Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCD) are standard in hemorrhage-control of unstable pelvic ring fractures (UPF). Controversial data on their usefulness exists. Aim of the study was to investigate whether prehospital application of PCCD can reduce mortality and transfusion requirements in UPF. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. From 2016 until 2021, 63,371 adult severely injured patients were included into TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society (TR-DGU). We analyzed PCCD use over time and compared patients with multiple trauma patients and UPF, who received prehospital PCCD to those who did not (noPCCD). Groups were adjusted for risk of prehospital PCCD application by propensity score matching. Primary endpoints were hospital mortality, standardized mortality rate (SMR) and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: Overall UPF incidence was 9% (N = 5880) and PCCD use increased over time (7.5% to 20.4%). Of all cases with UPF, 40.2% received PCCD and of all cases with PCCD application, 61% had no pelvic injury at all. PCCD patients were more severely injured and had higher rates of shock or transfusion. 24-h.-mortality and hospital mortality were higher with PCCD (10.9% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.033; 17.9% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.070). Hospital mortality with PCCD was 1% lower than predicted. SMR was in favor of PCCD but failed statistical significance (0.95 vs. 1.04, p = 0.101). 1,860 propensity score matched pairs were analyzed: NoPCCD-patients received more often catecholamines (19.6% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.043) but required less surgical pelvic stabilization in the emergency room (28.6% vs. 36.8%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality or transfusion requirements. CONCLUSION: We observed PCCD overuse in general and underuse in UPF. Prehospital PCCD appears to be more a marker of injury severity and less triggered by presence of UPF. We found no salutary effect on survival or transfusion requirements. Inappropriate indication and technical flaw may have biased our results. TR-DGU does not contain data on these aspects. Further studies are necessary. Modular add-on questioners to the registry could offer one possible solution to overcome this limitation. We are concerned that PCCD use may be unfairly discredited by misinterpretation of the available evidence and strongly vote for a prospective trial.

[Comparison of planimetric CT­based volumetry with simplified models for determining the size of intrapelvic hematomas due to pelvic fractures in emergency room diagnostics]. / Vergleich von planimetrisch CT­gestützter Volumetrie mit vereinfachten Modellen zur Größenbestimmung intrapelviner Hämatome bei Beckenfrakturen im Rahmen der Schockraumdiagnostik.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding in the pelvis can lead to a circulatory problem. The widely used whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) scan in the context of treatment in the trauma resuscitation unit (TRU) can give an idea of the source of bleeding (arterial vs. venous/osseous); however, the volume determination of an intrapelvic hematoma by volumetric planimetry cannot be used for a quick estimation of the blood loss. Simplified measurement techniques using geometric models should be used to estimate the extent of bleeding complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether simplified geometric models can be used to quickly and reliably determine intrapelvic hematoma volume in fractures type Tile B/C during emergency room diagnostics or whether the time-consuming planimetric method must always be used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively, 42 intrapelvic hemorrhages after pelvic fractures Tile B + C (n = 8:B, 34:C) at two trauma centers in Germany were selected (66% men, 33% women; mean age 42 ± 20 years) and the CT scans obtained during the initial trauma scan were analyzed in more detail. The CT datasets of the included patients with 1-5 mm slice thickness were available for analysis. By area labelling (ROIs) of the hemorrhage areas in the individual slice images, the volume was calculated by CT volumetrically. Comparatively, volumes were calculated using simplified geometric figures (cuboid, ellipsoid, Kothari). A correction factor was determined by calculating the deviation of the volumes of the geometric models from the planimetrically determined hematoma size. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The median planimetric bleeding volume in the total collective was 1710 ml (10-7152 ml). Relevant pelvic bleeding with a total volume > 100 ml existed in 25 patients. In 42.86% the volume was overestimated in the cuboid model and in 13 cases (30.95%) there was a significant underestimation to the planimetrically measured volume. Thus, we excluded this volume model. In the models ellipsoid and measuring method according to Kothari, an approximation to the planimetrically determined volume could be achieved with a correction factor calculated via a multiple linear regression analysis. The time-saving and approximate quantification of the hematoma volume using a modified ellipsoidal calculation according to Kothari makes it possible to assess the extent of bleeding in the pelvis after trauma if there are signs of a C-problem. This measurement method, as a simple reproducible metric, could be embedded in trauma resuscitation units (TRU) in the future.

