Randomized controlled trial of ventricular elastic support therapy in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure: rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Despite the current drug and device therapies, heart failure remains associated with high rates of disability, morbidity, and mortality. There is a need for newer therapies. One investigational approach is the use of ventricular support devices. These devices reduce ventricular wall stress leading to decreases in left ventricular (LV) volumes, dimensions, and mass. Ventricular support devices have been shown to reverse pathological ventricular remodeling, improve systolic function, and improve symptoms of heart failure. The Prospective Evaluation of Elastic Restraint to LESSen the effects of Heart Failure (PEERLESS-HF) trial was designed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of one such device, the HeartNet (Paracor Medical, Sunnyvale, CA). METHODS: The HeartNet is an elastic ventricular restraint device formed from nitinol and covered in silicone, implanted using a minimally invasive approach. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare optimal heart failure drug and device therapy plus the HeartNet (treatment group) to optimal drug and device therapy alone (control group) in patients with advanced systolic heart failure (LV ejection fraction ≤35% and LV end diastolic diameter <85 mm). Primary efficacy end points include the change in peak VO(2), quality of life score, and 6-minute hall walk distance from baseline to 6 months. The primary safety objective is to demonstrate noninferiority for all-cause mortality at 12 months. Planned enrollment is for 272 patients at approximately 35 centers in North America. CONCLUSIONS: The PEERLESS-HF trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of ventricular elastic support in advanced systolic heart failure, advancing our knowledge of this investigational approach to heart failure therapy.

Prospective evaluation of elastic restraint to lessen the effects of heart failure (PEERLESS-HF) trial.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) remodeling predicts poor outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. The HeartNet(®) cardiac restraint device (Paracor Medical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) may reduce LV remodeling and improve functional capacity, quality of life, and outcomes in HF patients. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the HeartNet Ventricular Support System in HF patients receiving optimal medical therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial in patients with symptomatic HF and LV ejection fraction ≤35% on optimal medical and device therapy. The primary efficacy end points were changes in peak VO(2), 6-minute walk (6MW) distance, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) quality of life score at 6 months. The primary safety end point was all-cause mortality at 12 months. Because the planned adaptive interim analysis of the first 122 subjects with a completed 6-month follow-up indicated futility to reach the peak VO(2) end point, trial enrollment was suspended. Hence, the results on the 96 treatment and 114 control subjects are reported. Groups were similar at baseline. At 6 months, responder frequency for a prespecified improvement was similar between groups for peak VO(2) (P = .502) and MLWHF score (P = .184) but borderline higher for improvement in 6MW distance in the treatment compared with the control group (33 [38%] vs. 25 [25%]; P = .044). At 6 months, the treatment group had a significantly greater improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (P < .001) and decrease in LV mass (P = .032), LV end-diastolic diameter (P = .015), LV end-systolic diameter (P = .032), and LV end-diastolic volume (P = .031) as compared with controls. At 12 months, all-cause mortality and responder rates were similar in the 2 groups. Success rate for the HeartNet implantation was 99%. CONCLUSION: Enrollment in the trial was stopped because an interim analysis showed futility of reaching the peak VO(2) end point. However, because of the device safety and favorable signals for LV remodeling and quality of life, further investigation of this device is warranted.

Assessing historical compliance with medical recommendations among transplant candidates: preliminary findings.

CONTEXT: Noncompliance with medical recommendations by transplant candidates and recipients carries serious consequences for morbidity and mortality. Few patient-specific, objective measures for assessing historical compliance exist. OBJECTIVE: To address this gap, a psychometric and exploratory analysis of an interview-based, global measure of clinician-rated judgment of historical compliance was undertaken. METHODS: All findings are based on a retrospective chart review of the medical and psychosocial evaluations of 96 consecutive potential heart transplant candidates seen at a large Southeastern academic medical center. RESULTS: Preliminary results demonstrated adequate interrater reliability and discriminant validity for the measure. Additionally, results from hierarchical multivariable regression analysis revealed years of education to be positively associated with clinician-rated judgment of historical compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary psychometric support for the use of a measure of historical compliance among heart transplant candidates. Findings from this study also are consistent with the literature to date and may be reflective of a psychobiological process that mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and health outcomes.

