Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Br J Radiol ; 96(1152): 20230296, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37747290

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are common and lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Analysis of plaque at the arterial access site may improve prediction of complications. METHODS: We investigated the association between demographic and procedural risk factors for Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) vascular complications in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI with use of a vascular closure device (ProGlide® or MANTA®) in this retrospective cohort study. The ability of pre-procedure femoral CT angiography to predict complications was investigated including a novel method of quantifying plaque composition of the common femoral artery using plaque maps created with patient specific X-ray attenuation cut-offs. RESULTS: 23 vascular complications occurred in the 299 patients in the study group (7.7%). There were no demographic risk factors associated with vascular complications and no statistical difference between use of closure device (ProGlide® vs MANTA®) and vascular complications. Vascular complications after TAVI were associated with sheath size (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.76, P 0.01) and strongly associated with CT-derived necrotic core volume in the common femoral artery of the procedural side (OR 17.49, 95% CI 1.21-226.60, P 0.03). CONCLUSION: Plaque map analysis of the common femoral artery by CT angiography reveals patients with greater necrotic core are at increased risk of VARC-3 vascular complications. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The novel measurement of necrotic core volume in the common femoral artery on the procedural side by CT analysis was associated with post-TAVI vascular complications, which can be used to highlight increased risk.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Valve
2.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 8(2): 113-126, 2022 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35026012

ABSTRACT

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aortic regurgitation (AR) contain recommendations that do not always match. We systematically reviewed clinical practice guidelines and summarized similarities and differences in the recommendations as well as gaps in evidence on the management of AR. We searched MEDLINE and Embase (1 January 2011 to 1 September 2021), Google Scholar, and websites of relevant organizations for contemporary guidelines that were rigorously developed as assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Three guidelines met our inclusion criteria. There was consensus on the definition of severe AR and use of echocardiography and of multimodality imaging for diagnosis, with emphasis on comprehensive assessment by the heart valve team to assess suitability and choice of intervention. Surgery is indicated in all symptomatic patients and aortic valve replacement is the cornerstone of treatment. There is consistency in the frequency of follow-up of patients, and safety of non-cardiac surgery in patients without indications for surgery. Discrepancies exist in recommendations for 3D imaging and the use of global longitudinal strain and biomarkers. Cut-offs for left ventricular ejection fraction and size for recommending surgery in severe asymptomatic AR also vary. There are no specific AR cut-offs for high-risk surgery and the role of percutaneous intervention is yet undefined. Recommendations on the treatment of mixed valvular disease are sparse and lack robust prospective data.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Humans , Prospective Studies , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left
3.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 8(3): 238-248, 2022 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878111

ABSTRACT

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a highly prevalent condition and an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. Multiple clinical guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of TR, but the recommendations may sometimes vary. We systematically reviewed high-quality guidelines with a specific focus on areas of agreement, disagreement, and gaps in evidence. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (1 January 2011 to 30 August 2021), the Guidelines International Network International, Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, Google Scholar, and websites of relevant organizations for contemporary guidelines that were rigorously developed (as assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool). Three guidelines were finally retained. There was consensus on a TR grading system, recognition of isolated functional TR associated with atrial fibrillation, and indications for valve surgery in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic patients, primary vs. secondary TR, and isolated TR forms. Discrepancies exist in the role of biomarkers, complementary multimodality imaging, exercise echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing for risk stratification and clinical decision-making of progressive TR and asymptomatic severe TR, management of atrial functional TR, and choice of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI). Risk-based thresholds for quantitative TR grading, robust risk score models for TR surgery, surveillance intervals, population-based screening programmes, TTVI indications, and consensus on endpoint definitions are lacking.