[Trauma team activation-Who should be alerted for which patients?] / Schockraumaktivierung ­ Bei welchen Patienten alarmieren wir wen?

INTRODUCTION: It is estimated that in total almost 10 million people are injured in accidents in Germany every year, most of which are in the household milieu and leisure sector. It is estimated that of these more than 32,000 seriously injured patients are admitted to the emergency room every year. It is recommended that the decision of the prehospital treatment team or the first examiner in the hospital as to whether a potentially severely injured patient should be admitted via the emergency room of the hospital should be based on a catalogue of criteria. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Against the background of the update of the S3 guidelines on the treatment of multiple trauma/severely injured patients and on the basis of the current literature, an overview with respect to the composition of the team and the criteria for which an emergency room team is or should be activated is given. RESULTS: Alerting the emergency room team is still recommended if a certain injury pattern is present or if a prehospital intervention is necessary. The B­criteria based on the course of the accident or mechanism, which have recently been the subject of increasing criticism, have been adapted. Recommendations for geriatric patients could also be formulated. DISCUSSION: Compared to the S3 guidelines from 2016 the emergency room alarm criteria could be revised on the basis of new literature and have been included in the revised guidelines. There is no doubt that further optimization. e.g., based on prehospital algorithms or using point of care diagnostics, are possible and desirable in the future.

[Emergency room activation due to trauma mechanism]. / Schockraumindikation nach Unfallhergang.

BACKGROUND: The quality of trauma care in Germany has been significantly increased due to the establishment of standards in the white paper on severe injury care and the S3 guidelines. A key issue of multiple trauma treatment is the trauma resuscitation unit (TRU)/emergency room management, which is associated with extensive material and human resources. From the very beginning of the introduction of structured care for the severely injured, the choice of the target hospital and the indications for TRU have been the focus of scientific research. Furthermore, a reduction of the TRU team for presumably less seriously injured patients is discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The emergency room assignments of a level I trauma center (n = 686) were analyzed in more detail. Of the patients 235 were assigned with the TRU indications according to the cause of the accident (GoR B criteria) and compared with the collective of TRU patients admitted according to the severity of injuries or life-threatening signs, the so-called GoR A criteria (n = 104) during the corresponding period. In addition to basic data (age, sex), the injured region and severity (injury severity score, ISS), the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital as well as the necessity for surgery and transfusion were compared. RESULT: Of the emergency room allocations at the trauma center 34% were due to the cause of the accident and the severity of the injuries in this patient group was almost half as high as that of the control group with an ISS of 11. Of the patients 74% were admitted to the IMC/ICU and stayed there for an average of almost 3 days. There were between 4% and 18% severe injuries (abbreviated injury scale, AIS 3) and 17.9% were characterized as polytrauma with an ISS ≥ 16 points. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients admitted to a TCU due to the cause of accident (the so-called B criteria of the white book), have severe and potentially life-threatening injuries, which necessitate a prioritized and immediate treatment by a TCU team. Whether a reduced TCU team is sufficient in this situation needs to be critically examined.

[Cost estimation for hospital mass casualty exercises]. / Kostenabschätzung für MANV-Übungen im Krankenhaus.

A mass casualty event (MCE) poses an enormous challenge for rescue services and hospitals. In addition to a hospital emergency plan, employee training and practice exercises are essential to be prepared for such an event. The organizational and financial burden of MCE exercises in a hospital is extraordinarily high. In a retrospective analysis of several large hospital exercises, the magnitude of the necessary financial means for the preparation and execution of such drills is outlined. Depending on the size (number of patients) and scope (extent of departments involved) of the MCE exercise in a hospital, a full-size MCE drill may entail costs between 10,000 and 100,000€. Since the execution of such exercises is essential in the sense of preparedness and considering quality management aspects, possibilities of refinancing and more cost-efficient training must be developed.

[Optimization of criteria for activation of trauma teams : Avoidance of overtriage and undertriage]. / Optimierung der Kriterien zur Schockraumalarmierung : Vermeidung von Über- und Untertriage.

