ABSTRACT
Introduction: Anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties maximize the therapeutic potential of bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in osteoarthritis (OA) knee. There is a lack of studies to standardize the treatment procedure to make the studies done across various centers comparable to understand the lacunae better and develop further the deficiency in our understanding of BMAC for OA knee. We aimed to assess the degree of pain relief, functional outcome, and cartilage thickness with different doses of BMAC in primary OA knee. Materials and Methods: A single-centered prospective observational study was conducted with 80 patients of OA knee who were divided into 4 groups where group A (n = 20), group B (n = 20), group C (n = 20), and group D (n = 20) received intra-articular 1, 2, 5 million BMAC cells per kg body weight, and intra-articular saline, respectively. All patients were followed up with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores both pre and post-procedurally at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Results: The study found no significant differences in demographics or co-morbidities across four participant groups (A, B, C, D). However, clinical outcomes varied markedly: Groups B and C showed significant improvements in pain perception (VAS scores), knee function, and quality of life (KOOS and WOMAC scores), while Group A showed marginal or non-significant changes, and Group D exhibited no significant improvements. These findings suggest that treatments in Groups B and C reached the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, significantly enhancing patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: A dose of 2 million BMAC cells per kg body weight for knee OA serves as the better regenerative modality of choice in cartilage regeneration. With our dose-escalation study, we would be able to standardize the treatment procedure and enable global comparison of the treatment method across various regions of the world.