialists, LTx surgeons and Delphi experts with expertise in NTM were recruited. A patient representative was also invited. Three questionnaires comprising questions with multiple response statements were distributed to panellists. Delphi methodology with a Likert scale of 11 points (5 to -5) was applied to define the agreement between experts. Responses from the first two questionnaires were collated to develop a final questionnaire. The consensus was described as a median rating >4 or <-4 indicating for or against the given statement. After the last round of questionnaires, a cumulative report was generated. Results: Panellists recommend performing sputum cultures and a chest computed tomography scan for NTM screening in LTx candidates. Panellists recommend against absolute contraindication to LTx even with multiple positive sputum cultures for MAC, M. abscessus or M. kansasii. Panellists recommend MAC patients on antimicrobial treatment and culture negative can be listed for LTx without further delay. Panellists recommend 6 months of culture-negative for M. kansasii, but 12 months of further treatment from the time of culture-negative for M. abscessus before listing for LTx. Conclusion: This NTM LTx study consensus statement provides essential recommendations for NTM management in LTx and can be utilised as an expert opinion while awaiting evidence-based contributions.

The role of riociguat in combination therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Effective clinical decision-making in initial treatment selection and switching or escalations of therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) depends on multiple factors including the patient's risk profile. Data from clinical trials suggest that switching from a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) to the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat may provide clinical benefit in patients not reaching treatment goals. In this review, we cover the clinical evidence for riociguat combination regimens for patients with PAH and discuss their evolving role in upfront combination therapy and switching from a PDE5i as an alternative to escalating therapy. Specifically, we review current evidence which suggests or provides a hypothesis for 1) the potential use of riociguat plus endothelin receptor antagonist combinations for upfront combination therapy in patients with PAH at intermediate to high risk of 1-year mortality and 2) the benefits of switching to riociguat from a PDE5i in patients who are not achieving treatment goals with PDE5i-based dual combination therapy and at intermediate risk.

Expert consensus on the management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, complex, connective tissue disorder. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in SSc, occurring in 35-52% of patients and accounting for 20-40% of mortality. Evolution of therapeutic options has resulted in a lack of consensus on how to manage this condition. This Delphi study was initiated to develop consensus recommendations based on expert physician insights regarding screening, progression, treatment criteria, monitoring of response, and the role of recent therapeutic advances with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants in patients with SSc-ILD. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was completed by pulmonologists (n = 13) and rheumatologists (n = 12) with expertise in the management of patients with SSc-ILD. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale from - 5 (complete disagreement) to + 5 (complete agreement). Consensus was predefined as a mean Likert scale score of ≤ - 2.5 or ≥ + 2.5 with a standard deviation not crossing zero. RESULTS: Panelists recommended that all patients with SSc be screened for ILD by chest auscultation, spirometry with diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and/or autoantibody testing. Treatment decisions were influenced by baseline and changes in pulmonary function tests, extent of ILD on HRCT, duration and degree of dyspnea, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and potential contribution of reflux. Treatment success was defined as stabilization or improvement of signs or symptoms of ILD and functional status. Mycophenolate mofetil was identified as the initial treatment of choice. Experts considered nintedanib a therapeutic option in patients with progressive fibrotic ILD despite immunosuppressive therapy or patients contraindicated/unable to tolerate immunotherapy. Concomitant use of nintedanib with MMF/cyclophosphamide can be considered in patients with advanced disease at initial presentation, aggressive ILD, or significant disease progression. Although limited consensus was achieved on the use of tocilizumab, the experts considered it a therapeutic option for patients with early SSc and ILD with elevated acute-phase reactants. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi study generated consensus recommendations for management of patients with SSc-ILD in a real-world setting. Findings from this study provide a management algorithm that will be helpful for treating patients with SSc-ILD and addresses a significant unmet need.

Delphi consensus recommendation for optimization of pulmonary hypertension therapy focusing on switching from a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor to riociguat.

