Surgical approaches of shoulder calcific tendonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Calcific tendonitis is a painful shoulder disorder characterized by calcium deposits (CDs) in the rotator cuff tendon. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the most efficient surgical procedure for calcific tendonitis. This includes the comparison between the three main surgical techniques: CD removal, CD removal with subacromial decompression (SAD) and CD removal with tendon repair with respect to functional outcomes and pain control scores. Methods: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched in February 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, and participants were patients diagnosed with calcific tendonitis of one or more rotator cuff tendon based on diagnostic imaging who underwent shoulder calcific tendonitis surgery. Other shoulder pathology diagnoses were excluded. Meta-analyses were conducted for results that were sufficiently homogeneous in terms of statistical, clinical, and methodological characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine if effect sizes differed based on the patient's position during the surgery, physiotherapy, and follow-up time. Results: All surgical interventions resulted in significant improvements in shoulder function and pain control. There were no significant differences between CD removal vs. CD removal with SAD or CD removal vs. CD removal with tendon repair. However, there was a trend in favor of CD removal alone or CD removal with SAD approaches, as they provided better outcome scores than CD removal with tendon repair in terms of shoulder function and pain control. Conclusions: All surgical interventions provide substantial improvement in shoulder functions and pain control scores with no significant difference between these surgical techniques.

Are There Any Pleiotropic Benefits of Vitamin D in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and kidney disease are risk factors for vitamin D deficiency. Native forms of vitamin D have a lower risk of hypercalcemia than calcitriol, the active hormone. The enzyme responsible for activating native vitamin D is now known to be expressed throughout the body; therefore, native vitamin D may have clinically relevant effects in many body systems. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effect of native vitamin D supplementation on clinical outcomes and surrogate laboratory measures in patients with T2D and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Design: Systematic review. Setting: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in any country. Patients: Adults with T2D and DKD receiving supplementation with any form of native vitamin D (eg, ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol, calcifediol). Measurements: Clinical outcomes and surrogate clinical and laboratory measures reported in each of the trials were included in this review. Methods: The following databases were searched from inception to January 31, 2023: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and medRxiv. Only RCTs examining supplementation with a native vitamin D form with a control or placebo comparison group were included. We excluded studies reporting only vitamin D status or mineral metabolism parameters, without any other outcomes of clinical relevance or surrogate laboratory measures. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2). Results were synthesized in summary tables for each type of outcome with the P values from the original studies displayed. Results: Nine publications were included, corresponding to 5 separate RCTs (377 participants total). Mean age ranged from 40 to 63. All trials administered vitamin D3. Intervention groups experienced improvements in vitamin D status and a reduction in proteinuria in 4 of the 5 included RCTs. There was a decrease in low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol in the 2 trials in which they were measured. Improvements in bone mass, flow-mediated dilation, and inflammation were also reported, but each was only measured in 1 RCT. Effects on glucose metabolism, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, blood pressure, oxidative stress, and kidney function were mixed. No serious adverse effects were reported. Limitations: Limitations include the small number of RCTs and lack of information on the use of drugs that affect measured outcomes (eg, proteinuria-lowering renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and lipid-lowering medication) in most studies. Our study is also limited by the absence of a prestudy protocol and registration. Conclusions: Native vitamin D is a safe treatment that improves vitamin D status in patients with DKD. Vitamin D may modify proteinuria and lipid metabolism in DKD, but further well-designed trials that include well-established treatments are necessary. Overall, there is limited evidence for beneficial pleiotropic effects of vitamin D in patients with DKD.

