Sprifermin (rhFGF18) versus vehicle induces a biphasic process of extracellular matrix remodeling in human knee OA articular cartilage ex vivo.

Sprifermin, recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 18 (rhFGF18), induces cartilage regeneration in knees of patients with osteoarthritis (OA). We hypothesized that a temporal multiphasic process of extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation and formation underlie this effect. We aimed to characterize the temporal ECM remodeling of human knee OA articular cartilage in response to sprifermin treatment. Articular cartilage explants from patients with knee OA (npatients = 14) were cultured for 70 days, with permanent exposure to sprifermin (900, 450, 225 ng/mL), FGF18 (450 ng/mL), insulin-like growth factor-1 (100 ng/mL, positive control) or vehicle (nreplicates/treatment/patient = 2). Metabolic activity (AlamarBlue) and biomarkers of type IIB collagen (PIIBNP) formation (Pro-C2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) and aggrecanase-mediated aggrecan neo-epitope NITEGE (AGNx1 ELISA) were quantified once a week. At end of culture (day 70), gene expression (quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) and proteoglycan content (Safranin O/Fast green staining) were quantified. The cartilage had continuously increased metabolic activity, when treated with sprifermin/FGF18 compared to vehicle. During days 7-28 PIIBNP was decreased and NITEGE was increased, and during days 35-70 PIIBNP was increased. At end of culture, the cartilage had sustained proteoglycan content and relative expression of ACAN < COL2A1 < SOX9 < COL1A1, indicating that functional chondrocytes remained in the explants. Sprifermin induces a temporal biphasic cartilage remodeling in human knee OA articular cartilage explants, with early-phase increased aggrecanase activity and late-phase increased type II collagen formation.

Disease-modifying treatments for osteoarthritis (DMOADs) of the knee and hip: lessons learned from failures and opportunities for the future.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the biggest unmet medical need among the many musculoskeletal conditions and the most common form of arthritis. It is a major cause of disability and impaired quality of life in the elderly. We review several ambitious but failed attempts to develop joint structure-modifying treatments for OA. Insights gleaned from these attempts suggest that these failures arose from unrealistic hypotheses, sub-optimal selection of patient populations or drug dose, and/or inadequate sensitivity of the trial endpoints. The long list of failures has prompted a paradigm shift in OA drug development with redirection of attention to: (1) consideration of the benefits of localized vs systemic pharmacological agents, as indicated by the increasing number of intra-articularly administered compounds entering clinical development; (2) recognition of OA as a complex disease with multiple phenotypes, that may each require somewhat different approaches for optimizing treatment; and (3) trial enhancements based on guidance regarding biomarkers provided by regulatory agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that could be harnessed to help turn failures into successes.

Inflammation (or synovitis)-driven osteoarthritis: an opportunity for personalizing prognosis and treatment?

The disabling and painful disease osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis. Strong evidence suggests that a subpopulation of OA patients has a form of OA driven by inflammation. Consequently, understanding when inflammation is the driver of disease progression and which OA patients might benefit from anti-inflammatory treatment is a topic of intense research in the OA field. We have reviewed the current literature on OA, with an emphasis on inflammation in OA, biochemical markers of structural damage, and anti-inflammatory treatments for OA. The literature suggests that the OA patient population is diverse, consisting of several subpopulations, including one associated with inflammation. This inflammatory subpopulation may be identified by a combination of novel serological inflammatory biomarkers. Preliminary evidence from small clinical studies suggests that this subpopulation may benefit from anti-inflammatory treatment currently reserved for other inflammatory arthritides.