INTRODUCTION: Severely injured patients are supposed to be admitted to hospital via the trauma room. Appropriate criteria are contained in the S3 guidelines on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries (S3-GL); however, some of these criteria require scarce hospital resources while the patients then often clinically present as uninjured. There are tendencies to streamline the trauma team activation criteria (TTAC); however, additional undertriage must be avoided. A study group of the emergency, intensive care medicine and treatment of the severely injured section (NIS) is in the process of optimizing the TTAC for the German trauma system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to solve the objective the following multi-step approach is necessary: a) definition of patients who potentially benefit from TTA, b) verification of the definition in the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU), c) carrying out a prospective, multicenter study in order to determine overtriage and undertriage, thereby validating the activation criteria and d) revision of the current TTAC. RESULTS: This article summarizes the consensus criteria of the group assumed to be capable of identifying patients who potentially benefit from TTA. These criteria are used to test if TTA was justified in a specific case; however, as the TTCA of the S3-GL are not fully incorporated into the TR-DGU dataset and because cases must also be considered which were not subject to trauma room treatment and therefore were not included in the TR-DGU, it is necessary to perform a prospective full survey of all individuals in order to be able to measure overtriage and undertriage. CONCLUSION: Currently, the TR-DGU can only provide limited evidence on the quality of the TTAC recommended in Germany. This problem has been recognized and will be solved by conducting a prospective DGU-supported study, the results of which can be used to improve the TR-DGU dataset in order to enable further considerations on the quality of care (e. g. composition and size of the trauma team).

Return to sport after acute acromioclavicular stabilization: a randomized control of double-suture-button system versus clavicular hook plate compared to uninjured shoulder sport athletes.

PURPOSE: Traumatic high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations can be surgically stabilized by numerous anatomic and non-anatomic procedures. The return to sport (Maffe et al. in Am J Sports Med 23:93-98, 1995] and remaining sport-associated impairments after acute ACJ stabilization has not yet been investigated. METHODS: 73 consecutive athletes with acute high-grade ACJ separation were prospectively assigned into two groups (64.4% randomized, 35.6% intention-to-treat): open clavicular hook plate (cHP) implantation (GI) or arthroscopically assisted double double-suture-button (dDSB) implantation (GII). Patients were analyzed using shoulder sport-specific measurement tools for sport ability (ASOSS), sport activity (SSAS), and numerical analog scales: NASpain during sport, NASshoulder function in sport, and NASre-achievement of sport level. Four points of examination were established: preoperative evaluation (FU0) and first postoperative follow-up (FU1) at 6 months; FU2 at 12 months; and FU3 at 24 months after surgery. The control group (GIII) consisted of 140 healthy athletes without anamnesis of prior macro-injury or surgery. RESULTS: After surgical stabilization, 29 of 35 athletes in GI (82.9%; 38.6 ± 9.9 years) and 32 of 38 in GII (82.9%; 38.6 ± 9.9 years) were followed up for 24 months (FU3) (loss 17.8%). All operated athletes showed significantly increased scores compared to FU0 (p < 0.05). Compared to GI, GII showed significantly superior outcome data for sporting ability as well as for NASre-achievement of sport level (p < 0.05). While GII re-achieved GIII-comparable SSAS and ASOSS levels, GI remained at a significantly inferior level. Athletes after ACJ injury of Rockwood grade IV/V and overhead athletes benefited significantly from the dDSB procedure. CONCLUSION: The dDSB procedure enabled significantly superior sport-specific outcomes compared to the cHP procedure. Athletes after dDSB surgeries re-achieved the sporting ability and the sport activity levels of healthy athletes, whereas athletes after cHP implantation remained at significantly inferior levels. The more extensive dDSB procedure and the more restrictive rehabilitation are recommended for treatment of acute high-grade ACJ separations of functionally high-demanding athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

[Nationwide implementation of a hospital resource register for daily trauma care, mass casualties and disasters : Position paper of the German Trauma Society and the Federation of German Medical Directors of Emergency Medical Services]. / Bundesweite Einführung eines Krankenhauskatasters in den Klinikalltag und bei Großschadens- und Bedrohungslagen : Positionspapier der DGU und des BV-ÄLRD e. V.

The introduction of requirements for a minimum intake capacity of trauma patients by the German Trauma Society (DGU) into the so-called white book of treatment of seriously injured patients, is helpful for a sufficient preparation for threats and for dealing with mass casualties for trauma centers as well as for the emergency medical services (EMS). In the hospital information database provided by the Federation of German Medical Directors of Emergency Medical Services, more than 1300 hospitals are currently listed. This information supports the allocation of trauma patients from the field to the appropriate trauma center. Currently, without any coordination requirements, the current 626 trauma centers in Germany are able to immediately handle 6260 patients. This number could be doubled by activating the local hospital action plan, where a priority plan is set up. Additionally, the implementation of a nationwide flexible standardized communication structure between the dispatch center of the ambulance service and the hospitals, would improve daily care as well as the management of threats and mass casualties. It is the obligation of the local medical director of the EMS, to maintain and update the hospital database. Providing the information in the database with the hospital resources and the flexible standard communication structure, is appropriate to improve the daily collaboration and the preparation for mass casualties.

