Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Radiol ; 64(5): 1730-1737, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36617943

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early detection can prevent the initial stages of fibrosis from progressing to cirrhosis. PURPOSE: To evaluate an algorithm combining three echographic indicators and elastographic measurements to screen for hepatic fibrosis in an unselected population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From May 2017 to June 2018, all patients with no history and no known chronic liver disease who were referred for an ultrasound (US) were prospectively included in eight hospitals. The indicators being sought were liver surface irregularity, demodulation of hepatic veins, and spleen length >110 mm. Patients presenting at least one of these underwent elastography measurements with virtual touch quantification (VTQ) or supersonic shear imaging (SSI). If elastography was positive, patients were referred to hepatologist for fibrosis evaluation. Reference standard was obtained by FibroMeterVCTE or biopsy. A FibroMeterVCTE result >0.384 indicated a "necessary referral" to a hepatologist. RESULTS: Of the 1501 patients included, 504 (33.6%) were positive for at least one US indicator. All of them underwent US elastography, with 85 being positive. Of the patients, 58 (3.6%) had a consultation with a liver specialist: 21 had positive FibroMeterVCTE and nine had an indication of biopsy for suspicion of fibrosis. This screening algorithm made it possible to diagnose 1.6% of patients in our population with unknown fibrosis. Of the patients, 50% referred to the liver specialist were "necessary referrals." CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that three simple US indicators with no systematic elastographic measurement could be applied in day-to-day practice to look for hepatic fibrosis in an unsuspected population allowing relevant referrals to a hepatologist.


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Humans , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Liver Cirrhosis/pathology , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver/pathology , Fibrosis , Algorithms , Ultrasonography, Doppler
2.
Scand J Urol ; 53(5): 350-355, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31607203

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) in predicting T3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and methods: Preoperative MDCT of 96 patients with 100 pathologically proven RCC were assessed by two radiologists focusing on the presence of peritumoral fat, sinus fat or venous invasion for cT3a staging. Nature of tumor margins and the presence of peritumoral neovessels were also evaluated, as the influence of perinephric soft-tissue stranding in the interpretation of peritumoral fat.Results: Sensitivity for the identification of peritumoral fat, sinus fat or renal vein invasion was 77%, 86% and 86%, and specificity was 72%, 88% and 97%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of T3a tumors were 72% and 70% respectively (κ score = 0.38 (0.29-0.47)). Among the 38 pT3 tumors, 6 (16%) were under-staged, and the neovessels and irregular tumor edge as secondary CT signs did not significantly increase the accuracy of the prediction of local invasion. Among the 62 confined tumors, 17 (27%) were over-staged as cT3 and among these 17 false positives cases, perinephric soft-tissue stranding was present in 14 cases.Conclusion: MDCT provides good results in detecting sinus fat, venous invasion and kidney-confined tumors, but evaluation of perinephric fat remains a difficult task, leading to reduced accuracy in T3a staging.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Period , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...