Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 108
1.
Br J Haematol ; 194(3): 496-507, 2021 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724461

In this review, two types of soft-tissue involvement in multiple myeloma are defined: (i) extramedullary (EMD) with haematogenous spread involving only soft tissues and (ii) paraskeletal (PS) with tumour masses arising from skeletal lesions. The incidence of EMD and PS plasmacytomas at diagnosis ranges from 1·7% to 4·5% and 7% to 34·4% respectively. EMD disease is often associated with high-risk cytogenetics, resistance to therapy and worse prognosis than in PS involvement. In patients with PS involvement a proteasome inhibitor-based regimen may be the best option followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in transplant eligible patients. In patients with EMD disease who are not eligible for ASCT, a proteasome inhibitor-based regimen such as lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) may be the best option, while for those eligible for high-dose therapy a myeloma/lymphoma-like regimen such as bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD)-RVD/cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (PACE) followed by SCT should be considered. In both EMD and PS disease at relapse many strategies have been tried, but this remains a high-unmet need population.


Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Plasmacytoma/therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Disease Management , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Plasmacytoma/complications , Plasmacytoma/diagnosis , Plasmacytoma/pathology , Prognosis , Transplantation, Autologous
2.
Leukemia ; 33(11): 2710-2719, 2019 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31462732

This phase 3 trial compared tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) versus autoSCT followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (auto/alloSCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with deletion of (del) chromosome 13q (del13q). The availability/absence of a human leukocyte antigen-matched-related or matched-unrelated donor (MUD) determined the nature of the second SCT. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population (n = 199). Auto/alloSCT was performed in 126 patients; 74 received MUD allografts. After 91 months median follow-up, median PFS with auto/allo versus tandem autoSCT was 34.5 versus 21.8 months (P = 0.003; adjusted hazard ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.84). Median overall survival (OS) was 70.2 versus 71.8 months (P = 0.856). Two-year non-relapse mortality with auto/allo versus tandem autoSCT was 14.3% versus 4.1% (P = 0.008). In patients harboring both del13q and del17p, median PFS and OS were 37.5 and 61.5 months with auto/allo (n = 19) versus 6.1 and 23.4 months with tandem autoSCT (n = 6) (P = 0.0002 and 0.032). Our findings suggest that auto/alloSCT significantly extends PFS versus tandem autoSCT in del13q MM, and indicate some survival benefit for first-line alloSCT in high-risk MM.


Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Transplantation, Homologous , Adult , Chromosome Deletion , Cytogenetics , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft vs Host Disease , HLA Antigens/chemistry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Transplantation Conditioning , Treatment Outcome
3.
Br J Haematol ; 178(1): 61-71, 2017 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28382618

This phase II study explored the effects of bortezomib consolidation versus observation on myeloma-related bone disease in patients who had a partial response or better after frontline high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients were randomized to receive four 35-day cycles of bortezomib 1·6 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, or an equivalent observation period, and followed up for disease status/survival. The modified intent-to-treat population included 104 patients (51 bortezomib, 53 observation). There were no meaningful differences in the primary endpoint of change from baseline to end of treatment in bone mineral density (BMD). End-of-treatment rates (bortezomib versus observation) of complete response/stringent complete response were 22% vs. 11% (P = 0·19), very good partial response or better of 80% vs. 68% (P = 0·17), and progressive disease of 8% vs. 23% (P = 0·06); median progression-free survival was 44·9 months vs. 21·8 months (P = 0·22). Adverse events observed ≥15% more frequently with bortezomib versus observation were diarrhoea (37% vs. 0), peripheral sensory neuropathy (20% vs. 4%), nausea (18% vs. 0) and vomiting (16% vs. 0). Compared with observation, bortezomib appeared to have little impact on bone metabolism/health, but was associated with trends for improved myeloma response and survival.


Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Consolidation Chemotherapy/methods , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Osteolysis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Biomarkers/blood , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/physiopathology , Osteolysis/etiology , Osteolysis/physiopathology , Stem Cell Transplantation , Treatment Outcome
4.
Haematologica ; 101(11): 1398-1406, 2016 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27662018

Autologous transplantation is controversial for older patients with multiple myeloma. The role of age-adjusted high-dose melphalan and the impact of induction chemotherapy cycles is still unclear. A total of 434 patients aged 60-70 years were randomly assigned to 4 cycles of standard anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy or no induction. For all patients, double autologous transplantation after melphalan 140 mg/m2 (MEL140) was planned. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Of 420 eligible patients, 85% received a first transplant and 69% completed double transplantation. Treatment duration was short with a median of 7.7 months with induction chemotherapy cycles and 4.6 months without induction. On an intention-to-treat basis, median progression-free survival with induction chemotherapy cycles (207 patients) was 21.4 months versus 20.0 months with no induction cycles (213 patients) (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.28; P=0.36). Per protocol, progression-free survival was 23.7 months versus 23.0 months (P=0.28). Patients aged 65 years or over (55%) did not have an inferior outcome. Patients with low-risk cytogenetics [absence of del17p13, t(4;14) and 1q21 gains] showed a favorable overall survival and included the patients with sustained first remission. MEL140 was associated with a low rate of severe mucositis (10%) and treatment-related deaths (1%). Based on hazard ratio, the short treatment arm consisting of mobilization chemotherapy and tandem MEL140 achieved 96% of the progression-free survival, demonstrating its value as an independent component of therapy in older patients with multiple myeloma who are considered fit for autologous transplantation. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 02288741).


Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Aged , Cytogenetics , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Mucositis/chemically induced , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
5.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 21(12): 2039-2051, 2015 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26428082

In contrast to the upfront setting in which the role of high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as consolidation of a first remission in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is well established, the role of high-dose therapy with autologous or allogeneic HCT has not been extensively studied in MM patients relapsing after primary therapy. The International Myeloma Working Group together with the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, and the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation convened a meeting of MM experts to: (1) summarize current knowledge regarding the role of autologous or allogeneic HCT in MM patients progressing after primary therapy, (2) propose guidelines for the use of salvage HCT in MM, (3) identify knowledge gaps, (4) propose a research agenda, and (5) develop a collaborative initiative to move the research agenda forward. After reviewing the available data, the expert committee came to the following consensus statement for salvage autologous HCT: (1) In transplantation-eligible patients relapsing after primary therapy that did NOT include an autologous HCT, high-dose therapy with HCT as part of salvage therapy should be considered standard; (2) High-dose therapy and autologous HCT should be considered appropriate therapy for any patients relapsing after primary therapy that includes an autologous HCT with initial remission duration of more than 18 months; (3) High-dose therapy and autologous HCT can be used as a bridging strategy to allogeneic HCT; (4) The role of postsalvage HCT maintenance needs to be explored in the context of well-designed prospective trials that should include new agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, immune-modulating agents, and oral proteasome inhibitors; (5) Autologous HCT consolidation should be explored as a strategy to develop novel conditioning regimens or post-HCT strategies in patients with short (less than 18 months remissions) after primary therapy; and (6) Prospective randomized trials need to be performed to define the role of salvage autologous HCT in patients with MM relapsing after primary therapy comparing it to "best non-HCT" therapy. The expert committee also underscored the importance of collecting enough hematopoietic stem cells to perform 2 transplantations early in the course of the disease. Regarding allogeneic HCT, the expert committee agreed on the following consensus statements: (1) Allogeneic HCT should be considered appropriate therapy for any eligible patient with early relapse (less than 24 months) after primary therapy that included an autologous HCT and/or high-risk features (ie, cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, plasma cell leukemia, or high lactate dehydrogenase); (2) Allogeneic HCT should be performed in the context of a clinical trial if possible; (3) The role of postallogeneic HCT maintenance therapy needs to be explored in the context of well-designed prospective trials; and (4) Prospective randomized trials need to be performed to define the role salvage allogeneic HCT in patients with MM relapsing after primary therapy.


Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Salvage Therapy/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Proteasome Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous
6.
Haematologica ; 100(10): 1254-66, 2015 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26432383

