Targeting IL-8 signalling to inhibit breast cancer stem cell activity.

Although survival from breast cancer has improved significantly over the past 20 years, disease recurrence remains a significant clinical problem. The concept of stem-like cells in cancer has been gaining currency over the last decade or so, since evidence for stem cell activity in human leukaemia and solid tumours, including breast cancer, was first published. Evidence indicates that this sub-population of cells, known as cancer stem-like cells (CSCs), is responsible for driving tumour formation and disease progression. In breast cancer, there is good evidence that CSCs are intrinsically resistant to conventional chemo-, radio- and endocrine therapies. By evading the effects of these treatments, CSCs are held culpable for disease recurrence. Hence, in order to improve treatment there is a need to develop CSC-targeted therapies. Interleukin-8 (IL-8), an inflammatory cytokine, is upregulated in breast cancer and associated with poor prognostic factors. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that IL-8, through its receptors CXCR1/2, is an important regulator of breast CSC activity. Inhibiting CXCR1/2 signalling has proved efficacious in pre-clinical models of breast cancer providing a good rationale for targeting CXCR1/2 clinically. Here, we discuss the role of IL-8 in breast CSC regulation and development of novel therapies to target CXCR1/2 signalling in breast cancer.

Recent advances reveal IL-8 signaling as a potential key to targeting breast cancer stem cells.

Breast cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are an important therapeutic target as they are purported to be responsible for tumor initiation, maintenance, metastases, and disease recurrence. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) is upregulated in breast cancer compared with normal breast tissue and is associated with poor prognosis. IL-8 is reported to promote breast cancer progression by increasing cell invasion, angiogenesis, and metastases and is upregulated in HER2-positive cancers. Recently, we and others have established that IL-8 via its cognate receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, is also involved in regulating breast CSC activity. Our work demonstrates that in metastatic breast CSCs, CXCR1/2 signals via transactivation of HER2. Given the importance of HER2 in breast cancer and in regulating CSC activity, a pathway driving the activation of these receptors would have important biological and clinical consequences, especially in tumors that express high levels of IL-8 and other CXCR1/2-activating ligands. Here, we review the IL-8 signaling pathway and the role of HER2 in maintaining an IL-8 inflammatory loop and discuss the potential of combining CXCR1/2 inhibitors with other treatments such as HER2-targeted therapy as a novel approach to eliminate CSCs and improve patient survival.

Targeting CXCR1/2 significantly reduces breast cancer stem cell activity and increases the efficacy of inhibiting HER2 via HER2-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer stem-like cells (CSC) are an important therapeutic target as they are predicted to be responsible for tumor initiation, maintenance, and metastases. Interleukin (IL)-8 is upregulated in breast cancer and is associated with poor prognosis. Breast cancer cell line studies indicate that IL-8 via its cognate receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, is important in regulating breast CSC activity. We investigated the role of IL-8 in the regulation of CSC activity using patient-derived breast cancers and determined the potential benefit of combining CXCR1/2 inhibition with HER2-targeted therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: CSC activity of metastatic and invasive human breast cancers (n = 19) was assessed ex vivo using the mammosphere colony-forming assay. RESULTS: Metastatic fluid IL-8 level correlated directly with mammosphere formation (r = 0.652; P < 0.05; n = 10). Recombinant IL-8 directly increased mammosphere formation/self-renewal in metastatic and invasive breast cancers (n = 17). IL-8 induced activation of EGFR/HER2 and downstream signaling pathways and effects were abrogated by inhibition of SRC, EGFR/HER2, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), or MEK. Furthermore, lapatinib, which targets EGFR/HER2, inhibited the mammosphere-promoting effect of IL-8 in both HER2-positive and negative patient-derived cancers. CXCR1/2 inhibition also blocked the effect of IL-8 on mammosphere formation and added to the efficacy of lapatinib in HER2-positive cancers. CONCLUSIONS: These studies establish a role for IL-8 in the regulation of patient-derived breast CSC activity and show that IL-8/CXCR1/2 signaling is partly mediated via a novel SRC and EGFR/HER2-dependent pathway. Combining CXCR1/2 inhibitors with current HER2-targeted therapies has potential as an effective therapeutic strategy to reduce CSC activity in breast cancer and improve the survival of HER2-positive patients.

Stem cells in breast tumours: are they ready for the clinic?

The concept of stem-like cells in cancer has been gaining currency over the last decade or so since evidence for stem cell activity in human leukaemia and solid tumours, including breast cancer, was first published. The evidence established that sub-populations of cells identified by antibodies to cell surface markers behaved like developmental stem cells in their capacity to re-grow the human tumour for several generations in experimental immune-deficient hosts. The experiments established that cells with tumourigenic capacity expressed 'cancer stem cell' (CSC) markers and that activity could also be measured by self-renewal of tumour sphere colonies in culture. In breast and other cancers, there is good evidence that CSCs are relatively resistant to radio- and chemotherapy indicating that novel CSC-targeted therapies are needed. Several pathways are promising targets in breast CSCs. There are several ways of combating CSC activity including inducing their apoptosis, inhibiting stem cell self-renewal to either stop their division or to promote their differentiation, or targeting the CSC niche that supports them. The first challenge for developing novel CSC therapies is to ascertain which of these CSC properties is being targeted. The second challenge is to determine suitable CSC biomarkers to measure the efficacy of the novel CSC therapies. We propose using biomarkers as a means to identify and assess CSC activity in clinical trials. This is likely to be demanding but feasible in the near future. Thus, we asked if CSCs are ready for the clinic, however, the emerging question becomes: is the clinic ready for cancer stem cells?

Routine pre-operative cross-match for elective colorectal resections: an appropriate use of resources?

INTRODUCTION: our Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS) recommends that blood is cross-matched prior to elective colorectal resections. National guidelines state that blood should not be cross-matched if blood usage is below 50%. Our aims were to determine compliance with local and national guidelines and assess timing of blood transfusions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: consecutive elective colorectal resections from August 2007 to December 2008 were identified retrospectively using an electronic theatre management system. Patients transfused pre-operatively were excluded. Pre-operative cross-match status and blood transfusion data for each patient were identified using an electronic pathology system and case notes. Cross-match to transfusion (C:T) ratio and blood usage were calculated. RESULTS: one hundred and thirty one patients were identified. One hundred and sixteen patients (88.5%) had a pre-operative cross-match, 13 patients (9.9%) had a pre-operative group and save and 2 patients (1.5%) had neither a valid cross-match nor group and save. A total of 295 units of blood were cross-matched; 79 units were transfused. Overall C:T ratio was 3.7:1 and blood usage was 26.8%. Twenty eight patients (21.4%) were transfused within 5 days of surgery. Six patients (4.6%) were transfused intra-operatively; 3 (2.3%) post-operatively on the same day; 8 (6.1%) on day one and 11 (8.4%) on or after day 2. CONCLUSION: we are over-ordering blood for elective colorectal resections and cannot justify performing a routine pre-operative cross-match. Blood should be grouped and saved pre-operatively and cross-matched only when clinically indicated to minimise inappropriate requests, expenditure and help improve blood stock management.