Dengue hepatitis: Incidence, spectrum and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While dengue infection is common in India, there is scarce information on dengue hepatitis. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, spectrum and outcome of dengue hepatitis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients, who had hepatitis among those with dengue infection admitted to two tertiary care hospitals in western India from January 2016 to March 2021. Diagnosis of dengue infection was made by serology. Dengue hepatitis was diagnosed and the severity of dengue was categorized by standard criteria. RESULTS: Of 1664 patients admitted with dengue fever during the study period, 199 patients had hepatitis (i.e. incidence of dengue hepatitis was 11.9%). Of the 199 dengue hepatitis patients (age: 29 [13 - 80] years, median [range], 67% males), 100 patients (50%) had severe dengue, 73 (36%) had severe dengue hepatitis, 32 (16%) had dengue shock syndrome and eight (4%) had acute liver failure. Forty-five patients (23%) had acute lung injury and 32 (16%) had acute kidney injury. The dengue hepatitis patients were treated with standard medical care, including vital organ support, as needed-166 (83%) patients survived, while 33 patients (17%) died (cause of death: multi-organ failure: 24 patients, septic shock: nine patients). The presence of shock independently predicted mortality (odds ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2 - 34). Among patients with dengue hepatitis, mortality rate was higher in those with severe dengue (23%), dengue shock syndrome (47%), severe dengue hepatitis (24%) and acute liver failure (38%). CONCLUSION: In this large series of hospitalized patients with dengue infection, the incidence of dengue hepatitis was 11.9%. Among 199 dengue hepatitis, 17% died; multi-organ failure was the commonest cause for death and death rate was higher in patients with more severe disease. The presence of shock at presentation independently predicted mortality.

Positive white nipple sign on esophageal varices: Not a just bystander; our experience.

Background and study aims The goal of this study was to assess whether a white nipple sign on esophageal varices is of no prognostic significance or mandates more attention. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 2601 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for variceal bleed from January 2008 to January 2020. Intraprocedural events like onset of active spurt while performing endoscopy, active spurt while attempting to band the varix with a nipple, need for rescue glue therapy required to control bleed in cases of failed endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), slipping of band and rebleed despite successful band application, need for emergency intubation, and pulmonary aspiration-related complications were noted. Results A total of 2601 patients underwent endoscopy for variceal bleeding. Of them, 631 had a positive white nipple sign. Of that subgroup, 137 (21.7 %) patients developed active spurt during endoscopy. In patients with the white nipple sign, 12.3 % required endotracheal intubation and 6.7 % developed aspiration pneumonia, which were significantly higher than in those without the sign. Rescue glue injection in esophageal varices was needed in 5.6 % as compared to 0.6 % in those without white nipple. Conclusions The white nipple sign is not only a predictor of recent bleed, but it carries statistically significant increased risk of intraoperative bleeding, need for endotracheal intubation, esophageal glue injections, and aspiration-related complications. Therefore, it is not just a bystander, but rather, a sign of increased danger and a need to be more vigilant with patient management.