ABSTRACT
Background and objective Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is used for the treatment of symptomatic gallstones. Intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) is used to diagnose common bile duct (CBD) stones. There is controversy surrounding routine vs selective use of IOC based on clinical, biochemical and ultrasound criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes from routine IOC and its utility in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and methods This was a UK-based single-centre retrospective study evaluating the outcomes from IOC for all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between May 2014 and February 2020. All adult patients undergoing elective, semi-elective or emergency operations were included. Demographics, biochemistry as well as radiological and endoscopic investigations were analysed. IOC was performed using a standardised technique and was interpreted by a single surgeon. Results A total of 744 out of 804 patients underwent IOC. The median age of the cohort was 51 years (SD: ±17.5); there were 468 females (62.9%) and 276 males (37.1%). Filling defects were identified in 43/744 (5.8%) patients, with 23/43 having stone extraction via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Logistic regression analysis identified alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as a predictor of filling defects in IOC (OR: 1.003; 95% CI: 1.001-1.005, p=0.015). Conclusion Based on our findings, the routine use of IOC during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective. Preoperative clinical, radiological and biochemical parameters apart from ALP have a limited role in predicting the diagnostic yield of IOC.
ABSTRACT
We have previously documented two patients (FOL and CLA) with posterior cortical atrophy who achieved accurate and rapid reading despite deficits in ten measures of visual processing, with two notable exceptions: (1) a measure of visual acuity, (2) a measure of visual crowding. Subsequent longitudinal investigation of these patients was carried out, involving annual tests of early visual, visuoperceptual and visuospatial processing and assessment of reading ability. Follow-up assessments identified the evolution of a particular early visual processing deficit, excessive visual crowding; this deficit has been previously implicated in forms of dyslexia. Consistent with the link between crowding and reading dysfunction, follow-up assessments also revealed deterioration in both patients' reading ability. The current findings demonstrate a neurodegenerative approach towards understanding the relationship between visual crowding and the reading system, and suggest possible mechanisms for how excessive crowding may disrupt word recognition.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/pathology , Crowding/psychology , Dyslexia/etiology , Neurodegenerative Diseases/complications , Neurodegenerative Diseases/psychology , Space Perception/physiology , Cerebral Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Discrimination, Psychological , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neurodegenerative Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Neuropsychological Tests , Photic Stimulation , Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We report (1) the quantitative investigation of text reading in posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), and (2) the effects of 2 novel software-based reading aids that result in dramatic improvements in the reading ability of patients with PCA. METHODS: Reading performance, eye movements, and fixations were assessed in patients with PCA and typical Alzheimer disease and in healthy controls (experiment 1). Two reading aids (single- and double-word) were evaluated based on the notion that reducing the spatial and oculomotor demands of text reading might support reading in PCA (experiment 2). RESULTS: Mean reading accuracy in patients with PCA was significantly worse (57%) compared with both patients with typical Alzheimer disease (98%) and healthy controls (99%); spatial aspects of passages were the primary determinants of text reading ability in PCA. Both aids led to considerable gains in reading accuracy (PCA mean reading accuracy: single-word reading aid = 96%; individual patient improvement range: 6%-270%) and self-rated measures of reading. Data suggest a greater efficiency of fixations and eye movements under the single-word reading aid in patients with PCA. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate how neurologic characterization of a neurodegenerative syndrome (PCA) and detailed cognitive analysis of an important everyday skill (reading) can combine to yield aids capable of supporting important everyday functional abilities. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with PCA, 2 software-based reading aids (single-word and double-word) improve reading accuracy.