Real-world clinical profile, RET mutation testing, treatments, and PROs for MTC in Europe.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe real-world patient and physician characteristics, rearranged during transfection (RET) mutation testing and results, treatment patterns, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (aMTC) across five populous European countries. METHODS: Cross-sectional physician and patient surveys were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK from July to December 2020, prior to the introduction of selective RET inhibitors in Europe. Physicians completed patient record forms and a survey about their specialty and practice site. Patients were asked to provide PRO data using four validated instruments, including the EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. RESULTS: The physician-reported sample included 275 patients with aMTC, including 79 patients with RET mutation-positive disease; median age was 60 and 56 years, respectively. Overall, 75% were tested for RET mutation (35% germline only, 21% somatic only, 44% both). Common physician-cited barriers to RET mutation testing included high cost, difficulty accessing latest tests, and time delay for results. First-line systemic therapy (most commonly vandetanib or cabozantinib) was prescribed for 69% of patients overall and 82% of the RET mutation-positive subgroup. Second-line therapy was prescribed for 12% of patients who received first-line therapy; most patients remained on first-line therapy at data capture. PROs revealed substantial disease/treatment burden. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aMTC report substantial disease/treatment burden. Outcomes could be improved by identifying patients eligible for treatment with selective RET inhibitors through more optimal RET mutation testing.

Real-world clinical profile, treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes for thyroid cancer in Japan.

Aim: To provide a real-world snapshot of the clinical profile, management, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for advanced medullary and papillary thyroid cancer prior to the availability of rearranged during transfection (RET) inhibitors in Japan. Materials & methods: Physicians completed patient-record forms for eligible patients seen during routine clinical practice. Physicians were also surveyed about their routine practice and patients were asked to provide PRO data. Results: RET testing patterns varied by hospital type; no therapeutic relevance was a commonly cited reason to not carry out testing. Multikinase inhibitors were the main systemic therapies prescribed, although timing to start multikinase inhibitors varied; adverse events were reported as challenges. PROs revealed high disease/treatment burden. Conclusion: More effective and less toxic systemic treatment targeting genomic alterations is needed to improve long-term outcomes of thyroid cancer.

This survey, conducted in Japan in 2020, included doctors who treat thyroid cancer and their patients. It is called a real-world survey because it provides information such as the types of tests and treatments used for thyroid cancer management in everyday clinical practice. The survey focused on two types of thyroid cancer: papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), a common type, and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), an uncommon type. About 10­20% of people with PTC and most people with MTC have alterations in a gene called RET, which caused the cancer. Laboratory tests can identify these gene alterations, fusions (joining the parts of two different genes) or mutations (changes to a gene's DNA sequence) and results can help guide treatment decisions. The survey showed that testing for RET gene alterations was less than optimal and varied by the type of hospital/center. Common reasons provided by doctors for not testing for RET alterations were, "no therapeutic relevance for patient management" and "specific targeted therapies not available". However, the survey was conducted before the availability in Japan of the treatment selpercatinib, which selectively targets/inhibits tumors with RET alterations. Most patients in the survey, including those with RET alterations, received treatment with a type of inhibitor called multikinase inhibitors, as per available guidelines. Doctors considered side effects due to inhibition of multiple targets by multikinase inhibitors to be among areas for improvement needed. People with PTC and MTC also reported substantial burdens (i.e., negative impact on their lives) from the disease/treatment. The researchers concluded that barriers to RET testing need to be overcome, and more effective and less toxic treatments targeting gene alterations are needed to improve long-term outcomes.