Dual combination therapy with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and endothelin receptor antagonist is recommended for most patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The RESPITE and REPLACE studies suggest that switching from a PDE5i to a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activator may provide clinical improvement in this situation. The optimal approach to escalation or transition of therapy in this or other scenarios is not well defined. We developed an expert consensus statement on the transition to sGC and other treatment escalations and transitions in PAH using a modified Delphi process. The Delphi process used a panel of 20 physicians with expertise in PAH. Panelists answered three questionnaires on the management of treatment escalations and transitions in PAH. The initial questionnaire included open-ended questions. Later questionnaires consolidated the responses into statements that panelists rated on a Likert scale from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree) to determine consensus. The Delphi process produced several consensus recommendations. Escalation should be considered for patients who are at high risk or not achieving treatment goals, by adding an agent from a new class, switching from oral to parenteral prostacyclins, or increasing the dose. Switching to a new class or within a class should be considered if tolerability or other considerations unrelated to efficacy are affecting adherence. Switching from a PDE5i to an SGC activator may benefit patients with intermediate risk who are not improving on their present therapy. These consensus-based recommendations may be helpful to clinicians and beneficial for patients when evidence-based guidance is unavailable.

Screening Strategies for Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Multidisciplinary Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality. Evaluation of PH is recommended in lung transplant candidates, but there are currently no standardized screening approaches. Trials have identified therapies that are effective in this setting, providing another rationale to routinely screen patients with ILD for PH. RESEARCH QUESTION: What screening strategies for identifying PH in patients with ILD are supported by expert consensus? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study convened a panel of 16 pulmonologists with expertise in PH and ILD, and used a modified Delphi consensus process with three surveys to identify PH screening strategies. Survey 1 consisted primarily of open-ended questions. Surveys 2 and 3 were developed from responses to survey 1 and contained statements about PH screening that panelists rated from -5 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). RESULTS: Panelists reached consensus on several triggers for suspicion of PH including the following: symptoms, clinical signs, findings on chest CT scan or other imaging, abnormalities in pulse oximetry, elevations in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and unexplained worsening in pulmonary function tests or 6-min walk distance. Echocardiography and BNP/NT-proBNP were identified as screening tools for PH. Right heart catheterization was deemed essential for confirming PH. INTERPRETATION: Many patients with ILD may benefit from early evaluation of PH now that an approved therapy is available. Protocols to evaluate patients with ILD often overlap with evaluations for pulmonary hypertension-interstitial lung disease and can be used to assess the risk of PH. Because standardized approaches are lacking, this consensus statement is intended to aid physicians in the identification of patients with ILD and possible PH, and provide guidance for timely right heart catheterization.

Riociguat for Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: Results of a 1-Year Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Riociguat is effective in delaying the time to clinical worsening (TCW) in patients with groups 1 and 4 pulmonary hypertension. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is riociguat more effective than placebo in prolonging TCW in sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients with SAPH confirmed by right heart catheterization were randomized 1:1 to riociguat or placebo. Patients underwent 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and spirometry testing every 8 weeks. The primary end point was TCW, which was defined by the time to the first of the following: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) need for hospitalization because of worsening cardiopulmonary status attributable to progression of disease, (3) > 50 m decrease in the 6MWD test, or (4) worsening of World Health Organization functional class. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were randomized to riociguat (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8). No difference was found in pulmonary artery mean, pulmonary vascular resistance, initial 6MWD, or FVC between the two groups. Five of eight patients who received placebo met TCW criteria, whereas none of the patients who received riociguat experienced a qualifying event. By log-rank analysis, patients who received riociguat were in the study for a significantly longer period (χ 2 = 6.259; P = .0124). The 6MWD decreased in the placebo group (median, -55.9 m; range, -176.8 to 60 m), but rose in the riociguat group (median, +42.7 m; range, -7.5 to +91.4 m; P = .0149), with a placebo-corrected difference of 94 m (P < .01). Four of eight patients who received riociguat, but only 1 of 8 patients who received placebo, showed a > 30-m improvement in 6MWD (P > .05). No significant adverse events associated with riociguat occurred. INTERPRETATION: Over the 1 year of the study, riociguat was effective in preventing clinical worsening and improving exercise capacity in patients with SAPH. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02625558; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency research and emerging treatment strategies: what's down the road?

