Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lasers Surg Med ; 56(5): 437-445, 2024 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The picosecond alexandrite laser has been safely and effectively used to treat the nevus of Ota in adults. However, limited data are available for children. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and correlative influencing factors of a 755nm picosecond alexandrite laser in the treatment of nevus of Ota in children. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed Chinese children with nevus of Ota who received a 755nm picosecond alexandrite laser treatment in a tertiary dermatological hospital. RESULT: A total of 305 pediatric patients received an average of two treatments achieving an average of 79% pigment clearance. After the first treatment, 22 patients achieved complete clearance (95%-100%), and 72 patients achieved excellent response (75%-94%), with an average initial efficacy of 63% lesion clearance. Treatment at an early age achieved better initial efficacy (0- to 12-month group >1- to 6-year group, 6- to 12-year group). And 0- to 12-month group achieved better final efficacy. More treatment sessions also increased the final efficacy. Both initial efficacy and final efficacy were better when treating a darker lesion. The incidence of complications was 12.1%, with 10.8% being post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and 1.3% being hypopigmentation. The rate of recurrence was 6.6%. LIMITATION: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: A 755nm picosecond alexandrite laser is safe and effective in treating nevus of Ota in children. Younger to initiate treatment, darker lesions, and more treatments are positively associated with better pigmentation clearance.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State , Nevus of Ota , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Nevus of Ota/radiotherapy , Nevus of Ota/surgery , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Child , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Infant , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Infant, Newborn , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods
2.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 22(11): 1095-1098, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea can be successfully treated using various laser and light-based devices. However, the use of narrow-band intense pulsed light for the treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea has not been investigated in detail. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of narrow-band intense pulsed light (500-600 nm) for the treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea among Chinese individuals.  Methods: Patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea who had completed 3 sessions of treatment with narrow-band intense pulsed light and follow-up from July 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical improvement was assessed by 2 blinded dermatologists based on photographs obtained at each follow-up visit using the clinician erythema assessment scale and 5-grade scale. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea treated with narrow-band intense pulsed light were included in this study. The effectiveness and excellent rates after 3 treatment sessions were 68.9% and 35.6%, respectively. An average of 2 treatment sessions was required among patients who achieved good or excellent clearance of erythema and telangiectasia. Except for transient erythema and edema, no severe adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow-band intense pulsed light is a safe and effective treatment for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Even with a small number of treatment sessions, narrow-band intense pulsed light can deliver a significant therapeutic effect, which may be applicable in clinical practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(11):1095-1098     doi:10.36849/JDD.4920.


Subject(s)
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy , Rosacea , Humans , Asian People , Erythema/diagnosis , Erythema/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Rosacea/diagnosis , Rosacea/therapy
3.
Lasers Surg Med ; 55(7): 636-641, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37265010

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The 730 nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser is a novel laser that shows promising results in treating freckles. This study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of the 730 nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser for treating freckles in Asian patients compared with those of the 755 nm picosecond alexandrite laser. METHODS: Each face of 86 participants was split into two parts and randomly assigned either one session of 730 or 755 nm picosecond-laser treatment each. Efficacy and safety were determined based on blinded visual evaluations and self-reports at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: The treatment outcomes of the 730 nm picosecond laser for the treatment of freckles were comparable to those of the 755 nm picosecond laser, with 68.99 ± 7.42% and 69.27 ± 7.75% clearance, respectively (p > 0.05). Participants achieved similar Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores (4.04 ± 0.31 vs. 4.02 ± 0.30, respectively [p > 0.05]). Additionally, the 730 nm picosecond laser was perceived to be less painful than the 755 nm picosecond laser (4.69 ± 1.63 vs. 5.65 ± 1.80 nm, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The 730 nm picosecond laser is safe and effective for the treatment of freckles in Asian patients. Besides, the 730 nm picosecond laser is less painful than the 755 nm picosecond laser.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State , Melanosis , Humans , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Titanium , Treatment Outcome , Pain , Aluminum Oxide
4.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 31: 101820, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32428574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pulsed dye laser is the first treatment choice for port-wine stains. However, as some facial port-wine stains are resistant to this modality, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (hemoporfin) photodynamic therapy for the treatment of such resistant port-wine stains. METHODS: Patients were treated with two sessions of hemoporfin photodynamic therapy in our department. Patients received an intravenous injection of hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (5 mg/kg) followed by 532 nm LED green light therapy. Three physicians graded the improvement in the port-wine stain, using a 4-level scale. Patients' satisfaction, reaction to treatment, and adverse effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (mean age, 23.9 ± 11.9 years, range, 3-48 years) were enrolled in this study. Hypertrophic lesions accounted for 48.4% of port-wine stain, with 80.6% of lesions being larger than 40 cm2. With regard to location, 41.9% were located on the central face and 32.3% involved a mix of the central and peripheral face. After one session, a treatment response was identified in 87.1% of cases, with the response deemed 'significant' in 29.0%. After two sessions, these rates increased to 100.0% and 61.3%, respectively. The clinical effect after two sessions was significantly greater than that after one session. Treatment reactions and adverse effects were well tolerated, and included pruritus, burning sensation, pain, edema, purpura-like change, blister, crust, and hyperpigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Hemoporfin photodynamic therapy is a promising treatment for port-wine stains resistant to pulsed dye laser therapy.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lasers, Dye , Photochemotherapy , Port-Wine Stain , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Hematoporphyrins , Humans , Lasers, Dye/therapeutic use , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Port-Wine Stain/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(2): 397-403, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30885760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel picosecond lasers have been available for various pigmentary disorders. However, there are limited data directly comparing picosecond lasers and Q-switched lasers for treatment of nevus of Ota. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a picosecond alexandrite laser (PSAL) with a Q-switched alexandrite laser (QSAL) for the treatment of nevus of Ota. METHODS: Each lesion of 56 enrolled participants was split into 2 parts and randomly assigned to either the PSAL or QSAL treatment arm. Each lesion was treated in up to 6 sessions in 12-week intervals. Efficacy and safety were determined using blinded visual evaluation and self-report at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: The PSAL arm achieved a significantly better clearance (5-point scale, PSAL 4.53 vs QSAL 4.0) with fewer sessions (PSAL 5.26 vs QSAL 5.87) and less severe pain (Visual Analog Scale, PSAL 5.61 vs QSAL 6.40). Patients were more satisfied with PSAL than QSAL (Likert scale, 4.5 vs 4.0). Occurrences of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PSAL 26% vs QSAL 34%) and hypopigmentation (PSAL 21% vs QSAL 47%) were also lower in PSAL than QSAL arm. LIMITATIONS: Lack of objective assessments and outcome measures. CONCLUSION: PSAL demonstrated better clinical results and fewer adverse events than QSAL for the treatment of nevus of Ota.


Subject(s)
Hyperpigmentation/epidemiology , Hypopigmentation/epidemiology , Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects , Nevus of Ota/surgery , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyperpigmentation/diagnosis , Hyperpigmentation/etiology , Hypopigmentation/diagnosis , Hypopigmentation/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nevus of Ota/diagnosis , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Skin/diagnostic imaging , Skin/radiation effects , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Pigmentation/radiation effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL