Impact of prophylactic central lymph node dissection on the complications and recurrence rates in papillary thyroid carcinoma-An AFCE (French-speaking Association of Endocrine Surgery) multicentre study based on the EUROCRINE® national data.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) remains controversial during the initial surgery for preoperative and intraoperative node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). METHODS: Patients undergoing thyroidectomy with or without pCND (Nx) for PTC in nine French surgical departments, registered in the EUROCRINE® national data in France between January 2015 and June 2021, were included in a cohort study. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, complications, and recurrence rates were compared using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1905 patients with cN0 PTC were enrolled, including 1534 who had undergone pCND and 371 who hadn't (Nx). Of these, 1546 (81.2%) were female, and the median age was 49 years (range: 15-89 years). Patients who had undergone pCND were more likely to have multifocal tumors (n = 524 [34.2%] vs. n = 68 [18.3%], p < .001) and larger tumors (15.3 vs. 10.2 mm, p = .01) than patients with Nx. Of the patients with pCND, 553 (36%) had positive central LN (N1a), with a median of 1 N1 (IQR 0-5). pCND was associated with a higher temporary hypocalcemia rate (n = 25 [8%] vs. n = 15 [4%], p < .001). The rates of permanent hypocalcemia and temporary and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy were not significantly different between the two groups (p > .2). After adjusting for covariates (age, sex, multifocality, and pathological T stage) in a multivariable Cox PH model, the performance of lymph node dissection (pCND vs. no-pCND) was not associated with PTC recurrence (p = .2). CONCLUSION: pCND in PTC does not reduce recurrence and is associated with a two-fold increase in the incidence of transient hypoparathyroidism. These data should be considered while issuing further guidelines regarding the treatment of patients with cN0 PTC.

Recurrence After Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism in 517 Patients With Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: An Association Francophone de Chirurgie Endocrinienne and Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess recurrence according to the type of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 ( MEN1 ) patients and to identify the risk factors for recurrence after the initial surgery. BACKGROUND: In MEN1 patients, pHPT is multiglandular, and the optimal extent of initial parathyroid resection influences the risk of recurrence. METHODS: MEN1 patients who underwent initial surgery for pHPT between 1990 and 2019 were included. Persistence and recurrence rates after less than subtotal parathyroidectomy (LTSP) and subtotal parathyroidectomy (STP) were analyzed. Patients with total parathyroidectomy with reimplantation were excluded. RESULTS: Five hundred seventeen patients underwent their first surgery for pHPT: 178 had LTSP (34.4%) and 339 STP (65.6%). The recurrence rate was significantly higher after LTSP (68.5%) than STP (45%) ( P < 0.001). The median time to recurrence after pHPT surgery was significantly shorter after LTSP than after STP: 4.25 (1.2-7.1) versus 7.2 (3.9-10.1) years ( P < 0.001). A mutation in exon 10 was an independent risk factor of recurrence after STP (odds ratio = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.31; 3.69; P = 0.003). The 5 and 10-year recurrent pHPT probabilities were significantly higher in patients after LTSP with a mutation in exon 10 (37% and 79% vs 30% and 61%; P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence, recurrence of pHPT, and reoperation rate are significantly lower after STP than LTSP in MEN1 patients. Genotype seems to be associated with the recurrence of pHPT. A mutation in exon 10 is an independent risk factor for recurrence after STP, and LTSP may not be recommended when exon 10 is mutated.

Surgery for Primary Aldosteronism in France From 2010 to 2020 - Results from the French-Speaking Association of Endocrine Surgery (AFCE): Eurocrine Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the diagnostic workup and postoperative results for patients treated by adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism in France from 2010 to 2020. BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the underlying cause of hypertension in 6% to 18% of patients. French and international guidelines recommend CT-scan and adrenal vein sampling as part of diagnostic workup to distinguish unilateral PA amenable to surgical treatment from bilateral PA that will require lifelong antialdosterone treatment.Adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism has been associated with complete resolution of hypertension (no antihypertensive drugs and normal ambulatory blood pressure) in about one-third of patients and complete biological success in 94% of patients.These results are mainly based on retrospective studies with short follow-up and aggregated patients from various international high-volume centers. METHODS: Here we report results from the French-Speaking Association of Endocrine Surgery (AFCE) using the Eurocrine® Database. RESULTS: Over 11 years, 385 patients from 10 medical centers were eligible for analysis, accounting for >40% of adrenalectomies performed in France for primary aldosteronism over the period.Preoperative workup was consistent with guidelines for 40% of patients. Complete clinical success (CCS) at the last follow-up was achieved in 32% of patients, and complete biological success was not sufficiently assessed.For patients with 2 follow-up visits, clinical results were not persistent at 1 year for one-fifth of patients.Factors associated with CCS on multivariate analysis were body mass index, duration of hypertension, and number of antihypertensive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: These results call for an improvement in thorough preoperative workup and long-term follow-up of patients (clinical and biological) to early manage hypertension and/or PA relapse.

