ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic rheumatic, musculoskeletal, inflammatory disease with a propensity to present as sacroiliitis, which manifests as low back, buttock, or thigh pain. Effective primary management of axSpA requires a comprehensive approach specific to each patient and disease severity. Non-pharmacological measures form the cornerstone of treatment. With refractory disease, management also consists of local periarticular and intraarticular injections. The use of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of axSpA and localised inflammation, however, is a continuously burgeoning management option. This narrative review aims to present consolidated findings and summarise previously unreferenced or recently available evidence regarding corticosteroid injections to the SIJ for treating sacroiliitis and axSpA. METHODS: A comprehensive literary review with the following electronic databases was searched: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. RESULTS: The initial search yielded a total of 126 references. After duplicates were removed and the remainder analysed for inclusion criteria, 7 studies were included. To stratify each study, injection methodology and characteristics were defined. DISCUSSION: The use of SIJ corticosteroid injections can be an appropriate and effective treatment option for refractory axSpA. The studies presented in this review reported a general trend towards a reduction in pain severity after SIJ corticosteroid injections. Because of the complexity and heterogeneity of the anatomy of the SIJ, image guidance is recommended when performing SIJ injections. Image-guided injections seem to produce better outcomes when compared to anatomic landmark-guided injections.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Sacroiliitis , Humans , Sacroiliitis/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Sacroiliac Joint , Spondylarthritis/drug therapyABSTRACT
Congenitally absent or hypoplastic L5-S1 facet (zygapophyseal) joints are an aberrated rarity, with less than 30 reported cases. This absence of facet joint and contralateral hypertrophic facet provides a continuum of presentations that can complicate low back pain diagnoses and management. A broad differential including lumbar facet syndrome, disc degeneration, spinal stenosis, herniated radiculopathy, spondyloarthropathies and sacroiliac joint pain should be considered initially, with the flexibility for other diagnoses. Understanding the effects of different anatomical, biomechanical and physiological changes on spinal health is essential for patient care. We report a progression of lumbar radiculopathy complicated by the presence of a congenitally absent left L5-S1 facet joint and hypertrophic right L5-S1 facet joint. Furthermore, our discussion concentrates on pathophysiology, differential diagnoses and management of congenitally absent facet joints and the impact they can have on low back pain and spinal health.
Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , Low Back Pain , Radiculopathy , Zygapophyseal Joint , Humans , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Radiculopathy/complications , Lumbar Vertebrae , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/complications , ArthralgiaABSTRACT
This study examines CTE-related knowledge and information-seeking behaviors of caregivers of persons who are at high risk of CTE. Online survey responses were collected from 64 females, ages 18-74, who were married to former college, semiprofessional, or professional football players and were fluent in English. Ranging from 0 to 18, a score was calculated to represent level of CTE knowledge. Participants were classified into groups based on their spouse's reported symptoms and diagnosis. Approximately 87% of participants reported that their spouses have been diagnosed with a football-related concussion and were significantly more likely to seek out information from a healthcare provider, a scientific journal or article, and post/comment on social media compared to spouses of symptomatic/undiagnosed and non-symptomatic groups. Participants reported 77% of available information as probably true, with social media thought to be highly credible. Highest levels of dissatisfaction were reported for league-sponsored websites and physicians/healthcare providers. Although the majority of participants sought CTE related information on regular or social media, and the internet, information sources differed amongst the groups. These findings may help healthcare providers and organizations develop more effective health-related educational programs that will help the wives make informed decisions regarding care for their spouses with respect to CTE.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: General surgery residents log operative case experience as "first assist" (FA) or "primary surgeon" (PS). This study will evaluate their quantitative and qualitative case log practices. METHODS: Modified Delphi technique was used to create a questionnaire and distributed online to institutions via the APDS. Descriptive analyses and example operative scenarios for resident case logging habits were ascertained. RESULTS: There were 363 residents from university (60%) and non-university (40%) programs; 94% did not know the definition of primary surgeon. Over 50% stated they had been encouraged to log a case as surgeon that they did not feel was warranted. Only 4% felt the current logging system is "very accurate." Given an operative scenario, residents varied how they chose to log the case. CONCLUSION: General surgery residents do not know the current definition of PS. Case logging should be an objective measure of resident operative exposure, but may actually be more complex than previously recognized.