Contexte: Le diabète de type 2 (DT2) et l'insuffisance rénale sont des facteurs de risque pour une carence en vitamine D. Les formes natives de la vitamine D représentent un risque plus faible d'hypercalcémie que le calcitriol, la forme active sur le plan hormonal de la vitamine D. On sait maintenant que l'enzyme responsable de l'activation de la vitamine D peut être exprimée dans tout le corps et donc, que la vitamine D native peut avoir des effets cliniquement significatifs dans de nombreux systèmes de l'organisme. Objectif: Examiner l'effet d'une supplémentation en vitamine D native sur les résultats cliniques et les mesures de laboratoire de substitution de patients atteints de DT2 et de maladie rénale diabétique (MRD). Conception: Revue systématique. Sources: Les essais contrôlés randomisés (ECR) pertinents, sans égard au pays où ils ont été menés. Sujets: Des adultes atteints de DT2 et de MRD recevant une supplémentation de toute forme de vitamine D native (ergocalciférol, cholécalciférol, calcifédiol). Mesures: Les mesures biologiques et cliniques de substitution ainsi que les résultats cliniques rapportés dans chacun des essais inclus. Méthodologie: Une recherche des articles pertinents a été effectuée dans les bases de données Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses et medRxiv depuis leur création jusqu'au 31 janvier 2023. Seuls les ECR examinant la supplémentation avec une forme native de vitamine D contre un groupe témoin ou un placebo ont été inclus. Nous avons exclu les études ne rapportant que le statut en vitamine D ou les paramètres du métabolisme minéral, sans aucun autre résultat significatif sur le plan clinique ou mesure de laboratoire de substitution. La qualité des études a été évaluée à l'aide de l'outil Cochrane sur le risque de biais (RoB2). Les résultats ont été résumés dans des tableaux récapitulatifs pour chaque type de résultat avec les valeurs de p tirées des essais originaux. Résultats: Neuf publications ont été incluses, lesquelles portaient sur cinq ECR distincts (377 participants au total). L'âge moyen des sujets variait de 40 à 63 ans. De la vitamine D3 avait été administrée dans tous les essais. Dans quatre des cinq ECR inclus, le groupe d'intervention avait connu une amélioration du statut en vitamine D et une réduction de la protéinurie. Une diminution des LDL et du cholestérol total avait été observée dans les deux essais où ces paramètres avaient été mesurés. Des améliorations de la masse osseuse, de la dilatation médiée par le débit et de l'inflammation avaient également été rapportées, mais chacun de ces paramètres n'avait été mesuré que dans un seul ECR. Lorsque rapportés, les effets sur le métabolisme du glucose, les HDL, les triglycérides, la pression artérielle, le stress oxydatif et la fonction rénale étaient mitigés. Aucun effet indésirable grave à la supplémentation n'a été signalé. Limites: Les résultats sont limités par le faible nombre d'ECR inclus et par le manque d'information dans la plupart des études sur l'utilisation de médicaments qui affectent les résultats mesurés (par exemple, les inhibiteurs du SRAA abaissant la protéinurie et les médicaments abaissant le taux de lipides). Aussi, notre étude n'est pas enregistrée et ne comportait pas de protocole pré-étude. Conclusion: La supplémentation en vitamine D native est sûre et elle améliore le statut en vitamine D des patients atteints de MRD. La vitamine D semble modifier la protéinurie et le métabolisme lipidique en contexte de MRD, mais d'autres essais bien conçus et intégrant des traitements bien établis sont nécessaires. Globalement, il existe peu de données probantes sur les effets pléiotropiques bénéfiques de la vitamine D chez les patients atteints de MRD.

Does Native Vitamin D Supplementation Have Pleiotropic Effects in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.

Vitamin D has been shown to have multiple pleiotropic effects beyond bone and mineral metabolism, with purported roles in cardiovascular disease, cancer, and host immunity. Vitamin D deficiency is common in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); however, current clinical practice has favored the use of the active hormone. Whether vitamin D deficiency should be corrected in patients with ESKD remains unclear, as few randomized trials have been conducted. In this systematic review, we summarize the current evidence examining whether vitamin D supplementation improves outcomes, beyond mineral metabolism, in patients with ESKD. Data from randomized controlled trials of adults with ESKD were obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection from inception to February 2023. Twenty-three trials composed of 2489 participants were identified for inclusion. Data were synthesized by two independent reviewers and summarized in tables organized by outcome. Outcomes included measures of mortality, cardiovascular disease, inflammation, muscle strength/function, nutrition, patient well-being, and outcomes specific to ESKD including erythropoietin usage, pruritus, and dialysis access maturation. The Cochrane risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2, 2019) was used to assess study quality. Overall, our findings indicate a minimal and varied benefit of native vitamin D supplementation. From the largest studies included, we determine that vitamin D has no demonstrated effect on patient-reported measures of well-being or utilization of erythropoietin, nor does it change levels of the inflammation biomarker C-reactive protein. Included trials were heterogeneous with regards to outcomes, and the majority studied small participant populations with a relatively short follow-up. We conclude that vitamin D supplementation corrects vitamin D deficiency and is safe and well-tolerated in humans with ESKD. However, it is not clear from clinical trials conducted to date that a causal pathway exists between 25(OH)D and pleiotropic effects that is responsive to vitamin D treatment.

Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies.

Background: frailty impacts older adults' ability to recover from an acute illness, injuries and other stresses. Currently, a systematic synthesis of available interventions to prevent or reduce frailty does not exist. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of interventions and international policies designed to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults. Methods and analysis: we conducted a scoping review using the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. We systematically searched articles and grey literature to identify interventions and policies that aimed to prevent or reduce the level of frailty. Results: fourteen studies were included: 12 randomised controlled trials and 2 cohort studies (mean number of participants 260 (range 51-610)), with most research conducted in USA and Japan. The study quality was moderate to good. The interventions included physical activity; physical activity combined with nutrition; physical activity plus nutrition plus memory training; home modifications; prehabilitation (physical therapy plus exercise plus home modifications) and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Our review showed that the interventions that significantly reduced the number of frailty markers present or the prevalence of frailty included the physical activity interventions (all types and combinations), and prehabilitation. The CGA studies had mixed findings. Conclusion: nine of the 14 studies reported that the intervention reduced the level of frailty. The results need to be interpreted with caution, as only 14 studies using 6 different definitions of frailty were retained. Future research could combine interventions targeting more frailty markers including cognitive or psychosocial well-being.