Intravenous infusion of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat emphysema associated with AAT deficiency (AATD) in 1987 and there are now several FDA-approved therapy products on the market, all of which are derived from pooled human plasma. Intravenous AAT therapy has proven clinical efficacy in slowing the decline of lung function associated with AATD progression; however, it is only recommended for individuals with the most severe forms of AATD as there is a lack of evidence that this treatment is effective in treating wild-type heterozygotes (e.g., PI*MS and PI*MZ genotypes), for which the prevalence may be much higher than previously thought. There are large numbers of individuals that are currently left untreated despite displaying symptoms of AATD. Furthermore, not all countries offer AAT augmentation therapy due to its expense and inconvenience for patients. More cost-effective treatments are now being sought that show efficacy for less severe forms of AATD and many new therapeutic technologies are being investigated, such as gene repair and other interference strategies, as well as the use of chemical chaperones. New sources of AAT are also being investigated to ensure there are enough supplies to meet future demand, and new methods of assessing response to treatment are being evaluated. There is currently extensive research into AATD and its treatment, and this chapter aims to highlight important emerging treatment strategies that aim to improve the lives of patients with AATD.

An expert panel delphi consensus statement on patient selection and management for transitioning between oral and inhaled treprostinil.

Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), is available for administration by parenteral, oral, or inhaled routes. Transitioning between routes may be beneficial for appropriate patients; however, there is little published data on transitions between oral and inhaled treprostinil. We used a modified Delphi process to develop expert consensus recommendations on transitions between these formulations. Three questionnaires were used to develop statements about relevant aspects of transition management, which the panelists rated, using a Likert scale, from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree). Eleven physicians with expertise in PAH treatment modalities, participated in the panel. Of the 492 statements evaluated, consensus was reached on 215 (43.7%). Key consensus recommendations included (1) accurately defining successful transition, as stable or improved PAH with good tolerability and adherence, and (2) patients with stable, low-risk PAH showing insufficient response or tolerability to their existing treprostinil therapy (and due to restrictions in up titration of dosing), as appropriate candidates for transitions between treprostinil formulations. Panelists did not reach consensus for an overall strategy for performing these transitions, mainly because of variability in their practice parameters. Consensus was also achieved on recommendations for adverse event management, including reassurance, administration of oral treprostinil 3 times daily with food, and dosing inhaled treprostinil at intervals ≥3 hours apart. The Delphi process aided in developing expert consensus recommendations that may provide clinically useful guidance for transitioning between treprostinil formulations. However, additional data from centers with high volumes of PAH patients undergoing treprostinil transitions would be optimal for defining more complete and robust strategies to facilitate successful transition.

Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Augmentation Therapy Improves Survival in Severely Deficient Patients with Predicted FEV1 Between 10% and 60%: A Retrospective Analysis of the NHLBI Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Registry.

Purpose: The extent of the survival benefit of augmentation therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) in individuals with advanced COPD is difficult to define. We performed a retrospective analysis using all available data from the observational registry of individuals with severe deficiency of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) conducted by the NHLBI investigators. Patients and Methods: Individuals (N=1129) with severe deficiency of AAT were evaluated for mortality using all data sources and stratified by 10% increments of baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted and by augmentation therapy status (ever receiving versus never receiving). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for each of the deciles comparing survival in treated vs non-treated groups. A multivariable model was performed to define the correlates of survival in individuals with FEV1 <30% predicted. Results: Amongst all subjects, augmentation was associated with improved survival (p<0.0001). Among the individuals ever receiving augmentation therapy, survival was better than for those not receiving augmentation at all 10% increments of FEV1% predicted from 10% to 60% (P values <0.05 in all deciles). In subgroups of participants with hyperinflation defined as residual volume (RV)>120% predicted and in subgroups of participants with reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <70% predicted, there was significantly better survival for those ever receiving augmentation therapy than for those who never received augmentation (p<0.001). A multivariable analysis showed that mortality benefit is influenced by age, DLCO % predicted, and augmentation therapy. Conclusion: There is a survival benefit from augmentation therapy in AATD between FEV1 values in the 10-60% predicted range. Screening and treatment of AATD patients should therefore not be limited by the severity of illness as defined by FEV1.