[The Significance of Early Reposition in Patients with Visible Malposition of the Upper Ankle Joint]. / Stellenwert der frühzeitigen Reposition bei sichtbarer Luxation im oberen Sprunggelenk.

Background: Protracted dislocation of the upper ankle joint can lead to substantial damage to the surrounding soft tissue, possibly followed by local complications and longer hospitalisation. Although reposition is usually easy to conduct, it is commonly recommended that this should only be performed by an experienced specialist, as long as there is no neurovascular restriction. There are however no exact data or studies on this problem. The aim of the present study is to examine whether early reposition is of benefit for subsequent treatment. Methods: Retrospective study of all patients in a supra-regional trauma centre during the period from January 2009 to July 2015, with either prehospital reposition of the ankle joint because of visible malposition or documented visible malposition on arrival at hospital. Patients with relevant concomitant injuries elsewhere were excluded. Data on the duration of dislocation were matched with diagnostic findings at the time of hospital admission, the kind of primary care, local complications and the time of hospitalisation, using linear regression analysis and ANOVA calculations. Results: Of a total of 391 patients with a dislocation or a fracture dislocation of the ankle joint within this period, 132 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These patients were divided into 5 groups on the basis of the time of dislocation. Time to reposition was less than one hour for 39 patients, between one and two hours for 29 patients, between two and six hours for 41 patients, between six and 24 hours for 13 patients and more than 24 hours for 10 patients, all with a visible dislocation. The results on admission showed a significant increase in skin bruises and tension bullae with increasing time of dislocation. A longer time of dislocation was associated with more two stage surgical procedures with external fixators and a decreasing number of single stage procedures. While there was immediate definitive treatment of 79.5 % of the patients in the first group, this figure decreased continuously to 10.0 % in the last group. The number of local complications increased significantly in every group with the duration of dislocation. In particular, the incidence of severe swelling, wound healing disorders, skin necrosis and the need for revision surgery and plastic reconstruction exhibit a significant linear increase within the groups (p < 0.05). The incidence of severe swelling rose from 10.3 % in the first group, to 31.0 % in the second group, to 100 % in the last group. The incidence of wound healing disorders rose from 7.7 to 13.8 to 80 % and the incidence of skin necrosis from 2.6 to 3.5 to 30.0 %. The duration of hospitalisation also exhibited a significant linear increase with group affiliation (p < 0.001), from 8.3 days in the first group to 12.5 days in the second group and 30.5 days in the last group. Conclusion: This study shows the importance of conducting reposition of the ankle joint as soon as possible if there is visible malposition, in order to avoid local complications and longer hospitalisation. If there is visible malposition of the ankle joint, the best procedure is immediate - ideally prehospital - reposition and in-axis splinting, in order to preserve soft tissue.

[Recommendations for Releasing the Pelvic Binder After a Non-Invasive Pelvic Stabilisation Procedure Under Emergency Room Conditions]. / "Clear-the-Pelvis-Algorithmus": Handlungsempfehlung zur Freigabe des Beckens nach nicht invasiver Stabilisierung mittels Beckengurt im Rahmen der Schockraumversorgung.