Bradycardia and syncope as a presentation of cardiac allograft rejection involving the conducting system.

Post-heart transplantation bradycardic syncope and arrest could be due to preferential rejection of the conduction system. We present six heart transplant patients with this presentation, two of whom died. The autopsy of one of those patients demonstrated severe rejection of the conduction system, with only mild rejection throughout the rest of the myocardium. We postulate that aggressive therapy for rejection and pacemaker placement may result in improved survival in heart transplant recipients with this clinical presentation.

Safety and efficacy of ibutilide in heart transplant recipients.

In this report we describe our experience with ibutilide, a relatively new Class III anti-arrhythmic agent, in 8 heart transplant patients with supraventricular tachycardia in various settings (3 patients with rejection, 2 after endomyocardial biopsy). Ibutilide treatment was successful in all patients, with the arrhythmia recurring early in 1 patient. There were no complications.

Left ventricular collapse secondary to pericardial effusion treated with pericardicentesis and percutaneous pericardiotomy in severe pulmonary hypertension.

A 61-year-old white female, a Jehovah's Witness, with severe pulmonary hypertension, presented with worsening heart failure symptoms. She had a pericardial effusion with left ventricular (LV) diastolic collapse on transthoracic echocardiography. She was not a candidate for surgical pericardial window and therefore underwent pericardiocentesis and percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy with remarkable improvement in her clinical condition and with no recurrence of the effusion. LV diastolic collapse, an atypical presentation of cardiac tamponade, is commonly seen in postoperative patients with localized pericardial effusions. However, outside the surgical setting, isolated LV diastolic collapse is rare. Our case is one of the first cases described in the literature of LV diastolic collapse in the setting of severe pulmonary hypertension treated successfully with pericardiocentesis and percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy.

Re-stenosis after drug-eluting stents in cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) constitutes a primary cause of death after heart transplantation. Balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents have been used for revascularization but they are associated with a high risk of re-stenosis. Limited data have shown favorable results with drug-eluting stents (DES). This study examines the rate of re-stenosis for DES in CAV as well as predictors for its occurrence. METHODS: Cardiac transplant patients who received at least one DES for a previously untreated coronary lesion were included. These patients were retrospectively followed until February 2007. Re-stenosis was defined as >or=50% lumen diameter narrowing on coronary angiography at the site of the DES. RESULTS: During the study period, 35 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on a total of 84 de novo lesions. The mean follow-up was 22 +/- 14 months. Twenty-six (31%) lesions developed re-stenosis during follow-up. Re-stenosis rates were 18%, 21% and 26% at 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. Predictors of re-stenosis included non-white race, ischemic etiology, intervention precipitated by symptoms and severe stenosis (>/=90% stenosis) of the target lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Use of DES has a favorable outcome when used in heart transplant patients for the treatment of CAV. An aggressive strategy for the treatment of CAV using DES may provide good long-term outcome compared with other available therapies.

Treprostinil-based therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe pulmonary arterial hypertension: long-term efficacy and combination with bosentan.

BACKGROUND: Treprostinil, a long-acting prostacyclin analog, diminished the symptoms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in controlled 12-week clinical efficacy studies. This retrospective, single-center, open-label study was designed to assess the efficacy of long-term, subcutaneously administered, treprostinil-based therapy alone or in combination with bosentan for the treatment of moderate-to-severe PAH. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with pulmonary hypertension treated with subcutaneous treprostinil were followed up for a mean (+/-SD) duration of 984+/-468 days (range, 165 to 1,847 days). Oral bosentan was added to the treprostinil regimen if patients remained in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or II with intolerable prostacyclin side effects that limited therapy. Hemodynamic studies, Borg dyspnea score evaluations, 6-min walk (6MW) tests, and NYHA functional class determinations were performed at approximately 6-month intervals. RESULTS: Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 59.7 to 50.5 mm Hg (p<0.001). Significant and sustained improvement in 6MW distance (p=0.022) and Borg dyspnea score (p=0.023) were observed. At the final observation, the mean dose of treprostinil was 37.8 ng/kg/min (range, 7.5 to 115 ng/kg/min). At baseline, 5% of patients were in NYHA functional class 2 or lower vs 58% at the last follow-up. Bosentan was added to the regimens of 19 patients. In those patients, significant additional improvement occurred in the pulmonary arterial pressure (p<0.001), 6MW distance (p=0.001), and Borg dyspnea scale (p=0.020) compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with subcutaneous treprostinil-based therapy improved functional parameters and hemodynamics in patients with moderate-to-severe PAH. In patients requiring combination therapy, the addition of oral bosentan to treprostinil-based therapy was safe, well-tolerated, and associated with further clinical improvements.

