ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) are reviewed, and practical issues for pharmacists to consider are discussed. SUMMARY: Eight randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of FMT for recurrent CDI were analyzed. The trials varied in the type of sample (fresh, frozen, lyophilized), route of administration (nasogastric tube, colonoscopy, enema, oral), and comparator agent (different type of FMT, vancomycin). Efficacy rates ranged from 43.8% to 96.2% with FMT, and safety data were relatively similar. With these favorable data, pharmacists are likely to be involved at multiple steps in the delivery of FMT to patients with recurrent CDI, including the procurement, documentation, and administration of various products and patient education. CONCLUSION: FMT is an option for recurrent CDI that is supported by findings of randomized controlled trials, although a preferred method for the delivery remains to be defined. Pharmacists can play an important role in the successful management of patients with recurrent CDI who may benefit from FMT.
Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Professional Role , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage and nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and determine the duration of therapy at which CDI risk increases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included consecutive adult patients in whom nosocomial CDI developed after hospitalization for 3 or more days at one of 2 affiliated hospitals between June 1, 2010, and October 31, 2011. These patients were matched to patients hospitalized within 6 months who did not have CDI development in a 1:2 ratio using age, sex, and antibiotic usage. Potential risk factors for CDI, including PPI use and duration, were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding variables and identify risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were evaluated, 67 with CDI and 134 matched controls. Patients in whom CDI developed were more likely to have received a PPI (76% vs 39%; P<.001) and had a longer duration of PPI therapy (median [range], 5 [0-20] days vs 0 [0-11] days; P<.001) than those who did not have CDI development. After controlling for prior hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, admission from a skilled nursing facility, immunosuppression, number of antibiotics received, PPI duration, and time to event via multivariate analysis, PPI duration was found to be a risk factor for CDI (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.27; P=.018). The probability for CDI was higher when PPI use exceeded 2 days in patients without a prior hospital admission and 1 day in patients with a prior admission. CONCLUSION: The duration of PPI therapy is significantly associated with CDI. Clinicians should strongly consider restricting PPI use given the short exposure time associated with this increased risk.