Identifying predictive factors for bowel control in patients with spina bifida and spinal cord injuries.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess our bowel management program (BMP) and identify predictive factors for bowel control in patients with Spina Bifida (SB) and Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). Additionally, in patients with SB, we examined the impact of fetal repair (FRG) on bowel control. METHODS: We included all patients with SB and SCI seen in the Multidisciplinary Spinal Defects Clinic at Children's Hospital Colorado from 2020 to 2023. RESULTS: 336 patients included. Fecal incontinence was present in 70% and bowel control in 30%. All patients with urinary control also had bowel control. Fecal incontinence prevalence was higher in patients with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt (84%), urinary incontinence (82%), and wheelchair users (79%) compared to those who did not need a VP shunt (56%), had urinary continence (0%) and non-wheelchair users (52%), respectively (p = < 0.001 in all three scenarios). After completing BMP, 90% remained clean for stool. There was no statistical significance when comparing bowel control in FRG with non-fetal repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary continence predicts bowel control in patients with SB and SCI. Risk factors for fecal incontinence were the need for a VP shunt, urinary incontinence, and wheelchair usage. We did not find any positive impact of fetal repair on bowel and urinary control.

Visualization of the Anal Dimple by Fetal MRI: Is It Feasible?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of fetal MRI in identifying the normal anal dimple (AD) and compare it with prenatal ultrasound (US). METHODS: Retrospective review of 130 patients with both fetal MRI and US. The gestational age (GA) was stratified into four groups: (1) 16 to 21 weeks-6 days; (2) 22 to 27 weeks-6 days; (3) 28 to 33 weeks-6 days; and (4) 34 weeks and beyond. Steady-state free precession (SSFP) and single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) axial T2 MRI and transverse US images of the fetal perineum were analyzed, and visualization of the AD was determined. Clinical indication, gender, single versus multiple gestation, best MRI sequence where it was seen, and postnatal AD information were recorded. RESULTS: The AD was visualized in 125/130 fetal MRIs, and visualization was independent of GA (p 0.230). US visualized the AD in 67/130 cases, and the best GA for visualization was in group 3 (p < 0.001). There was no difference in AD visualization between SSFSE and SSFP sequences (p 0.167). CONCLUSION: Prenatal visualization of the AD by MRI is feasible and superior to US, independent of GA. Adding AD visualization to routine screening prenatal US and MRI may increase recognition of anorectal malformation.

Is the appendix a good organ to diagnose total colonic aganglionosis?

PURPOSE: The use of the appendix for diagnosis of Total Colonic Aganglionosis (TCA) remains controversial. This study aimed to categorize the presence of ganglion cells in the appendix and determine its reliability as a histological specimen for the diagnosis of TCA. METHODS: This was a combined retrospective and prospective study. Permanent histological specimens of normal appendices removed during appendectomy for malrotation or falsely presumed appendicitis, and from patients with short segment Hirschsprung's disease (HD) or TCA were included. Permanent specimens of the appendix tip from Malone procedures were prospectively collected. All specimens were independently reviewed by two experienced pathologists in a standardized manner to assess for the presence of ganglion cells. RESULTS: A total of 112 appendices were evaluated. Nine came from patients with a diagnosis of TCA, and five from patients with HD. Ganglion cells were present in all specimens from patients with diagnoses other than TCA and were absent in all specimens from patients with TCA. CONCLUSION: In the correct clinical setting, the absence of ganglion cells in the appendix can allow for a reliable diagnosis of TCA.

Visualization of the fetal anus by prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of anorectal malformations: is it feasible?

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of identifying the anal dimple (AD) on routine prenatal ultrasound. Using the presence, absence, appearance, and location of the anal dimple as an indirect sign for possible underlying anorectal malformations (ARM), we hypothesize that evaluation of the anal dimple as part of the fetal anatomic survey may increase the sensitivity in detecting less severe ARMs. METHODS: In a prospective longitudinal observational study, pregnant women who underwent prenatal ultrasound (US) at the Colorado Fetal Care Center between January 2019 and 2020 were enrolled. The variables recorded included gestational age, singleton versus multiple pregnancy, gender of the fetus, visualization of the AD, and reason for non-visualization of the AD. RESULTS: A total of 900 ultrasounds were performed, evaluating 1044 fetuses, in 372 different pregnant women. Gestational ages ranged from 16 to 38 weeks. The AD was visualized in 612 fetuses (58.6%) and not seen in 432 (41.4%). The two most common reasons for non-visualization were extremes in gestational age (n = 155; 36%) and fetal position (n = 152; 35.3%). The optimal gestational age range for AD visualization was 28-33 weeks + 6 days, with 78.1% visualization rate. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the anal dimple by ultrasound is feasible and may aid in the detection of less severe ARMs, ultimately impacting pregnancy management and family counseling. The optimal timing for anal dimple visualization is late second and third trimester.

