ABSTRACT
Principles and conditions for guideline implementation and evaluation were the subject of a workshop organised by the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) and the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF). This report reflects contents and discussions and suggests possible future activities. The workshop highlighted the need for conceptual frameworks, theory-driven research and concerted strategies. The reinforcement of strategic partnerships within the health care organisations is an indispensable prerequisite for successful guideline implementation and evaluation.(As supplied by author).
Subject(s)
Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Health Services Research/organization & administration , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Cooperative Behavior , Education , Forecasting , Germany , Health Plan Implementation/trends , Health Services Research/trends , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , National Health Programs/trendsABSTRACT
Benchmarking as a tool of organisational development is directed towards improvement through learning from others. The German Ministry of Health funded 10 demonstration projects on clinical benchmarking in order to study the prerequisites to and the methods for its dissemination. The evaluation was carried out as an observational study in 2008. The evaluation tools used included a list of criteria to uniformly describe benchmarking networks and a scheme to categorize the realized benchmarking steps.
Subject(s)
Benchmarking/organization & administration , Health Planning Organizations/organization & administration , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Organizational Objectives , Germany , Humans , Quality Improvement/organization & administrationABSTRACT
A survey among 232 German health care organisations addressed benchmarking projects in patient care. 53 projects were reported and analysed using a benchmarking development scheme and a list of criteria. None of the projects satisfied all the criteria. Rather, examples of best practice for single aspects have been identified.
Subject(s)
Benchmarking/methods , Benchmarking/organization & administration , Health Care Sector/standards , Health Services Research/methods , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Germany , Humans , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
Nine out of ten demonstration projects on clinical benchmarking funded by the German Ministry of Health were evaluated. Project reports and interviews were uniformly analysed using a list of criteria and a scheme to categorize the realized benchmarking approach. At the end of the funding period four benchmarking networks had implemented all benchmarking steps, and six were continued after funding had expired. The improvement of outcome quality cannot yet be assessed. Factors promoting the introduction of benchmarking networks with regard to organisational and process aspects of benchmarking implementation were derived.
Subject(s)
Benchmarking/organization & administration , Financing, Government/organization & administration , Health Planning Councils/organization & administration , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Germany , Humans , Organizational Objectives , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methodsABSTRACT
The German Health Ministry funded 10 demonstration projects and accompanying research of benchmarking in health care. The accompanying research work aimed to infer generalisable findings and recommendations. We performed a meta-evaluation of the demonstration projects and analysed national and international approaches to benchmarking in health care. It was found that the typical benchmarking sequence is hardly ever realised. Most projects lack a detailed analysis of structures and processes of the best performers as a starting point for the process of learning from and adopting best practice. To tap the full potential of benchmarking in health care, participation in voluntary benchmarking projects should be promoted that have been demonstrated to follow all the typical steps of a benchmarking process.
Subject(s)
Benchmarking/standards , National Health Programs , Quality Improvement/standards , Germany , Health Services Research/standards , Humans , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Total Quality Management/standardsABSTRACT
All well-known quality management (QM) models in health care also address issues of the quality of leadership, even if they do so with varying intensity. Skills in managing organisations are a basically important quality in a top manager, but skills in leading people have been revealed as being most relevant. All the manuals of the most common quality management systems specify 'To-Do' lists and tasks for the top management--EFQM and KTQ/proCum Cert have definitively linked them with quality management. Quality needs to be assessed by the degree to which management goals are achieved. However, there is no easy approach to measure leadership abilities and explain it to the public. Since this is a real challenge and very difficult to achieve it is not a central focus of the various QM manuals.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Leadership , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Total Quality Management/organization & administration , Certification/standards , Germany , Humans , Total Quality Management/standardsABSTRACT
The aim of quality management is to optimize the quality of care under given circumstances, which include the provided resources. If these resources no longer suffice, a deterioration of the achievable quality will follow. This could be avoided by 1) recognizing and eliminating unnecessary or deficient health services, 2) excluding health services from funding when adequate scientific proof of effectiveness is lacking, and 3) modifying the definition of the level of quality to be achieved. Outcome quality of health care is measured, on the one hand, by prevention of avoidable mortality and morbidity and, on the other hand, by improvement of quality of life and patient satisfaction. Methodologically, it is difficult to determine which part of the quality of life and of patient satisfaction is to be attributed to private life style. Since the evidence for effects on quality of life and patient satisfaction is often worse than for mortality and morbidity, there is the risk that they will become increasingly less relevant when defining the quality that is to be achieved for the community of the insured. In order to prevent this from happening unnoticed, measurements of the outcome quality of care with the indicator group mortality, morbidity, quality of life and patient satisfaction need to be intensified.