Worldwide surgical experience with the Paracor HeartNet cardiac restraint device.

OBJECTIVE: An elastic ventricular restraint device has been developed for patients with heart failure who remain symptomatic despite treatment with standard therapies. The safety and efficacy of this device are under clinical investigation. Six-month data for the first 51 patients treated worldwide are reported. We hypothesize that the Paracor HeartNet device (Paracor Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif), placed through a minithoracotomy in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy, improves clinical and functional status. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with an ejection fraction of 35% or less, with a New York Heart Association class II or III, and receiving optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, were selected at 15 sites (3 in Europe, 12 in the United States) to undergo implantation of the HeartNet device through a minithoracotomy. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6-month follow-up by echocardiography, the 6-minute walk test, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (partial oxygen pressure in mixed venous blood), New York Heart Association class, and (in the United States) the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. RESULTS: The average age was 52 years (30-73 years), with a preponderance of men and nonischemic cause of heart failure. Implantation was accomplished in 50 of 51 patients (98%). Adverse events included 2 in-hospital deaths secondary to pulmonary complications (4%), additional pulmonary complications in 7 patients (14%), arrhythmia in 14 patients (27%), epicardial laceration in 2 patients (4%), and empyema in 1 patient (2%). Six-month data demonstrated significant improvement in the 6-minute walk test (+65.7, P = .002) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure scores (-15.7, P = .002) and improvement in echocardiographic findings. CONCLUSION: The Paracor HeartNet device can be reliably implanted in patients with heart failure and marked reduction of left ventricular function. These data suggest a functional and clinical benefit, with a trend toward reverse remodeling, and support the conduct of a randomized controlled pivotal trial.

Post-heart transplant diastolic dysfunction is a risk factor for mortality.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and prognostic implication of diastolic dysfunction (DD) occurring in the first year after transplant. BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction is a recognized complication in heart transplant recipients, but its true incidence and natural history has been poorly characterized. We studied the prognostic implication of DD, as defined by elevated filling pressures with normal systolic function, occurring in the first year after transplant. METHODS: Between June 1992 and June 2002, all patients who underwent heart transplantation at a single institution were included in the study (231 at 6 weeks and 250 at 6 months and 1 year). Diastolic dysfunction was defined as right atrial pressure (RAP) >/=15 mm Hg (right ventricular [RV] DD) or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >/=18 mm Hg (left ventricular [LV] DD) with normal systolic function by echocardiogram and without severe mitral or tricuspid insufficiency. In addition, RV DD was defined by a RAP/stroke volume (SV) ratio. RESULTS: The incidence of DD was 22%, 8%, and 12% at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. The incidence of LV DD was more frequent than that of RV DD at any time point (p < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis RV DD, as manifested by an elevated RAP/SV, but not LV DD was a strong predictor of cardiac mortality at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic dysfunction is common early after transplant, and its incidence decreases during the first year. Right ventricular DD, as measured by an elevated RAP/SV ratio, but not LV DD is a strong predictor of cardiac mortality. Further studies are needed to evaluate the functional status of patients with RV or LV DD and whether aggressive medical therapy for early DD could alter outcome.

Rationale, design, and methods for the Transplant-Eligible MAnagement of Congestive Heart Failure (TMAC) trial: a multicenter clinical outcomes trial using nesiritide for TMAC.

