ABSTRACT
TSPO is a promising novel tracer target for positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging of brain tumors. However, due to the heterogeneity of cell populations that contribute to the TSPO-PET signal, imaging interpretation may be challenging. We therefore evaluated TSPO enrichment/expression in connection with its underlying histopathological and molecular features in gliomas. We analyzed TSPO expression and its regulatory mechanisms in large in silico datasets and by performing direct bisulfite sequencing of the TSPO promotor. In glioblastoma tissue samples of our TSPO-PET imaging study cohort, we dissected the association of TSPO tracer enrichment and protein labeling with the expression of cell lineage markers by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence multiplex stains. Furthermore, we identified relevant TSPO-associated signaling pathways by RNA sequencing.We found that TSPO expression is associated with prognostically unfavorable glioma phenotypes and that TSPO promotor hypermethylation is linked to IDH mutation. Careful histological analysis revealed that TSPO immunohistochemistry correlates with the TSPO-PET signal and that TSPO is expressed by diverse cell populations. While tumor core areas are the major contributor to the overall TSPO signal, TSPO signals in the tumor rim are mainly driven by CD68-positive microglia/macrophages. Molecularly, high TSPO expression marks prognostically unfavorable glioblastoma cell subpopulations characterized by an enrichment of mesenchymal gene sets and higher amounts of tumor-associated macrophages.In conclusion, our study improves the understanding of TSPO as an imaging marker in gliomas by unveiling IDH-dependent differences in TSPO expression/regulation, regional heterogeneity of the TSPO PET signal and functional implications of TSPO in terms of tumor immune cell interactions.
Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Glioma , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Humans , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/genetics , Tumor-Associated Macrophages , Macrophages , Receptors, GABA/geneticsABSTRACT
Conventional 2D cultures are commonly used in cancer research though they come with limitations such as the lack of microenvironment or reduced cell heterogeneity. In this study, we investigated in what respect a scaffold-based (Matrigel™) 3D culture technique can ameliorate the limitations of 2D cultures. NGS-based bulk and single-cell sequencing of matched pairs of 2D and 3D models showed an altered transcription of key immune regulatory genes in around 36% of 3D models, indicating the reoccurrence of an immune suppressive phenotype. Changes included the presentation of different HLA surface molecules as well as cellular stressors. We also investigated the 3D tumor organoids in a co-culture setting with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Of note, lymphocyte-mediated cell killing appeared less effective in clearing 3D models than their 2D counterparts. IFN-γ release, as well as live cell staining and proliferation analysis, pointed toward an elevated resistance of 3D models. In conclusion, we found that the scaffold-based (Matrigel™) 3D culture technique affects the transcriptional profile in a subset of GBM models. Thus, these models allow for depicting clinically relevant aspects of tumor-immune interaction, with the potential to explore immunotherapeutic approaches in an easily accessible in vitro system.
Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Humans , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Coculture Techniques , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Phenotype , Tumor MicroenvironmentABSTRACT
We previously reported on the first neuropathological round robin trials operated together with Quality in Pathology (QuIP) GmbH in 2018 and 2019 in Germany, i.e., the trials on IDH mutational testing and MGMT promoter methylation analysis [1]. For 2020 and 2021, the spectrum of round robin trials has been expanded to cover the most commonly used assays in neuropathological institutions. In addition to IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation testing, there is a long tradition for 1p/19q codeletion testing relevant in the context of the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma. With the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the central nervous system tumors, additional molecular markers came into focus: TERT promoter mutation is often assessed as a molecular diagnostic criterion for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Moreover, several molecular diagnostic markers have been introduced for pediatric brain tumors. Here, trials on KIAA1549::BRAF fusions (common in pilocytic astrocytomas) and H3-3A mutations (in diffuse midline gliomas, H3-K27-altered and diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3-G34-mutant) were most desired by the neuropathological community. In this update, we report on these novel round robin trials. In summary, success rates in all four trials ranged from 75 to 96%, arguing for an overall high quality level in the field of molecular neuropathological diagnostics.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Chromosome Deletion , Genetic Testing , Histones , Mutation , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Telomerase , Child , Humans , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Germany , Histones/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Oligodendroglioma/diagnosis , Oligodendroglioma/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Telomerase/geneticsABSTRACT
Brain-tumor-initiating cells (BTICs) of proneural and mesenchymal origin contribute to the highly malignant phenotype of glioblastoma (GB) and resistance to current therapies. BTICs of different subtypes were challenged with oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) inhibition with metformin to assess the differential effects of metabolic intervention on key resistance features. Whereas mesenchymal BTICs varied according to their invasiveness, they were in general more glycolytic and less responsive to metformin. Proneural BTICs were less invasive, catabolized glucose more via the pentose phosphate pathway, and responded better to metformin. Targeting glycolysis may be a promising approach to inhibit tumor cells of mesenchymal origin, whereas proneural cells are more responsive to OXPHOS inhibition. Future clinical trials exploring metabolic interventions should account for metabolic heterogeneity of brain tumors.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Metformin , Brain/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Glucose/metabolism , Humans , Metformin/metabolism , Metformin/pharmacology , Metformin/therapeutic use , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolismABSTRACT
The molecular pathomechanisms of major depressive disorder (MDD) are still not completely understood. Here, we follow the hypothesis, that mitochondria dysfunction which is inevitably associated with bioenergetic disbalance is a risk factor that contributes to the susceptibility of an individual to develop MDD. Thus, we investigated molecular mechanisms related to mitochondrial function in induced neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) which were reprogrammed from fibroblasts of eight MDD patients and eight non-depressed controls. We found significantly lower maximal respiration rates, altered cytosolic basal calcium levels, and smaller soma size in NPCs derived from MDD patients. These findings are partially consistent with our earlier observations in MDD patient-derived fibroblasts. Furthermore, we differentiated MDD and control NPCs into iPS-neurons and analyzed their passive biophysical and active electrophysiological properties to investigate whether neuronal function can be related to altered mitochondrial activity and bioenergetics. Interestingly, MDD patient-derived iPS-neurons showed significantly lower membrane capacitance, a less hyperpolarized membrane potential, increased Na+ current density and increased spontaneous electrical activity. Our findings indicate that functional differences evident in fibroblasts derived from MDD patients are partially present after reprogramming to induced-NPCs, could relate to altered function of iPS-neurons and thus might be associated with the aetiology of major depressive disorder.
ABSTRACT