Expert consensus on the management of adverse events and prescribing practices associated with the treatment of patients taking pirfenidone for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with pirfenidone (Esbriet®, Genentech USA, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.), effectively managing treatment-related adverse events (AEs) may improve adherence. Due to a lack of clinical evidence and expertise, managing these AEs can be challenging for patients and physicians alike. In the absence of evidence, consensus recommendations from physicians experienced in using pirfenidone to treat IPF are beneficial. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, expert recommendations were developed by a panel of physicians experienced with using pirfenidone for IPF. Over three iterations, panelists developed and refined a series of statements on the use of pirfenidone in IPF. Their agreement on each statement was ranked using a Likert scale. RESULTS: A panel of 12 physicians participated and developed a total of 286 statements on dosing and administration, special populations, drug-drug interactions, laboratory analysis, warnings and precautions, and AE management. Expert recommendations were achieved with regard to slower initial titrations and slower titrations for AEs, dosing with meal(s) or substantial meals, and adding other prescribed pharmacological agents for AEs. CONCLUSION: Until there is further clinical evidence, the resulting consensus recommendations are intended to provide direction on the practical management of IPF with pirfenidone, by encompassing a broad experience from the real world to complement data gleaned from clinical trials.

Inpatient Initiation of Oral Treprostinil in an Academic Medical System.

PURPOSE: Clinicians may transition patients on parenteral or inhaled prostacyclins to oral treprostinil for ease of use or to avoid adverse effects related to parenteral therapy. However, few data are available to guide these transitions in inpatients. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the inpatient initiation of oral treprostinil at an academic medical system. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients newly initiated on oral treprostinil at Cleveland Clinic Heath System from 2015 to 2017. Demographic information regarding pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) history and previous PAH therapies were recorded. Outcomes evaluated included doses of oral treprostinil utilized, adverse effects related to therapy, and measures of clinical and functional status before and after the initiation of oral treprostinil. RESULTS: Overall, 29 patients were prescribed oral treprostinil, of which 15 patients were included in the analysis. Common reasons for initiation of oral treprostinil included disease progression (6, 40%) and patient desire (4, 25%). The median duration of transition/initiation of oral treprostinil was 4 days (range, 3-11 days). Median daily dose of oral treprostinil on day 1 of initiation was 2 mg (0.25-4 mg). By day 7, median daily dose was 15 mg (0.75-27.75 mg). Common adverse effects related to therapy were gastrointestinal (7, 47%) and headache (4, 27%). No patients required discontinuation of oral treprostinil due to adverse effects within 90 days of initiation. CONCLUSION: Inpatient initiation/transition to oral treprostinil was relatively well tolerated. Future studies should evaluate clinical outcomes surrounding the transitioning to oral treprostinil.

Clinical phenotyping: role in treatment decisions in sarcoidosis.

