ZH-ECochG Bode Plot: A Novel Approach to Visualize Electrocochleographic Data in Cochlear Implant Users.

Background: Various representations exist in the literature to visualize electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings along the basilar membrane (BM). This lack of generalization complicates comparisons within and between cochlear implant (CI) users, as well as between publications. This study synthesized the visual representations available in the literature via a systematic review and provides a novel approach to visualize ECochG data in CI users. Methods: A systematic review was conducted within PubMed and EMBASE to evaluate studies investigating ECochG and CI. Figures that visualized ECochG responses were selected and analyzed. A novel visualization of individual ECochG data, the ZH-ECochG Bode plot (ZH = Zurich), was devised, and the recordings from three CI recipients were used to demonstrate and assess the new framework. Results: Within the database search, 74 articles with a total of 115 figures met the inclusion criteria. Analysis revealed various types of representations using different axes; their advantages were incorporated into the novel visualization framework. The ZH-ECochG Bode plot visualizes the amplitude and phase of the ECochG recordings along the different tonotopic regions and angular insertion depths of the recording sites. The graph includes the pre- and postoperative audiograms to enable a comparison of ECochG responses with the audiometric profile, and allows different measurements to be shown in the same graph. Conclusions: The ZH-ECochG Bode plot provides a generalized visual representation of ECochG data, using well-defined axes. This will facilitate the investigation of the complex ECochG potentials generated along the BM and allows for better comparisons of ECochG recordings within and among CI users and publications. The scripts used to construct the ZH-ECochG Bode plot are provided by the authors.

Classification of Acoustic Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using Electrocochleography.

The objective to preserve residual hearing during cochlear implantation has recently led to the use of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) as an intraoperative monitoring tool. Currently, a decrease in the amplitude of the difference between responses to alternating-polarity stimuli (DIF response), predominantly reflecting the hair cell response, is used for providing feedback. Including other ECochG response components, such as phase changes and harmonic distortions, could improve the accuracy of surgical feedback. The objectives of the present study were (1) to compare simultaneously recorded stepwise intracochlear and extracochlear ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts, (2) to explore patterns in features extracted from the intracochlear ECochG recordings relating to hearing preservation or hearing loss, and (3) to design support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) classifiers of acoustic hearing preservation that treat each subject as a sample and use all intracochlear ECochG recordings made during electrode array insertion for classification. Forty subjects undergoing cochlear implant (CI) surgery at the Oslo University Hospital, St. Thomas' Hearing Implant Centre, or the University Hospital of Zurich were prospectively enrolled. In this cohort, DIF response amplitude decreases did not relate to postoperative acoustic hearing preservation. Exploratory analysis of the feature set extracted from the ECochG responses and preoperative audiogram showed that the features were not discriminative between outcome classes. The SVM and RF classifiers that were trained on these features could not distinguish cases with hearing loss and hearing preservation. These findings suggest that hearing loss following CI surgery is not always reflected in intraoperative ECochG recordings.

Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cochlear implant (CI) electrode distances to the cochlea's inner wall (the modiolus) and electrical impedance measurements made at the CI's electrode contacts. We introduced a protocol for "three-point impedances" in which we recorded bipolar impedances in response to monopolar stimulation at a neighboring electrode. We aimed to assess the usability of three-point impedances and two existing CI impedance measurement methods (monopolar and four-point impedances) for predicting electrode positioning during CI insertion. METHODS: Impedances were recorded during stepwise CI electrode array insertions in cadaveric human temporal bones. The positioning of the electrodes with respect to the modiolus was assessed at each step using cone beam computed tomography. Linear mixed regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the impedances and electrode-modiolar distances. The experimental results were compared to clinical impedance data and to an existing lumped-element model of an implanted CI. RESULTS: Three-point and four-point impedances strongly correlated with electrode-modiolar distance. In contrast, monopolar impedances were only minimally affected by changes in electrode positioning with respect to the modiolus. An overall model specificity of 62% was achieved when incorporating all impedance parameters. This specificity could be increased beyond 73% when prior expectations of electrode positioning were incorporated in the model. CONCLUSION: Three-point and four-point impedances are promising measures to predict electrode-modiolar distance in real-time during CI insertion. SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows how electrical impedance measurements can be used to predict the CI's electrode positioning in a biologically realistic model.

