Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 37(3): 184-188, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37561937

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Disparities in Alzheimer disease (AD) and differences in help seeking (HS) across sociodemographic groups warrant public health concern. Research addressing such disparities must shift toward the earliest clinical manifestations of AD to optimize diagnosis, intervention and care planning. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD), a risk state for AD, provides an important context in which to examine sociodemographic-related disparities in HS. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven cognitively healthy older adults (M age =73, M education =16) (26.4% Black, Asian, or "Other") completed SCD questionnaire, HS questions, and mood measures (depression and anxiety). Binary logistic adjusted regressions examined: (a) the association between SCD and HS; and (b) the extent to which education moderated the relationship between SCD and HS. SCD [b = 0.06, SE=0.13, P <0.001, odds ratio=1.06, 95% CI (1.03, 1.08)] and education [b=0.32, SE=0.09, P <0.001, odds ratio=1.37, 95% CI (1.15, 1.64)] were independently associated with HS, with significant interaction between education and SCD on HS [b=0.2, SE=0.01, P =0.01, odds ratio=1.02, 95% CI (1.00, 1.03)]. CONCLUSIONS: Findings elucidate the importance of tailoring SCD-related psychoeducational resources depending on educational background as a preliminary stepping-stone in encouraging HS among older adults who may be at particular risk for developing dementia.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Help-Seeking Behavior , Humans , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Anxiety , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 29(4): 388-396, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36062550

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Job loss is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and frequently associated with depression, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction. Identifying these modifiable risk factors and providing "at-risk" women with a neuropsychologically-based intervention may improve employment outcomes. Our study seeks to investigate the utility of a neuropsychologically-based intervention with varying levels of treatment and follow-up, and evaluate treatment and employment outcomes among groups. METHOD: In this longitudinal, quasi-randomized controlled trial, employed women with MS meeting criteria on screening measures were considered "at-risk" for job instability and randomized to one of two neuropsychological testing interventions (standard-care group received testing and phone feedback of results and recommendations; experimental group received testing and in-person feedback with subsequent care-coordinator calls from a nurse to help coordinate recommendation completion). Participants who did not meet criteria were considered "low-risk" and only followed over time. RESULTS: 56 women in the treatment groups (standard-care = 23; experimental = 33) and 63 women in the follow-only group were analyzed at 1 year. Rates of decreased employment were similar between standard-care (17.4%) and experimental (21.2%) groups (OR = .782, 95% CI .200-3.057). However, the experimental group completed significantly more treatment recommendations, t(53) = -3.237, p = .002. Rates of decreased employment were also similar between the "low-risk" (17.5%) and "at-risk" groups (19.6%), (OR = .721, 95% CI .285-1.826). CONCLUSION: Employment outcomes were similar at 1 year between treatment groups receiving differing levels of a neuropsychologically-based intervention, however treatment adherence significantly improved in the experimental group. Treatment groups also had similar employment outcomes as compared to a "low-risk," no intervention group, suggesting that engaging in either neuropsychological intervention may have impacted job stability.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Female , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Rehabilitation, Vocational/methods , Employment
3.
Rehabil Psychol ; 67(1): 100-109, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35113641

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients often report high levels of illness intrusiveness. The direct and indirect effects of disability and psychological symptoms on illness intrusiveness remain largely unknown, despite their pervasiveness. The present study aimed to examine how depression and anxiety can serve as mechanisms through which disability may impact illness intrusiveness in 3 life domains-instrumental activities, intimacy, and relationships and personal development. METHOD: Participants (N = 72) were adults (Mage = 47.86, SD = 11.79), predominantly female (73.6%) and diagnosed relapse-remitting MS (81.9%). The data was used from an archival neuropsychological database. Data on self-report measures were analyzed to examine the relationship between disability and illness intrusiveness, with depression and anxiety as mediators. Mediation models were run for total illness intrusiveness and the subscales. RESULTS: Depression and anxiety were significant mediators through which disability may impact overall illness intrusiveness. When examining life domains, depression was a significant mediator in all domains. Anxiety was only a significant mediator between disability and relationships/personal development. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that greater disability both directly and indirectly interferes with illness intrusiveness via depression and anxiety. However, life domains are differentially impacted. Thus, this study helps to guide interventions on the best symptoms to target to improve illness intrusiveness and overall quality of life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Adult , Affect , Anxiety , Anxiety Disorders , Depression/complications , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Quality of Life
6.
Int J MS Care ; 21(2): 70-75, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31049037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adherence to nonmedication recommendations is typically low, as seen in various health populations. Because literature on adherence to treatment recommendations made after neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis (MS) is lacking, this study evaluated adherence and reasons for nonadherence. Relationships between adherence to recommendations and various other factors in patients with MS were also evaluated. METHODS: Of 66 adult patients seen for neuropsychological testing at an MS center, 55 were eligible for this study. Forty-five patients (mean age, 43.4 years; 75.6% women) were reached by phone, and all agreed to an interview involving questions regarding adherence to treatment recommendations. Other information was obtained through retrospective medical record review. RESULTS: Overall self-reported adherence to recommendations made from neuropsychological testing was 38%. Adherence rates varied by recommendation type: psychopharmacological management had the highest rate (80%), and referrals for cognitive rehabilitation had the lowest (6.5%). Reasons for nonadherence included needing more information and wanting to speak with one's physician regarding the recommendations. Adherence was associated with patients' ability to spontaneously recall at least some of their recommendations and with receiving both a written report and a phone call with test results. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to recommendations made after neuropsychological testing for patients with MS is low. Points of intervention may be to give directed feedback for each recommendation and to provide both a written report and a phone call with results and recommendations. Asking patients to repeat back the recommendations may be a simple and efficient way to increase understanding and improve adherence.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL