Sonographic Assessment of Fetal Sex: More than External Genitalia.

Early identification of fetal sex is possible due to both improved ultrasound resolution and the incorporation of cell-free DNA testing into routine prenatal screening services. While ultrasound assessment of the external genitalia generally suffices, there are instances where identification of the internal genitalia becomes vital to allow accurate prenatal diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This manuscript outlines the methodology and clinical utility of assessing fetal genitalia beyond conventional sonography from the second trimester onward and is the first to describe direct visualization of the fetal vagina.

Cell-free DNA screening for rare autosomal trisomies and segmental chromosome imbalances.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of pregnancies at high-risk for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) and segmental imbalances (SIs) on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening. METHOD: A retrospective study of women who underwent cfDNA screening between September 2019 and July 2021 at three ultrasound services in Australia. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated using fetal chromosomal analysis. RESULTS: Among 23,857 women screened, there were 93 high-risk results for RATs (0.39%) and 82 for SIs (0.34%). The PPVs were 3.8% (3/78, 95% CI 0.8%-10.8%) for RATs and 19.1% (13/68, 95% CI 10.6%-30.5%) for SIs. If fetuses with structural anomalies were also counted as true-positive cases, the PPV for RATS increased to 8.5% (7/82, 95% CI 3.5%-16.8%). Among 85 discordant cases with birth outcomes available (65.4%), discordant positive RATs had a significantly higher proportion of infants born below the 10th and 3rd birthweight percentiles than expected (19.6% (p = 0.022) and 9.8% (p = 0.004), respectively), which was not observed in the SI group (2.9% < 10th (p = 0.168) and 0.0% <3rd (p = 0.305)). CONCLUSION: The PPVs for SI and RAT results are low, except when a structural abnormality is also present. Discordant positive RATs are associated with growth restriction.

Increasing maternal age is not a significant cause of false-positive results for monosomy X in non-invasive prenatal testing.

OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of cell-free DNA aneuploidy screening varies by the chromosome assessed. The positive predictive value is consistently low for monosomy X (MX), at less than 30%. This study aims to investigate maternal age and other possible predictors of false-positive MX screening results in order to guide pre-test and post-test counselling. METHODS: A total of 52 499 NIPT samples were tested over 69 months, across three specialist obstetric services. Outcome data were available for 96 out of 107 cases high risk for MX. Cytogenetic outcomes were compared to clinical and demographic data to look for trends that may indicate higher likelihood of a false-positive NIPT result. RESULTS: The likelihood of a false-positive MX result significantly increased with the absence of ultrasound features suggestive of MX and with lower PAPP-A levels. Non-significant trends towards false-positive results were identified with increased maternal age, increased body mass index and Caucasian ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Maternal age is not a reliable predictor of a false-positive result. Assessment of ultrasound findings and placental serology in the first trimester is important for appropriate post-test counselling and should continue to be a part of screening even when NIPT is used as a first-tier screening test.

Discordant fetal sex on NIPT and ultrasound.

Prenatal diagnosis of sex discordance is a relatively new phenomenon. Prior to cell-free DNA testing, the diagnosis of a disorder of sexual differentiation was serendipitous, either through identification of ambiguous genitalia at the midtrimester morphology ultrasound or discovery of genotype-phenotype discordance in cases where preimplantation genetic diagnosis or invasive prenatal testing had occurred. The widespread integration of cfDNA testing into modern antenatal screening has made sex chromosome assessment possible from 10 weeks of gestation, and discordant fetal sex is now more commonly diagnosed prenatally, with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 1500-2000 pregnancies. Early detection of phenotype-genotype sex discordance is important as it may indicate an underlying genetic, chromosomal or biochemical condition and it also allows for time-critical postnatal treatment. The aim of this article is to review cfDNA and ultrasound diagnosis of fetal sex, identify possible causes of phenotype-genotype discordance and provide a systematic approach for clinicians when counseling and managing couples in this circumstance.