The European Myeloma Network provides recommendations for the management of the most common complications of multiple myeloma. Whole body low-dose computed tomography is more sensitive than conventional radiography in depicting osteolytic disease and thus we recommend it as the novel standard for the detection of lytic lesions in myeloma (grade 1A). Myeloma patients with adequate renal function and bone disease at diagnosis should be treated with zoledronic acid or pamidronate (grade 1A). Symptomatic patients without lytic lesions on conventional radiography can be treated with zoledronic acid (grade 1B), but its advantage is not clear for patients with no bone involvement on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. In asymptomatic myeloma, bisphosphonates are not recommended (grade 1A). Zoledronic acid should be given continuously, but it is not clear if patients who achieve at least a very good partial response benefit from its continuous use (grade 1B). Treatment with erythropoietic-stimulating agents may be initiated in patients with persistent symptomatic anemia (hemoglobin <10g/dL) in whom other causes of anemia have been excluded (grade 1B). Erythropoietic agents should be stopped after 6-8 weeks if no adequate hemoglobin response is achieved. For renal impairment, bortezomib-based regimens are the current standard of care (grade 1A). For the management of treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy, drug modification is needed (grade 1C). Vaccination against influenza is recommended; vaccination against streptococcus pneumonia and hemophilus influenza is appropriate, but efficacy is not guaranteed due to suboptimal immune response (grade 1C). Prophylactic aciclovir (or valacyclovir) is recommended for patients receiving proteasome inhibitors, autologous or allogeneic transplantation (grade 1A).


Disease Management , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/etiology , Anemia/therapy , Bone Diseases/diagnosis , Bone Diseases/etiology , Bone Diseases/therapy , Humans , Infections/diagnosis , Infections/etiology , Infections/therapy , Kidney Diseases/diagnosis , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Diseases/therapy , Pain Management , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/therapy
7.
J Clin Oncol ; 33(6): 657-64, 2015 Feb 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25605835

PURPOSE: The aim of International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practical recommendations for the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: An interdisciplinary panel of clinical experts on MM and myeloma bone disease developed recommendations for the value of MRI based on data published through March 2014. RECOMMENDATIONS: MRI has high sensitivity for the early detection of marrow infiltration by myeloma cells compared with other radiographic methods. Thus, MRI detects bone involvement in patients with myeloma much earlier than the myeloma-related bone destruction, with no radiation exposure. It is the gold standard for the imaging of axial skeleton, for the evaluation of painful lesions, and for distinguishing benign versus malignant osteoporotic vertebral fractures. MRI has the ability to detect spinal cord or nerve compression and presence of soft tissue masses, and it is recommended for the workup of solitary bone plasmacytoma. Regarding smoldering or asymptomatic myeloma, all patients should undergo whole-body MRI (WB-MRI; or spine and pelvic MRI if WB-MRI is not available), and if they have > one focal lesion of a diameter > 5 mm, they should be considered to have symptomatic disease that requires therapy. In cases of equivocal small lesions, a second MRI should be performed after 3 to 6 months, and if there is progression on MRI, the patient should be treated as having symptomatic myeloma. MRI at diagnosis of symptomatic patients and after treatment (mainly after autologous stem-cell transplantation) provides prognostic information; however, to date, this does not change treatment selection.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
8.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 56(2): 368-76, 2015 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24794810

The patient granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) response is represented by the leukocyte peak in the blood induced by a single dose of G-CSF after chemotherapy, and is correlated with subsequent neutropenic infection risk. General patterns for a meaningful risk group stratification, have not yet been determined. Two independent data sets including a total of 306 cases with myeloma or lymphoma and autologous blood stem cell transplant were available. An infection susceptibility curve plotted according to ranked G-CSF responses from a multicenter study reproduced and validated a curve from the previous single center. Two trend changes were seen within these curves at around 11,000 and 22,000 leukocytes/µL, which separated three groups with a high, medium and low risk of infection. While G-CSF response is related to the consecutive duration of neutropenia, it retains additional independent predictive information for infection risk (p<0.0001) and, more important, is a tool available before the onset of the critical period.


Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Lymphoma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Mycoses/etiology , Mycoses/prevention & control , Neutropenia/etiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
9.
Lancet Oncol ; 15(12): e538-48, 2014 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25439696

This International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the disease definition of multiple myeloma to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions). These changes are based on the identification of biomarkers associated with near inevitable development of CRAB features in patients who would otherwise be regarded as having smouldering multiple myeloma. A delay in application of the label of multiple myeloma and postponement of therapy could be detrimental to these patients. In addition to this change, we clarify and update the underlying laboratory and radiographic variables that fulfil the criteria for the presence of myeloma-defining CRAB features, and the histological and monoclonal protein requirements for the disease diagnosis. Finally, we provide specific metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease definition. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the implementation of these criteria in routine practice and in future clinical trials, and recommends that future studies analyse any differences in outcome that might occur as a result of the new disease definition.


Biomarkers, Tumor , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency/diagnosis , Bone Marrow Cells/pathology , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Prognosis , Renal Insufficiency/complications , Renal Insufficiency/pathology
10.
Haematologica ; 99(6): 984-96, 2014 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24658815

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is one of the most common pre-malignant disorders. IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are precursor conditions of multiple myeloma; light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of light-chain multiple myeloma; and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and other lymphoproliferative disorders. Clonal burden, as determined by bone marrow plasma cell percentage or M-protein level, as well as biological characteristics, including heavy chain isotype and light chain production, are helpful in predicting risk of progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to symptomatic disease. Furthermore, alterations in the bone marrow microenvironment of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients result in an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, infections, osteoporosis, and bone fractures. In addition, the small clone may occasionally be responsible for severe organ damage through the production of a monoclonal protein that has autoantibody activity or deposits in tissues. These disorders are rare and often require therapy directed at eradication of the underlying plasma cell or lymphoplasmacytic clone. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical relevance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. We also give general recommendations of how to diagnose and manage patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.


Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnosis , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Management , Disease Progression , Humans , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/complications , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/etiology , Precancerous Conditions , Prognosis , Watchful Waiting
11.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(29): 3696-703, 2013 Oct 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24019544

PURPOSE: Despite advancements, prognosis for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is poor, and novel therapies are needed. Panobinostat is a potent deacetylase inhibitor that elicits synergistic effects on MM cells in combination with bortezomib. This phase Ib study sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of panobinostat plus bortezomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the dose-escalation phase (n = 47), panobinostat was administered orally thrice weekly every week in combination with bortezomib (21-day cycles). After MTD determination, patients were evaluated in an expansion phase (n = 15) that incorporated a 1-week treatment holiday of panobinostat, with dexamethasone added in cycle 2. Additional assessments included safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. RESULTS: The MTD was established at panobinostat 20 mg plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (85.1%), neutropenia (63.8%), and asthenia (29.8%) in the escalation phase, and thrombocytopenia (66.7%), neutropenia (46.7%), and fatigue (20.0%) in the expansion phase. At MTD in the escalation phase, eight patients (47.1%) discontinued therapy as a result of AEs, whereas five patients (33.3%) discontinued treatment in the expansion phase. Expansion phase patients demonstrated greater median treatment duration. Overall response rate (ORR) was 73.3% in the expansion phase and 52.9% at the escalation phase MTD. Among bortezomib-refractory patients, the ORR was 26.3%, and 42.1% of patients had ≥ minimal response. CONCLUSION: The MTD of panobinostat plus bortezomib was determined and demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM, including bortezomib-refractory patients. A phase II/III clinical trial program (Panobinostat or Placebo With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [PANORAMA]) has been initiated.


Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Boronic Acids/administration & dosage , Hydroxamic Acids/administration & dosage , Indoles/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Boronic Acids/adverse effects , Bortezomib , Female , Humans , Hydroxamic Acids/adverse effects , Hydroxamic Acids/pharmacokinetics , Indoles/adverse effects , Indoles/pharmacokinetics , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Panobinostat , Pyrazines/adverse effects
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(18): 2347-57, 2013 Jun 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23690408

PURPOSE: The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma (MM) -related bone disease. METHODOLOGY: An interdisciplinary panel of clinical experts on MM and myeloma bone disease developed recommendations based on published data through August 2012. Expert consensus was used to propose additional recommendations in situations where there were insufficient published data. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were assigned and approved by panel members. RECOMMENDATIONS: Bisphosphonates (BPs) should be considered in all patients with MM receiving first-line antimyeloma therapy, regardless of presence of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography. However, it is unknown if BPs offer any advantage in patients with no bone disease assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (ZOL) or pamidronate (PAM) is recommended for preventing skeletal-related events in patients with MM. ZOL is preferred over oral clodronate in newly diagnosed patients with MM because of its potential antimyeloma effects and survival benefits. BPs should be administered every 3 to 4 weeks IV during initial therapy. ZOL or PAM should be continued in patients with active disease and should be resumed after disease relapse, if discontinued in patients achieving complete or very good partial response. BPs are well tolerated, but preventive strategies must be instituted to avoid renal toxicity or osteonecrosis of the jaw. Kyphoplasty should be considered for symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. Low-dose radiation therapy can be used for palliation of uncontrolled pain, impending pathologic fracture, or spinal cord compression. Orthopedic consultation should be sought for long-bone fractures, spinal cord compression, and vertebral column instability.


Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Diseases/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Administration, Intravenous , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Diseases/complications , Bone Diseases/radiotherapy , Clodronic Acid/administration & dosage , Clodronic Acid/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Humans , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , International Cooperation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/radiotherapy , Osteonecrosis/diagnosis , Osteonecrosis/prevention & control , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Pamidronate , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radiotherapy/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Zoledronic Acid
13.
Eur J Haematol ; 90(4): 263-72, 2013 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23311753

Interactions of myeloma cells with the bone marrow microenvironment lead to enhanced osteoclast recruitment and impaired osteoblast activity. Recent evidence revealed that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib stimulates osteoblast differentiation, but the mechanisms are not fully elucidated. We hypothesised that bortezomib could influence osteoblastic differentiation via alteration of vitamin D signalling by blocking the proteasomal degradation of the vitamin D receptor (VDR). This is of clinical importance, as a high rate of vitamin D deficiency was reported in patients with myeloma. We performed cocultures of primary human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and human osteoblasts (hOBs) with myeloma cells, which resulted in an inhibition of the vitamin D-dependent differentiation of osteoblast precursors. Treatment with bortezomib led to a moderate increase in osteoblastic differentiation markers in hMSCs and hOBs. Importantly, this effect could be strikingly increased when vitamin D was added. Bortezomib led to enhanced nuclear VDR protein levels in hMSCs. Primary hMSCs transfected with a VDR luciferase reporter construct showed a strong increase in VDR signalling with bortezomib. In summary, stimulation of VDR signalling is a mechanism for the bortezomib-induced stimulation of osteoblastic differentiation. The data suggest that supplementation of vitamin D in patients with myeloma treated with bortezomib is crucial for optimal bone formation.


Boronic Acids/pharmacology , Osteoblasts/cytology , Osteoblasts/drug effects , Proteasome Inhibitors/pharmacology , Pyrazines/pharmacology , Receptors, Calcitriol/metabolism , Base Sequence , Bortezomib , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cells, Cultured , Coculture Techniques , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/drug effects , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Osteocalcin/genetics , Osteoclasts/cytology , Osteoclasts/drug effects , Osteoclasts/metabolism , Osteopontin/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Receptors, Calcitriol/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Transfection , Up-Regulation/drug effects , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy , Vitamin D Deficiency/etiology , Vitamin D Deficiency/metabolism
14.
Psychooncology ; 22(2): 268-75, 2013 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22052786

OBJECTIVE: Informational needs among cancer patients are similar, but the degree of information disclosure in different cultural areas varies. In this paper, we present the results of a cross-cultural study on information received. METHODS: The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25, was administered during the treatment process. This questionnaire evaluates the information that patients report they have received. Cross-cultural differences in information have been evaluated using statistical tests such as Kruskall-Wallis and multivariate models with covariates to account for differences in clinical and demographic characteristics across areas. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-one patients from three cultural areas, North-Middle Europe, South Europe, and Taiwan, were included in the study. Significant differences among the three cultural areas appeared in eight QLQ-INFO25 dimensions: information about the disease; medical tests; places of care; written information; information on CD/tape/video; satisfaction; wish for more information; and information helpfulness. North-Middle Europe patients received more written information (mean = 67.2 (North) and 33.8 (South)) and South Europe patients received more information on different places of care (mean = 24.7 (North) and 35.0 (South)). Patients from North-Middle Europe and South Europe received more information than patients from Taiwan about the disease (mean = 57.9, 60.6, and 47.1, respectively) and medical tests (70.9, 70.4, and 54.5), showed more satisfaction (64.8, 70.2, and 35.0), and considered the information more helpful (71.9, 73.9, and 50.4). These results were confirmed when adjusting for age, education, and disease stage. CONCLUSION: There are cross-cultural differences in information received. Some of these differences are based on the characteristics of each culture.


Cross-Cultural Comparison , Disclosure/statistics & numerical data , Medical Oncology/methods , Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Paternalism , Personal Autonomy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Truth Disclosure
15.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 104(13): 1005-20, 2012 Jul 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22745469