Subject(s)
Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency , Canada , Echocardiography , Humans , Risk Factors , Tricuspid Valve/surgery , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/surgery
4.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 8(5): 481-495, 2022 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878118

ABSTRACT

Multiple guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of mitral regurgitation (MR), the second most common valvular heart disease in high-income countries, with recommendations that do not always match. We systematically reviewed guidelines on diagnosis and management of MR, highlighting similarities and differences to guide clinical decision-making. We searched national and international guidelines in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1 June 2010 to 1 September 2021), the Guidelines International Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and websites of relevant organizations. Two reviewers independently screened the abstracts and identified articles of interest. Guidelines that were rigorously developed (as assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument) were retained for analysis. Five guidelines were retained. There was consensus on a multidisciplinary approach from the heart team and for the definition and grading of severe primary MR. There was general agreement on the thresholds for intervention in symptomatic and asymptomatic primary MR; however, discrepancies were present. There was agreement on optimization of medical therapy in severe secondary MR and intervention in patients symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy, but no consensus on the choice of intervention (surgical repair/replacement vs. transcatheter approach). Cut-offs for high-risk intervention in MR, risk stratification of progressive MR, and guidance on mixed valvular disease were sparse.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Canada , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Humans , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery
5.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 8(6): 602-618, 2022 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878131

ABSTRACT

A number of guidelines exist with recommendations for diagnosis and management of mitral stenosis (MS). We systematically reviewed existing guidelines for diagnosis and management of MS, highlighting their similarities and differences, in order to guide clinical decision-making. We searched national and international guidelines in MEDLINE and EMBASE (5/4/2011-5/9/2021), the Guidelines International Network, Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and websites of relevant organizations. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and the full text of potentially relevant articles where needed. Selected guidelines were assessed for rigor of development; only guidelines with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument score >50% were included in the final analysis. Four guidelines were retained for analysis. There was consensus for percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy as first-line treatment of symptomatic severe rheumatic MS with suitable anatomy. In patients with unfavourable anatomy, surgical intervention should be considered. Exercise testing is indicated if discrepancy exists between symptoms and echocardiographic measurements. There was no clear divide between rheumatic MS and degenerative MS for their respective diagnoses and management. Pregnancy in severe MS is discouraged and the stenosis should be treated before conception. Long-term antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for patients with rheumatic MS. Recommendations for the management of patients with mixed valvular diseases are lacking.


Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Stenosis , Canada , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Mitral Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Stenosis/surgery , Pregnancy
6.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 7(4): 340-353, 2021 07 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33751049

ABSTRACT

Multiple guidelines exist for the management of aortic stenosis (AS). We systematically reviewed current guidelines and recommendations, developed by national or international medical organizations, on management of AS to aid clinical decision-making. Publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE between 1 June 2010 and 15 January 2021 were identified. Additionally, the International Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and websites of relevant organizations were searched. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Two reviewers assessed rigour of guideline development and extracted the recommendations. Of the seven guidelines and recommendations retrieved, five showed considerable rigour of development. Those rigourously developed, agreed on the definition of severe AS and diverse haemodynamic phenotypes, indications and contraindications for intervention in symptomatic severe AS, surveillance intervals in asymptomatic severe AS, and the importance of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and shared decision-making. Discrepancies exist in age and surgical risk cut-offs for recommending surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the use of biomarkers and complementary multimodality imaging for decision-making in asymptomatic patients and surveillance intervals for non-severe AS. Contemporary guidelines for AS management agree on the importance of MDT involvement and shared decision-making for individualized treatment and unanimously indicate valve replacement in severe, symptomatic AS. Discrepancies exist in thresholds for age and procedural risk used in choosing between SAVR and TAVI, role of biomarkers and complementary imaging modalities to define AS severity and risk of progression in asymptomatic patients.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Canada , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans
7.
Br J Cardiol ; 28(1): 2, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35747487

ABSTRACT

Social distancing/isolation is vital for infection control but can adversely impact on mental health. As the spread of COVID-19 is contained, mental health issues will surface with particular concerns for elderly, isolated populations. We present a case of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy related to lockdown anxiety.