Rare autosomal trisomies: Important and not so rare.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can assess chromosomes other than 13, 18, 21, X and Y. These rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) can adversely affect pregnancy outcome. METHODS: A prospective study of NIPT using the Illumina sequencing platform assessing all chromosomes were reported for further management. RESULTS: There were 28 RATs identified in 23 388 samples (one in 835), the most common being trisomy 7 (n = 6), followed by trisomy 16 (n = 4) and trisomy 22 (n = 3). Abnormal outcomes occurred in 16 cases: miscarriage (n = 6), true fetal mosaicism (n = 5), and fetal structural anomaly on ultrasound (n = 5). Growth restriction was seen in eight cases and correlated with very low-pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels. Two of the 17 live born babies had a structural anomaly, and one had a phenotype similar to mosaic trisomy 16 despite a normal microarray result. CONCLUSION: Rare autosomal trisomies are not rare and often associated with poor obstetric outcomes. They should be discussed with the clinician to guide management. Pregnancy outcomes varied by chromosome being generally favourable for some (eg, trisomy 7) and poor for others (eg, trisomy 22). In the presence of a RAT, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A is predictive of placental dysfunction and fetal growth restriction.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy in Routine Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) in routine clinical practice and to review counselling and sonographic issues arising in SCA cases. METHODS: Three specialist Australian obstetric ultrasound and prenatal diagnosis practices offering NIPT after 10 weeks' gestation participated in this study. NIPT was reported for chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X, and Y. RESULTS: NIPT screening was performed in 5,267 singleton pregnancies. The odds of being affected given a positive screening result (OAPR) was lowest for SCAs, most notably for monosomy X (20%). Fewer women underwent invasive prenatal testing when counselled regarding a high risk for SCA (65.5%) compared with those who had a high risk for another aneuploidy (85%). The positive screening rate of NIPT including SCA was 2.3%, but 1.2% if only the autosomal trisomies were included in the panel. CONCLUSION: The addition of SCA testing to NIPT doubles the positive screening rate. The OAPR for SCAs (most notably for monosomy X) is reduced compared with the autosomal trisomies. Clinicians need a more extensive discussion with women prior to the inclusion of the X and Y chromosomes in the NIPT panel, given the complexity in counselling regarding further management and the additional anxiety that these abnormal results may cause. A benefit of sex chromosome analysis is an improvement in antenatal diagnosis of some disorders of sexual development.

Factors affecting cell-free DNA fetal fraction and the consequences for test accuracy.

INTRODUCTION: Biological factors are known to influence the fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA and may also influence the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NIPT from 5267 mixed risk women across three specialist clinics in Australia were analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine whether maternal characteristics, ultrasound, and placental biomarkers affect FF and test accuracy. RESULTS: FF ranged from 4% to 37% (mean 11.6%). Body mass index (BMI), gestation, and placental biomarkers were found to be significant factors associated with FF. For each unit increase in BMI, the logarithmically transformed FF, (lnFF), mean value decreased by 0.027. Each week increases in gestation, lnFF increased by 0.023. Each unit increase in free BhCG, PAPPA, and PlGF, the lnFF increased by 0.065, 0.050, and 0.17, respectively. There was no significant association between FF with either maternal age or nuchal translucency. The false-positive cases and one false-negative case did not have lower FF than the true-positive cases. DISCUSSION: The fetal fraction in maternal plasma cfDNA increased with gestational age, serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), ß-hCG, and PlGF and decreased with increasing maternal BMI. There was no significant correlation between low FF and test accuracy, when FF was above 4%.

Sex discordance identification following non-invasive prenatal testing.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to characterise genotype-phenotype discordance identified in the routine clinical setting and to explore the associated diagnostic and counselling challenges. METHOD: Cases were derived from a cohort of pregnant women who attended a multisite specialist prenatal screening and ultrasound service for non-invasive prenatal testing by cell-free DNA analysis and midtrimester fetal morphology assessment. RESULTS: Seven cases of genotype-phenotype discordance were identified from a cohort of 12 919 women between June 2013 and March 2017 (incidence 1/1845 pregnancies). A variety of disorders of sexual differentiation were subsequently diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Sex chromosomes are the basis of sexual differentiation during embryonic development. Variations of the traditional XX or XY karyotype may result in conditions where the genotype is discordant with the phenotype. Detection of these conditions in the past typically occurred during adolescence, due to delayed puberty, or during adulthood, due to infertility. With the increasing availability of non-invasive prenatal testing and high-resolution ultrasound, more cases of genotype-phenotype sex discordance are being identified in routine clinical practice during early pregnancy. These discordant results present significant diagnostic and counselling challenges, and their potential should be included in increasingly complex pre-NIPT counselling.

