Antibiotic Diversity Index: A novel metric to assess antibiotic variation among hospitalized children.

BACKGROUND: Despite nationally endorsed treatment guidelines and stewardship programs, variation and deviation from evidence-based antibiotic prescribing occur, contributing to inappropriate use and medication-related adverse events. Measures of antibiotic prescribing variability can aid in quantifying this problem but are not adequate. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to develop a standardized metric to quantify antibiotic prescribing variability (diversity) within and across children's hospitals, and to examine its association with outcomes. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of empiric antibiotic exposure among children hospitalized during 2017-2019 with one of 15 common pediatric infections using the Pediatric Health Information System database. Encounters for children with complex chronic conditions, transfers in, and birth hospitalizations were excluded. Using the Shannon-Weiner entropy index, we quantified antibiotic diversity for each infection type using the d-measure of diversity. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association between hospital-level antibiotic diversity and risk-adjusted length of stay and costs. RESULTS: A total of 79,515 hospitalizations for common pediatric infections were included. Antibiotic diversity varied within and across hospitals. Infections with low mean antibiotic diversity included appendicitis (mean diversity [mDiv] = 4.9, SD = 2.5) and deep neck space infections (mDiv = 5.9, SD = 1.9). Infections with high mean antibiotic diversity included pneumonia (mDiv = 23.4, SD = 5.6) and septicemia/bacteremia (mDiv = 28.5, SD = 12.1). There was no statistically significant association between hospital-level antibiotic diversity and risk-adjusted LOS or costs. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and applied a novel metric to quantify diversity in antibiotic prescribing that permits comparisons across hospitals and can be leveraged to identify high-priority areas for local and national stewardship interventions.

American-ish.

In this narrative medicine essay, a pediatric infectious disease physician relates how he has learned to understand the protective role of code-shifting in his life and how that understanding has aided him in promoting an inclusive environment in academic medicine.

Clinician Perspectives on Continuous Monitor Use in a Children's Hospital: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Variation in continuous cardiopulmonary monitor (cCPM) use across children's hospitals suggests preference-based use. We sought to understand how clinical providers make decisions to use cCPMs. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structed interviews with clinicians (nurses, respiratory therapists [RTs], and resident and attending physicians) from 2 hospital medicine units at a children's hospital. The interview guide employed patient cases and open-ended prompts to elicit information about workflows and decision-making related to cCPM, and we collected basic demographic information about participants. We used an inductive approach following thematic analysis to code transcripts and create themes. RESULTS: We interviewed 5 nurses, 5 RTs, 7 residents, and 7 attending physicians. We discovered that clinicians perceive a low threshold for starting cCPM, and this often occurred as a default action at admission. Clinicians thought of cCPMs as helping them cope with uncertainty. Despite acknowledging considerable flaws in how cCPMs were used, they were perceived as a low-risk intervention. Although RNs and RTs were most aware of the patient's current condition and number of alarms, physicians decided when to discontinue monitors. No structured process for identifying when to discontinue monitors existed. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that nurses, physicians, and RTs often default to cCPM use and lack a standardized process for identifying when cCPM should be discontinued. Interventions aiming to reduce monitor use will need to account for or target these factors.

Outcomes associated with initial narrow-spectrum versus broad-spectrum antibiotics in children hospitalized with urinary tract infections.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the proportion of children hospitalized with urinary tract infections (UTIs) who receive initial narrow- versus broad-spectrum antibiotics across children's hospitals and explore whether the use of initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics is associated with different outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children aged 2 months to 17 years hospitalized with UTI (inclusive of pyelonephritis) using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: We analyzed the proportions of children initially receiving narrow- versus broad-spectrum antibiotics; additionally, we compiled antibiogram data for common uropathogenic organisms from participating hospitals to compare with the observed antibiotic susceptibility patterns. We examined the association of antibiotic type with adjusted outcomes including length of stay (LOS), costs, and 7- and 30-day emergency department (ED) revisits and hospital readmissions. RESULTS: We identified 10,740 hospitalizations for UTI across 39 hospitals. Approximately 5% of encounters demonstrated initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics, with hospital-level narrow-spectrum use ranging from <1% to 25%. Approximately 80% of hospital antibiograms demonstrated >80% Escherichia coli susceptibility to cefazolin. In adjusted models, those who received initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics had shorter LOS (narrow-spectrum: 33.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.8-35.4) h versus broad-spectrum: 46.1 (95% CI: 44.1-48.2) h) and reduced costs [narrow-spectrum: $4570 ($3751-5568) versus broad-spectrum: $5699 ($5005-$6491)]. There were no differences in ED revisits or hospital readmissions. In summary, children's hospitals have low rates of narrow-spectrum antibiotic use for UTIs despite many reporting high rates of cefazolin-susceptible E. coli. These findings, coupled with the observed decreased LOS and costs among those receiving narrow-spectrum antibiotics, highlight potential antibiotic stewardship opportunities.