Scope of prophylactic lymph node dissection in the surgical treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. Recommendations of the AFCE (Association francophone de chirurgie endocrinienne) with the SFE (Société française d'endocrinologie) and the SFMN (Société française de médecine nucléaire).

Prophylactic lymph node dissection is considered only for papillary cancers. It is not indicated for vesicular cancers or oncocytic cancers, nor should it entail a secondary surgical intervention in the event of an incidental discovery of papillary cancer on a thyroidectomy specimen. Prophylactic lymph node dissection means a cervical lymph node dissection in the absence of any pre- or intraoperative evidence (biological, cytological, histological, clinical or ultrasound) of lymph node metastases. There is currently no evidence in the literature that prophylactic central dissection improves overall survival, which is similar for N0 and NX patients. Yet although prophylactic lymph node dissection is not justified by overall survival, it does seem to reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence in the case of micro-N1, and it allows occult metastases to be detected and a tumour to be reclassified. This enables patients at risk of recurrence to be more surely identified and therapeutic strategy and follow-up adapted accordingly. Prophylactic homolateral central lymph node dissection is warranted for papillary cancers with largest ultrasound diameter 4cm and above and/or with intraoperative macroscopic evidence of perithyroid tissue invasion. The benefits and risks of lymph node dissection must be assessed and discussed on a case-by-case basis. Only a central lymph node dissection homolateral to the tumour is recommended, except for bilateral or isthmic cancers, for which a prophylactic bilateral central lymph node dissection may be considered. This bilateral lymph node dissection incurs an increased risk of complications (parathyroids, recurrent laryngeal nerve). Prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection is not recommended.

Pancreatoduodenectomy for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: An AFCE (Association Francophone de Chirurgie Endocrinienne) and GTE (Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines) Study.

AIM: To assess postoperative complications and control of hormone secretions following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) performed on multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients with duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (DP-NETs). BACKGROUND: The use of PD to treat MEN1 remains controversial, and evaluating the right place of PD in MEN1 disease makes sense. METHODS: Thirty-one MEN1 patients from the Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines MEN1 cohort who underwent PD for DP-NETs between 1971 and 2013 were included. Early and late postoperative complications, secretory control and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Indication for surgery was: Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (n = 18; 58%), nonfunctioning tumor (n = 9; 29%), insulinoma (n = 2; 7%), VIPoma (n = 1; 3%) and glucagonoma (n = 1; 3%). Mean follow-up was 141 months (range 0-433). Pancreatic fistulas occurred in 5 patients (16.1%), distant metastases in 6 (mean onset of 43 months; range 13-110 months), postoperative diabetes mellitus in 7 (22%), and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in 6 (19%). Five-year overall survival was 93.3% [CI 75.8-98.3] and ten-year overall survival was 89.1% [CI 69.6-96.4]. After a mean follow-up of 151 months (range 0-433), the biochemical cure rate for MEN-1 related gastrinomas was 61%. CONCLUSION: In MEN1 patients, pancreatoduodenectomy can be used to control hormone secretions (gastrin, glucagon, VIP) and to remove large NETs. PD was found to control gastrin secretions in about 60% of cases.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and paraaortic lymph nodes metastases: The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with paraaortic lymph nodes metastases (PALN +) is associated with poor survival. Still, there are no current guidelines advocating systematic detection of PALN+. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent surgical exploration/resection with concurrent paraaortic (group 16) lymphadenectomy for PDAC between 2009 and 2016 were considered for inclusion. Resection was systematically aborted in case of intraoperative PALN + detection. Diagnostic performance of preoperative imaging upon blind review and intraoperative PALN dissection with frozen section (FS) for PALN detection were evaluated. Additionally, the prognostic significance of PALN + on overall survival (OS) was analyzed. RESULTS: Over the study period, among 129 patients undergoing surgery for PDAC, 113 had intraoperative PALN dissection with FS analysis. Median number of resected PALN was 3 (range, 1-15). Overall, PALN+ was found in 19 patients (16.8%). Upon blind review, preoperative imaging performed poorly for PALN + detection with a low agreement between imaging and final pathology (Kappa-Cohen index<0.2). In contrast, PALN FS showed high detection performances and strong agreement with final pathology (Kappa-Cohen index = 0.783, 95%CI 0.779-0.867, p < 0.001). Regarding survival outcomes, there was no difference between patients with PALN+ and patients not resected in the setting of liver metastases or locally unresectable disease found at exploration (p = 0.708). CONCLUSIONS: Before PD for PDAC, intraoperative PALN dissection and FS analysis yields accurate PALN assessment and allows appropriate patient selection. This should be routinely performed and aborting resection should be strongly considered in case of PALN+.

