Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 20(7): 1183-1191, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533757

ABSTRACT

Over the past few years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool used to efficiently automate several tasks across multiple domains. Sleep medicine is perfectly positioned to leverage this tool due to the wealth of physiological signals obtained through sleep studies or sleep tracking devices and abundance of accessible clinical data through electronic medical records. However, caution must be applied when utilizing AI, due to intrinsic challenges associated with novel technology. The Artificial Intelligence in Sleep Medicine Committee of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine reviews advancements in AI within the sleep medicine field. In this article, the Artificial Intelligence in Sleep Medicine committee members provide a commentary on the scope of AI technology in sleep medicine. The commentary identifies 3 pivotal areas in sleep medicine that can benefit from AI technologies: clinical care, lifestyle management, and population health management. This article provides a detailed analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with using AI-enabled technologies in each pivotal area. Finally, the article broadly reviews barriers and challenges associated with using AI-enabled technologies and offers possible solutions. CITATION: Bandyopadhyay A, Oks M, Sun H, et al. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of using AI-enabled technology in sleep medicine: a commentary. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(7):1183-1191.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Sleep Medicine Specialty , Humans , Sleep Medicine Specialty/methods
2.
Sleep Breath ; 27(2): 519-525, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35622197

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) is a therapeutic option for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Improved patient selection criteria are needed to target those most likely to benefit. We hypothesized that the pattern of negative effort dependence (NED) on inspiratory flow limited waveforms recorded during sleep, which has been correlated with the site of upper airway collapse, would contribute to the prediction of HGNS outcome. We developed a machine learning (ML) algorithm to identify NED patterns in pre-treatment sleep studies. We hypothesized that the predominant NED pattern would differ between HGNS responders and non-responders. METHODS: An ML algorithm to identify NED patterns on the inspiratory portion of the nasal pressure waveform was derived from 5 development set polysomnograms. The algorithm was applied to pre-treatment sleep studies of subjects who underwent HGNS implantation to determine the percentage of each NED pattern. HGNS response was defined by STAR trial criteria for success (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduced by > 50% and < 20/h) as well as by a change in AHI and oxygenation metrics. The predominant NED pattern in HGNS responders and non-responders was determined. Other variables including demographics and oxygenation metrics were also assessed between responders and non-responders. RESULTS: Of 45 subjects, 4 were excluded due to technically inadequate polysomnograms. In the remaining 41 subjects, ML accurately distinguished three NED patterns (minimal, non-discontinuous, and discontinuous). The percentage of NED minimal breaths was significantly greater in responders compared with non-responders (p = 0.01) when the response was defined based on STAR trial criteria, change in AHI, and oxygenation metrics. CONCLUSION: ML can accurately identify NED patterns in pre-treatment sleep studies. There was a statistically significant difference in the predominant NED pattern between HGNS responders and non-responders with a greater NED minimal pattern in responders. Prospective studies incorporating NED patterns into predictive modeling of factors determining HGNS outcomes are needed.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Hypoglossal Nerve , Prospective Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Polysomnography , Treatment Outcome
3.
Physiol Meas ; 38(9): R204-R252, 2017 Aug 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28820743

ABSTRACT

While public awareness of sleep related disorders is growing, sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) remains a public health and economic challenge. Over the last two decades, extensive controlled epidemiologic research has clarified the incidence, risk factors including the obesity epidemic, and global prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), as well as establishing a growing body of literature linking OSA with cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, metabolic dysregulation, and neurocognitive impairment. The US Institute of Medicine Committee on Sleep Medicine estimates that 50-70 million US adults have sleep or wakefulness disorders. Furthermore, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) estimates that more than 29 million US adults suffer from moderate to severe OSA, with an estimated 80% of those individuals living unaware and undiagnosed, contributing to more than $149.6 billion in healthcare and other costs in 2015. Although various devices have been used to measure physiological signals, detect apneic events, and help treat sleep apnea, significant opportunities remain to improve the quality, efficiency, and affordability of sleep apnea care. As our understanding of respiratory and neurophysiological signals and sleep apnea physiological mechanisms continues to grow, and our ability to detect and process biomedical signals improves, novel diagnostic and treatment modalities emerge. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the current engineering approaches for the detection and treatment of sleep apnea. APPROACH: It discusses signal acquisition and processing, highlights the current nonsurgical and nonpharmacological treatments, and discusses potential new therapeutic approaches. MAIN RESULTS: This work has led to an array of validated signal and sensor modalities for acquiring, storing and viewing sleep data; a broad class of computational and signal processing approaches to detect and classify SAS disease patterns; and a set of distinctive therapeutic technologies whose use cases span the continuum of disease severity. SIGNIFICANCE: This review provides a current perspective of the classes of tools at hand, along with a sense of their relative strengths and areas for further improvement.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Diagnostic Equipment , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , Humans , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...