Severe brain, thoracic and intrapelvic injuries, as well as heavy bleeding, are the main causes of death in patients with major trauma. Unstable pelvic ring fractures can cause this bleeding and the so-called "C problem". This is usually due to haemorrhagic shock caused by the loss of large volumes of blood from the presacral venous plexus, iliac vessels and the fracture surfaces. Many clinical studies have shown that, in the preclinical setting, unstable pelvic ring injuries are often underestimated. The application of a non-invasive external pelvic ring stabilisation (pelvic binder) is therefore recommended if a pelvic fracture is possible. Several circumferential pelvic binders have been developed and their prehospital use is increasing. Clinical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated that there is a favourable haemodynamic effect in unstable fractures, due to rapid closure of the pelvic ring. It is unclear whether the pelvic binder can be safely removed in a presumably haemodynamically stable patient. A correctly placed pelvic binder leads to anatomical closure of the pelvic ring. Therefore unstable pelvic ring fractures may be clinically and radiologically overlooked. This is a particular problem in unconscious patients. Furthermore, the real severity of the injury may then be underestimated in the diagnostic evaluation. Unconsidered opening of the pelvic binder can thus provoke renewed deterioration of the circulatory situation, especially if the injury was adequately treated by the binder and the C problem was controlled. The aim of this article is to describe procedures for handling pelvic binders, particularly as to how to deal with an already applied pelvic binder and how to "clear the pelvic region" while reducing the risk of haemodynamic instability. A detailed analysis of the literature and a Delphi-like discussion among several experts were performed. The following points were raised: 1) Assessment of the clinical situation, including trauma kinematics. 2) Assessment of the haemodynamic status. 3) Check of the need to open the pelvic binder for diagnostic/therapeutic measures before completing all diagnostic tests. 4) Assessment of the radiology diagnostic testing and release of the pelvic region. The result is a so-called "clear the pelvis algorithm" which describes a structured approach according to specific criteria and which specifies the circumstances under which the pelvic binder can be opened. Additional studies are necessary to analyse the applicability and safety of this algorithm in a clinical context. Our advice is not to "clear" the pelvis if no X-rays or CT scans of the pelvis have been carried out without (or with an opened) pelvic binder.

[Preclinical and clinical treatment of instable pelvic injuries : Results of an online survey]. / Präklinische und klinische Versorgung der instabilen Beckenverletzung : Ergebnisse einer Online-Umfrage.

Instable pelvic injuries are often associated with a high blood loss, which can effectively be curtailed by rapid external stabilization of the pelvis. The S3 guidelines on the treatment of multiple trauma and the severely injured recommend an initial stability testing in cases of an instable pelvis and hemodynamic instability even though the sensitivity is very low, with subsequent external stabilization. Radiological diagnostic procedures are also becoming more important for early diagnostics. An online survey of the current management of instable pelvic injuries was carried out with 266 participants via the e-mail distribution list of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU).Most answers in the survey were received from very experienced senior and chief physicians at level 1 trauma centers. The vast majority of the participants recommended carrying out mechanical stabilization testing and most wanted to do the testing themselves independent of any previous findings. Most participants would only carry out a pelvic stabilization if they themselves had recognized instability during the stability testing and many of them even in cases of hemodynamic instability alone, although several studies have reported a very low sensitivity of 26-44 % for stability testing. The preferred procedure for emergency stabilization in the emergency room was the pelvic sling, which in contrast to invasive tools was often implemented before radiological imaging was completed. In preclinical treatment the vacuum mattress was used more often for stabilization than the pelvic sling. In radiological examinations a whole body computed tomography (CT) scan was mostly used, sometimes combined with an anteroposterior pelvic x-ray. In cases of persisting hemorrhage in spite of external stabilization, most participants preferred a pelvic tamponade but angioembolization was also highly rated.Because many of the participants relied on their own findings from stability testing for a decision on external emergency stabilization despite the very low sensitivity, in cases of false negative testing there is a risk of insufficient treatment resulting in life-threatening hemorrhage. From our viewpoint, it therefore makes sense to treat patients with a suspicion of instable pelvic fractures based on the trauma mechanism and clinical examination (without mechanical stability testing) with non-invasive external pelvic stabilization as early as possible.

[Essential measures for prehospital treatment of severely injured patients: The trauma care bundle]. / Wesentliche Maßnahmen zur prähospitalen Versorgung schwerverletzter Patienten: Das Trauma Care Bundle.

BACKGROUND: In order to ensure adequate treatment and to avoid complications, care bundles are increasingly being implemented. These are comprehensive and evidence-based procedures for the treatment of individual diseases or injuries which should be carried out for every patient. The aim of this study was to define a care bundle for the prehospital treatment of severely injured patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The scientific contents of the bundle were gathered from the interdisciplinary evidence-based S3 guidelines for the treatment of severely injured patients by the German Trauma Society. The ABCDE scheme suggested by the prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS®) and the advanced trauma life support (ATLS®) functioned as a matrix for the individual elements in the bundles. The identified elements were finalized by a consensus process. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A bundle of six elements was suggested and a comprehensive summary of key items during prehospital management of severely injured patients was identified. In a next step the effectiveness of the care bundle should be evaluated in a clinical trial.