Noninvasive prenatal testing in routine clinical practice--an audit of NIPT and combined first-trimester screening in an unselected Australian population.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in low-risk populations, and the ideal aneuploidy screening model for a pregnant population has yet to be established. AIMS: To assess the implementation of NIPT into clinical practice utilising both first- and second-line screening models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three private practices specialising in obstetric ultrasound and prenatal diagnosis in Australia offered NIPT as a first-line test, ideally followed by combined first-trimester screening (cFTS), or as a second-line test following cFTS, particularly in those with a calculated risk between 1:50 and 1:1000. RESULTS: NIPT screening was performed in 5267 women and as a first-line screening method in 3359 (63.8%). Trisomies 21 and 13 detection was 100% and 88% for trisomy 18. Of cases with known karyotypes, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the test was highest for trisomy 21 (97.7%) and lowest for monosomy X (25%). Ultrasound detection of fetal structural abnormality resulted in the detection of five additional chromosome abnormalities, two of which had high-risk cFTS results. For all chromosomal abnormalities, NIPT alone detected 93.4%, a contingent model detected 81.8% (P = 0.097), and cFTS alone detected 65.9% (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: NIPT achieved 100% T21 detection and had a higher DR of all aneuploidy when used as a first-line test. Given the false-positive rate for all aneuploidies, NIPT is an advanced screening test, rather than a diagnostic test. The benefit of additional cFTS was the detection of fetal structural abnormalities and some unusual chromosomal abnormalities.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the detection of chromosomal mosaicism in chorionic villus (CVS) and amniotic fluid (AF) samples using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. METHODS: All patients undergoing invasive prenatal testing by aCGH at a specialist prenatal screening service were included in the study. A total of 1609 samples (953 CVS and 656 AF) underwent quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and targeted aCGH without concurrent conventional G-banded karyotyping. RESULTS: Chromosomal mosaicism was detected in 20 of the 1609 cases (1.24%); of which 17 were derived from 953 CVS (1.78%), and three from 656 AF (0.46%). Mosaicism was observed at a level as low as 9%. Four cases were likely confined placental mosaicism, 12 were likely true fetal mosaicism, and four cases were unable to be classified into either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the use of aCGH as a first line test is able to identify chromosomal mosaicism down to 9%, which is lower than the level reliably detected using standard cytogenetic analysis. aCGH avoids the disadvantages of culturing, which include culture bias, artifact, and culture failure.

Perinatal outcome in fetuses with extremely large nuchal translucency measurement.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that an entirely normal outcome is likely when the nuchal translucency (NT) measurement is very large and the karyotype, morphology and echocardiography scans are normal. Recently this has been questioned as it is based on very small numbers. AIM: Assess the outcome of pregnancies with an NT measurement of 6.5 mm or greater. METHODS: Audit of a large first trimester screening program. RESULTS: Over the ten years to 2006, 76 813 patients underwent first trimester screening, with 120 having an extremely large NT. Thirty-one cases had normal karyotypes, of which there were four sets of twins that demised. Six cases miscarried and ten were terminated, some with morphological abnormalities. Eight cases were still alive for the morphology scan, with the only abnormality being mild pyelectasis in one case. At birth, three cases were normal and another three cases had a good outcome. Two cases had coarctation of the aorta and a good outcome. One case had Noonan's syndrome, another had cerebral palsy and the case with pyelectasis had hydronephrosis, dilated ureters and some contractures. CONCLUSIONS: When the karyotype and morphology scan are normal, the outcome is often good in spite of an extremely large NT. However, even a subtle ultrasound anomaly can indicate a genetic syndrome and echocardiography cannot exclude mild cardiac abnormalities.

Pregnancy outcome in the setting of extremely low first trimester PAPP-A levels.