Implications of Phase Changes in Extracochlear Electrocochleographic Recordings During Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and implications of phase changes in extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings during cochlear implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extracochlear ECochG recordings were performed before and after insertion of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode by a recording electrode placed on the promontory. Acoustic stimuli were tone bursts at 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 Hz. The pure tone average (PTA) was determined before and approximately 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Extracochlear ECochG recordings in 69 ears of 68 subjects were included. At 250 Hz, the mean phase change was 43° (n = 50, standard deviation (SD) 44°), at 500 Hz 36° (n = 64, SD 36°), at 750 Hz 33° (n = 42, SD 39°), and at 1,000 Hz 22° (n = 54, SD 27°). Overall, in 48 out of 210 ECochG recordings a phase change of ≥45° (23%) was detectable. Ears with an amplitude drop >3 dB and a phase change ≥45° (n = 3) had a complete or near complete loss of residual cochlear function in all cases. A phase change of ≥90° in one recording was not associated with a larger amplitude change of the ECochG signal (1.9 dB vs. -0.9 dB, p = 0.1052, n = 69), but with a significantly larger postoperative hearing loss (17 dB vs. 26 dB, p = 0.0156, n = 69). CONCLUSIONS: Phase changes occur regularly in extracochlear ECochG recordings during cochlear implantation. Phase changes of ≥90° with or without amplitude changes in the ECochG signal are associated with a larger postoperative hearing loss and could therefore represent an independent marker for cochlear trauma or changes of inner ear mechanics relevant for the postoperative hearing outcome.

Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation to Enhance Response Interpretation.

The use of electrocochleography (ECochG) for providing real-time feedback of cochlear function during cochlear implantation is receiving increased attention for preventing cochlear trauma and preserving residual hearing. Although various studies investigated the relationship between intra-operative ECochG measurements and surgical outcomes in recent years, the limited interpretability of ECochG response changes leads to conflicting study results and prevents the adoption of this method for clinical use. Specifically, the movement of the recording electrode with respect to the different signal generators in intracochlear recordings makes the interpretation of signal changes with respect to cochlear trauma difficult. Here, we demonstrate that comparison of ECochG signals recorded simultaneously from intracochlear locations and from a fixed extracochlear location can potentially allow a differentiation between traumatic and atraumatic signal changes in intracochlear recordings. We measured ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts with alternating starting phases during cochlear implant insertions in six human cochlear implant recipients. Our results show that an amplitude decrease with associated near 180° phase shift and harmonic distortions in the intracochlear difference curve during the first half of insertion was not accompanied by a decrease in the extracochlear difference curve's amplitude (n = 1), while late amplitude decreases in intracochlear difference curves (near full insertion, n = 2) did correspond to extracochlear amplitude decreases. These findings suggest a role for phase shifts, harmonic distortions, and recording location in interpreting intracochlear ECochG responses.

Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Electrode Insertion.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To correlate simultaneously recorded intra- and extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) signals during electrode insertion into the cochlea, (2) to track changes in the ECochG signal during insertion and removal of an electrode, and (3) to correlate the findings with the preoperative residual hearing. We hypothesized that intracochlear ECochG recordings show signal changes not reflected in simultaneous extracochlear ECochG recordings. DESIGN: During cochlear implantation in human cochlear implant recipients, a short, slim, custom-made electrode was inserted and removed in a stepwise manner. At each step, ECochG recordings were simultaneously recorded by an extracochlear electrode near the round window and via the inserted electrode. The acoustic stimulus was a 500 Hz tone burst at 110 to 130 dB SPL. RESULTS: The mean amplitude difference between intra- and extracochlear ongoing ECochG responses was 14 dB (range 9 to 24 dB; n = 10) at the beginning of insertion. Intracochlear ECochG responses were larger in all cases. Extracochlear ECochG responses remained stable while intracochlear recordings showed large variations regarding amplitude and phase during the electrode array insertion. Intracochlear signal changes during insertion were reversible with retraction of the electrode. There were only weak to moderate (rs = 0.006 to 0.4), nonsignificant correlations of residual preoperative hearing with maximum amplitudes and amplitude changes during electrode insertion and removal in intracochlear recordings. CONCLUSIONS: Signals in intracochlear ECochG recordings are reliably larger than ECochG signals recorded simultaneously from an extracochlear location. Intracochlear ECochG recordings show reversible amplitude and phase changes during insertion, not reflected in simultaneous extracochlear ECochG recordings. Such changes are most likely due to the movement of the recording electrode in relation to the signal generators. Residual high-frequency hearing is associated with larger ECochG signal amplitudes. Modeling of expected intracochlear ECochG changes during electrode insertions may allow detection of cochlear trauma in the future.