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a malignancy characterized by the expansion of a plasma cell clone that localizes to the human bone marrow. Myeloma cells and bone marrow stromal cells produce soluble factors that promote the survival and progression of multiple myeloma. Interleukin 16 (IL-16) is involved in regulating the migration and proliferation of normal leukocytes. However, the role of IL-16 in human cancers, including multiple myeloma, is unclear. METHODS: We investigated IL-16 expression in cell lines (n = 10) and in the bone marrow of myeloma patients (n = 62) and healthy bone marrow donors (n = 12) by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunoblot analysis, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry. Transfection of two human multiple myeloma cell lines with small interfering RNAs was used to examine the effect of IL-16 gene silencing on apoptosis by flow cytometry, on proliferation by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation, and on colony formation. Protein neutralization assays were performed by treating multiple myeloma cells with a monoclonal antibody against the carboxyl-terminal fragment of IL-16. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: IL-16 was strongly overexpressed in the bone marrow of myeloma patients compared with healthy donors. Myeloma cell lines as well as primary tumor cells from myeloma patients constitutively expressed IL-16 and its receptors CD4 and/or CD9 and spontaneously secreted soluble IL-16. Silencing of IL-16 reduced the proliferative activity of myeloma cells by approximately 80% compared with untreated cells (mean relative proliferative activity IL-16 siRNA vs untransfected cells, EJM cells: 20.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.3% to 26.0%, P = .03; KMS-12-BM cells: 22.8%, 95% CI = 5.5% to 40.0%, P = .04), and addition of a recombinant carboxyl-terminal IL-16 peptide reversed that effect. A monoclonal antibody directed against IL-16 or its receptors had a comparably strong growth-inhibiting effect on the tumor cells. CONCLUSIONS: IL-16 is an important growth-promoting factor in multiple myeloma and a candidate for novel diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications for this incurable human malignancy.


Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism , Interleukin-6/genetics , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Plasma Cells/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Apoptosis , CD4 Antigens/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Flow Cytometry , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gene Silencing , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tetraspanin 29/metabolism , Up-Regulation
16.
Clin Dev Immunol ; 2012: 134081, 2012.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22481961

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) and its therapies may induce a severely compromised humoral immunity. We have performed a longitudinal analysis of IgG-antibody responses against influenza virus (FLU) and tetanus toxoid (TT) as surrogate markers for the B cell-mediated immunity in MM patients. METHODS: 1094 serum samples of 190 MM patients and samples from 100 healthy donors were analyzed by ELISA for FLU- and TT-specific antibodies. RESULTS: MM patients evidenced lower levels of FLU- and TT-specific antibodies than healthy controls (P < 0.001). Immunoreactivity decreased with progressing disease and worsening clinical status. Levels of FLU- and TT-specific antibodies increased shortly (0-6 months) after alloSCT (P < 0.001), a time-period during which intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is routinely applied. Thereafter, antibody concentrations declined and remained suppressed for 3 years in the case of FLU-specific and for more than 5 years in the case of TT-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: We found that MM is associated with a profound disease- and therapy-related immunosuppression, which is compensated for a few months after alloSCT, most likely by application of IVIG. This and the differences regarding the recovery of anti-FLU and anti-TT antibody titers during the following years need to be taken into account for optimizing IVIG application and immunization after alloSCT.


Alphainfluenzavirus/immunology , Antibodies, Bacterial/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Tetanus Toxoid/immunology , Aged , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunosuppression Therapy , Injections, Intravenous , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Nucleocapsid Proteins , RNA-Binding Proteins/immunology , Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation, Homologous , Viral Core Proteins/immunology
17.
Eur J Haematol ; 88(5): 406-15, 2012 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22309072

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) binds and stabilizes numerous proteins and kinases essential for myeloma cell survival and proliferation. We and others have recently demonstrated that inhibition of HSP90 by small molecular mass inhibitors induces cell death in multiple myeloma (MM). However, some of the HSP90 inhibitors involved in early clinical trials have shown limited antitumor activity and unfavorable toxicity profiles. Here, we analyzed the effects of the novel, orally bioavailable HSP90 inhibitor NVP-HSP990 on MM cell proliferation and survival. The inhibitor led to a significant reduction in myeloma cell viability and induced G2 cell cycle arrest, degradation of caspase-8 and caspase-3, and induction of apoptosis. Inhibition of the HSP90 ATPase activity was accompanied by the degradation of MM phospho-Akt and phospho-ERK1/2 and upregulation of Hsp70. Exposure of MM cells to a combination of NVP-HSP990 and either melphalan or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors caused synergistic inhibition of viability, increased induction of apoptosis, and was able to overcome the primary resistance of the cell line RPMI-8226 to HSP90 inhibition. Combined incubation with melphalan and NVP-HSP990 led to synergistically increased cleavage of caspase-2, caspase-9, and caspase-3. These data demonstrate promising activity for NVP-HSP990 as single agent or combination treatment in MM and provide a rationale for clinical trials.