A variety of phenotypic categorisations have been developed for sarcoidosis. Phenotyping has been used for genetics studies and to guide treatment selection. The authors participated in a Delphi expert consensus panel to develop a proposed phenotype categorisation and treatment recommendations for pulmonary sarcoidosis patients. Panellists reached consensus that asymptomatic patients with normal pulmonary function and adenopathy alone or normal chest imaging do not require therapy, while symptomatic patients with impaired pulmonary function or infiltrates should be treated. The panel did not reach consensus on asymptomatic patients with abnormal chest imaging or reduced pulmonary function, or symptomatic patients with normal chest imaging and pulmonary function. The proposed phenotype categories and associated treatment recommendations are asymptomatic (no therapy), acute (disease duration <1-2 years, apparently self-limited, corticosteroids), chronic (antimetabolites and other second-line therapies) and advanced (biologics). Some clinical settings, such as dyspnoea/hypoxaemia at rest, severely impaired or rapidly decreasing pulmonary function tests, and severe cardiac, neurologic, ocular or renal involvement warrant immediate therapy.

Delphi consensus recommendations for a treatment algorithm in pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Pulmonary sarcoidosis presents substantial management challenges, with limited evidence on effective therapies and phenotypes. In the absence of definitive evidence, expert consensus can supply clinically useful guidance in medicine. An international panel of 26 experts participated in a Delphi process to identify consensus on pharmacological management in sarcoidosis with the development of preliminary recommendations.The modified Delphi process used three rounds. The first round focused on qualitative data collection with open-ended questions to ensure comprehensive inclusion of expert concepts. Rounds 2 and 3 applied quantitative assessments using an 11-point Likert scale to identify consensus.Key consensus points included glucocorticoids as initial therapy for most patients, with non-biologics (immunomodulators), usually methotrexate, considered in severe or extrapulmonary disease requiring prolonged treatment, or as a steroid-sparing intervention in cases with high risk of steroid toxicity. Biologic therapies might be considered as additive therapy if non-biologics are insufficiently effective or are not tolerated with initial biologic therapy, usually with a tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor, typically infliximab.The Delphi methodology provided a platform to gain potentially valuable insight and interim guidance while awaiting evidenced-based contributions.

Management of repository corticotrophin injection therapy for pulmonary sarcoidosis: a Delphi study.

In patients treated with repository corticotrophin injection (RCI) for pulmonary sarcoidosis, effective management of adverse events may improve adherence. However, management of adverse events may be challenging due to limitations in real-world clinical experience with RCI and available published guidelines.We surveyed 12 physicians with a modified Delphi process using three questionnaires. Questionnaire 1 consisted of open-ended questions. Panellists' answers were developed into a series of statements for Questionnaires 2 and 3. In these, physicians rated their agreement with the statements using a Likert scale.Key consensus recommendations included a starting dose of 40 units twice a week for patients with less severe disease, continued at a maintenance dose for patients who responded, particularly those with chronic refractory sarcoidosis. Panellists reached consensus that concomitant steroids should be quickly tapered in patients receiving RCI, but that concomitant use of immunosuppressive medications should be continued. Panellists developed consensus recommendations for adverse event management, and reached consensus that RCI should be down-titrated or discontinued if other interventions for the adverse effects fail or if the adverse effect is severe.In the absence of clinical evidence, our Delphi consensus opinions may provide practical guidance to physicians on the management of RCI to treat pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Individual dose adjustment of riociguat in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Riociguat is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator that has been approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension following pulmonary endarterectomy. Riociguat is administered using an 8-week individual dose-adjustment scheme whereby a patient initially receives riociguat 1.0 mg three times daily (tid), and the dose is then increased every 2 weeks in the absence of hypotension, indicated by systolic blood pressure measurements and symptoms, up to a maximum dose of 2.5 mg tid. The established riociguat dose-adjustment scheme allows the dose of riociguat to be individually optimized in terms of tolerability and efficacy. The majority of patients in the phase III clinical trials and their long-term extension phases achieved the maximum riociguat dose, whereas some patients remained on lower doses. There is evidence that these patients may experience benefits at riociguat doses lower than 2.5 mg tid, with improvement in exercise capacity being observed after only 2-4 weeks of treatment in the phase III studies and in the exploratory 1.5 mg-maximum patient group of PATENT-1. This review aims to provide an overview of the rationale behind the riociguat dose-adjustment scheme and examine its application to both clinical trials and real-life clinical practice.