BACKGROUND: Urgent heart transplant candidates classified as United Network for Organ Sharing status 1B who require continuous infusions of inotropic agents for hemodynamic stability often have hemodynamic, electrical, or multisystem decompensation. This multicenter trial will study both traditional safety and efficacy parameters and the physiologic mechanisms of benefit of the addition to conventional therapy of nesiritide, a recombinant analog of brain-type natriuretic peptide, in this population. METHODS: TMAC is a prospective, randomized, parallel, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients awaiting heart transplantation who meet United Network for Organ Sharing status 1B criteria (N = 120) and receive continuous dobutamine or milrinone through a double-lumen central catheter for at least 3 consecutive days before randomization. Patients will receive standard care and continuous intravenous inotrope therapy plus a 28-day continuous infusion of nesiritide or placebo. There will be up to 6 months of follow-up. Primary efficacy end point will be days alive after treatment without renal, hemodynamic, or electrical worsening at completion. Secondary analyses will evaluate effects on hemodynamics, echocardiographic parameters, endogenous brain-type natriuretic peptide levels, modification of diet in renal disease-calculated glomerular filtration rate, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Two mechanistic substudies will evaluate the effect on iohexol-determined glomerular filtration rate and assess changes in lung mechanics. CONCLUSION: This investigation will provide key data for clinical profiles of heart transplant candidates bound to inotropic support. It will investigate the efficacy and safety (especially renal) of nesiritide and provide mechanistic insight into benefits of its use for the relief of breathlessness.

Device therapy for remodeling in congestive heart failure.

Heart failure is a progressive condition which begins after an inciting event that leads to neurohormonal activation and cardiac remodeling. Medical therapy with beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors has been shown to attenuate neurohormonal changes and left ventricular remodeling. Despite optimal medical therapy, patients often progress, and other therapeutic modalities have been sought to interrupt and reverse the process of remodeling. Various devices have been developed and entered into clinical trials with the intent of promoting reverse remodeling by directly altering the mechanical properties or shape of the left ventricle. This article reviews devices currently undergoing clinical trials.

Initial United States experience with the Paracor HeartNet myocardial constraint device for heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to review the initial results and surgical safety data for the US Food and Drug Administration safety and feasibility trial of the Paracor HeartNet (Paracor Medical, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif.) myocardial constraint device. METHODS: Patients with New York Heart Association functional class II or III heart failure underwent device implantation (n = 21) through a left minithoracotomy. RESULTS: The average age was 53 years (31-72 years). There were 18 men and 3 women, and 17 patients had nonischemic etiology of heart failure. Mean heart failure duration was 8.3 years (1.4-18.8 years). Average ejection fraction was 22% (11%-33%), with an average left ventricular end-diastolic dimension of 74 mm (55-94 mm). Previous medical therapy included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, digoxin, and aldosterone receptor blockers. At implantation, 17 patients had implantable electronic devices: 1 biventricular pacemaker, 11 biventricular pacemakers with cardioverter-defibrillators, and 5 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Patient comorbidities included hypertension in 10 cases, diabetes mellitus in 8, myocardial infarction in 1, and ventricular tachycardia in 8. Mean operative time was 68 minutes (42-102 minutes), and implantation time averaged 15 minutes (5-51 minutes). The average time to ambulation was 1.6 days (1-4 days). The intensive care unit stay averaged 3.3 days (1-16 days), and hospital stay averaged 6.3 days (4-16 days). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 2 patients, and there were 2 in-hospital deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The Paracor device can be implanted in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular function with a high degree of success. Significant surgical complications were infrequent. The initial US experience supports the conduct of a randomized, controlled, pivotal trial.

A phase 1-2 dose-escalating study evaluating the safety and tolerability of istaroxime and specific effects on electrocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced systolic function.

Istaroxime (PST2744) is a luso-inotrope that stimulates the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium adenosine triphosphatase isoform 2a without chronotropic effects. Additionally, it has beneficial effects on myocardial energetics. This phase 1-2 clinical trial in patients with chronic stable heart failure (HF) is the first evaluation of istaroxime in humans. Three cohorts of 6 patients each were exposed to 4 sequentially increasing 1-hour infusions with a random placebo. Doses were 0.005-5.0 micro/kg per min. Safety and hemodynamics were evaluated by impedance cardiography, digital Holter recorder, and electrocardiography. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained for 1 hour during treatment and for 6 hours after dosing. The mean age was 53+/-7 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.27+/-0.08. Impedance cardiography demonstrated enhanced contractility as measured by the acceleration index, left cardiac work index, cardiac index, and pulse pressure at doses>or=1 micro/kg per min, with evidence of activity at doses of 0.5 micro/kg per min. Istaroxime shortened QTc. After infusion, the hemodynamic effect rapidly dissipated over 1-2 hours. Istaroxime was pharmacologically active and well tolerated at doses up to 3.33 micro/kg per min. Side effects were related to gastrointestinal symptoms and injection site pain at higher doses, which dissipated within minutes after the infusion ended. Ventricular ectopy was not altered. This study suggests that istaroxime is potentially useful in the treatment of HF and may offer a unique treatment for systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction. Additional studies are under way to further define its utility in acute HF.