Efficacy and safety of an abbreviated perioperative care bundle versus standard perioperative care in children undergoing elective bowel anastomoses: A randomized, noninferiority trial.

PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate if an abbreviated perioperative care bundle (APCB) is noninferior to the standard care, in terms of efficacy and safety, in pediatric patients undergoing bowel anastomoses. METHODS: A randomized, open, noninferiority trial with two parallel groups of equal size was carried out at the National Institute of Pediatrics in Mexico City, Mexico, from April 2016 to July 2018. The total number analyzed was 74 (37 per group). The APCB comprised same day admission, avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, optimized antibiotic prophylaxis, and early feeding. Statistical analysis was done with Fisher's exact test or Chi2, and Student's T test. RESULTS: No significant differences were found for demographic variables and type of disease, either for the safety (anastomotic leakage, p 0.753; organ/space surgical site infection, p 0.500) or for some efficacy outcomes (ileus or bowel obstruction, p 0.693). Other efficacy outcomes were better in the study group, with shorter median times for feeding tolerance (19 h vs. 92 h, p < 0.001), for first bowel movement (15 h vs. 36 h, p < 0.001), and for discharge (1 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The abbreviated care bundle was proven to be as safe but more efficacious than the standard care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I - randomized controlled trial with adequate statistical power.

Transanal endorectal approach for the treatment of idiopathic rectal prolapse in children: Experience with the modified Delorme's procedure.

BACKGROUND: Persistent or recurrent idiopathic rectal prolapse in children requires surgical intervention. Several techniques have been used to repair this problem. However, recurrence and complications continue to be a challenge in the management of this condition. Here we report our experience in using the modified Delorme's procedure to treat such patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with idiopathic rectal prolapse who underwent the modified Delorme's procedure during 2013-2017. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of the patients and the recurrence and complication rates during a follow-up of 15-68 months. RESULTS: We included 14 patients. The age at operation ranged from 2 to 17 years, and the length of the prolapse was 3-15 cm. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients achieved postoperative fecal control, and there were no recurrences. CONCLUSION: The modified Delorme's procedure was effective for the treatment of idiopathic rectal prolapse. There were no recurrences or complications. Because it is a perineal technique, the procedure avoids the risk of nerve injury that exists for transabdominal methods.

Effectiveness of senna vs polyethylene glycol as laxative therapy in children with constipation related to anorectal malformation.

PURPOSE: Constipation is present in 80% of children with corrected anorectal malformations, usually associated to rectal dilation and hypomotility. Osmotic laxatives are routinely used for idiopathic constipation. Senna is a stimulant laxative that produces contractions improving colonic motility without affecting the stool consistency. We designed this trial to study the effectiveness of Senna versus polyethylene glycol for the treatment of constipation in children with anorectal malformation. METHODS: A randomized controlled crossover design clinical trial, including a washout period, was conducted, including children with corrected anorectal malformations with fecal continence and constipation. The sample size was calculated for proportions (n=28) according to available data for Senna. Effectiveness of laxative therapy was measured with a three variable construct: 1) daily bowel movement, 2) fecal soiling, 3) a "clean" abdominal x-ray. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and a Fisher's exact test for the outcome variable (effectiveness). RESULTS: The study was terminated early because the interim analysis showed a clear benefit toward Senna (p = 0.026). The sample showed a normal statistical distribution for the variables age and presence of megarectum. The maximum daily dose of Senna (sennosides A and B) was 38.7mg and 17g for polyethylene glycol. No adverse effects were identified. CONCLUSION: Therapy with Senna should be the laxative treatment of choice as part of a bowel management program in children with repaired anorectal malformations and constipation, since the stimulation of colonic propulsion waves could lead to stool evacuation without modification of its consistency which can affect fecal continence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I - randomized controlled trial with adequate statistical power.

Unexpected megarectum: A potential hidden source of complications in patients with anorectal malformation.

BACKGROUND: Primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is recommended to repair anorectal malformations with rectoperineal or rectovestibular fistula. The aim of this study was to identify the impact of the presence of megarectum on the relative frequency of complications related to posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study including patients with anorectal malformation, preoperative rectogram and surgically treated with primary or staged posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Only complications related to anorectoplasty were analyzed and compared with the presence of megarectum. RESULTS: Thirty patients aged 1 day to 7 years were included, 60% had megarectum. Sixteen patients had primary repair: 6 with megarectum and 10 without megarectum; complications occurred in four of the six with megarectum, 66.7%, and no complication were observed in the 10 patients without megarectum (F p=0.008). Fourteen patients had staged repair and no complications related to posterior sagittal anorectoplasty occurred in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive preoperative evaluation in patients with anorectal malformation with rectoperineal or rectovestibular fistula could include a rectogram. Awareness of the presence of megarectum could be useful information in the decision to create a colostomy or perform a primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.