ABSTRACT
Background: Tight glycemic control is essential for the normal growth and development of preschool children. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems in a real-life setting in children younger than 6 years. Methods: We conducted a two-center prospective study. We enrolled 19 patients with a median age at disease onset of 2.6 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.6; 4.4] and a median disease duration of 1.4 years (IQR 0.9; 2.8) who were switched to AHCL from multiple daily injections or open-loop insulin therapy and with a 6-month follow-up. Clinical data, sensor glycemic metrics, and pump settings were collected and analyzed. Results: After 6 months of follow-up, there was a significant reduction in median HbA1c (p = 0.0007) and glucose management indicator (p = 0.03). A reduction in both mild (>180 mg/dL) (p = 0.04) and severe (>250 mg/dL) (p = 0.01) hyperglycemia was observed after 1 month of auto mode, and in mild hyperglycemia, it persisted up to 6 months (p = 0.02). A small increase in time below range (<70 mg/dL) was observed (p = 0.04) without a significant difference in time <54 mg/dL (p = 0.73). Time in range increased significantly, reaching a 10% increment (p = 0.03) compared with baseline. A significant reduction in the average sensor glucose was observed (p = 0.01) while coefficient of glucose variability (CV%) remained stable (p = 0.12). No episodes of ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia have been recorded. Conclusion: AHCL systems are effective and safe for children younger than 6 years and should be considered as a valid therapeutic option from diabetes onset.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Prospective Studies , Blood Glucose/analysis , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Infant , Glycemic Control/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Treatment Outcome , Hypoglycemia , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , ChildABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Early and tight glycaemic control is crucial to prevent long-term complications of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). The aim of our study was to compare glucose metrics, including Time In Tight Range (TITR), in a real-world setting. METHODS: We performed a single-centre cross-sectional study in 534 children and adolescents with T1D. Participants were divided into four groups (multiple daily injections + real-time Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), multiple daily injections + intermittently scanned CGM, sensor augmented pump (SAP), and Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL). Demographical and clinical data were collected and analysed. RESULTS: The group with AHCL showed significantly higher Time In Range (TIR) (71.31% ± 10.88) than SAP (57.82% ± 14.98; p < 0.001), MDI + rtCGM (54.56% ± 17.04; p < 0.001) and MDI + isCGM (52.17% ± 19.36; p < 0.001) groups with a lower Time Above Range (p < 0.001). The group with AHCL also showed lower Time Below Range than MDI + isCGM and SAP groups (p < 0.01). The overall TITR was 37% ± 14 with 19% of participants who reached a TITR ≥50% with a mean TIR of 81%. AHCL had significantly higher TITR (45.46% ± 11.77) than SAP (36.25% ± 13.53; p < 0.001), MDI + rtCGM (34.03% ± 13.89; p < 0.001) and MDI + isCGM (33.37% ± 15.84; p < 0.001) groups with a lower Coefficient of Variation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that AHCL ensures a better glycaemic control with an improvement in both TIR and TITR, along with a reduction in CV. Implementation of automated insulin delivery systems should be considered in the treatment of children and adolescents with T1D.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Child , Adolescent , Female , Male , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Blood Glucose/analysis , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Glycemic Control/methods , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Biomarkers/analysis , Hypoglycemia/prevention & controlABSTRACT
There has been continuous progress in diabetes management over the last few decades, not least due to the widespread dissemination of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and automated insulin delivery systems. These technological advances have radically changed the daily lives of people living with diabetes, improving the quality of life of both children and their families. Despite this, hypoglycemia remains the primary side-effect of insulin therapy. Based on a systematic review of the available scientific evidence, this paper aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, risk stratifying, treating, and managing patients with hypoglycemia. The objective of these recommendations is to unify the behavior of pediatric diabetologists with respect to the timely recognition and prevention of hypoglycemic episodes and the correct treatment of hypoglycemia, especially in patients using CGM or advanced hybrid closed-loop systems. All authors have long experience in the specialty and are members of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology. The goal of treating hypoglycemia is to raise blood glucose above 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) and to prevent further decreases. Oral glucose at a dose of 0.3 g/kg (0.1 g/kg for children using "smart pumps" or hybrid closed loop systems in automated mode) is the preferred treatment for the conscious individual with blood glucose <70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L), although any form of carbohydrate (e.g., sucrose, which consists of glucose and fructose, or honey, sugary soft drinks, or fruit juice) containing glucose may be used. Using automatic insulin delivery systems, the oral glucose dose can be decreased to 0.1 g/kg. Practical flow charts are included to aid clinical decision-making. Although representing the official position of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (ISPED), these guidelines are applicable to the global audience and are especially pertinent in the era of CGM and other advanced technologies.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Hypoglycemia , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin , Humans , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Child , Adolescent , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Insulin Infusion Systems , Risk Assessment , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Disease ManagementABSTRACT
AIMS: Recent clinical trials and real-world studies highlighted those variations in ECG waveforms and HRV recurrently occurred during hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events in patients with diabetes. However, while several studies have been carried out for adult age, there is lack of evidence for paediatric patients. The main aim of the study is to identify the correlations of variations in ECG Morphology waveforms with blood glucose levels in a paediatric population. METHODS: T1D paediatric patients who use CGM were enrolled. They wear an additional non-invasive wearable device for recording physiological data and respiratory rate. Glucose metrics, ECG parameters and HRV features were collected, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Spearman's correlation analysis were used to explore if different levels of blood glucose were associated to ECG morphological changes. RESULTS: Results showed that hypoglycaemic events in paediatric patients with T1D are strongly associated with variations in ECG morphology and HRV. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed the opportunity of using the ECG as a non-invasive adding instrument to monitor the hypoglycaemic events through the integration of the ECG continuous information with CGM data. This innovative approach represents a promising step forward in diabetes management, offering a more comprehensive and effective means of detecting and responding to critical changes in glucose levels.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Electrocardiography , Humans , Blood Glucose/analysis , Child , Female , Male , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Adolescent , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Heart Rate/physiology , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Wearable Electronic DevicesABSTRACT
AIMS: To analyze metabolic outcomes, diabetes impact and device satisfaction in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Italy who used different treatment modalities for diabetes care in a real-life context. METHODS: In this multicenter, nationwide, cross-sectional study, 1464 participants were enrolled at a routine visit. The following treatment modalities were considered MDI + SMBG; MDI + CGM; Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy; predictive management of low glucose; Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL); Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL). Health related quality of life was evaluated by the Italian version of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction Scale (DIDS) questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients treated with AID systems were more likely to have HbA1c ≤ 6.5 %, higher percentage of time with glucose levels between 70 and 180 mg/dL, lower percentage of time with glucose levels above 180 mg/dL, higher device satisfaction, and reduced impact of diabetes. All the therapeutic modalities with respect to MDI + CGM, except for MDI + SMBG, contributed to increase the device satisfaction. HCL and AHCL respect to MDI + CGM were associated with lower diabetes impact. CONCLUSION: Real-life use of automated insulin delivery systems is associated with reduced type 1 diabetes impact, increased device satisfaction, and achievement of glycemic goals.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Insulin , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Insulin Infusion SystemsABSTRACT
CONTEXT: In the last decade the Sanger method of DNA sequencing has been replaced by next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS is valuable in conditions characterized by high genetic heterogeneity such as neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM). OBJECTIVE: To compare results of genetic analysis of patients with NDM and congenital severe insulin resistance (c.SIR) identified in Italy in 2003-2012 (Sanger) vs 2013-2022 (NGS). METHODS: We reviewed clinical and genetic records of 104 cases with diabetes onset before 6 months of age (NDM + c.SIR) of the Italian dataset. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (50 NDM + 5 c.SIR) were identified during 2003-2012 and 49 (46 NDM + 3 c.SIR) in 2013-2022. Twenty-year incidence was 1:103 340 (NDM) and 1:1 240 082 (c.SIR) live births. Frequent NDM/c.SIR genetic defects (KCNJ11, INS, ABCC8, 6q24, INSR) were detected in 41 and 34 probands during 2003-2012 and 2013-2022, respectively. We identified a pathogenic variant in rare genes in a single proband (GATA4) (1/42 or 2.4%) during 2003-2012 and in 8 infants (RFX6, PDX1, GATA6, HNF1B, FOXP3, IL2RA, LRBA, BSCL2) during 2013-2022 (8/42 or 19%, P = .034 vs 2003-2012). Notably, among rare genes 5 were recessive. Swift and accurate genetic diagnosis led to appropriate treatment: patients with autoimmune NDM (FOXP3, IL2RA, LRBA) were subjected to bone marrow transplant; patients with pancreas agenesis/hypoplasia (RFX6, PDX1) were supplemented with pancreatic enzymes, and the individual with lipodystrophy caused by BSCL2 was started on metreleptin. CONCLUSION: NGS substantially improved diagnosis and precision therapy of monogenic forms of neonatal diabetes and c.SIR in Italy.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Male , Female , Infant , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , Insulin Resistance/genetics , Mutation , Incidence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIMS: While continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and associated technologies have positive effects on metabolic control in young people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), less is known about their impact on quality of life (QoL). Here, we quantified CGM satisfaction and QoL in young people with T1D and their parents/caregivers to establish (i) the relationship between QoL and CGM satisfaction and (ii) the impact of the treatment regimen on QoL. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of children and adolescents with T1D on different treatment regimens (multiple daily injections, sensor-augmented pumps and automated insulin delivery). QoL was assessed with the KINDL instrument, and CGM satisfaction with the CGM-SAT questionnaire was evaluated in both youths with T1D and their parents. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten consecutively enrolled youths with T1D completed the KINDL and CGM-SAT questionnaires. The mean total KINDL score was greater than neutral in both subjects with T1D (3.99 ± 0.47) and parents (4.06 ± 0.40), and lower overall CGM-SAT scores (i.e., higher satisfaction) were significantly associated with higher QoL in all six KINDL subscales (p < 0.05). There were no differences in KINDL scores according to delivery technology or when participants were grouped according to optimal and sub-optimal glucose control. CONCLUSIONS: Higher satisfaction with recent CGMs was associated with better QoL in all dimensions. QoL was independent of both the insulin delivery technology and glycaemic control. CGM must be further disseminated. Attention on perceived satisfaction with CGM should be incorporated with the clinical practice to improve the well-being of children and adolescents with T1D and their families.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Adolescent , Male , Female , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Glycemic Control , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Glucose/analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Parents/psychology , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Continuous Glucose MonitoringABSTRACT
Glycemic abnormalities are a frequent finding in pediatric oncological patients, both during treatment and after its discontinuation. Moreover, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), impaired fasting glycemia (IFG) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are not rarely diagnosed in non-oncological hematological diseases. To explore the current pediatric Italian approach to the diagnosis and the management of the glycemic alterations in this clinical setting and, thus, to identify and enforce current clinical needs, we submitted an online 23-items survey to all the Italian Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP) centers, and surveys were descriptively analyzed. Thirty-nine AIEOP centers were involved in the study. In 2021, among 75278 children and adolescents affected by an oncological or a hematological disease, 1.2 and 0.65% developed DM, while IGT or IFG were widespread in 2.3 and 2.8%, respectively. The main causes of DM were the use of corticosteroids in patients with cancer and the iron overload in patients with thalassemia. Venous fasting plasma glycemia was the most used tool to detect glycemic abnormalities. The performance of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was extremely limited, except when IFG occurred. Despite the diagnosis of DM, â¼45% of patients with cancer and 30% of patients with one hematological disease did not receive an appropriate treatment. In the other cases, insulin was the drug of first choice. Emerging technologies for diabetes care (glucose sensors and insulin pumps) are not largely used yet. The results of our study support the standardization of the care of the glycemic abnormalities during or after onco-hematologic diseases in the pediatric age. Despite the scarce data in pediatric literature, proper guidelines are needed.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Glucose Intolerance , Hematologic Diseases , Insulins , Neoplasms , Prediabetic State , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Glucose Intolerance/diagnosis , Hematologic Diseases/epidemiology , Hematologic Diseases/therapy , HomeostasisSubject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemia , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Glucagon , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Insulin , Blood GlucoseSubject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Glycated Hemoglobin , Follow-Up Studies , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/etiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
AIMS: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can improve glucometrics in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), and its efficacy is positively related to glucose sensor use for at least 60% of the time. We therefore investigated the relationship between CGM satisfaction as assessed by a robust questionnaire and glucose control in pediatric T1D patients. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of children and adolescents with T1D using CGM. The CGM Satisfaction (CGM-SAT) questionnaire was administered to patients and demographic, clinical, and glucometrics data were recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten consecutively enrolled patients attending 14 Italian pediatric diabetes clinics completed the CGM-SAT questionnaire. CGM-SAT scores were not associated with age, gender, annual HbA1c, % of time with an active sensor, time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), and coefficient of variation (CV). However, CGM satisfaction was positively correlated with time in range (TIR, p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with glycemia risk index (GRI, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CGM seems to have a positive effect on glucose control in patients with T1D. CGM satisfaction is therefore an important patient-reported outcome to assess and it is associated with increased TIR and reduced GRI.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Hypoglycemic AgentsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Glucose metabolism alterations in cystic fibrosis range from the classic cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) to forms of glucose intolerance and prediabetes. The aim of the present work is to review the most up-to-date novelties in terms of CFRD diagnosis and therapy. This review is timely and relevant because it allows an update for the early and correct classification of glucose abnormalities in cystic fibrosis and because it favours an appropriate therapeutic approach. RECENT FINDINGS: Confirm that Oral Glucose Tolerance Test is still the diagnostic gold standard despite the advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems; this latter is spreading very rapidly, however, to date, there is still no strong evidence to hypothesize the use of CGM for diagnostic purposes. CGM has indeed proven to be very useful in managing and guiding CFRD therapy. SUMMARY: Tailored and personalized insulin therapy is still the recommended therapy for children and adolescents with CFRD, although nutritional intervention and oral hypoglycaemic treatment are equally important and efficacious. Finally CFTR modulators have allowed the increase of the life expectancy of cystic fibrosis patients and have proven effective not only in improving the pulmonary function and the nutritional status but also the glucose control.
Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis , Diabetes Mellitus , Prediabetic State , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Prediabetic State/diagnosis , Prediabetic State/therapy , Prediabetic State/complications , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Cystic Fibrosis/diagnosis , Cystic Fibrosis/therapy , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/adverse effects , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Insulin/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Penetrance , Diabetes Mellitus/genetics , Mutation , Sulfonylurea Receptors/geneticsABSTRACT
Purpose: Paediatric Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients are at greater risk for developing severe hypo and hyperglycaemic events due to poor glycaemic control. To reduce the risk of adverse events, patients need to achieve the best possible glycaemic management through frequent blood glucose monitoring with finger prick or Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems. However, several non-invasive techniques have been proposed aiming at exploiting changes in physiological parameters based on glucose levels. The overall objective of this study is to validate an artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithm to detect glycaemic events using ECG signals collected through non-invasive device. Methods: This study will enrol T1D paediatric participants who already use CGM. Participants will wear an additional non-invasive wearable device for recording physiological data and respiratory rate. Glycaemic measurements driven through ECG variables are the main outcomes. Data collected will be used to design, develop and validate the personalised and generalized classifiers based on a deep learning (DL) AI algorithm, able to automatically detect hypoglycaemic events by using few ECG heartbeats recorded with wearable devices. Results: Data collection is expected to be completed approximately by June 2023. It is expected that sufficient data will be collected to develop and validate the AI algorithm. Conclusion: This is a validation study that will perform additional tests on a larger diabetes sample population to validate the previous pilot results that were based on four healthy adults, providing evidence on the reliability of the AI algorithm in detecting glycaemic events in paediatric diabetic patients in free-living conditions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03936634. Registered on 11 March 2022, retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05278143?titles=AI+for+Glycemic+Events+Detection+Via+ECG+in+a+Pediatric+Population&draw=2&rank=1. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-022-00719-x.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly important for assessing patient satisfaction with diabetes technologies. PROs must be assessed with validated questionnaires in clinical practice and research studies. Our aim was to translate and validate the Italian version of the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) Satisfaction (CGM-SAT) scale questionnaire. METHODS: Questionnaire validation followed MAPI Research Trust guidelines and included forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, and cognitive debriefing. RESULTS: The final version of the questionnaire was administered to 210 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 232 parents. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach's coefficient was 0.71 and 0.85 for young people (patients) and parents indicating moderate and good internal consistency, respectively. Parent-young people agreement was 0.404 (95% confidence interval: 0.391-0.417), indicating moderate agreement between the two assessments. Factor analysis identified that factors assessing the "benefits" and "hassles" of CGM accounted for 33.9% and 12.9% of score variance in young people and 29.6% and 19.8% in parents, respectively. DISCUSSION: We present the successful Italian translation and validation of the CGM-SAT scale questionnaire, which will be useful for assessing satisfaction with Italian T1D patients using CGM systems.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Humans , Adolescent , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/psychology , Blood Glucose , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Italy , Personal SatisfactionSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiologyABSTRACT
AIM: In the pediatric diabetes clinic, patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) account for more than 90% of cases, while monogenic forms represent about 6%. Many monogenic diabetes subtypes may respond to therapies other than insulin and have chronic diabetes complication prognosis that is different from T1D. With the aim of providing a better diagnostic pipeline and a tailored care for patients with monogenic diabetes, we set up a monogenic diabetes clinic (MDC). METHODS: In the first 3 years of activity 97 patients with non-autoimmune forms of hyperglycemia were referred to MDC. Genetic testing was requested for 80 patients and 68 genetic reports were available for review. RESULTS: In 58 subjects hyperglycemia was discovered beyond 1 year of age (Group 1) and in 10 before 1 year of age (Group 2). Genetic variants considered causative of hyperglycemia were identified in 25 and 6 patients of Group 1 and 2, respectively, with a pick up rate of 43.1% (25/58) for Group 1 and 60% (6/10) for Group 2 (global pick-up rate: 45.5%; 31/68). When we considered probands of Group 1 with a parental history of hyperglycemia, 58.3% (21/36) had a positive genetic test for GCK or HNF1A genes, while pick-up rate was 18.1% (4/22) in patients with mute family history for diabetes. Specific treatments for each condition were administered in most cases. CONCLUSION: We conclude that MDC may contribute to provide a better diabetes care in the pediatric setting.