Use and impact of inotropes and vasodilator therapy in hospitalized patients with severe heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of decompensated heart failure often includes the use of intravenous vasoactive medications, but the effect on outcome has not been clearly defined. METHODS: Data from 433 patients enrolled in the ESCAPE trial were analyzed to determine 6-month risks of all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality plus rehospitalization associated with the use of vasodilators, inotropes, and their combination. Patients had a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 19%, 6-minute walk distance of 414 ft, and systolic blood pressure of 106 mm Hg. The main outcome measure was multivariable risk-adjusted 6-month hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: Overall 6-month mortality was 19%. Risk-adjusted HRs were not statistically significant for vasodilators (1.39, 95% CI 0.64-3.00), but were significant for inotropes (2.14, 95% CI 1.10-4.15) and the combination (4.81, 95% CI 2.34-9.90). Risk-adjusted 6-month mortality plus rehospitalization HRs were not significant for vasodilators (1.20, 95% CI 0.81-1.78, P = .37), but were significant for inotropes (1.96, 95% CI 1.37-2.82, P < .001) and their combination (2.90, 95% CI 1.88-4.48, P = .001). The decision to use vasodilators or inotropes was determined by hemodynamic parameters and renal function, but the main factor was treatment site. CONCLUSIONS: In ESCAPE, the choice of medications was mainly determined by the treatment site. Use of inotropic agents was associated with adverse outcomes, whereas the use of vasodilators was not. Inotropes in combination with vasodilators identified a group with the highest mortality. Prospective studies are needed to establish the appropriate use of vasoactive medications in this population.

Efficacy of bosentan in a small cohort of adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension related to congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the tolerability and efficacy of the oral endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) related to congenital heart disease (CHD). BACKGROUND: Severe PAH in the setting of CHD is a debilitating syndrome for which there are limited treatment options. This is the first long-term study experience in adults reporting on the tolerability and efficacy of therapy with bosentan for this patient population. METHODS: A 12-month single-center experience with 19 women and 5 men with PAH associated with CHD (79% in New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III) was analyzed. Hemodynamic responses, exercise capacity, and Borg dyspnea index were assessed prior to the administration of bosentan, and again at 3, 6, and 12 months after the study began. Clinical assessments were performed monthly for up to 12 months. The change from baseline was tested using the Wilcoxon pairs test. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in hemodynamics from baseline to 12 months (mean [+/- SD] systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, 99 +/- 30 to 87 +/- 28 mm Hg [p

Response of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy to the current management strategy of heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin (D) (Adriamycin) is a potent and efficacious chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of various forms of cancer, but its use has been limited by the development of cardiac toxicity. Historically, D-induced cardiomyopathy (CMP) has been refractory to therapy. We report our experience with this form of CMP at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (20 women, 5 men) with a clinical diagnosis of D-CMP were referred to our program from 1990 to 2003. Patient data were extracted from office charts. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for 71 +/- 58 months. On presentation, the average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 26 +/- 9.2%, and 88% of patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV. Patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi; n = 23) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB; n = 2), and 15 were treated with a combination of ACEi and beta-blockers (BB). With medical therapy, LVEF improved significantly (26 +/- 9.2% vs 35 +/- 16.5%, p = 0.022), as did the NYHA class (p < 0.003). All survivors (n = 19) were NYHA Class I or II with medical therapy, with 10 (53%) being Class I. In the group of patients treated with ACEi + BB, there was a statistically significant improvement in LVEF (26 +/- 10.0% vs 37 +/- 17.6%, p = 0.028), which not seen in the ACEi group, with a strong trend toward normalization of LV function (47% vs 10%, p = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: In the current era of management of heart failure, D-CMP carries a better prognosis than previously described. Early addition of BB may further improve LVEF.