Apoptosis/drug effects , Caspases/metabolism , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Melphalan/pharmacology , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Pyridones/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Administration, Oral , Biological Availability , Enzyme Activation , Humans , Proteolysis , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/pharmacokinetics , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics
18.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 12(1): 5-11, 2012 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22178143

Neutropenia is a hematologic adverse event characterized by an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) lower than 1500 cells/mL. This reduction may be due to decreased neutrophil production, accelerated use, a shift in compartments of neutrophils, or a combination of these factors. Neutropenia is often associated with infections, which are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. In patients with multiple myeloma, the novel agents thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have improved outcome, but chemotherapy-related neutropenia should be carefully considered. Chemotherapy-related high-risk factors for severe neutropenia include regimens with an expected neutropenia rate of > 50%, such as the 3-drug combinations including lenalidomide plus alkylating agents or doxorubicin, whereas low-risk regimens include combinations of the novel agents with dexamethasone alone. Patient characteristics, disease stage, type of current and previous treatment, and ANC < 1000 cells/mL at baseline are additional factors that define the risk of severe neutropenia. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) should be used to manage chemotherapy-related neutropenia so that patients may stay on treatment for a longer time and benefit from it. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis should be used when high-risk regimens are administered or when low/intermediate-risk regimens are used and additional risk factors are present. Reactive G-CSF treatment is indicated when patients undergoing low-risk chemotherapy experience grade 3/4 neutropenia. If ANC restores to > 1000 cells/mL, therapy can be resumed with no dose modifications. In case of persistence of severe neutropenia, treatment should be delayed until ANC reaches > 1000 cells/mL, and dose reductions are necessary.


Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
19.
Clin Dev Immunol ; 2011: 302145, 2011.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22190969

The occurrence of SOX2-specific autoantibodies seems to be associated with an improved prognosis in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). However, it is unclear if SOX2-specific antibodies also develop in established multiple myeloma (MM). Screening 1094 peripheral blood (PB) sera from 196 MM patients and 100 PB sera from healthy donors, we detected SOX2-specific autoantibodies in 7.7% and 2.0% of patients and donors, respectively. We identified SOX2(211-230) as an immunodominant antibody-epitope within the full protein sequence. SOX2 antigen was expressed in most healthy tissues and its expression did not correlate with the number of BM-resident plasma cells. Accordingly, anti-SOX2 immunity was not related to SOX2 expression levels or tumor burden in the patients' BM. The only clinical factor predicting the development of anti-SOX2 immunity was application of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Anti-SOX2 antibodies occurred more frequently in patients who had received alloSCT (n = 74). Moreover, most SOX2-seropositive patients had only developed antibodies after alloSCT. This finding indicates that alloSCT is able to break tolerance towards this commonly expressed antigen. The questions whether SOX2-specific autoantibodies merely represent an epiphenomenon, are related to graft-versus-host effects or participate in the immune control of myeloma needs to be answered in prospective studies.


Autoantibodies/immunology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/immunology , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Autoantibodies/blood , Cell Line, Tumor , Epitopes/chemistry , Epitopes/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Prognosis , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/genetics , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transplantation, Homologous
20.
Blood ; 118(17): 4519-29, 2011 Oct 27.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21841166

Most patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) are aged > 65 years with 30% aged > 75 years. Many elderly patients are also vulnerable because of comorbidities that complicate the management of MM. The prevalence of MM is expected to rise over time because of an aging population. Most elderly patients with MM are ineligible for autologous transplantation, and the standard treatment has, until recently, been melphalan plus prednisone. The introduction of novel agents, such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, has improved outcomes; however, elderly patients with MM are more susceptible to side effects and are often unable to tolerate full drug doses. For these patients, lower-dose-intensity regimens improve the safety profile and thus optimize treatment outcome. Further research into the best treatment strategies for vulnerable elderly patients is urgently needed. Appropriate screening for vulnerability and an assessment of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and neurologic functions, as well as age > 75 years, at the start of therapy allows treatment strategies to be individualized and drug doses to be tailored to improve tolerability and optimize efficacy. Similarly, occurrence of serious nonhematologic adverse events during treatment should be carefully taken into account to adjust doses and optimize outcomes.


Frail Elderly , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Precision Medicine/methods , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Community Networks , Europe , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data
...