Subject(s)
Health Care Rationing , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/standards , GermanyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The homogeneity of the schemes for follow-up care after curative surgical treatment of early breast cancer is still a matter of debate in Germany. We investigated whether symptom-oriented follow-up is equivalent in terms of survival rates to conventional surveillance based on scheduled tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, non-randomised, multicentre cohort study carried out between 1995 and 2000, 244 patients underwent a conventional follow-up (scheduled laboratory tests including CEA and CA 15-3, chest X-rays and liver ultrasound). 426 patients were monitored in a symptom-oriented manner (additional tests only in the case of symptoms indicating possible recurrence). Mammography, structured histories and physical examinations were done regularly in both branches. 1,108 patients did not participate in the project. They represent 'real world patients', unaffected by the implications of a study. RESULTS: The symptom-oriented follow- up group produced results not inferior to those of the intensive one (p < 0.05) in terms of overall and relapse-free survival. Furthermore, no difference was indicated in terms of overall survival between study participants and the 'real world patients' (p = 0.316). CONCLUSION: The results confirm that regular imaging and laboratory tests have no relevant effect on overall survival of patients after curative primary therapy of early breast cancer and support the implementation of a symptom-oriented routine follow-up.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The Programme for National Disease Management Guidelines (German DM-CPG Programme) was established in 2002 by the German Medical Association (umbrella organisation of the German Chambers of Physicians) and joined by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF)--umbrella organisation of more than 150 professional societies--and by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP) in 2003. The programme provides a conceptual basis for disease management, focussing on high priority healthcare topics and aiming at the implementation of best practice recommendations for prevention, acute care, rehabilitation and chronic care. It is organised by the German Agency for Quality in Medicine, a founding member of the Guidelines International Network G-I-N. The main objective of the German DM-CPG Programme is to establish consensus among the medical professions on evidence-based key recommendations covering all sectors of healthcare provision and facilitating the coordination of care for the individual patient through time and across interfaces. Within the last year DM-CPGs have been published for asthma, COPD, type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease. In addition, experts from national patient self-help groups have been developing patient guidance based upon the recommendations for healthcare providers. The article describes background, methods and tools of the DM-CPG programme using the DM-CPG Method Report 2007.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , National Health Programs/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Physicians/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Societies, MedicalABSTRACT
Children born with very low birth weight (VLBW) are at risk of impaired growth. We aimed to study VLBW survivors (90.8%) born in 1998/1999 in the state of Baden-Württemberg (n = 2103) for whom growth data were available up to age six. Classification as appropriate for gestational age (AGA) or small for gestational age (SGA) depended on size at birth. Models to predict height SDS at 5 y were developed using data for 1 yr (Model 1) and 2 yrs (Model 2). The data of 1320 (63%) children were available: SGA: n = 730, AGA: n = 590. At 6 yrs, 8.3% AGA and 13.4% SGA children were short (<-2.0 SDS). The following factors explained Ht SDS at 5 (and 6) yrs (order of importance): (a) Model 1 (n = 1033; R2 = 0.52; error: 0.84 SDS): 1st yr Ht SDS, mid-parental height (MPH) SDS, 1 yr weight SDS, birth weight SDS; (b) Model 2 (n = 991; R2 = 0.72; error: 0.65 SDS): 1st yr Ht SDS; change (2nd yr) in Ht and weight SDS; MPH SDS; 1st yr weight SDS; birth weight SDS. Thus, some AGA and SGA children born VLBW remain short and preventive strategies need to be developed for those at risk.
Subject(s)
Body Height , Growth Disorders/physiopathology , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight/growth & development , Body Weight , Cephalometry , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Head/growth & development , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Models, Biological , Models, Statistical , Registries , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Guidelines are meant to be decision aids with precise procedural recommendations that are based upon the best knowledge available and thus should contribute to improving healthcare delivery. The achievement of this goal necessitates both a systematic and methodically sound approach in guideline development. Essential elements include the search for and the selection and evaluation of empirical evidence for existing knowledge. In addition, personal experience and subjective judgements will always be part of guideline recommendations, especially when the applicability of the evidence is appraised and health benefits and risks of different management options for the disease or condition are considered. To achieve high-quality results in this process, formal consensus techniques should be employed and potential users and affected patients should be involved. Typical of this technique is the structured interaction that provides the framework in which contributions of individual participants are documented, made transparent and brought together. Quality and acceptance of results are determined by the preparation and practical implementation of these procedures, in which individual- and group-psychological influencing factors play an important role. Along with the methods of evidence synthesis, structured consensus building methodology represents a cornerstone of guideline development.
Subject(s)
Consensus , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Germany , Humans , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Cultural background influences the development of guidelines. In Germany, classifications exist from S1 (low level of evidence, no structured process of consensus finding) up to S3 (high level of evidence, consensus finding by a representative body). Consensus is indispensable in the guideline development process because every step is influenced by preferences and values, from the choice of output and outcome criteria to the role of pathophysiological models in the assessment of new therapies. A structured process of consensus finding increases transparency. Different models of consensus finding are discussed.