10.
Minerva Cardioangiol ; 67(5): 380-391, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31527583

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Temporal changes in contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) incidence following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) are poorly defined. Additionally, the benefits of iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) compared to low osmolar CM (LOCM) are uncertain. METHODS: Using data from a regional PPCI service, temporal changes in baseline risk and annual incidence of CI-AKI were studied. A CM protocol change occurred in 2013 allowing a comparison of the incidence of CI-AKI between LOCM (2012-13) and IOCM (2013-15). RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2015, 208 of 1310 patients experienced CI-AKI (15.9%). The Mehran AKI risk score did not change during the study period although there was an increase in the incidence of CI-AKI in later study years (P<0.001 for trend) when IOCM was used. Factors independently associated with CI-AKI were IOCM use (OR=1.96, [95% CI: 1.39-2.75]), age per year (OR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), baseline creatinine per µmol/L (OR=1.006, 95% CI: 1.003-1.01) and contrast volume per milliliter (OR=1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.004). The baseline characteristics of patients treated using IOCM (N.=783) vs. LOCM (N.=527) were similar (Mehran Score 6.6 vs. 6.9, P=0.173) but CI-AKI occurred more frequently with IOCM compared to LOCM (19.2% vs. 11.2%, P<0.001). Use of IOCM was independently associated with CI-AKI (OR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.339-2.774, P<0.001) with consistency across all sub-groups of age, gender, baseline creatinine, contrast volume, shock and diabetes. The adjusted in-hospital mortality was increased with IOCM compared to LOCM (OR=3.03, 95% CI: 1.313-6.994, P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: IOCM use was observed to be associated with an increased occurrence of CI-AKI, and an increase in in-hospital mortality after primary PCI.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Contrast Media/chemistry , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Osmolar Concentration
11.
Heart ; 104(24): 2058-2066, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30030336

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of the CharlsonComorbidity Index (CCI) with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing TAVI have high comorbid burden; however, there is limited evidence of its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Data from 1887 patients from the UK, Canada, Spain, Switzerland and Italy were collected between 2007 and 2016. The association of CCI with 30-day mortality, Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) composite early safety, long-term survival and length of stay (LoS) was calculated using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, as a whole cohort and at a country level, through a two-stage individual participant data (IPD) random effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: Most (60%) of patients had a CCI ≥3. A weak correlation was found between the total CCI and four different preoperative risks scores (ρ=0.16 to 0.29), and approximately 50% of patients classed as low risk from four risk prediction models still presented with a CCI ≥3. Per-unit increases in total CCI were not associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24) or VARC-2 early safety (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.14) but were associated with increased hazard of long-term mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.16). The two-stage IPD meta-analysis indicated that CCI was not associated with LoS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.02). CONCLUSION: In this multicentre international study, patients undergoing TAVI had significant comorbid burden. We found a weak correlation between the CCI and well-established preoperative risks scores. The CCI had a moderate association with long-term mortality up to 5 years post-TAVI.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Risk Assessment/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Comorbidity/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Spain/epidemiology , Switzerland/epidemiology , Time Factors , Young Adult
12.
Echo Res Pract ; 5(2): K35-K40, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29643124

ABSTRACT

SummaryThis case describes an unusual presentation of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE): an acute coronary syndrome. A 67-year-old male presented with cardiac sounding chest pain on a background of a short history of night sweats, weight loss and general malaise. Four months previously, he had undergone bio-prosthetic aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis and single vessel bypass grafting of the obtuse marginal. Whilst having chest pain, his ECG showed infero-lateral ST depression. Early coronary angiography revealed a new right coronary artery (RCA) lesion that was not present prior to his cardiac surgery. Using multi-modality cardiac imaging, the diagnosis of PVE was made. An aortic root abscess was demonstrated that was causing external compression of the RCA. LEARNING POINTS: PVE accounts for up to 20% of all cases of infective endocarditis.High clinical suspicion and early blood cultures before empirical antibiotics are key as the presentation of PVE can often be atypical.PVE rarely presents as an acute coronary syndrome. Potential mechanisms by which PVE may result in an ACS include coronary embolization, obstruction of coronary ostia by a large mobile vegetation and external coronary artery compression from an infective aneurysms/abscess.Repeat cardiac surgery is often required for high-risk PVE such as those caused by staphylococcal infection or severe prosthetic dysfunction.

