Cardiac Disease: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Although the epidemiology-as well as the morbidity and mortality-of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is a subject of constant change, nevertheless, CVDs are still the primary (or secondary at best after neoplasms) cause of deaths in developed countries [...].

Extracellular volume is an independent predictor of arrhythmic burden in dilated cardiomyopathy.

The current stratification of arrhythmic risk in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is sub-optimal. Cardiac fibrosis is involved in the pathology of arrhythmias; however, the relationship between cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived extracellular volume (ECV) and arrhythmic burden (AB) in DCM is unknown. This study sought to evaluate the presence and extent of replacement and interstitial fibrosis in DCM and to compare the degree of fibrosis between DCM patients with and without AB. This is a prospective, single-center, observational study. Between May 2019 and September 2020, 102 DCM patients underwent CMR T1 mapping. 99 DCM patients (88 male, mean age 45.2 ± 11.8 years, mean EF 29.7 ± 10%) composed study population. AB was defined as the presence of VT or a high burden of PVCs. There were 41 (41.4%) patients with AB and 58 (58.6%) without AB. Replacement fibrosis was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), whereas interstitial fibrosis with ECV. Overall, LGE was identified in 41% of patients. There was a similar distribution of LGE (without AB 50% vs. with AB 53.7%; p = 0.8) and LGE extent (without AB 4.36 ± 5.77% vs. with AB 4.68 ± 3.98%; p = 0.27) in both groups. ECV at nearly all myocardial segments and a global ECV were higher in patients with AB (global ECV: 27.9 ± 4.9 vs. 30.3 ± 4.2; p < 0.02). Only indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (HR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.2; p < 0.02) and global ECV (HR 1.12, 95%CI 1.0-1.25; p < 0.02) were independently associated with AB. The global ECV cut-off value of 31.05% differentiated both groups (AUC 0.713; 95%CI 0.598-0.827; p < 0.001). Neither qualitative nor quantitative LGE-based assessment of replacement fibrosis allowed for the stratification of DCM patients into low or high AB. Interstitial fibrosis, expressed as ECV, was an independent predictor of AB in DCM. Incorporation of CMR parametric indices into decision-making processes may improve arrhythmic risk stratification in DCM.

Differences between familial and sporadic dilated cardiomyopathy: ESC EORP Cardiomyopathy & Myocarditis registry.

AIMS: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a complex disease where genetics interplay with extrinsic factors. This study aims to compare the phenotype, management, and outcome of familial DCM (FDCM) and non-familial (sporadic) DCM (SDCM) across Europe. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with DCM that were enrolled in the prospective ESC EORP Cardiomyopathy & Myocarditis Registry were included. Baseline characteristics, genetic testing, genetic yield, and outcome were analysed comparing FDCM and SDCM; 1260 adult patients were studied (238 FDCM, 707 SDCM, and 315 not disclosed). Patients with FDCM were younger (P < 0.01), had less severe disease phenotype at presentation (P < 0.02), more favourable baseline cardiovascular risk profiles (P ≤ 0.007), and less medication use (P ≤ 0.042). Outcome at 1 year was similar and predicted by NYHA class (HR 0.45; 95% CI [0.25-0.81]) and LVEF per % decrease (HR 1.05; 95% CI [1.02-1.08]. Throughout Europe, patients with FDCM received more genetic testing (47% vs. 8%, P < 0.01) and had higher genetic yield (55% vs. 22%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that FDCM and SDCM have significant differences at baseline but similar short-term prognosis. Whether modification of associated cardiovascular risk factors provide opportunities for treatment remains to be investigated. Our results also show a prevalent role of genetics in FDCM and a non-marginal yield in SDCM although genetic testing is largely neglected in SDCM. Limited genetic testing and heterogeneity in panels provides a scaffold for improvement of guideline adherence.