A Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Pancreatography With or Without Pancreatoscopy for Removal of Pancreatic Duct Stones.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic duct stones contribute to pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis, and per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) allows visualization, fragmentation, and removal of these stones. This study compared the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) with and without POP. METHODS: This single-center retrospective review compared ERP with and without POP for treatment of main-duct pancreatic duct stones. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as partial or complete stone removal, which was compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In all, 223 patients underwent 549 ERPs with a technical success rate of 92.4% and complete stone clearance rate of 74.9%. Patients undergoing ERP with POP (n = 94) had higher technical success than patients undergoing ERP without POP (n = 129, 98.9% vs 87.6%, P < 0.001), but required more ERPs (3.1 vs 1.9, P = 0.02). Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with POP was associated with larger stone size (8.9 vs 6.1 mm, P = 0.001), more stones per case (5+ stones: 33.8% vs 21.1%, P = 0.002), and more impacted stones (48.8% vs 10.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy permits effective stone removal in cases not amenable to standard ERP techniques, including those with larger or more numerous stones.

Refractory Jaundice From Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Treated With Cholangioscopy-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are epithelial neoplasms treated with surgical resection when appropriate. We present a 79-year-old man with jandice refractory to endoscopic stenting. Biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with cholangioscopy was used as palliation of obstructive jaundice due to a mucin-producing pancreatic IPMN with fistulous biliary communication. Clinical improvement permitted surgery, and he returned to pre-illness status at 17 months. The use of cholangioscopy in the setting of mucinous filling defects can guide over-the-wire RFA for palliation and may be a bridge to surgery.

Pancreatic Duct Changes in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis Treated With Polyethylene and Sof-Flex Material Stents: A Blinded Comparison.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic stenting is used to improve painful, obstructive chronic pancreatitis. Data suggest that polyethylene stents (PESs) cause stent-associated changes (SACs). Whether a stent composed of more flexible material (Sof-Flex stent [SFS]) is associated with less SAC is unknown. METHODS: This study is a retrospective study of patients who underwent pancreatic duct stenting of at least 1 PES and 1 SFS on separate examinations and had a follow-up pancreatogram at the time of stent removal. The main outcome measurements were assessed for SAC on follow-up pancreatogram and interpreted by 2 radiologists blinded to the clinical data. RESULTS: Stent-associated changes were noted with 28% (13/47) of SFS and with 25% (13/52) of PES (P = 0.65). For 10F stent subgroups, SACs were seen with 25% (6/24) of the SFS compared with 50% (2/4) in the PES. Thirty percent (7/23) of the 8.5F SFS subgroup had SACs versus 29% (2/7) in the PES group (P = 0.887) for 8.5F + 10F combined comparison. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have had polyethylene or SFSs of varying sizes, approximately 1 in 4 have SACs. Despite the use of a softer stent material for therapeutic stenting, the rate of SACs in the 8.5F and 10F subgroups seems similar between the 2 materials and design.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with per oral pancreatoscopy for calcific chronic pancreatitis using endoscope and catheter-based pancreatoscopes: a 10-year single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: Per oral pancreatoscopy (POP) with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or laser lithotripsy (LL) permits stone fragmentation and removal during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Our study evaluates the safety and efficacy of POP in patients with main pancreatic duct (PD) stones. METHODS: This was a cohort study of patients undergoing POP with EHL/LL for PD stones between January 2000 and March 2011. Technical success was defined as complete or partial stone clearance, and clinical success as greater than 50% reduction in opiate use, pain, or hospitalizations. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent POP for PD stones using a 10F cholangioscope (POP-Endo) (n = 31) or catheter-based system (POP-Cath, n = 15). Electrohydraulic lithotripsy/LL was performed in 39 (85%) of 46 patients. Stone extraction without EHL or LL was performed in 7 (15%) of 46 patients. Technical success for POP-Endo versus POP-Cath was 27 (87%) of 31 versus 15 (100%) of 15 patients (P = 0.29). Complete clearance was achieved in 21 (68%) of 31 versus 11 (73%) of 15 patients, respectively (P = 0.519). Per oral pancreatoscopy-related complications were found in 10%. Follow-up in 43 (93%) of 46 patients was a median of 18 months (range, 1-60 months). Overall clinical success was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Per oral pancreatoscopy-guided endotherapy leads to partial or complete stone clearance in most patients with PD stones. The technical success rates between POP-Endo versus POP-Cath systems appear similar and are associated with clinical improvement in most patients.