Recommendations for the clinical management of patients receiving macitentan for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): A Delphi consensus document.

In patients treated with macitentan (Opsumit®, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), prevention and/or effective management of treatment-related adverse events may improve adherence. However, management of these adverse events can be challenging and the base of evidence and clinical experience for macitentan is limited. In the absence of evidence, consensus recommendations from physicians experienced in using macitentan to treat PAH may benefit patients and physicians who are using macitentan. Consensus recommendations were developed by a panel of physicians experienced with macitentan and PAH using a modified Delphi process. Over three iterations, panelists developed and refined a series of statements on the use of macitentan in PAH and rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. The panel of 18 physicians participated and developed a total of 118 statements on special populations, add-on therapy, drug-drug interactions, warnings and precautions, hospitalization and functional class, and adverse event management. The resulting consensus recommendations are intended to provide practical guidance on real-world issues in using macitentan to treat patients with PAH.

Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation.

Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of delivery, use of the drug is challenging because of the requirement for careful titration and management of drug-related adverse effects. We aimed to create a consensus document combining available evidence with expert opinion to provide guidance for use of oral treprostinil. Following a methodology commonly used in business and social sciences (the 'Delphi Process'), two investigators from the oral treprostinil (Freedom) studies created a series of statements based on available evidence and the package insert. The set of 'best practice' statements was circulated to nine other Freedom trial investigators. Their comments were incorporated into the document as new line items for further vote and comment. The subsequent document was put to vote line by line (scale of -5 to +5) and a final statement was drafted. Consensus recommendations include initial therapy with 0.125 mg for treatment naÿ patients, three times daily dosing, aggressive use of antidiarrheal medication, and a strong preference for use of the drug in combination with other approved PAH therapies. This process was particularly valuable in providing guidance for the management of adverse events (where essentially no data is available). The Delphi process was useful to codify investigator experience and subsequently develop investigator consensus about practical issues for physicians who may wish to prescribe oral treprostinil.

Long-term clinical outcomes following treatment with alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor for COPD associated with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a look at the evidence.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a common hereditary disorder caused by mutations in the SERPINA1 gene, which encodes alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT; also known as alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor, A1-PI). An important function of A1-PI in the lung is to inhibit neutrophil elastase, one of various proteolytic enzymes released by activated neutrophils during inflammation. Absence or deficiency of A1-PI leads to an imbalance between elastase and anti-elastase activity, which results in progressive, irreversible destruction of lung tissue, and ultimately the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with early-onset emphysema. AATD is under-diagnosed, patients can experience long delays before obtaining an accurate diagnosis, and the consequences of delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis can be severe. Currently, A1-PI therapy is the only available treatment that addresses disease etiology in patients with AATD; however, demonstrating clinical efficacy of A1-PI therapy is challenging. In order to show therapeutic efficacy with traditional endpoints such as forced expiratory volume in one second and mortality, large sample sizes and longer duration trials are required. However, AATD is a rare, slow progressive disease, which can take decades to manifest clinically and recruiting sufficient numbers of patients into prolonged placebo-controlled trials remains a significant obstacle. Despite this, the Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation therapy in Alpha 1-Proteinase Inhibitor Deficiency (RAPID) and RAPID Extension trial, the largest clinical program completed to date, utilized quantitative chest computed tomography as a sensitive and specific measure of the extent of emphysema. Findings from the RAPID/RAPID Extension program definitively confirmed the benefits of A1-PI therapy in slowing disease progression and provided evidence of a disease-modifying effect of A1-PI therapy in patients with AATD. These findings suggest that the early introduction of treatment in patients with severe emphysema-related AATD may delay the time to death, lung transplantation or crippling respiratory complaints. In addition, there is now limited evidence that A1-PI therapy provides a gain of more than five life-years, supporting previous observations based on registry data. With the clinical efficacy of A1-PI therapy now demonstrated, further studies are required to assess long-term outcomes.