Multi-organ transplantation: is there a protective effect against acute and chronic rejection?

BACKGROUND: Heart-lung transplantation (Tx) is known to offer a protective effect against acute cardiac rejection. This study was undertaken to evaluate acute and chronic heart and/or lung rejection in the setting of multiple-transplanted organs from the same donor compared with single-organ transplantation. METHODS: Acute (treated rejection episodes of heart or lungs) and chronic (allograft vasculopathy in hearts and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS] in lungs) rejection events were analyzed in 348 heart transplant (H) recipients, 24 heart-lung (HL) recipients, 82 double-lung (L) recipients and 8 heart-kidney (HK) recipients >18 years of age, who were transplanted between 1990 and 2002. RESULTS: Survival at 3 years differed among groups as follows: HK, 100%; H, 82%; HL, 74%; and L, 70%. The probability of acute rejection within the first 3 months was higher in H recipients than in HL (81% vs 22%; p < 0.0001) or HK (81% vs 12%; p = 0.00009) recipients. Acute cardiac rejection occurred more frequently during the first 2 years in isolated H recipients compared with HL (2.8 vs 0.27 episodes; p < 0.0001) and HK (2.8 vs 0.54; p < 0.001) recipients. Acute lung rejection occurred more frequently in the first 2 years in L than HL (2.4 vs 1.0 episodes; p = 0.02) recipients. Chronic cardiac rejection (allograft vasculopathy) was more likely within 3 years after H compared with HL (32% vs 16%; p = 0.04) or HK (32% vs 0%; p = 0.14). The onset of chronic lung rejection (BOS) within 3 years was similar in HL and L recipients (39% vs 40%; p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of multiple organs from a single donor undergo less acute rejection of the heart or lungs compared with isolated heart or lung transplant recipients. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is decreased significantly when cardiac transplantation is combined with a lung allograft. A lower incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy is observed when cardiac transplantation is combined with a renal allograft, and may prove statistically significant when more cases have been accumulated. These phenomena may result from immune modulation of the recipient by simultaneous transplant of disparate tissues or introduction of immune-modulating hematopoietic elements.

Relationship between bridging with ventricular assist device on rejection after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are commonly used to bridge patients to heart transplantation. Recipients of VADs may develop anti-human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen antibodies, as reflected by elevated panel-reactive antibodies (PRA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between bridging with VAD before heart transplantation and development of cellular rejection, humoral rejection, and allograft vasculopathy after transplantation. METHODS: Data on all patients who underwent cardiac transplantation between July 1994 and February 2001 at Rush Presbyterian St Luke's Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included sex, age, etiology of cardiomyopathy, percentage panel reactive antibodies (by cytotoxic method), type and duration of mechanical circulatory support, transfusion history, rejection history (both cellular and humoral) after cardiac transplantation, and development of allograft vasculopathy. Cellular rejection was treated when International Society of Heart and Lung and Transplantation Grade 2 or greater in the first 12 months after transplant and Grade 3 or greater after 12 months and treated with intensification of immunosuppression. Humoral rejection was defined clinically as allograft dysfunction by echocardiography without evidence of cellular rejection on endomyocardial biopsy or allograft vasculopathy. Allograft vasculopathy was defined by presence of any degree of luminal narrowing or pruning of distal vessels by coronary arteriography. Statistical analyses were performed by chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients underwent cardiac transplantation during the study period (87 men, mean age 49 years, 46 ischemic etiology). Of these, 48 were bridged with HeartMate VAD (20 patients received vented electric device, 28 received pneumatic device). Nineteen percent of VAD patients had a peak pretransplant PRA > or =10% vs 2% of patients without VAD (p = 0.014). PRA > or =10%, use of VAD, or duration of VAD support did not predict development of humoral rejection. Use of VAD did not predict development of cellular rejection or allograft vasculopathy. VAD use was not associated with sudden death after heart transplantation. In the entire group of 98 patients, neither humoral nor cellular rejection predicted development of allograft vasculopathy. Longer ischemic time correlated with increased cellular rejection and humoral rejection after transplantation (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Some patients bridged to cardiac transplantation with VADs have increased PRA before heart transplantation, but this does not appear to translate into increased risk of either humoral or cellular rejection after transplantation or development of allograft vasculopathy as detected by coronary angiography.