We previously reported that DIRAS-3 is frequently inactivated in oligodendrogliomas due to promoter hypermethylation and loss of the chromosomal arm 1p. DIRAS-3 inactivation was associated with better overall survival. Consequently, we now investigated regulation and function of its family members DIRAS-1 and DIRAS-2. We found that DIRAS-1 was strongly downregulated in 65% and DIRAS-2 in 100% of analyzed glioma samples compared to non-neoplastic brain tissue (NNB). Moreover, a significant down-regulation of DIRAS-1 and -2 was detected in glioma data obtained from the TCGA database. Mutational analyses did not reveal any inactivating mutations in the DIRAS-1 and -2 coding regions. Analysis of the DIRAS-1 and -2 promoter methylation status showed significantly higher methylation in IDH-mutant astrocytic and IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglial tumors compared to NNB. Treatment of U251MG and Hs683 glioblastoma cells lines with 5-azacytidine led to significant re-expression of DIRAS-1 and -2. For IDH-wild-type primary gliomas, however, we did not observe significantly elevated DIRAS-1 and -2 promoter methylation levels, but still detected strong downregulation of both DIRAS family members. Additional analyses revealed that DIRAS-1 and -2 expression was also regulated by histone modifications. We observed a shift towards promoter heterochromatinization for DIRAS-1 and less promoter euchromatinization for DIRAS-2 in IDH-wild-type glioblastomas compared to controls. Treatment of the two glioblastoma cell lines with a histone deacetylase inhibitor led to significant re-expression of DIRAS-1 and -2. Functionally, overexpression of DIRAS-1 and -2 in glioblastoma cells translated into significantly higher sensitivity to lomustine treatment. Analyses of DNA damage markers revealed that DIRAS-1 and -2 may play a role in p53-dependent response to alkylating chemotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Recent updates in the classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors have increased the need for molecular testing. Assessment of multiple alterations in parallel, complex combinations of gene sequence and chromosomal changes, as well as therapy prediction by identification of actionable mutations are the major challenges. We here report on a customized next generation sequencing (NGS)-based DNA panel assay that combines diagnostic and predictive testing and -as a comprehensive approach- allows for simultaneous single nucleotide variant (SNP) / small insertion/deletion (InDel), copy number variation (CNV) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) detection. We analyzed formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) DNA from a total of 104 patients with CNS tumors. After amplicon capture-based library preparation, sequencing was performed on the relatively cost-efficient Illiumina MiniSeq platform and evaluated with freely available bioinformatical tools. 57 genes for exonic SNP/InDel calling (19 of those in intronic regions for CNV analysis), 3 chromosomal arms and 4 entire chromosomes for CNV and LOH analysis were covered. Results were extensively validated. Our approach yielded high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. It led to refined diagnoses in a relevant number of analyzed cases, reliably enabled complex subclassifications (e.g. for medulloblastomas) and identified actionable targets for clinical use. Thus, our single-platform approach is an efficient and powerful tool to comprehensively support molecular testing in neurooncology. Future functionality is guaranteed as novel upcoming biomarkers can be easily incorporated in a modular panel design.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/methods , Neurology/methods , Precision Medicine/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNAABSTRACT
We here report on the first neuropathological round robin trials initiated by the Quality Assurance Initiative Pathology (QuIP) in Germany in the years 2018 and 2019. Testing services as external laboratory controls were offered for IDH1-R132H immunohistochemistry in 2018 followed by a molecular trial for IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in 2019 including the rare mutational variants. Also in 2019, a trial on MGMT promoter methylation testing was offered. On a national scale, trial offers were well received with around 40 participating institutions. The international announcement of the molecular IDH1/IDH2 mutational trial achieved only moderate European outspread. Success rates in all three trials were excellent (IDH1-R132H immunohistochemistry 2018: 94%, 18 out of 20 possible points required; IDH1/IDH2 mutational status 2019: 100%, 19 out of 20 possible points required; MGMT promoter methylation 2019: 94%, 19 out of 20 possible points required) indicating that quality standards are high in the broad majority of the institutions. Trial participation also involved filling in a questionnaire asking for background information on local testing procedures. We here present a first assessment of the information collected providing unique insights in the landscape of molecular testing in neuropathology. Derived from this information we identify future challenges and provide an outlook on the development of quality assurance in the field of neuropathology.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , DNA Modification Methylases/genetics , DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Neuropathology/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , DNA Methylation , Germany , Glioma/genetics , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Mutation , Pathology, Clinical/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The phosphatase chronophin (CIN/PDXP) has been shown to be an important regulator of glioma cell migration and invasion. It has two known substrates: p-Ser3-cofilin, the phosphorylated form of the actin binding protein cofilin, and pyridoxal 5'-phosphate, the active form of vitamin B6. Phosphoregulation of cofilin, among other functions, plays an important role in cell migration, whereas active vitamin B6 is a cofactor for more than one hundred enzymatic reactions. The