Time to Clinical Stability in Children With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Time to clinical stability (TCS) is a commonly used outcome in adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), yet few studies have evaluated TCS in children. Our objective was to determine the association between TCS and disease severity in children with suspected CAP, as well as factors associated with reaching early stability. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of children (aged 3 months to 18 years) hospitalized with suspected CAP. TCS parameters included temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and hypoxemia with the use of supplemental oxygen. TCS was defined as time from admission to parameter normalization. The association of TCS with severity and clinical factors associated with earlier TCS were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 571 children, 187 (32.7%) had at least 1 abnormal parameter at discharge, and none had ≥3 abnormal discharge parameters. A greater proportion of infants (90 [93%]) had all 4 parameters stable at discharge compared with 12- to 18-year-old youths (21 [49%]). The median TCS for each parameter was <24 hours. Younger age, absence of vomiting, diffusely decreased breath sounds, and normal capillary refill were associated with earlier TCS. Children who did not reach stability were not more likely to revisit after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A TCS outcome consisting of physiologic variables may be useful for objectively assessing disease recovery and clinical readiness for discharge among children hospitalized with CAP. TCS may decrease length of stay if implemented to guide discharge decisions. Clinicians can consider factors associated with earlier TCS for management decisions.

Changing patterns of routine laboratory testing over time at children's hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Research into low-value routine testing at children's hospitals has not consistently evaluated changing patterns of testing over time. OBJECTIVES: To identify changes in routine laboratory testing rates at children's hospitals over ten years and the association with patient outcomes. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a multi-center, retrospective cohort study of children aged 0-18 hospitalized with common, lower-severity diagnoses at 28 children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information Systems database. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We calculated average annual testing rates for complete blood counts, electrolytes, and inflammatory markers between 2010 and 2019 for each hospital. A >2% average testing rate change per year was defined as clinically meaningful and used to separate hospitals into groups: increasing, decreasing, and unchanged testing rates. Groups were compared for differences in length of stay, cost, and 30-day readmission or ED revisit, adjusted for demographics and case mix index. RESULTS: Our study included 576,572 encounters for common, low-severity diagnoses. Individual hospital testing rates in each year of the study varied from 0.3 to 1.4 tests per patient day. The average yearly change in hospital-specific testing rates ranged from -6% to +7%. Four hospitals remained in the lowest quartile of testing and two in the highest quartile throughout all 10 years of the study. We grouped hospitals with increasing (8), decreasing (n = 5), and unchanged (n = 15) testing rates. No difference was found across subgroups in costs, length of stay, 30-day ED revisit, or readmission rates. Comparing resource utilization trends over time provides important insights into achievable rates of testing reduction.

Current update on the role of endoanal ultrasound: a primer for radiologists.

Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is a valuable imaging modality for the evaluation of anal and perianal pathologies. It provides detailed information about the anatomy and physiology of the anorectal region and has been used in pre-and post-operative settings of anorectal pathologies. EAUS is not only useful in the evaluation of benign pathologies but also in loco-regional staging of anal and rectal tumors. EAUS has several advantages over MRI, including reduced cost, better patient tolerance, and improved scope of application in patients with contraindications to MRI. Despite its benefits, EAUS is not widely performed in many centers across the globe. This article aims to educate radiologists, trainees, and surgeons about the indications, contraindications, patient preparation, imaging technique, and findings of EAUS. We will also highlight the technical difficulties, diagnostic challenges, and procedural complications encountered during EAUS, along with a comparative analysis of EAUS with other imaging approaches.