Investigating the Robustness and Diagnostic Potential of Extracellular Matrix Remodelling Biomarkers in Alkaptonuria.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Alkaptonuria (AKU) clinical manifestations resemble severe arthritis. The Suitability of Nitisinone in Alkaptonuria 1 (SONIA 1) study is a dose-finding trial for nitisinone treatment of AKU patients. We tested a panel of serum and urinary biomarkers reflecting extracellular matrix remodelling (ECMR) of cartilage, bone and connective tissue in SONIA 1 patients to identify non-invasive and diagnostic biomarkers of tissue turnover in AKU. METHODS: Fasted serum and urine were retrieved from 40 SONIA 1 patients and 44 healthy controls. Established biomarkers of bone remodelling (CTX-I, P1NP, OC), cartilage remodelling (CTX-II, C2M, AGNx1) and inflammation (CRPM) as well as exploratory biomarkers of ECMR (C6M, VCANM, MIM, TIM) were measured at baseline in serum and urine by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) or automated systems (Elecsys 2010). RESULTS: The levels of bone resorption (CTX-I) and cartilage degradation (C2M) were elevated in AKU patients as compared to controls (p > 0.0001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Also tissue inflammation (CRPM) was elevated in AKU patients (p = 0.01). In addition all four exploratory biomarkers of ECMR (C6M, VCANM, MIM, TIM) were elevated in AKU patients compared to healthy controls. CTX-II was the only biomarker to be reduced in AKU patients. TIM was the only marker that showed a higher concentration than the normal assay range in AKU patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified new potential biomarkers for assessment of cartilage, bone and cardiovascular remodelling in AKU and demonstrated the robustness of the assays used to measure the biomarker concentration in biological fluids.

Association between biochemical cartilage markers and clinical symptoms in patients with hip osteoarthritis: cohort study with 2-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To assess associations between uCTX-II or uCIIM and severity of hip pain in patients with mild-moderate hip osteoarthritis (OA) over a 2-year period, and establish whether the level of these biomarkers at baseline could estimate a specific trajectory of hip pain. DESIGN: A cohort study with a 2-year follow-up and 6-monthly measurements of urinary biomarkers (uCTX-II and uCIIM) and symptom severity. Patients were recruited from general practices. The primary outcome was hip pain, measured with the Western Ontario and McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) subscale and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Associations between hip pain and biomarkers were assessed using linear mixed-model analysis for repeated measurements. Five previously identified pain trajectories were used as outcome to investigate whether the level of biomarkers at baseline could estimate membership in one of the trajectories using multinomial regression analysis. RESULTS: LoguCTX-II and loguCIIM were not associated with WOMAC pain or VAS pain during the 2-year follow-up. Patients in the highly progressive pain trajectory and the moderate pain trajectory were more likely to have a higher loguCTX-II at baseline (OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.6-28.2 and OR 4.8; 95% CI 1.0-22.8, respectively) than patients in the mild pain trajectory. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in patients with mild-moderate hip OA the urinary biochemical markers uCTX-II and uCIIM are not cross-sectionally associated with hip pain during the 2-year follow-up. Because the uCTX-II level estimated a progressive or moderate hip pain trajectory, this correlation needs to be confirmed in additional patients with hip OA.

Identification and characterisation of osteoarthritis patients with inflammation derived tissue turnover.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease with a subset of patients experiencing joint inflammation, but C-reactive protein (CRP) has shown limited use in OA as a diagnostic marker. The aim was to identify subpopulations of patients with high or low levels of acute (high sensitive CRP (hsCRP)) and/or matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) derived inflammation (CRPM) and investigate the subpopulations' association with biomarkers of collagen degradation and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score. METHODS: hsCRP, CRPM and MMP-degraded type I, II and III collagen (type I collagen degraded by MMP (C1M), type II collagen degraded by MMP (C2M) and type III collagen degraded by MMP (C3M)) were quantified by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in serum of 342 patients with symptomatic knee OA of which 60 underwent total knee replacement (TKR). KL was obtained. Patients were divided into quartiles by hsCRP and CRPM levels, where Q1 and Q4 were low or high in both. The biomarker levels of healthy adults provided in the ELISA kits were used as reference level. RESULTS: hsCRP was elevated in TKR (5.9(3.6-8.2 95% confidence interval (CI)) µg/mL) compared to reference level (3 µg/mL), while CRPM was highly elevated with OA independent of KL (10-14 ng/mL) compared to reference level (5 ng/mL). Q4 had higher KL than Q1 (P < 0.001), Q2 (P = 0.017) and Q3 (P < 0.001). C1M, C2M and C3M were lowest in Q1. C1M was elevated in Q3 compared to Q2 (P < 0.001), whereas C3M was lower (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: A bigger proportion of patients were elevated in CRPM compared to hsCRP, indicating MMP-derived inflammation as a component of OA. Moreover, the levels of MMP-degraded collagens differed between the subgroups segregated by inflammation, indicating distinctively different subpopulation selected by inflammation.