role of CIN has yet only been examined in glioblastoma cell line models derived under serum culture conditions. RESULTS: We found that CIN is highly expressed in cells cultured under non-adherent, serum-free conditions that are thought to better mimic the in vivo situation. Furthermore, the substrates of CIN, p-Ser3-cofilin and active vitamin B6, were significantly reduced as compared to cell lines cultured in serum-containing medium. To further examine its molecular role we stably knocked down the CIN protein with two different shRNA hairpins in the glioblastoma cell lines NCH421k and NCH644. Both cell lines did not show any significant alterations in proliferation but expression of differentiation markers (such as GFAP or TUBB3) was increased in the knockdown cell lines. In addition, colony formation was significantly impaired in NCH644. Of note, in both cell lines CIN knockdown increased active vitamin B6 levels with vitamin B6 being known to be important for S-adenosylmethionine biosynthesis. Nevertheless, global histone and DNA methylation remained unaltered as was chemoresistance towards temozolomide. To further elucidate the role of phosphocofilin in glioblastoma cells we applied inhibitors for ROCK1/2 and LIMK1/2 to our model. LIMK- and ROCK-inhibitor treatment alone was not toxic for glioblastoma cells. However, it had profound, but antagonistic effects in NCH421k and NCH644 under chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In non-adherent glioblastoma cell lines cultured in serum-free medium, chronophin knockdown induces phenotypic changes, e.g. in colony formation and transcription, but these are highly dependent on the cellular background. The same is true for phenotypes observed after treatment with inhibitors for kinases regulating cofilin phosphorylation (ROCKs and LIMKs). Targeting the cofilin phosphorylation pathway might therefore not be a straightforward therapeutic option in glioblastoma.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Glioblastoma/pathology , Phosphoprotein Phosphatases/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Vitamin B 6/metabolism , Actin Depolymerizing Factors/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Culture Media, Serum-Free , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/genetics , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Humans , Lim Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Phosphoprotein Phosphatases/genetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Sequence Analysis, RNA , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Signal Transduction/genetics , rho-Associated Kinases/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
The literature on TGF-ß in cancer including data on the expression or activation of TGF-ß pathway components in specific tumors types is steadily growing. However, no systematic and uniform analysis exists reporting expression levels of the main TGF-ß pathway components across the most frequent tumor types. We used a standardized immunohistochemical assay investigating TGF-ß isoform expression and pathway activation across 13 different tumor types and corresponding non-neoplastic tissues. The study was performed on tissue microarrays allowing for the parallel analysis of a total of 1638 human tumor samples. TGF-ß1, TGF-ß2 and p-Smad2/3 were substantially expressed in multiple cancers widening the options for TGF-ß isoform directed therapies. Of note, TGF-ß antigens appear to be expressed in an individual manner pointing towards a need for patient preselection for TGF-ß isoform specific treatment. Yet, a thorough investigation of antibody specificity and assay validity revealed that immunohistochemistry did not correlate with other detection methods on mRNA or protein level in all instances. As such, with the currently available means (i.e. antibodies tested) a stratification of patients within clinical trials for TGF-ß directed antisense therapies based upon TGF-ß immunohistochemistry alone has to be interpreted with caution and should be carefully evaluated in combination with other parameters.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma/immunology , Glioma/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , Smad Proteins/metabolism , Transforming Growth Factors/metabolism , Antibody Specificity , Blotting, Western , Brain Neoplasms/immunology , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma/pathology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: LC-MS/MS allows quantification of therapeutic oligonucleotides in biological fluids at low ng/ml concentrations. Achieving selectivity between metabolites and parent molecules in a single assay is one of the biggest challenges when developing a method. We present a strategy that allows quantification of an 18-mer antisense therapeutic, trabedersen, and six metabolites in human plasma. RESULTS/METHODOLOGY: The method utilizes phenol-chloroform and SPE with UHPLC-MS/MS to independently quantify trabedersen and the 5´n-1, 5´n-2, 5´n-3, 3´n-1, 3´n-2 and 3´n-3 metabolites in a single assay. The qualification data indicate that if the method was validated it would meet regulatory expectations for precision, accuracy and selectivity. CONCLUSION: We show that quantification of an oligonucleotide and multiple metabolites, including isobaric 3´ and 5´ metabolites, is achievable in a single assay through good sample clean-up and careful optimization of the LC-MS/MS parameters. The strategy presented here can be applied elsewhere and may be useful for other oligonucleotides and their metabolites.