[Pilon Fractures]. / Pilonfrakturen.

Pilon fractures are uncommon, representing approximately 5-10 % of all lower limb fractures. Pilon fractures are often associated with serious soft tissue injuries resulting in initial external fixation followed by internal fixation once the condition of the soft tissues has improved. Articular distal fractures of the tibia are classified as B3, C1, C2 and C3 fractures according to the AO Classification. Pilon fractures are usually the result of a high energy trauma. A low energy trauma such as a twisting injury of the ankle can also lead to a pilon fracture. Such low energy mechanisms of injury are rarely associated with significant soft tissue injury and can be immediately fixated internally. Pilon fractures are often associated with an unsatisfactory healing response. This is a result of a combination of factors including the severity of the trauma, the extent of the initial soft tissue injury and the accuracy of the articular surface reconstruction.

[Air rescue missions at night: Data analysis of primary and secondary missions by the DRF air rescue service in 2014]. / Einsatz der Luftrettung in der Nacht: Datenanalyse von Primär- und Sekundäreinsätzen der DRF-Luftrettung des Jahres 2014.

The advantages that are inherent to the air ambulance service are shown in a reduction in mortality of critically ill or injured patients. The air ambulance service ensures quick and efficient medical care to a patient as well as the immediate transport of patients to a suitable hospital. In addition, primary air rescue has proved to be effective as a support for the standard ground-based ambulance services in some regions of Germany during the night. Under certain conditions, such as the strict adherence to established, practiced and coordinated procedures, air rescue at night does not have a significantly higher risk compared to operations in daytime. Particular requirements should be imposed for air rescue operations at night: a strict indication system for alerting, 4-man helicopter crews solely during the night as well as pilots (and copilots) with the correct qualifications and experience in dealing with night vision devices on a regular basis. Moreover, the helicopters need to be suitable and approved for night flying including cabin upgrades and the appropriate medical technology equipment. To increase the benefits of air rescue for specific diseases and injuries, a nationwide review of the processes is needed to further develop the primary air rescue service.

[Significance of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Prehospital Trauma Care]. / Bedeutung der Luftrettung bei der präklinischen Traumaversorgung.

BACKGROUND: In the late 1960s, the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) was established in Germany because of an increasing number of severe injuries in traffic accidents. To get a doctor quickly on scene was the initial intention, rather than transporting the patient. Today, rescue helicopters cover the entire field of emergency medicine and are an important transportation device for polytrauma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The importance of the HEMS for the treatment of severely injured patients was examined by an analysis of the databases of the leading air rescue organisations ADAC and DRF Luftrettung (2005-2011). RESULTS: Traumatological cases, albeit with large regional differences, make up 35 % of all uses of the helicopter emergency services. CONCLUSIONS: For the multiply injured patient in particular, in over 40 % of the cases there is a joint patient care involving both helicopter- and ambulance-based emergency services. The HEMS undertakes especially the rapid, if necessary, even transregional transport to specialised trauma centres.

[Importance of air ambulances for the care of the severely injured]. / Bedeutung der Luftrettung für die Schwerverletztenversorgung.

BACKGROUND: In the late 1960s, helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) were established because of the increasing number of severely injured in road traffic accidents. It was initially thought to bring the doctor to the patient quickly. AIM: Today, the rescue helicopter covers the entire field of emergency medicine. By analyzing the databases of the TraumaRegister DGU® (2005-2011), the importance of the HEMS for the treatment of the severely injured was examined. RESULTS: The results showed that around 30 % of severely injured are allocated to hospitals by HEMS. In addition to regional differences, the level of the hospital also plays a particularly important role. The combination of the transfer by HEMS and treatment in a level I trauma center has a significantly positive effect on the survival rate of the patient, especially in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

[Simple pelvic fracture - presentation of life-threatening complications and their therapy]. / Die einfache Beckenringfraktur - kasuistische Darstellung von lebensbedrohlichen Komplikationen und deren Therapie.

The risk of life-threatening bleeding in stable pelvic-ring fractures is often underestimated. The angioembolisation is, in these cases, an important treatment option. Two case reports illustrate the risks of such haemorrhagic complications in stable pelvic-ring fractures and their immediate treatment. The fracture itself can often be treated conservatively and does not require treatment in a trauma centre. However, in the case of haemorrhage complications such treatment seems to be essential.