Prognosticating accelerated deterioration in skeletally mature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves of 40-50° using uniplanar radiographic measures of axial rotation.

PURPOSE: The management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves between 40 and 50° is controversial. Here, we investigated the prognostic significance of simple radiographic rotational parameters to identify curves of this magnitude with accelerated deterioration following skeletal maturity. METHODS: Seventy-three patients were identified with AIS and Cobb angles of the major curve between 40 and 50° at skeletal maturity. We defined fast progressive curves as those increasing by ≥ 2° per year after skeletal maturity. From the apical vertebra of the major curve upon presentation and skeletal maturity, we determined the modified Nash-Moe index (×100), and from thoracic major curves, the Rib Index. T tests were performed to compare fast-progressive curves with those that deteriorated by < 2° per year. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to establish optimal cutoffs, sensitivity, and specificity measures for rotational parameters. RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up post was 11.8 ± 7.3 years. Thirteen out of seventy-three patients were fast progressors. The modified Nash-Moe index was similar between groups at presentation (p = 0.477) but significantly higher in fast progressors than non-fast progressors at maturity for major thoracic curves (25.40 ± 6.60 vs. 19.20 ± 4.40, p < 0.001). Rib Index values were also higher among fast progressors at skeletal maturity (2.50 ± 0.90 vs. 1.80 ± 0.60, p = 0.026). An ROC curve for a modified Nash-Moe index of 0.235 for thoracic curves achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 for discriminating fast progressors. A threshold of 1.915 for Rib Index at maturity achieved an AUC of 0.72 for discriminating fast progressors. In combining both rotational parameters, an AUC of 0.81 was achieved. CONCLUSION: These simple rotational parameters may be useful to predict fast progression in 40-50° AIS curves following skeletal maturity indicated for early fusion, but further validation upon larger cohorts and non-thoracic major curves is required.

Management of Metastatic Spinal Disease - A Practical Approach.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: This review presents a comprehensive approach to the management of spinal metastases. METHODS: N/A. RESULTS: The wide spectrum of clinical presentation in spinal metastases necessitates a personalized approach to treatment planning. This includes a comprehensive diagnostic workup, oncological management, palliation of symptoms, and surgical intervention if appropriate. A systematic and multidisciplinary approach allows optimal shared decision making to reach an evidence-informed and value-congruent treatment plan for the patient. We highlight how advances in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and separation surgery may be incorporated into clinical management from a spine surgeon's perspective. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the approach and management of spinal metastases, its outcomes and complications.

The effect of long-term alendronic acid treatment on Modic changes in the lumbar spine: a gender and age-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) affects a significant proportion of the adult population. Potent anti-resorptive drugs such as intravenous zoledronic acid have been demonstrated to reduce Modic changes (MCs) upon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine and concomitantly decrease associated LBP. It is uncertain whether oral alendronic acid has a similar effect. METHODS: 82 subjects were recruited in this case-control study. Treatment subjects (n = 41) received oral alendronic acid treatment for at least 1-year and were matched by gender and age (± 2) to control subjects (n = 41) not receiving any anti-osteoporotic medication. The prevalence, type, and extent of MCs were quantified upon T1 and T2-weighted MRIs of the lumbosacral spine. RESULTS: Treatment subjects received oral alendronic acid for 124.0 ± 62.1 weeks at the time of MRI assessment and exhibited a lower prevalence of MCs over the lumbosacral spine (18/41 vs. 30/41, p < 0.001) as compared to control subjects. Amongst both groups, type 2 MCs were predominant. Quantification of type 2 MCs in treatment subjects revealed a significant reduction in area (113 ± 106 mm2 vs. 231 ± 144 mm2, p < 0.01) and volume (453 ± 427 mm3 vs. 925 ± 575 mm3, p < 0.01) affected by type 2 MCs in comparison to matched controls. CONCLUSION: Oral alendronic acid may be useful in the treatment of MC-associated LBP in patients with concomitant osteoporosis.

Paired and matched analysis of neurological outcomes in revision surgery for cervical myelopathy following delayed neurological decline.

Background: Delayed neurological decline may be experienced following successful decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Our objective was to analyze neurological recovery upon revision surgery with relation to the index procedure and a matched control. Methods: Fourteen patients underwent both primary and revision decompression at a single academic center. Peri-operative clinical, radiological, and surgical details were retrieved. Neurological outcomes [change in modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA), recovery ratio] following the second surgery were compared to (I) the primary operation and (II) a control subject receiving primary decompression matched for gender, age, mJOA score, and surgical approach. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in mJOA score was set at 2.5. Results: Revision decompressions were performed 6.8±4.2 years following the index surgery, when patients were 61.4±11.0 years of age. An increase in mJOA score of 2.7±2.0 following revision surgery was similar to that achieved after the primary operation (2.2±2.1, P=0.616). A recovery ratio of 38.1%±25.4% upon revision compared favorably to that following the primary operation (35.0%±37.4%, P=0.867). Non-inferiority testing between revision surgery and the first operation (P=0.02) demonstrated a similar capacity to achieve the MCID as did comparison with matched subjects (P<0.01). Conclusions: Patients were able to make up for lost neurological gains following revision surgery. Careful selection of cases for revision likely facilitated recovery. Recovery trajectories should be consolidated upon larger sample sizes allowing for identification of prognostic factors.