15.
BJR Case Rep ; 2(3): 20150466, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30459992

ABSTRACT

We report the case of an immunocompetent patient who presented with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome and was found to be in complete heart block. He re-presented within 2 months with worsening breathlessness and investigations confirmed infiltrative cardiac disease. We describe here an uncommon presentation of primary cardiac lymphoma as acute coronary syndrome and atrioventricular block.

17.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20152015 Nov 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26611486

ABSTRACT

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition with adverse consequences and increased mortality, despite improvements in treatment options. Diagnosed patients usually require a prolonged course of antibiotics, with up to 40-50% requiring surgery during initial hospital admission. We report a case of a 42-year-old intravenous drug user who presented feeling generally unwell, with lethargy, rigours, confusion and a painful swollen right leg. He was subsequently diagnosed with Proteus mirabilis endocarditis (fulfilling modified Duke criteria for possible IE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). He was successfully treated with single antibiotic therapy without needing surgical intervention or requiring anticoagulation for his DVT. Proteus endocarditis is extremely uncommon, with a limited number of case reports available in the literature. This case illustrates how blood cultures are invaluable in the diagnosis of IE, especially that due to unusual microorganisms. Our case also highlights how single antibiotic therapy can be effective in treating Proteus endocarditis.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Proteus Infections/diagnosis , Proteus mirabilis , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Adult , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Diagnosis, Differential , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Prosthesis/microbiology , Humans , Male , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Proteus Infections/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis
18.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 582590, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25722981

ABSTRACT

462 patients presenting with chest pain to a rural district general hospital underwent calcium scoring and pretest clinical risk assessment in order to stratify subsequent investigations and treatment was retrospectively reviewed. The patients were followed up for two years and further investigations and outcomes recorded. Of the 206 patients with zero calcium score, 132 patients were immediately discharged from cardiac follow-up with no further investigation on the basis of their calcium score, low pretest risk of coronary artery disease, and no significant incidental findings. After further tests, 267 patients were discharged with no further cardiac therapy, 88 patients were discharged with additional medical therapy, and 19 patients underwent coronary artery by-pass grafting or percutaneous intervention. 164 patients with incidental findings on the chest CT (computed tomography) accompanying calcium scoring were reviewed, of which 88 patients underwent further tests and follow-up for noncardiac causes of chest pain. The correlations between all major risk factors and calcium scores were weak except for a combination of diabetes and hypertension in the male gender (P = 0.012), The use of calcium scoring and pretest risk appeared to reduce the number of unnecessary cardiac investigations in our patients: however, the calcium scoring test produced a high number of incidental findings on the associated CT scans.


Subject(s)
Calcinosis/physiopathology , Chest Pain/physiopathology , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Joint Diseases/physiopathology , Vascular Diseases/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/therapy , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Joint Diseases/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Rural Population , Vascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Diseases/therapy
19.
J Transplant ; 2013: 748578, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24307939

ABSTRACT

Heart transplantation (HTX) is the gold standard surgical treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. The prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection in HTX recipients is over 10%. Despite its increased prevalence, the long-term outcome in this cohort is still not clear. There is a reluctance to place these patients on transplant waiting list given the increased incidence of viral reactivation and chronic liver disease after transplant. The emergence of new antiviral therapies to treat this cohort seems promising but their long-term outcome is yet to be established. The aim of this paper is to review the literature and explore whether it is justifiable to list advanced heart failure patients with coexistent hepatitis B/C infection for HTX.

20.
Clin Cardiol ; 36(2): 68-73, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22911227

ABSTRACT

Increased resting heart rate is an independent modifiable risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Numerous studies have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with heart rate reduction in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure, but its role in transplanted hearts is not yet established. Sinus tachycardia is more common in heart transplant recipients due to graft denervation. Although a large number of studies have recognized increased heart rate as a predictor of native coronary artery atherosclerosis and overall cardiac mortality, contradicting results have been observed in heart transplant recipients. There is no clear consensus about what the normal range of heart rate should be following heart transplantation. The aim of this article was to review the literature to evaluate whether heart rate reduction should be considered in heart transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Heart Rate/drug effects , Heart Transplantation , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...