A comparison of the antianginal efficacy of nifedipine alone and the fixed combination of atenolol and nifedipine.

The antianginal efficacy of a fixed combination of atenolol (50 mg) and nifedipine (20 mg) was compared with nifedipine (20 mg) alone; 102 patients experiencing three or more anginal attacks on their current monotherapy received each treatment twice daily for 3 weeks in a randomised, double-blind crossover trial. Both treatments reduced the weekly number of angina attacks compared with existing therapy; treatment with the fixed combination resulted in significantly fewer angina attacks per week than treatment with nifedipine alone. Also, when the fixed combination treatment followed the period of nifedipine therapy a further decrease in weekly angina attack rate was apparent. Comparison of individual patient response to each treatment showed that twice as many patients reported lower attack rates while on the fixed combination: 6 patients were withdrawn while receiving fixed combination compared with 10 patients on nifedipine alone. However, the incidence of commonly reported complaints was similar with both treatments.

Comparison of lipid-lowering effects of low-dose fluvastatin and conventional-dose gemfibrozil in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

A total of 123 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were randomized on a 2:1 ratio to receive either fluvastatin at 20 mg once daily at night (n = 82) or gemfibrozil at 600 mg twice daily (n = 41) in a double-blind, double-dummy comparison of the effects on plasma lipid parameters and tolerability over 8 weeks. All patients had either low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations > or = 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L) in association with definite coronary artery disease (CAD) or > or = 2 risk factors, or LDL-C > or = 190 mg/dL (4.9 mmol/L) with no CAD and < 2 risk factors. All had triglyceride (TG) levels < or = 350 mg/dL (4.0 mmol/L). After 8 weeks of treatment, fluvastatin produced significant reductions from baseline of 17.4% (p < 0.001) in LDL-C, 13.2% (p < 0.001) in total cholesterol (TC), 13.8% (p < 0.001) in very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), and 6.4% (NS) in TG. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was increased by 5.6% (p < 0.001), and the ratio of LDL-C:HDL-C (Friedewald) was decreased by 21.2% (p < 0.001). Gemfibrozil reduced LDL-C by 15.8%, TC by 13.4%, VLDL-C by 32.2%, LDL-C:HDL-C by 24.8%, and TG by 34.2%, and increased HDL-C by 13.9% (all changes were statistically significant, p < 0.001) compared with baseline. Gemfibrozil produced significantly greater changes in VLDL-C (p < 0.01), HDL-C (p < 0.001), and TG (p < 0.001), but not in LDL-C: HDL-C, compared with fluvastatin. Both drugs significantly reduced apolipoprotein (apo) B and lipoparticles (Lp) E:B, and increased apo A-I but had divergent effects on LpA-I (increased with fluvastatin and reduced with gemfibrozil; p < 0.05). At the end of the study, 43.8% of fluvastatin patients and 45% of gemfibrozil patients achieved a reduction of > 20% in LDL-C levels. Normalization of LDL-C levels was achieved (according to European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines) by 13.4% of fluvastatin- and 14.6% of gemfibrozil-treated patients. Both drugs were well tolerated; adverse events occurred in 36.6% of fluvastatin recipients compared with 58.5% of patients taking gemfibrozil. No clinically notable elevations of aspartate or alanine aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, or creatine phosphokinase occurred. No patient developed new or worsening lens opacities associated with a reduction in optically corrected visual acuity. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache and gastrointestinal upset. There were no serious drug-related adverse events.