BACKGROUND: Serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) is part of first trimester Down syndrome screening. Low levels have been associated with adverse outcome as well as chromosomal abnormality. AIMS: To assess the incidence of adverse outcome when PAPP-A levels are at or below 0.2 multiples of the median (MoM). METHODS: Data on consecutive patients attending a first trimester screening program were collected. Those with PAPP-A levels < or = 0.2 MoM were divided into three groups: < or = 0.1 MoM; 0.11-0.15 MoM; and 0.16-0.2 MoM. RESULTS: Screening 44 535 patients resulted in 197 with PAPP-A levels < or = 0.2 MoM. The incidence of karyotypic abnormality increased with decreasing PAPP-A levels. In the absence of chromosome abnormality, pregnancy outcomes were defined as 'normal' in at least 30% and 'good' in at least 60%, with both percentages increasing as the PAPP-A level rose. The PAPP-A levels were significantly lower in the group with a poor outcome. The incidence of prematurity was similar in the three groups, but higher than the statewide average, while the incidence of extreme prematurity appeared to be related to reducing PAPP-A levels. The incidence of growth restriction in the three groups was similar, but was still double the incidence in the normal population. CONCLUSION: If the PAPP-A level is < or = 0.2 MoM and the karyotype is normal, there is an increased risk of adverse outcome. Even with PAPP-A below 0.1 MoM, a good outcome can be expected in 60% of cases. Careful morphological assessment is suggested and later monitoring of fetal growth and well-being.

Prospective evaluation of a first trimester screening program for Down syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities using maternal age, nuchal translucency and biochemistry in an Australian population.

BACKGROUND: A combination of maternal age and ultrasound assessment of the nuchal translucency (NT) has been used in the first trimester to screen for chromosomal abnormality. In the United Kingdom, the addition of NT screening was shown to be beneficial. AIMS: To report the sensitivity of combined first trimester biochemistry and ultrasound screening for Down syndrome in an Australian private practice specialising in obstetric ultrasound. METHODS: A prospective study in a private obstetric ultrasound practice. Over 22 months, 2121 patients were screened and data was analysed for sensitivity (detection) and false positive rates for all chromosome abnormalities. RESULTS: There were 17 chromosomal abnormalities, five of which were Down syndrome. Using maternal age alone or age and biochemistry, four of the Down syndrome cases were detected for a 29 and 19% false positive rate, respectively. Using age and NT or age, NT and biochemistry, all the Down syndrome cases were detected, for a false positive rate of 5.7 and 7.2%, respectively. The difference in detection rates for Down syndrome or other chromosomal abnormalities, using the four screening methods, did not reach statistical significance. However, the false positive rates in screening methods without ultrasound to assess the NT was significantly higher (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of maternal age, NT and maternal serum biochemistry gives a high detection rate for both trisomy 21 and other chromosomal abnormalities. Down syndrome screening using either maternal age alone or age in combination with first trimester biochemistry conferred screen positive rates significantly higher than when combined with NT.

The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the spontaneous miscarriage rate and compare it with the procedure related miscarriage rate for amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) by experienced operators. DESIGN: Retrospective audit over a two-year period of all patients having a consultation for prenatal diagnosis before 12 weeks gestation. SETTING: A specialised obstetric and gynaecological ultrasound practice. POPULATION: A total of 2366 patients, mostly over 35 years of age. METHODS: Between 1 July 1995 and 30 June 1997, all patients having a prenatal consultation decided between amniocentesis, CVS or no invasive testing. The CVS was performed either transabdominally or transcervically, depending on the position of the uterus and placenta. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delivery, termination of pregnancy for chromosomal abnormality or miscarriage. RESULTS: Over the two-year period, 2366 patients had a prenatal consultation and outcome data were available for all but 53 patients. After consultation, 346 patients decided not to have any prenatal testing and 29 (8.4%) of these had a spontaneous miscarriage. Amniocentesis was requested by 839 patients; however 10 miscarried before the scheduled procedure. After the amniocentesis, there were 13 terminations for chromosomal abnormality and three miscarriages. CVS was requested by 1128 patients; however, 23 miscarried before the scheduled procedure. Transabdominal CVS was performed in 665 patients, transcervical in 416 and in 24 cases the documentation of the method used was unclear. Eleven patients miscarried after the transabdominal CVS (1.65%) compared with nine patients miscarrying after the transcervical CVS (2.16%), which was not statistically significant (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: In the group studied, the spontaneous miscarriage rate from nine weeks gestation is very high (8.4%). The procedure-related loss rate from amniocentesis was less than 1 in 280. Transabdominal CVS appears to have a lower fetal loss rate than transcervical CVS, but much larger numbers are needed to prove this.