NIFT-P: Are they indolent tumors? Results of a multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma has recently been reclassified as noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the basis of its highly indolent behavior, as proposed by an international group of experienced thyroid pathologists. METHODS: All patients from 9 high-volume endocrine surgery departments who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2015 and whose final surgical pathology revealed noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (>10 mm) were included in this study. The primary outcome was to determine the potential for recurrent disease in these patients. RESULTS: Among the 363 patients with noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features, 76% were female with a median age of 50 years (5-86 years); 345 patients (95%) underwent total thyroidectomy. A total of 65 patients had an associated micropapillary thyroid carcinoma. In the group of 133 patients who underwent prophylactic lymph node dissection (37%), 1 patient had a micrometastasis but with an associated micropapillary thyroid carcinoma. Over a median follow-up period of 5 years, 1 patient with an associated micropapillary thyroid carcinoma had recurrent disease at 6 years. All patients with noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features without micropapillary thyroid carcinoma had no lymph node metastasis or recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: We found that noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features presents with indolent behavior. However, the identification of an associated micropapillary thyroid carcinoma should be carefully evaluated because it could be a factor for lymph node metastasis and/or of recurrence.

CA 19-9 predicts resectability of pancreatic cancer even in jaundiced patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection remains the only curative option for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite recent improvements in medical imaging, unresectability is still often discovered at the time of surgery. It is essential to identify unresectable patients preoperatively to avoid unnecessary surgery. High serum CA 19-9 levels have been suggested as a marker of unresectability but considered inaccurate in patients with hyperbilirubinemia. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate CA 19-9 serum levels as a predictor of unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinomas with a special focus on jaundiced patients. METHODS: All patients presenting with histologically-confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma and having serum CA 19-9 levels available prior to any treatment were included in this retrospective study. The relationship between serum concentrations of CA 19-9 and resectability was studied by regression analysis and theROC curves obtained. A cut-off value of CA 19-9 was calculated. In jaundiced patients, a CA 19-9 adjusted for bilirubinemia was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 171 patients included, 49 (29%) were deemed resectable and 122 (71%) unresectable. Altogether, 93 patients (54%) had jaundice. The area under the ROC curve for CA 19-9 as a predictor of resectability was 0.886 (95%CI:[0.832-0.932]); in jaundiced patients it was 0.880 (95% CI [0.798-0.934]. A cut-off in CA 19-9 at 178 UI/mlyielded 85% sensitivity, 81% specificity and 91% positive predictive value for resectability. There was no correlation between the levels of bilirubin and CA 19-9 (r = 0.149). CONCLUSION: Serum CA 19-9 is a good predictive marker of unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, even in jaundiced patients. CA 19-9 levels over 178 UI/ml strongly suggest unresectable disease.

Inflammatory markers as early predictors of infection after colorectal surgery: the same cut-off values in laparoscopy and laparotomy?

PURPOSE: C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are reliable early predictors of infection after colorectal surgery. However, the inflammatory response is lower after laparoscopy as compared to open surgery. This study analyzed whether a different cutoff value of inflammatory markers should be chosen according to the surgical approach. METHODS: A prospective, observational study included consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in three academic centers. All infections until postoperative day (POD) 30 were recorded. The inflammatory markers were analyzed daily until POD 4. Areas under the ROC curve and diagnostic values were calculated in order to assess their accuracy as a predictor of intra-abdominal infection. RESULTS: Five-hundred-one patients were included. The incidence of intra-abdominal infection was 11.8%. The median levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were lower in the laparoscopy group at each postoperative day (p < 0.0001). In patients without intra-abdominal infection, they were also lower in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.0036) but were not different in patients presenting with intra-abdominal infections (p = 0.3243). In the laparoscopy group, CRP at POD 4 was the most accurate predictor of overall and intra-abdominal infection (AUC = 0.775). With a cutoff of 100 mg/L, it yielded 95.7% negative predictive value, 75% sensitivity, and 70.3% specificity for the detection of intra-abdominal infection. CONCLUSION: The impact of infection on inflammatory markers is more important than that of the surgical approach. Defining a specific cutoff value for early discharge according to the surgical approach is not justified. A patient with CRP values lower than 100 mg/L on POD 4 can be safely discharged.