Subject(s)
Consensus , Physicians/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Germany , Humans , Risk Assessment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften) is an umbrella organization. It currently represents 151 scientific societies and thus the majority of medical researchers in Germany. Through the coordination and support of the scientific medical societies, the AWMF significantly contributes to health services research by establishing guidelines that ensure a high quality of healthcare. To this purpose, AWMF founded a guideline committee in 1995, whose objective is to assist AWMF member societies in the establishment of guidelines, the organization of training sessions for AWMF guideline representatives, the hosting of regular guideline conferences and the close cooperation with the German Medical Association (Bundesärztekammer, BAK) and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, KBV) in the development of national disease management guidelines (Nationale Versorgungs Leitlinien, NVL). Together with the Agency for Quality in Medicine [AQuMed; Arztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin (AZQ)], AWMF published a 'German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal' ('Deutsches Instrument zur methodischen Leitlinien-Bewertung', DELBI) in order to assure the quality of the guideline development process. A close cooperation has also developed between AWMF and the German Medical Association within the scope of their program for promoting health services research and with the Board of the German Network for Health Services Research (Deutsches Netzwerk for Versorgungsforschung, DNVF). Furthermore, AMWF has acknowledged a special need for improving the financial and conceptual promotion of a systematic evaluation of guideline development and the implementation and application of guidelines in everyday clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/standards , Health Services Research/standards , Societies, Medical , Disease , Germany , Humans , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
The Program for National Disease Management Guidelines (German DM-CPG Program) was established in 2002 by the German Medical Association (umbrella organization of the German Chambers of Physicians) and joined by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF; umbrella organization of more than 150 professional societies) and by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP) in 2003. The program provides a conceptual basis for disease management, focusing on high-priority health-care topics and aiming at the implementation of best practice recommendations for prevention, acute care, rehabilitation and chronic care. It is organized by the German Agency for Quality in Medicine, a founding member of the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). The main objective of the German DM-CPG Program is to establish consensus of the medical professions on evidence-based key recommendations covering all sectors of health-care provision and facilitating the coordination of care for the individual patient through time and across interfaces. Within the last year, DM-CPGs have been published for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, and coronary heart disease. In addition, experts from national patient self-help groups have been developing patient guidance based upon the recommendations for health-care providers. The article describes background, methods, and tools of the DM-CPG Program, and is the first of a publication series dealing with innovative recommendations and aspects of the program.
Subject(s)
Disease Management , National Health Programs , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Germany , Humans , Quality Control , Self-Help Groups/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Suppression of NK cell activity is considered to be an unfavourable prognostic factor for tumour progression. There is proof that mistletoe extracts may increase NK cell activity. However, the inverse relation between an increase of NK cell activity and clinical progress of cancer has not been investigated. AIM AND DESIGN: The relation of NK cell activity and progress of cancer in patients under therapy with mistletoe extracts was examined in a prospective, monocentric, cohort study. At the same time the in vitro killing of K562 cells and autologous tumour cells was compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 40 patients with operable cancer of the breast or colon were included. The patients did not receive any immunologically relevant therapies except for mistletoe extracts. The absolute NK cell count in peripheral blood as well as the in vitro NK cell activity were monitored for up to 2 years and compared with clinical outcome as well as quality of life. RESULTS: The absolute NK cell count in peripheral blood increased within the observation period. Patients without progression had a significantly higher mean activity of NK cells against K562 cells than patients with progression. In the latter group, only stage IV patients showed reduced NK cell activity. The killing activity against autologous tumour cells was <5% in about 77.5% of the patients and could not be evaluated further. The NK cell activity against K562 cells was not related to the number of NK cells. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relation between NK cell activity and the progression of malignant disease. In further studies the causality of this relation has to be clarified. The establishment of NK cell activity against autologous tumour cells as a suitable parameter during follow-up was not successful.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Colonic Neoplasms/immunology , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Mistletoe/chemistry , Phytotherapy , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , K562 Cells , Killer Cells, Natural/drug effects , Killer Cells, Natural/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The motivation for quality management has now reached medical and psychotherapeutic practices. This is partly due to exogenous factors, including regulatory requirements such as Sect. 135a SGB V (German Book of Social Code) demanding the implementation and further development of internal quality management from both out-patient and in-patient healthcare providers. The National Association of SHI-Accredited Physicians in Germany (KBV), along with several regional associations, responded to these internal demands and external requirements by developing the quality management system "Quality and Development in Practices (QEP)". Assisted by an independent institute, 61 selected practices participated in the pilot study. The pilot phase included five interview rounds held between April and November 2004 with 60 practices taking part. The results describe practitioners' expectations for the current state of and the demand for internal quality management. Only one in five practices expects improvements from the implementation of quality management in the area of healthcare processes and management. The improvement of organizational processes, patients' safety and patient outcomes are considered more important. In a self-assessment procedure which included 73 targets with 236 verifications from the quality target catalogue a distinct potential for quality improvement has been revealed. The greatest need for improvement has been identified in cases where quality management defines specific requirements for the practices. These include: treatment pathways, patient information, risk management, case discussions and instruction, quality improvement, regulations and quality measurement. Even practices with advanced quality development activities were able to detect some potential for improvement with the application of the QEP catalogue. In order to attain 15 selected quality targets with 45 verifications, the practices were provided with tools like sample documents and suggestions for internal regulations to be used for quality improvement and requiring relatively small efforts. The effectiveness of implementing a quality management system cannot be adequately demonstrated by an accompanying evaluation. However, established instruments (such as the quality target catalogue and verifications), complemented with suitable outcome indicators, allow the effects of the implementation of internal quality management to be measured in a comparative, or, ideally in a randomized study.