Cervical Stenosis After Hysteroscopic Surgery for Cesarean Scar Disorder.

Cesarean scar disorder (CSDi) is a newly recognized cause of secondary infertility. Laparoscopic or hysteroscopic surgery is generally chosen for the surgical treatment of CSDi, depending on the residual myometrial thickness of the cesarean scar. Previously, hysteroscopic transcervical resection for CSDi (TCR-CSDi) has been reported to be a safe procedure, with no cases of postoperative cervical stenosis. Herein, we report a novel case of cervical stenosis after circumferential hysteroscopic TCR-CSDi of an extensive CSDi lesion. Notably, although no cervical stenosis was observed upon postoperative hysteroscopy one month postoperatively, cervical stenosis developed four months after the surgery; therefore, it is important to avoid circumferential resection and cauterization in patients with CSDi, even when abnormal blood vessels are present. Additionally, it is advisable to check for delayed cervical stenosis at least three weeks before embryo transfer in patients who have undergone TCR-CSDi.

Characteristics, treatment trends, and long-term outcomes of Japanese patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC).

PURPOSE: To clarify the characteristics, treatment trends, and long-term outcomes of patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC). METHODS: PABC includes breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (PBC) and breast cancer diagnosed within 1 year after childbirth or during lactation (LBC). We compared clinical characteristics of 126 patients with LBC and 49 patients with PBC who underwent surgery at our hospital from 1946 to 2018. Survival was compared between patients with LBC and those with PBC in terms of breast cancer-specific disease-free survival (BC-DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients with LBC were more likely to have family history, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and to receive chemotherapy than patients with PBC. Patients with LBC showed poorer BS-DFS and OS than patients with PBC. Among patients with LBC, those treated after 2005 were older at surgery, had a smaller tumor size, received more systemic therapy, and had a more favorable prognosis than patients treated before 2004. Family history, breast cancer within 1 year after childbirth, and surgery before 2004 as well as cStage, lymph node metastasis, and lymphatic invasion were significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with LBC. In the multivariate analysis for BC-DFS and OS among patients with PABC, LBC vs PBC did not remain as an independent prognostic factor while cStage remained. CONCLUSION: Patients with LBC had a poorer prognosis than those with PBC, most likely due to disease progression rather than biological characteristics. Early detection and optimization of systemic treatments are critical for improving the outcomes of patients with LBC.

A case of two ovarian tissue transplantations that led to a biochemical pregnancy in Japan.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) and ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) are fertility preservation options for prepubertal girls or those in whom cancer treatment cannot be delayed. They are important to increasing number of cancer survivors, but there are very few reports on this topic in Japan. This is the first report of a biochemical pregnancy after OTT in Japan. An 18-year-old woman, diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma of the seventh thoracic vertebra, underwent tumor resection. OTC was performed before postoperative chemotherapy. After 7 years, she decided to undergo OTT following the diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency. On postoperative day 104, ovarian stimulation was started, yielding one embryo after 3 days. Embryo transfer was performed during a hormone replacement cycle. At 6 weeks and 1 day, the human chorionic gonadotropin level was 81.5 mIU/mL; however, no gestational sac was observed on ultrasonography, indicating a biochemical pregnancy. Our data will be useful for the further development of fertility preservation options in Japan in the future.

Physician's knowledge, attitudes and practice pattern for breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: a survey among breast care specialists in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (BCP) is uncommon, and thus there is limited evidence on its treatment. However, the incidence of BCP is increasing probably due to women having children at an older age. We aimed to clarify the practice patterns and limitations in treatment for BCP in Japan. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was developed for board-certified Japanese breast cancer specialists (n = 1583) to evaluate their knowledge, attitude, experience, and practice patterns regarding BCP. Survey items also included questions regarding potential barriers of practice toward patients diagnosed during pregnancy and respondents' background. RESULTS: In March 2018, 492 (31.1%) breast oncologists responded to the survey. Among them, 234 (48%) respondents had the experience of treating at least one case of BCP. The accuracy of knowledge about BCP was evaluated by three items regarding BCP treatment from the latest Japanese Breast Cancer Society treatment guideline, and 265 (54%) were categorized to have "appropriate knowledge". Majority of the physicians (89%) have responded that patients should be treated in a center where both a cancer-treating team and obstetrician exist, and 48% responded that treating patients by the collaboration of cancer-treating team and obstetric team in different institutes is an alternative reasonable option. CONCLUSIONS: Interest, knowledge, and awareness of the guidelines appear to influence physician attitude, and thus it is urgently important to lay out educational materials and learning opportunities regarding BCP for breast specialists. A regional network of oncologists, obstetricians, and pediatricians to support the BCP patients should be developed.

Factors associated with treatment delay in women with primary breast cancer who were referred to reproductive specialists.

PURPOSE: Cancer treatment delay due to fertility preservation procedures is a barrier for patients with breast cancer who wish to preserve their fertility. This study aimed to describe the associations between fertility preservation and treatment delay in patients with breast cancer with reproductive concerns and assess the factors related to treatment delay. METHODS: Patients with primary breast cancer who visited the reproductive unit at our institution before cancer treatment between 2007 and 2015 were enrolled. The treatment delay cut-off was defined as follows: time to chemotherapy (TTC) >8 weeks for patients intending to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, TTC >12 weeks for patients intending to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, time to endocrine therapy (TTE) >12 weeks for patients intending to receive endocrine therapy without radiation therapy and TTE >20 weeks for patients intending to receive endocrine therapy after radiation therapy. Multivariable models were constructed to examine the factors of treatment delay. RESULTS: Overall, 212 patients met the inclusion criteria. Using the defined cut-offs, treatment delay was noted in 18% of the patients. Endocrine therapy was related to treatment delay (OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.02 to 19.7; p=0.05), but fertility preservation by artificial reproductive treatment (ART) was not. Pregnancy and delivery following treatment for breast cancer were achieved in 18 (19%) and 15 (16%) patients who underwent fertility preservation with ART. CONCLUSION: Fertility preservation with ART was not associated with treatment delay in patients with breast cancer who were referred to reproductive specialists before cancer treatment.