Preconceptional evaluation of women with recurrent pregnancy loss: the additional value of assessing vascular and metabolic status.

BACKGROUND: A majority of recurrent pregnancy loss cases (RPL) remains unexplained. We hypothesized that complications in vascular and metabolic status may guide towards underlying problems that also predispose to RPL and that the number of pregnancy losses is related. METHODS: A retrospective study in 123 women with either a history of low-order RPL (2-3 pregnancy losses) or high-order RPL (≥ 4 pregnancy losses) and 20 women with a history of uncomplicated pregnancy (controls) was performed. Vascular status was assessed by measuring hemodynamic parameters, determining abnormal parameters and analyzing their contribution to the circulatory risk profile (CRP). In a similar way, metabolic status was assessed. Metabolic parameters were measured, used to determine abnormal parameters and analyzed for their contribution to the metabolic syndrome (MetS). RESULTS: No major differences were observed in vascular or metabolic parameters between women with RPL and controls. There was no relation with the number of pregnancy losses. However, when analyzing the presence of abnormal constituents, more than 80% of women with RPL had at least one abnormal constituent of the CRP. While only 27% had one or more abnormal constituent of the MetS. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of abnormal circulatory factors prior to pregnancy, and to lesser extent constituents of the metabolic syndrome, may predispose to RPL and offer new insights to its pathophysiology.

7T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the detection of subtle blood-brain barrier leakage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) can be employed to assess the blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Detection of BBB leakage at lower field strengths (≤3T) is cumbersome as the signal is noisy, while leakage can be subtle. Utilizing the increased signal-to-noise ratio at higher field strengths, we explored the application of 7T DCE-MRI for assessing BBB leakage. METHODS: A dual-time resolution DCE-MRI method was implemented at 7T and a slow injection rate (0.3 ml/s) and low dose (3 mmol) served to obtain signal changes linearly related to the gadolinium concentration, that is, minimized for T2* degradation effects. With the Patlak graphical approach, the leakage rate (Ki ) and blood plasma volume fraction (vp ) were calculated. The method was evaluated in 10 controls, an ischemic stroke patient, and a patient with a transient ischemic attack. RESULTS: Ki and vp were significantly higher in gray matter compared to white matter of all participants. These Ki values were higher in both patients compared to the control subjects. Finally, for the lesion identified in the ischemic stroke patient, higher leakage values were observed compared to normal-appearing tissue. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate how a dual-time resolution DCE-MRI protocol at 7T, with administration of half the clinically used contrast agent dose, can be used for assessing subtle BBB leakage. Although the feasibility of DCE-MRI for assessing the BBB integrity at 3T is well known, we showed that a continuous sampling DCE-MRI method tailored for 7T is also capable of assessing leakage with a high sensitivity over a range of Ki values.

Preventing Recurrent Preeclampsia by Tailored Treatment of Nonphysiologic Hemodynamic Adjustments to Pregnancy.

[Figure: see text].

The "sex gap" in COVID-19 trials: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Many studies investigate the role of pharmacological treatments on disease course in Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Sex disparities in genetics, immunological responses, and hormonal mechanisms may underlie the substantially higher fatality rates reported in male COVID-19 patients. To optimise care for COVID-19 patients, prophylactic and therapeutic studies should include sex-specific design and analyses. Therefore, in this scoping review, we investigated whether studies on pharmacological treatment in COVID-19 were performed based on a priori sex-specific design or post-hoc sex-specific analyses. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, UpToDate, clinical trial.org, and MedRxiv for studies on pharmacological treatment for COVID-19 until June 6th, 2020. We included case series, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in humans (≥18 years) investigating antiviral, antimalarial, and immune system modulating drugs. Data were collected on 1) the proportion of included females, 2) whether sex stratification was performed (a priori by design or post-hoc), and 3) whether effect modification by sex was investigated. FINDINGS: 30 studies were eligible for inclusion, investigating remdesivir (n = 2), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 5), favipiravir (n = 1), umifenovir (n = 1), hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (n = 8), convalescent plasma (n = 6), interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway inhibitors (n = 5), interleukin-1 (IL-1) pathway inhibitors (n = 1) and corticosteroids (n = 3). Only one study stratified its data based on sex in a post-hoc analysis, whereas none did a priori by design. None of the studies investigated effect modification by sex. A quarter of the studies included twice as many males as females. INTERPRETATION: Analyses assessing potential interference of sex with (side-)effects of pharmacological therapy for COVID-19 are rarely reported. Considering sex differences in case-fatality rates and genetic, immunological, and hormonal mechanisms, studies should include sex-specific analyses in their design to optimise COVID-19 care. FUNDING: None.